UK must 'do everything' to rebuild trade with EU, says Bank boss
The Governor of the Bank of England has said the UK now needs to "rebuild" Britain's trade relationship with the European Union and do "everything we can" to improve long term trade, after yesterday's US deal.Andrew Bailey told the BBC that as a public official he did not take a view on Brexit, but that reversing the post Brexit hit to UK-EU trade would be "beneficial".The Government is currently in talks with the EU on its plan to reset its trade and security relationship ahead of a summit later this month. The US deal agreed on Thursday left space for the UK to pursue a veterinary agreement with the EU, including alignment on standards in order to lower post Brexit red tape on food, farm and fish exports.
As part of a new agreement between the US and UK, the US agreed to reduce import taxes on a set number of British cars and allow some steel and aluminium into the country tariff-free.But it will leave a 10% duty in place on most goods from the UK.Pushed on what impact a closer relationship between the UK and the EU would have on the economy and inflation, Mr Bailey said: "It would be beneficial. Having a more open economy to trade with the European Union. Because there has been a fall-off in goods trade with the EU over recent years."He added that it's important because the EU is the UK's largest trading partner."It is important we do everything we can to ensure that whatever decisions are taken on the Brexit front do not damage the long-term trade position. So I hope that we can use this to start to rebuild that relationship," Mr Bailey said.The Governor also said that the UK's dealmaking across the world was setting an important example to other countries. "It demonstrates that trade deals are important. Trade deals can be done, and the trade is important…honestly, it seems an unpromising landscape at times. But I hope that we can use these deals to rebuild the world trading system," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
South Korea exports rebound on tech boost but US, China shipments extend losses
SEOUL, July 1 (Reuters) - South Korea's exports rose in June on the back of strong tech demand, after falling in May for the first time in four months, trade data showed on Tuesday, though shipments to the U.S. and China remained weak amid tariff uncertainty. Exports from Asia's fourth-largest economy, an early bellwether for global trade, rose 4.3% from the same month last year to $59.80 billion, marginally weaker than the median 4.7% rise tipped in a Reuters poll of economists. In May, exports dipped 1.3%, as shipments to the U.S. and China dropped more than 8% each on downward pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats. Shipments to the U.S. fell 0.5% last month, extending losses for a third consecutive month, while those to China were also down for a second month, dropping 2.7%. Exports to the European Union rose 14.7%, while those to Southeast Asian countries gained 2.1%. "Volatility in U.S. tariff policy and economic recovery uncertainty are expected to persist in the second half," South Korean Industry and Trade Minister Ahn Duk-geun said, promising an all-out response to U.S. tariffs. South Korea will seek an extension to the 90-day pause in U.S. tariffs that is set to expire next week, as negotiations are likely to continue past the deadline set between Seoul and Washington, a senior South Korean trade official said on Monday. Exports of semiconductors extended gains for a fourth straight month by rising 11.6%, but it was the slowest in the streak. Automobiles rose 2.3%, as robust electric-vehicle demand in Europe offset losses in U.S. sales, according to the ministry. Imports rose 3.3% to $50.72 billion, bringing the monthly trade balance to a surplus of $9.08 billion, the biggest since September 2018.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: Lisa flew into a prolonged riff tearing into Glastonbury and the BBC... Nandy was jammin'!
