Video shows steel workers scrambling into wreckage left by explosion that killed 2 in Pennsylvania
By the time the scene was secure, two people were dead and more than 10 others were injured, including one who spent hours trapped in rubble left Monday by the blast that was powerful enough to shake nearby homes.
Video from Pittsburgh television station WTAE showed workers in orange jumpsuits and hard hats running toward the wreckage at the U.S. Steel coking plant in Clairton. A reporter described seeing someone being pulled from the debris and loaded onto a gurney. The station's footage later showed a mountain of charred rubble spilling from a hole left by demolished walls.
Investigators worked Tuesday to determine the cause of the blast, which jolted a region of the state synonymous with steel for more than a century. Amy Sowers, who was sitting on her porch less than a mile from the plant, felt her house shake.
'I could see smoke from my driveway,' she said. 'We heard ambulances and fire trucks from every direction.'
Sowers, 45, grew up in Clairton and has seen several fatal accidents at the plant over the years.
'Lives were lost again,' Sowers said. 'How many more lives are going to have to be lost until something happens?'
Company officials were expected to join Gov. Josh Shapiro at a news conference scheduled for Tuesday afternoon.
Speaking to reporters Monday, U.S. Steel's chief manufacturing officer, Scott Buckiso, gave no details about the damage or casualties. He said the company, now a subsidiary of Japan-based Nippon Steel Corp., was working with authorities.
The Allegheny County Police Department said five people were hospitalized in critical but stable condition Monday night, and five others had been treated and released. Other individuals were treated for injuries at the scene, but the department said it did not have an exact number.
The county medical examiner's office identified one of the dead as Timothy Quinn, 39.
According to the company, the plant has approximately 1,400 workers.
In a statement, the United Steelworkers union, which represents many of the Clairton plant's workers, said it had representatives on the ground at the plant and would work to ensure there is a thorough investigation.
David Masur, executive director of PennEnvironment, an environmental group that has sued U.S. Steel over pollution, called for an independent investigation and a re-evaluation 'as to whether the Clairton plant is fit to keep operating.'
It's not the first explosion at the plant. A maintenance worker was killed in a blast in September 2009. In July 2010, another explosion injured 14 employees and six contractors. According to online OSHA records of workplace fatalities, the last death at the plant was in 2014, when a worker was burned and died after falling into a trench.
After the 2010 explosion, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration fined U.S. Steel and a subcontractor $175,000 for safety violations. U.S. Steel appealed its citations and fines, which were later reduced under a settlement agreement.
In February, a problem with a battery at the plant led to a 'buildup of combustible material' that ignited, causing an audible boom, officials said. Two workers received first aid treatment but were not seriously injured.
Pittsburgh attorney John Gismondi represented the widow of the worker who was killed in the 2009 explosion at the plant and three men who were badly burned in the 2010 explosion. In a phone interview Tuesday, Gismondi said his immediate thought a day earlier was 'Oh my God, not again at Clairton.'
Both lawsuits were settled out of court for 'significant' amounts, he said.
'There was no question in both of those cases we established that appropriate safety protocols weren't followed, and that's what led to the explosions,' he said. 'There's a lot of gas on the premises. That's fine, it's part and parcel of what they do. But gas is a dangerous substance, and you need to make sure safety protocols are being followed.'
In the 2010 case, Gismondi's clients claimed managers directed them to repair a live gas line even after an alarm went off warning of high levels of natural gas.
The plant, a massive industrial facility along the Monongahela River, converts coal to coke, a key component in the steelmaking process. It is considered the largest coking operation in North America and is one of four major U.S. Steel plants in Pennsylvania.
To make coke, coal is baked in special ovens for hours at high temperatures to remove impurities that could otherwise weaken steel. The process creates what's known as coke gas — a lethal mix of methane, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.
The county health department initially told residents within 1 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the plant to remain indoors and close all windows and doors, but the agency lifted the advisory later Monday. Health officials said their monitors did not detect levels of soot or sulfur dioxide above federal standards.
