How To Develop A Robust Change Management Strategy
Change is inevitable in today's fast-evolving business landscape. Whether it's digital transformation, mergers or shifting market demands, organizations must adapt swiftly to remain competitive. However, research shows that 70% of change initiatives fail due to resistance, lack of leadership support and poor execution.
A well-structured change management strategy bridges this gap, ensuring smooth transitions, minimizing disruptions and fostering long-term growth. The organizations that effectively manage change are more likely to outperform their competitors.
Every successful change initiative begins with a well-defined vision. Leaders must articulate:
• Why the change is necessary: Addressing pain points and market shifts
• What benefits it will bring: Improved efficiency, revenue growth or innovation
• How it aligns with long-term business goals: Ensuring relevance and sustainability
A compelling business case helps secure leadership buy-in and fosters company-wide commitment. In fact, companies that clearly define their change objectives see a 79% success rate compared to those that don't.
Change starts at the top. Leaders must not just approve the change but actively champion it. McKinsey research highlights that successful transformations are two times more likely when senior leaders are visibly engaged.
Key leadership actions for success include communicating openly and consistently, addressing employee concerns proactively and leading by example when adopting new processes.
Leaders who demonstrate personal commitment to change can drive up to a 70% higher success rate in organizational transformations.
Employees often resist change due to fear of the unknown. The key is to make them part of the process. A culture of adaptability ensures employees embrace innovation rather than resist it.
Best practices for employee engagement include holding interactive town halls or Q&A sessions, gathering feedback through surveys and focus groups and identifying change ambassadors within teams.
A 2023 study found that 92% of employees are more likely to engage and support change when they feel heard and involved.
A gradual, step-by-step rollout reduces resistance and operational disruption. Organizations can follow proven frameworks such as Kotter's 8-Step Change Model, which focuses on creating urgency, building a clear vision and reinforcing change. They can also apply the ADKAR Model, which addresses key stages of change by building "Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability and Reinforcement."
By implementing change in phases, businesses can test, tweak and scale efficiently while ensuring employees adapt progressively.
Effective communication can make or break a transformation effort. In my experience, one of the top reasons change initiatives fail is due to poor communication.
To ensure clear communication, tailor messages to different stakeholders and use multiple channels such as emails, meetings and intranet updates. Additionally, provide regular progress updates to keep everyone informed and engaged.
New processes or technologies require new skills. Organizations must invest in training workshops and e-learning platforms, mentorship programs and peer coaching and hands-on learning experiences.
According to LinkedIn's Workplace Learning Report, 94% of employees would stay longer at a company that invests in their development. Providing the right training empowers employees to adapt to change confidently.
Success should be measured, analyzed and optimized. Without clear performance indicators, organizations cannot track the impact of change.
Key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor include:
• Employee adoption rates
• Engagement and sentiment surveys
• Business impact metrics (productivity, revenue, cost savings)
Companies that track change effectiveness through data-driven insights are twice as likely to achieve their desired outcomes.
A well-planned change management strategy doesn't just help businesses adapt—it helps them thrive. Organizations that embrace structured changes can see increased innovation, employee engagement and long-term business growth.
Change is inevitable, but how organizations manage it determines success. What's your biggest challenge in implementing change?
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Is the AI Winter Finally Upon Us?
I wrote at the beginning of the year that Wall Street investors should brace for an 'AI winter' in 2025; not necessarily a slowdown in investment, and certainly not in hype from the companies, but in tangible progress. Patience would be tested. Some recent events warrant revisiting the question: Is the AI winter upon us? GPT-5, the long-awaited new model from Sam Altman's OpenAI, was released earlier this month to a tepid reception. If it's a step toward artificial general intelligence, as the company repeatedly said it would be, it's a tiny one indeed. The model was so poorly received by some ChatGPT die-hards that the company was forced into an embarrassing rollback, making older models available again. Altman's claim that GPT-5 was like talking to a 'PhD-level' expert quickly became a joke. At the same time, CoreWeave Inc., one of the few pure-play AI stocks, plummeted more than 25% last week after guidance that spooked investors: Revenue growth is expected to be enormously outpaced by capital expenditure increases. (And the IPO lockup was coming to an end, which didn't help either.) And while it's hard to pin down just how beneficial AI has been, or will be, in the business world, one piece of research from McKinsey & Company should give everyone pause. While eight of out 10 companies surveyed said they were implementing generative AI in their business, the consultancy group observed, just as many said there had been ' no significant bottom-line impact.'