Well that should have Glastonbury 's founder Michael Eavis chewing his silly beard. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy came to the Commons to debate the BBC 's hate-rapper incident. Rather than excuse it, the minister flew into what I understand (guitar-speak) is called a prolonged riff. Nandy was jammin'! Both Glastonbury and the BBC were torn off a strip. For years the centre-Left has grovelled to Glastonbury, hailing it as a pinnacle of our culture. Labour MPs have attended its foetid mosh pits and chanted 'oooh Jeremy Corbyn ' alongside spliffy rich kids boogying in the mud and mire. MPs such as Tom Watson (now a Lord) sucked up to these designer-grungies and their ghastly eco-glamping. But all that was forgotten when Ms Nandy stood at the despatch box. She seized on this foul-up and on wider conduct at the festival, where terrorist flags and Nazi symbols were seen. Things were so bad that Jewish festival-goers had felt it necessary to create their own 'safe space'. All this from a venue that claims to be liberal. 'I have levers at my disposal,' Ms Nandy told the Commons, 'and I will not hesitate to use them.' She was 'exasperated' by the BBC and its poohbahs. 'I'm not satisfied with the explanation so far,' she cried. Not since the row over Blairites 'sexing-up' the case for war in Iraq has a Labour politician torn into the corporation in such a way. For Ms Nandy to sound cross is quite something. Normally she is as menacing as Sooty's little friend Soo. For all the harrumphing, do we believe the Starmerites would ever pull the ultimate 'lever' over the BBC and put it out of existence? Invited to do that by Reform's Richard Tice (Boston), she froze. But she certainly did well with this Commons display and even managed not to be booed – a miracle –when she made a reference to Sir Keir Starmer. It may or may not be worth noting that the Culture Secretary has been much tipped for demotion in a coming ministerial shuffle. After this performance she has made it harder for No 10 to sack her. The Conservatives' Stuart Andrew claimed that music festivals 'must appeal to the highest standards of social cohesion'. There speaks a man who plainly packs a chip butty for his picnic at Glyndebourne. No MP asked the obvious question: can the director general, Tim Davie, survive? But Peter Prinsley (Lab, Bury St Edmunds), fanning himself with a scrap of paper, did ask 'who on earth will be held accountable?' and John Glen (Con, Salisbury) said the public would expect 'people to be held individually to account'. Dame Caroline Dinenage (Con, Gosport) noted that the editing failures could hardly be for lack of staff. The Beeb had 400 people at Glastonbury, averred Dame Caroline, who chairs the culture select committee. 'What were they all doing?' They were surely in the beer tent. Or, being the BBC, it may have been the Pimm's tent. Or something more powdery. Sarah Sackman, justice minister, wandered in to listen to the debate. So, upstairs in the peers' gallery, did Luciana Berger, who has rejoined Labour after the anti-Semitism of the Corbyn years. Jim Allister (DUP, North Antrim) spoke of 'an appalling pro-terrorist broadcast on our national broadcaster'. Andrew Murrison (Con, SW Wilts) had written to the super-rich Eavises at Glastonbury – 'no reply, none expected'. The only dissent to the Beeb-knocking came from Ayoub Khan (Ind, Perry Barr), who wondered why the Government did not criticise 'death to all Arabs' chants by Israeli football crowds. Ms Nandy firmly told Mr Khan that was because it had not been broadcast by the BBC. Sammy Wilson (DUP, E Antrim) described Glastonbury-goers as 'young, middle-class, educated morons'. Rap may not be Sammy's thing. He is possibly more of a Dolly Parton fan. I must say, I can seldom understand a word rappers say or sing. No subtitles. Maybe that was why the BBC failed to cut the feed.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JEFF PRESTRIDGE: Rachel's raid on the tax-free Isa will plunge financial dagger into the hearts of millions
The Chancellor of the Exchequer will send a financial dagger through the hearts of millions of savers when she confirms a reduction in the amount we can safely tuck away in a tax-free cash Isa. We will discover the gory details on July 15 when Ms Reeves delivers her Mansion House speech in London. But for young and old, the prudent and the risk averse, the announcement will feel like a betrayal – an undermining of the savings culture that underpins the finances of millions of households up and down the country. For more than a quarter of a century, cash Isas have been an integral part of our financial furniture, providing savers a mini 'tax haven' where savings interest rolls up tax-free and all deposits are capital secure. They have allowed the young to save assiduously for a home deposit – and those longer in the tooth to build tax-free savings pots which can be used to supplement their retirement finances. Yet these trusty vehicles are now going to be butchered as part of the Chancellor's plan to encourage more investing rather than saving. From the start of the new tax year in April 2026, the amount we can save each year into a cash Isa could be cut from £20,000 to £5,000, maybe £4,000. For those who want to use an Isa to invest (buy stocks and shares), they will continue to enjoy a £20,000 annual allowance. While the Chancellor says the changes will boost an ailing stock market by encouraging investing over saving, I don't believe the public will act the way she wants them to do. At best, the impact on UK shares will be marginal. Millions of people, especially the wannabe homebuyers and the elderly, will simply not play ball. For them, investment risk is a no-go. For the Chancellor, that would not necessarily be a total disaster. After all, preventing cash savers from using the full annual Isa allowance will result in more of their savings being exposed to tax. This tax year, official figures indicate that tax receipts from savings will reap the Treasury £6 billion of revenue, three times the amount three years ago. This sum, I fear, will look like chicken feed if cash Isas are given a haircut – while the tax-free personal savings allowance for taxpayers (£1,000 for basic rate taxpayers, £500 for higher rate taxpayers and zero for additional rate taxpayers) remains frozen at its 2016 level. Savers are being shafted, left, right and centre.