U.S. Steel has been a symbol of industrialization since it was founded in 1901 by J.P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie and others. It's been the icon of the American steel industry that once dominated the world market until Japan and then China became preeminent steelmakers over the past 40 years.
In June, U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel announced they had finalized a 'historic partnership' that gives the U.S. government a say in some matters. The deal came a year and a half after the Japanese company first proposed its nearly $15 billion buyout of the iconic American steelmaker.
The pursuit by Nippon Steel of the Pittsburgh-based company was buffeted by national security concerns and presidential politics in a premier battleground state, dragging out the transaction for more than a year after U.S. Steel shareholders approved it.
Levy, Puskar, Casey and Whittle write for the Associated Press. Levy reported from Harrisburg, Pa. Casey reported from Boston, and Whittle reported from Portland, Maine. AP reporters Holly Ramer in Concord, N.H., Beatrice Dupuy in New York City and Audrey McAvoy in Honolulu contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
Meet Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's legal ace pulling out all the stops to get her out of prison
Print Close By Adam Sabes Published August 13, 2025 Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2021, but her attorney is lobbying to secure an early release. Who is the man representing Maxwell? David Oscar Markus has been Maxwell's attorney dating back to her trial in 2021, when she was sentenced to 20 years in prison for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse young girls with Epstein. Markus has continued to represent Maxwell and was involved in interviews between the Department of Justice and Maxwell, which took place in late-July over a two-day period. Following the interviews, Maxwell was transferred from a federal prison facility in Tallahassee, Florida, to a Federal Prison camp in Bryan, Texas. Neither the Department of Justice nor Maxwell's attorney explained why she was transferred. Markus previously told Fox News Digital that "people shouldn't be so quick to judge and throw stones" after Maxwell's move to a minimum security prison camp. JEFFREY EPSTEIN ACCOMPLICE GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S ATTORNEY: 'I LOVE REPRESENTING THE UNDERDOG' "I love what I do," Markus said during the interview. "I love representing the underdog. You know, being a criminal defense lawyer isn't for everybody, but it is one of the most rewarding and great jobs there is, and I really enjoy what I do. So, you know, this case, as all my cases, is an honor to be able to help somebody." While Markus has represented Maxwell going back to 2021, he has also represented other high-profile defendants, including politicians and athletes. Markus represented former NBA star Dwight Howard, who was being investigated for alleged child abuse. According to ESPN, Howard was investigated after an incident where he allegedly hit his own child with a belt. The former basketball player told authorities he was disciplined in a similar way growing up. While police in Florida and Georgia investigated the incident, no charges were filed. Former Florida Democrat gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum was also among Markus' clients, turning to the lawyer when he was facing corruption charges. Federal prosecutors alleged the former Tallahassee mayor took illegal gifts and picketed campaign money. Federal prosecutors dismissed the corruption charges after Gillum was acquitted on one count, with the jury hung on the remaining charges. Markus also represented Tom Grady, a Naples, Florida-based attorney who was accused of obstructing waters in the Florida Keys, according to Naples News. In January 2014, Grady filed applications with state agencies to build a dock and two boat lifts, but the U.S. government claimed federal permits were necessary. Prosecutors alleged the dock and two boat lifts violated the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, which barred any bridge or dam from being built over some navigable waters. A jury in 2021 found him not guilty of the violations. As Epstein's death and previous criminal cases were brought back into the spotlight, Markus has made an effort to get Maxwell out of jail. Maxwell in late July filed a brief with the Supreme Court asking justices to consider her appeal, which seeks a ruling on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement signed in 2007. The agreement states that "the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein." Maxwell argued that the agreement would have prevented federal prosecution in New York. EPSTEIN GRAND JURY MATERIALS WON'T BE RELEASED AFTER FEDERAL JUDGE DENIES DOJ REQUEST TO UNSEAL Markus has also, so far, successfully prevented the disclosure of grand jury transcripts in Maxwell's sex trafficking case. "Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not," her attorney wrote. "Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain." A federal judge on Monday denied the Department of Justice's request to release the grand jury material, stating the documents do not contain "significant, undisclosed information about [their] crimes, or the investigation into them." Criminal defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh, who knows Markus, told Fox News Digital that Maxwell's attorney "seems to understand what many high-profile lawyers don't." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "He's extremely brilliant, dedicated, passionate, zealous, experienced, and extremely humble. He seems to understand what many high-profile lawyers don't, and that is his ego is not his amigo," Eiglarsh said. "He does not shy away from a challenge. And boy, does he have a challenge here. Getting the Supreme Court to take this case at all is going to be extremely challenging. But then to zealously argue and effectively get them to embrace this case and his point of view, he's probably one of the only of few attorneys who could ever pull that off." Fox News' Digital's Michael Ruiz and Ashley Oliver contributed to this report. Print Close URL


Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana mom sues school district after it banned her for recording a meeting
A mom and a national public policy organization are taking her northeast Indiana school district to court to challenge a school policy they say violates her First and 14th Amendment rights. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, filed a complaint Aug. 12 in the Northern District of Indiana that, if successful, could overturn the school district's meeting recording policy and clarify a gray area of First Amendment law. Whitley County Consolidated Schools' policy says a building administrator must first give permission before parents and others can record private school meetings such as parent-teacher conferences. Goldwater argues that the policy is unconstitutional, saying there is "no compelling, substantial, important, or even rational reason" to prohibit parents from recording. "We think there's a clear idea that the First Amendment protects more than just verbal speech. It protects conduct, and especially conduct that's inherently expressive," Goldwater attorney Adam Shelton said. "We think that presents a very good and important First Amendment question." In a previous statement to IndyStar, district Superintendent Laura McDermott said Nicole Graves was restricted from campus for "a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," not for expressing concerns. IndyStar has reached out to McDermott regarding the newly filed litigation. Last year, Graves recorded a meeting with her school principal about an incident on her daughter's school bus concerning the driver's behavior. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater. Discontent with the principal's answers, she posted part of the recording on social media. The district then notified Graves in a letter, which IndyStar obtained, that she broke policy and was given a school grounds ban and restrictions on staff communications. The punishment has since expired. As she brings her fight to court, Graves said she is surprised it has come to this but not that the school won't back down. She said she is continuing to fight to establish better policies for parents and protect children. "This is not fun for me. This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for," she said. "But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district." With her four children still attending school in the district, Graves is concerned about retaliation. She said she is keeping a close eye on her children's schooling and is "terrified" the school will ban her again. The right to record public officials engaged their official duties in a public place has been solidified through previous case law. Goldwater, through its complaint, is attempting to deepen those rights by arguing that some private conversations are protected as well. In its complaint, Goldwater argues that people have the right to record meetings with government officials as long as the recording doesn't violate the rights of other private individuals and the person is lawfully present. "When it's just a conversation between a parent and a school official about their child and doesn't implicate any privacy rights of other students, we think a parent has the right to record that meeting," Shelton said. If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton previously said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different. The complaint also says the policy violates Graves' 14th Amendment rights to control her child's education in several instances, overlapping with their First Amendment argument. Goldwater is seeking an injunction halting the recording policy and a judgment finding the school district violated Graves' First and 14th Amendment rights. This is Goldwater's second crack in two years at clarifying First Amendment case law on recording conversations with school officials. The institute petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2024 to take up the case of a Massachusetts dad denied the ability to video-record his son's special education accommodation conferences. The high court did not take up the appeal after a district court ruled the act of recording was not protected by the First Amendment. Shelton said the institute is hopeful the courts will take a full look at their arguments in Graves' case. "We think we have a very good argument here that the recording of this meeting is protected both by the First Amendment and the 14th Amendment," he said. "We look forward to expressing those ideas in court." The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

Epoch Times
9 hours ago
- Epoch Times
US State Department Spotlights Beijing's Global Repression in New Report