Forbes
19 hours ago
- Forbes
The 'Layer 1' Fight Is Not About Stablecoins But The Future Of Finance
With the GENIUS Act signed, stablecoins are on a tear. According to the management consultancy McKinsey, the total value of issued stablecoins has doubled to $250 billion today from $120 billion 18 months ago, and it is forecast to reach more than $400 billion by year-end (and $2 trillion by 2028). Wow. In addition to stablecoins tokens, a number of yield-bearing tokens are out there now. These tokens, typically an investment in short-duration government securities, such as the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund ($2.9 billion) and the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund ($0.8 billion). Big money, and hence the reasons for the 'Layer 1' or 'Layer 2' discussions in decentralised finance (DeFi) circles. Who Cares About Layer 1 or Layer 2? I am sure you are all familiar with the distinction, but for those who are new to this space, when DeFi people talk about Layer 1 they mean a distributed ledger of some kind (such as the Bitcoin blockchain) whereas Layer 2 networks run on top of the Layer 1 blockchains in order to delivered improved performance or additional functionality. The Layer 2 networks execute transactions off of the ledgers but use Layer 1 to provide the underlying security and finality. So, for example: Bitcoin is a Layer 1 protocol, but on top of this people have built Lightning, which is a Layer 2 service that uses off-chain 'payment channels' to make Bitcoin transactions work at point-of-sale (POS). Similarly, Ethereum is a Layer 1 blockhain and Arbitrum is a Layer 2 service that uses a 'rollup' mechanism to anchor transactions. Well, so far, so technical. But there is escalating competition in this space and that has business implications. The news that major players, such as Circle and Stripe, are developing their own Layer 1 networks is rather interesting. Given their investments in the stablecoin space it seems logical for Stripe, for example, to create a new high performance Layer 1 blockchain specially designed to for payment processing. Their blockchain, known as 'Tempo', is compatible with Ethereum's programming language so developers will be able to easily migrate 'smart" 'contracts' to the new blockchain. Similarly, Circle announced its new Layer-1 blockchain 'Arc' (also compatible with the Ethereum programming language) which they say is optimised for stablecoin-based financial services. Arc has native support for the Circle Payments Network (CPN) and stablecoins including USDC, EURC and USYC1. It also has, rather interestingly from my point of view, an opt-in privacy schemes that offers selectively shielded transactions. Circle say that Arc is designed not only for stablecoins but for all forms of digital money and tokenized value in the future, a point I will return to later on. Now you might ask, since Bitcoin and Ethereum seem to work, why are serious players in the stablecoin space looking to build their own Layer 1 blockchains while others are already building Layer 2 rails (such as Robinhood's chain on Arbitrum and Coinbase's Base on the OP Stack) that also seem to work. There are, broadly speaking there are two business pressures: functionality and economics. Functionality first. A good reason to develop a Layer 1 is to ensure the development of features that are required by the ecosystem. Now that this infrastructure is no longer a technical detail but a defining factor in who leads the next phase of digital finance, business is paying attention and as stablecoins begin to be used in mainstream business applications, so operational pressures will increase and favour platforms that are secure, compliant and capable of high-throughput transactions. As the respected industry commentator Noelle Acheson noted in the case of both Circle and Stripe, these will be the priorities of most financial services players but they are not necessarily the priorities of blockchains such as the Bitcoin blockchain, which was optimised for censorship resistance. There is also the element of control: decentralisation sounds good but it would be annoying to find that your payroll payments to employees are held up because everyone is playing some sort of cryptokitties game or messing around with NFTs. Then there are the economics. The fact is that running decentralised network is expensive. If you want the censorship resistance of Bitcoin then you have to consume enormous amounts of energy and therefore charge significant fees. This is a key reason people started building Layer 2 networks in the first place. But if you don't need the pseudonymity and censorship resistance (ie, you are running a regulated financial service) then you can redesign the infrastructure in a far more cost-effective way. You can imagine, then, that if Stripe offers stablecoin services to its global customer base, it will offer them its own stablecoins running over its own network and the transactions will never go anywhere near the world's banking networks except for on- and off-ramps. Assuming, that is, that Stripe's customers won't want to hold stablecoin balances that are non-interest bearing. (Of course once the service is up and running then Stripe can offer their infrastructure to third-parties so that they can use the Stripe Layer 1 to provide stablecoin services to their own customers. Given that payments are such a huge, but vulnerable, profit pool for the TradFi incumbents they they will have to respond.) Layer 1 And The Real World Where does this take us then? I suspect that the average consumer (eg, me) will have zero interest in Layer 1 or Layer 2 of indeed how any payments get anywhere. If I tell my accounting package to go ahead and pay a supplier in Canada, I really do not care how the money gets there: if Stripe uses open banking to take the money out of my UK account, take Canadian Dollar stablecoins from their Treasury and then send these stablecoins over to Canada where they are then paid out to the supplier using Interac e-Transfer, or whether they send the money from my bank account via SWIFT to a Canadian bank account, I do not care. Hence the winners and losers here will be determined by their cost-benefit performance for business. The battle for Layer 1, though, is not only about the battle to control payments, because it is about much more than stablecoins. As Circle indicated, it is about the future of value, a future in which the continuous exchange of 'real world' digital assets replaces the traditional infrastructure (and associated overheads) of clearing and settlement vanish. In this world, the next-general financial market infrastructure of distributed ledgers, tokens and protocols (that is, 'defi') that will in essence become critical national infrastructure. Can this really be provided Circle or Stripe? Or will it ultimately need Big Tech or governments or someone else to deliver the platform for innovation?
