New research links gun violence exposure to higher rates of depression and suicidal ideation
The study, led by researchers at the New Jersey Gun Violence Research Center, surveyed 8,009 respondents across the country, assessing both their exposure to gun violence and their mental health over time. It found that a greater frequency of gun violence exposure was associated with higher depression scores, greater odds of mental health service use, and, perhaps most significantly, greater odds of suicidal ideation compared to having no exposure. It's the first time, using a national representative survey, that researchers have found a correlation between people exposed to gun violence and higher rates of suicidal ideation.
The research is an integral step in what experts call a public health approach to gun violence, helping to lay out the empirical foundation for future prevention efforts.
"Until we understand the true scope of what gun violence means for our health and our well-being … we are not going to tackle it in a way that fully addresses the issue with all the resources required," said Daniel Semenza, director of research at the center and the lead author of the study.
The study, published in the journal Social Science and Medicine in February, found that 40 percent of the respondents had heard gunshots multiple times in their lives. Another 12 percent had cumulative exposure, meaning they were exposed to five or more forms of gun violence, including witnessing a shooting or being threatened with a gun, in their lifetimes. Exposure to firearm suicide more than once and being shot multiple times were found to be associated with increased depression and suicide risks. This recent analysis expands on Semenza's study from last year that found that preparation for a suicide attempt was nearly four times higher among Black Americans who had been shot.
"This study is vital to be able to talk about what gun violence does to the mental health of America as a whole, and what it means for our collective well-being," Semenza said. "But the conversation doesn't have to stop there. Exposure to gun violence is fundamentally unequal, and it impacts those who are most marginalized throughout the country."
The recent findings hit close to home for Aswad Thomas, a gun violence survivor and the vice president of the Alliance for Safety and Justice, a national organization that provides resources to trauma recovery centers, specialized facilities that support victims of crime.
"When I got shot, I remember during the discharge process that my doctors and nurses told me about the physical challenges, but they never mentioned anything about the psychological effects," Thomas said. "I've lost about 40 friends to gun violence throughout my life, and the topic as it relates to 'how do we heal and cope' has just been nonexistent."
Research has consistently found that people suffering from severe mental health issues are more likely to be victims of gun violence rather than perpetrators. A 10-year study in San Francisco showed the primary need for gun violence victims was mental health services, and hospital violence intervention program screening in Philadelphia found 75 percent of participants suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder. Experts working in those care settings have long reported on the effects of interpersonal violence on marginalized communities, but continue to face financial challenges in sustaining their research.
"We are seeing the highest rates of suicide among Black adolescents that we've ever seen," said Fatimah Loren Dreier, the executive director of the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention, a national organization of hospital-based violence intervention programs. "This study may unlock some of the mechanisms that are making that so, given the increased concentration of violence in communities of color and the distress that comes from that exposure."
Semenza said the study expands on the groundwork that programs like the trauma recovery centers have sustained by highlighting the connection between mental health services and gun violence victims. This support, through mechanisms like grief counseling, transportation, and financial assistance, is the core of the work trauma recovery centers do to help those affected by gun violence, Thomas noted.
"It's not that most people, especially survivors, don't want to get mental health services, but it's really an issue about access," Thomas said. "There needs to be more public understanding of these issues, and there needs to be more investments into those type of program services, like the trauma recovery model."
This story was produced by The Trace and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
08-08-2025
- Black America Web
Brookings' ‘Wellness In Black Life Project' Centers On The Health And Well-Being Of Black Men And Boys
Source: blackCAT / Getty Black men and boys in the U.S. face persistent disparities in education, healthcare, employment, and criminal justice, but they are also driving solutions rooted in community, culture, and resilience. The Wellness in Black Life (WIBL) project, led by the Brookings Institution's Race, Prosperity, and Inclusion Initiative, seeks to center the voices of Black men and boys in defining what true well-being looks like—on their terms. The WIBL project is taking a community-driven approach to examining the factors that may help Black men and boys elevate their health and well-being through an in-depth research study and a two-panel discussion titled, What does well-being mean for Black men and boys in the US? Set for Aug. 20 at the Brookings Institution Saul Room in Washington, D.C., the panel will feature representatives from local partner organizations and community members who took part in the conversations across three cities. The panels will explore the engagement process, share firsthand participant stories, and present findings from the project's research, offering a clearer picture of how Black men envision thriving communities and what policies could help bring those visions to life. Attendees can also sign up to watch this impactful panel online. We care about your data. See our privacy policy. Key areas of focus have included social connection, economic opportunity, family structure, and mental health, a critical issue for Black men. According to research obtained by Columbia University , Black men are 20% more likely to experience serious psychological distress than white men, but are far less likely to receive treatment. Black men experience disproportionately higher rates of mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression. Suicide rates in the community are especially alarming. As previously reported, between 2011 and 2021, suicide among Black Americans rose by 58%, becoming the third leading cause of death for those ages 15 to 24 in 2020, and again in 2022 for those ages 10 to 24, the Office of Minority Health noted. Alarmingly, the suicide rate for Black men was over four times higher than that of Black women in 2021. These statistics highlight the urgent need for culturally relevant and community-informed solutions, exactly what WIBL is striving to bring to the forefront. Participants in the study have stressed the importance of redefining wellness not just as physical health, but as a holistic state revolving around mental stability, strong family bonds, access to opportunity, and dignity. 'The panel will reflect on the engagement process, share firsthand experiences from conversation participants, and include a presentation of key research findings, including how Black men want to enhance social, economic, and family well-being for their communities,' a press release for the upcoming event added. Viewers are encouraged to participate by submitting questions in advance via email at events@ or via X, formerly Twitter, at @BrookingsGov. Will you be attending this insightful panel? SEE MORE: The Lingering Mental Health Impact Of Prison On Black Men Racial Trauma: Anti-Black Racism And Public Health SEE ALSO Brookings' 'Wellness In Black Life Project' Centers On The Health And Well-Being Of Black Men And Boys was originally published on
Medscape
06-08-2025
- Medscape
New Campaign Aims to Eliminate ‘Cardiology Deserts'
The Association of Black Cardiologists has launched a new initiative to raise awareness of the effects of 'cardiology deserts' — counties or neighborhoods in which Black residents have little to no access to a cardiologist. The campaign is focused on Louisiana, Georgia, Mississippi, and Arkansas. More than 16 million Black Americans have few or no options for cardiology care, with the majority of cardiology deserts in the nation's south, according to research from GoodRx. A 2024 study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology ( JACC ) found that almost half of US counties do not have a practicing cardiologist; this proportion rises to 86% in rural counties and comprises 22 million Americans. Keith C. Ferdinand, MD 'Higher poverty rates, lower insurance coverage, and less availability of specialists for referrals then translate potentially into more heart attacks, heart failure, and complicated care,' said Keith C. Ferdinand, MD, the former chief science officer for the Association of Black Cardiologists and Gerald S. Berenson chair in preventative cardiology at the Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans. On average, people in counties without a cardiologist have a life expectancy of one year shorter than people with easier access to such specialists, the JACC researchers found. Mississippi and Louisiana have some of the highest rates of death from heart disease in the country, according to the CDC. The new campaign aims to empower patients to work with their primary care providers to better control their hypertension and lipid levels. The biotechnology firm Amgen is supporting the effort with educational initiatives to help patients manage their cardiac risk factors with a combination of medications, exercise, and a healthier diet. As part of the campaign, the members of the association will be assessing blood pressure and cholesterol levels in community settings. The group is also offering patients a free cookbook with recipes for heart-healthy yet tasty meals. 