Time Business News
2 days ago
- Time Business News
The Role of AI in Personalizing the Customer Journey
Personalization is no longer just a buzzword—it's a critical component of a successful customer experience strategy. As competition intensifies and consumer expectations rise, businesses must deliver hyper-personalized experiences to stand out. This is where Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role. AI is revolutionizing how brands understand, interact with, and serve their customers throughout the buyer journey. From awareness to post-purchase, AI enables businesses to tailor interactions at scale, in real-time. Modern consumers expect brands to know who they are, what they want, and when they want it. According to McKinsey & Company, companies that excel at personalization generate 40% more revenue from those activities than average players. Additionally, 71% of consumers expect companies to deliver personalized interactions, and 76% get frustrated when this doesn't happen. In other words, personalization isn't a luxury—it's an expectation. AI-powered personalization refers to using machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and predictive analytics to tailor customer experiences across various channels and touchpoints. It leverages real-time and historical data to make, like courier package delivery systems, intelligent decisions about what content, product, or message to serve each user. Unlike traditional rule-based personalization, AI systems learn and adapt continuously. They identify patterns and make recommendations with increasing accuracy over time. In the initial stage of the customer journey, AI helps brands deliver the right message to the right audience. AI in programmatic advertising allows for real-time bidding and targeting based on behavioral data. AI-powered tools like Meta's Advantage+ and Google Ads' Smart Bidding automatically optimize ad performance. Predictive algorithms analyze customer segments and choose the best creative formats or messaging. Once a prospect shows interest, AI refines the experience further by delivering personalized content or product recommendations. E-commerce platforms like Amazon and Shopify use AI to suggest products based on browsing history, cart activity, and similar customer behavior. Content recommendation engines (like those used by Netflix or YouTube) keep users engaged longer by suggesting personalized media options. When customers are ready to convert, AI simplifies the process: AI chatbots provide real-time answers to pre-purchase questions, increasing conversion rates and reducing support costs. Dynamic pricing algorithms adjust prices based on demand, user behavior, and competitor pricing. Email automation platforms like Klaviyo and Mailchimp use AI to send personalized messages at optimal times. After a purchase, AI plays a critical role in retention: Predictive analytics helps identify at-risk customers and trigger proactive retention campaigns. AI suggests loyalty rewards based on customer value and behavior. Post-purchase emails, tailored with AI, recommend complementary products or services. Customer Data Platforms (CDPs): Aggregate and unify customer data from various sources Aggregate and unify customer data from various sources AI-driven CRM Systems: Salesforce Einstein, HubSpot AI, and Zoho Zia use AI integration to guide sales and marketing decisions. Salesforce Einstein, HubSpot AI, and Zoho Zia use AI integration to guide sales and marketing decisions. Recommendation Engines: Tools like Dynamic Yield, Adobe Target, and Algolia personalize content and product suggestions Tools like Dynamic Yield, Adobe Target, and Algolia personalize content and product suggestions Natural Language Processing: Powers chatbots like Drift, Intercom, and ChatGPT-based solutions to offer human-like support. While powerful, AI-driven personalization comes with challenges: Data privacy concerns: Striking a balance between personalization and respecting privacy is crucial. Transparency and compliance with GDPR and CCPA are non-negotiable. Striking a balance between personalization and respecting privacy is crucial. Transparency and compliance with GDPR and CCPA are non-negotiable. Bias in algorithms: Poorly trained models may reinforce biases, leading to inaccurate personalization. Poorly trained models may reinforce biases, leading to inaccurate personalization. Integration complexity: AI systems require clean, structured data and often need integration with legacy systems. Amazon: Amazon uses AI extensively to personalize product recommendations, which account for 35% of total sales. Their recommendation system is based on collaborative filtering, deep learning, and clickstream analysis. Spotify: Spotify's AI tailors playlists like Discover Weekly and Release Radar to individual listening habits. This personalization drives user loyalty and increases listening time. Starbucks: Through its Deep Brew AI engine, Starbucks customizes offers, drink suggestions, and email content based on customer behavior and weather, location, and order history. The next wave of AI will be conversational and contextual. As technologies like Generative AI, augmented reality (AR), and edge AI advance, personalization will go beyond product suggestions and into immersive, human-like experiences. We're also likely to see more AI Employees—virtual brand representatives that engage with customers across platforms like social media, email, and websites in real-time, offering personalized assistance at scale. The role of AI in personalizing the customer journey is undeniable. It empowers brands to deliver value-driven, relevant, and seamless experiences at every stage of the funnel. As customer expectations evolve, the businesses that win will be those that invest in intelligent, AI-powered personalization systems. Personalization at scale is no longer a future goal—it's a present necessity. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