'We will go wherever we can in order to identify risk factors and direct patients to federally qualified health centers or primary care clinicians who can help them control their risk,' Ferdinand told Medscape Medical News . Looming over the new effort is the concern that Medicaid cuts in the Trump administration's new budget will worsen disparities in cardiology outcomes even more than they exist today, particularly for those living in cardiology deserts. 'It could include very extreme barriers when needed for referral to a cardiovascular specialist,' Ferdinand said. 'What's particularly concerning about some of the Medicaid cuts is that those at highest risk will be most affected,' said Stacey Rosen, MD, a cardiologist for Northwell Health in New York and volunteer president of the American Heart Association (AHA). While regular access to preventive care — ideally from a cardiologist but at least from a primary care provider — improves health outcomes, Rosen said any reduction in funding for Medicaid could exacerbate cardiovascular outcomes. The effects of cuts could be even wider, she added. Any cardiology clinic or health practice that relies on Medicaid funds will see a drop in income as these funds decrease, potentially affecting their ability to serve all their patients. Prior to the passage of the new bill, the AHA lobbied against Medicaid cuts and cuts in food assistance. The AHA is now working to reverse the provisions it believes are harmful, and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) is engaged in similar efforts. 'We're still waiting to see how this plays out, because there are many provisions on this bill on a scattered schedule of when they roll in,' said William Van Decker, MD, cardiologist at Temple Health in Philadelphia and chair of the ACC's Health Affairs Committee. 'The biggest hits probably won't be for a couple of years.' Although the bulk of the Medicaid cuts would be in 2027 and 2028, according to the Center for American Progress, their potential scope concerns Van Decker and all other ACC members, he said. 'It's been estimated that 28% of adults covered by Medicaid have a history of active cardiovascular disease,' Van Decker said, citing research from the Kaiser Family Foundation. 'That doesn't even include people who present with acute cardiovascular disease, which could be life-threatening for access, and also those people who need preventive care.' Van Decker added that if some portion of the Medicaid population goes uninsured, they will postpone preventive cardiology care and may wind up in the emergency room after their condition has become severe. 'They'll present to emergency rooms with acute infarctions when they could have been found with angina prior,' he said. In Louisiana, Ferdinand shared these concerns while pointing to the patient empowerment efforts of the Association of Black Cardiologists' new cardiology deserts campaign, which is expected to last at least 3 years, if not longer. 'We're in this for the long haul,' Ferdinand said. 'We're trying to make a real difference. It's not a one and done.' Amgen is funding the cardiology deserts campaign. Ferdinand, Van Decker, and Rosen reported having no relevant financial conflicts of interest.
WebMD
31-07-2025
- WebMD
Obesity's Cancer Link Is Worse Than You Think
July 31, 2025 — Cancer deaths are dropping overall, but not the ones linked to obesity. That's what mounting evidence now shows. A sweeping new report on U.S. cancer trends, published in April, revealed that cancers linked to obesity are becoming more common. Another study, presented in July at the Endocrine Society Annual Meeting in San Francisco, found that deaths from obesity-related cancers have more than tripled over the past two decades. These include esophageal, colon and rectal, breast (postmenopausal), uterine, gallbladder, upper stomach, kidney, liver, ovarian, pancreatic, thyroid, meningioma (brain), and multiple myeloma — 13 types in all, now accounting for 40% of new cancer diagnoses in the U.S. Women, older adults, Native Americans, and Black Americans are especially vulnerable. Second only to smoking, obesity ranks as one of the leading preventable causes of cancer. Yet even as the public's awareness of smoking's risks has dramatically increased, experts warn we've underestimated just how much excess weight — and the complex biology behind it — can fuel the disease. What exactly drives this link is not fully understood, but experts are homing in on some strong possibilities. It could be estrogen, fat cells, the microbiome, insulin resistance, or all of the above. One thing is sure: The public health threat of obesity is only increasing. So what does this mean for cancer prevention, and how can you protect yourself? A Risk for Women Behind the drop in overall cancer rates are significant declines in the number of smokers — and smoking-related cancers. Between 1965 and 2015, the smoking rate fell from 42% of the population to 15%, putting a major dent in rates of lung cancer, which is still the deadliest form. Meanwhile, obesity rates have gone the other way, rising from 13% in 1960 to more than 40% today. Estimates reveal a crucial gender difference. While overall cancer diagnoses in men are down —decreasing from 2001 through 2013, and plateauing after that — the same is not true for women, according to the April report, jointly published by top health organizations like the CDC, the National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society. Cancer diagnoses among women increased every year from 2003 to 2021. That includes upticks among women in every major racial and ethnic group since 2017, even while cancer rates have remained stable among men in those groups. According to the American Cancer Society, women under 50 are now 82% more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than are men of the same age — up from a 51% difference in 2002. 'One of my most common referrals is cancer doctors,' said Ethan Lazarus, MD, an obesity medicine specialist in Colorado, who is often recruited by oncologists to help patients in remission, commonly from breast cancer, lose weight. Evidence has repeatedly shown that higher amounts of fat tissue increase the risk of cancer recurrence. Weight loss is linked to improvements in cancer survival, particularly with breast and colon cancer. Women tend to have higher rates of obesity than men — and higher rates of severe obesity, in particular — which may partly explain why they're more affected by obesity-related cancers. Also worth highlighting is that several of the obesity-related cancers are female-specific or far more common in women. But that doesn't explain the bigger question: Why does obesity raise the risk of cancer in women — or in anyone? When Fat Makes You Sick 'The truth is, no one really knows why obesity causes cancer,' said Scott Summers, PhD, co-executive director of the Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center at the University of Utah Health. But Summers' research group believes fat cells are a big part of the problem. 'Fat cells are weird, and they can be nasty,' he said. Obesity experts have coined a term for the tipping point when fat cells start to affect your health: adiposopathy — 'adipos' meaning fat, and 'pathy' meaning disease, Lazarus said. For one, they may drive cancer simply by proximity. Almost all of the obesity-related cancers occur in or next to parts of the body where fat tissue is more concentrated, like the abdomen and breast, according to a 2023 review in Frontiers in Endocrinology. And research in mice shows that breast cancer is more aggressive when surrounded by more fat tissue. One leading theory is that fat tissue is 'hormonally active,' especially after menopause — meaning it releases hormones like estrogen that can cause certain cancers like breast or endometrial to grow, said Priya Jaisinghani, MD, an obesity medicine specialist in New York City. In fact, postmenopausal breast cancer is the most common obesity-associated cancer in women. The Role of Inflammation and Insulin Inflammation is another suspect. As fat cells accumulate and grow — or as a person gains weight — those tissues stimulate an immune response. 'There are a few ways that happens,' Summers said. 'One is immune cells infiltrate fat tissue because they are clearing out dying fat cells.' This immune activation produces a chronic, low-grade inflammation, which raises the risk of DNA damage and cellular mutations — potentially priming the body for cancer. Chronic inflammation may also contribute to insulin malfunctions, which can promote cancer. People with obesity often have insulin resistance, meaning their cells don't respond properly to normal levels of insulin, the hormone secreted by the pancreas to regulate blood sugar. When that happens, the pancreas releases more insulin to try to keep blood sugar under control, elevating blood levels of insulin, which can stimulate tissue growth, including cancer tissue, Summers said. What's Happening in the Gut Summers's team at U Health has also uncovered a potential driver in the gut: a type of fat-storage molecule called sphingolipids, which build up in the body during obesity. 'We think they do a lot of damage in obesity, and they're a sign the other pathways for [fat] storage are full,' Summers said. In mouse studies, removing sphingolipids eliminated obesity-related diseases like kidney disease, fatty liver disease, diabetes, and heart failure. One study showed that sphingolipids drive up the rapid production of stem cells in the intestine — an unexpected finding that suggests the fat molecules could trigger excessive cell proliferation in the colon, increasing the risk for colon cancer, Summers said. This is critically important given the unexplained, global rise in colon cancer among people under 50. Data shows persistent obesity increases the risk of colon cancer by as much as 57%. Big Problem With Bias Forty-two percent of Americans now live with obesity, and that number is projected to hit 50% by 2030. That leaves us with two options for cancer prevention, Lazarus said. 'Do we want to go after all the cancers [individually] or recognize obesity as a serious health threat?' Jaisinghani agreed. Preventing obesity-related cancers starts with equitable access to obesity care, 'regular physical activity, balanced and nutritious eating, and early treatment of metabolic conditions like insulin resistance or prediabetes,' she said. 'And prevention shouldn't be a privilege,' or it can't just be for those who can afford it. Only about 10% of people with obesity receive medical treatment, compared with 85% of patients with diabetes, Lazarus said. Many people, doctors included, still see obesity as a lifestyle issue instead of a medical one. 'Most don't get any care, much less comprehensive.' Early cancer symptoms are often overlooked and blamed on excess body weight, and machines used for screening, such as MRIs and mammography machines, don't always fit properly. For these reasons, obesity often goes untreated, and cancers in people with obesity go undetected. Experts say it's a public health crisis that, like smoking and lung cancer, calls for a public health approach. 'It's policy-level interventions that shape the environments in which people live, work, and make decisions about their health,' Jaisinghani said. But you can take steps to protect yourself too. Know that if you have health concerns with obesity, that is a medical issue and seeking treatment is completely appropriate. Consider seeing an obesity medicine specialist. This subspecialty is rapidly expanding, and doctors with this training can help you avoid bias and inadequate care. You can find one by searching the Obesity Medicine Association's provider directory.