The State Department has called out the Chinese regime for intimidating and exacting reprisals against targets globally to advance its political goals. In its long-anticipated international human rights report, published on Aug. 12, the department noted the wide-ranging ways the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) campaign takes form, including assaults, harassment, hacking, anonymous threats, and bullying through proxies. Victims of the regime's long-arm tactics, often called transnational repression, are wide ranging, with the report listing ethnic Uyghurs, spiritual practitioners, dissidents, foreign journalists, and Chinese students and faculty members studying outside China as common targets. The department cited research by the D.C.-based nonprofit Freedom House, which found that the CCP is responsible for 'the most comprehensive and sophisticated' transnational repression campaign in the world, at times co-opting other countries' institutions to force targeted individuals back to China—where they're often in danger of persecution. One of the most prominent episodes took place during CCP leader Xi Jinping's visit to San Francisco for the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in late 2023. During the multi-day event, protesters arranged through Chinese foreign influence programs, attacked pro-democracy activists with flagpoles and chemical spray, the State Department's report said. There have been repercussions for these transnational acts of violent repression. In May, the Justice Department indicted two men for allegedly harassing and surveilling a victim by installing a tracking device on the victim's car and slashing their tires in an effort to stop them from protesting Xi's trip. The report noted the case of a former Chinese undercover agent who after defecting to Australia, revealed his 15-year-long involvement in targeting Chinese dissidents in several countries under orders from the CCP's secret police operating on foreign soil. The agent, Eric, in 2024 told The Epoch Times that his handler in 2021 asked him to locate a Thailand-based Falun Gong practitioner who had fled China to escape the CCP's persecution of his faith. The handler, in assigning him the job, gave him photos showing the name and location of the target's apartment, as well as several photos of the man and his family. The victim, Li Guixin, confirmed that one of these photos was never previously posted on the internet. Threats from the CCP have also been experienced by the international media. In June 2024, a French reporter and a French filmmaker received threatening phone calls from a China-based number, following the broadcast of their documentary about the attempted forced repatriation of a Chinese dissident, the State Department reports. According to Reporters Without Borders, an unidentified individual hacked into the journalists' group chat on an encrypted app, sending Chinese-language messages asking them not to release the film. Those reporters weren't alone in being hacked by agents of the CCP. The United States has, in recent years, identified a number of Chinese state-sponsored cyber attackers like Salt Typhoon and i-Soon—whose victims include The Epoch Times—that pilfer intelligence from Western governments, civil groups, and others deemed to suit the regime's interests. Crimes of transnational repression were highlighted in one major segment in the State Department report under 'Security of the Person,' as well as two other sections focused on 'Life' and 'Liberty.' The report also covered forced labor in China's northwestern region of Xinjiang, where over 1 million Uyghurs and other ethnic Muslim minorities are detained, with the regime suppressing dissident voices in their communities, with many cases of forced disappearances. The State Department also cited the seven-year sentence given to former Chinese state media editor and columnist Dong Yuyu on espionage charges, arrests of citizens for sharing political views or facts reflecting public concerns, detention and disappearance of journalists—including Swedish publisher Gui Minhai and Australian journalist Yang Hengjun, both of Chinese descent—and acts of aggression to undermine foreign and local reporting. The report named dozens of political prisoners: pastors, a Catholic bishop, Falun Gong practitioners, Tibetans, Uyghurs, rights lawyers, scholars, and others. The report covers the 2024 calendar year before the Trump administration began. The text underwent revisions in March, which the department said was made to improve readability and better align with the legislative and presidential mandates of the new administration. It pared down the volume of content focused on abuses based on gender identity. Regarding the 'China' section of the report, Nina Shea, who has served on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom for over a decade, said the information only 'scratches the surface of the Chinese Communist Party's human rights atrocities and violations.' 'I understand the need not to duplicate the annual reports on religious freedom and human trafficking but that leaves a big hole in this report, since religious communities across the board are the largest CCP targets today,' she told The Epoch Times. She said the report 'would benefit with stand alone sections on China's surveillance system as a method of control and limitation on individual freedom, as well as ones on the CCP's social credit system, ideological indoctrination measures, forced ethnic assimilation, and one on forced organ harvesting and other coerced bio- and medical interventions.' The report should also expand sources to include the various Justice Department cases against CCP agents and spies in the United States, who have targeted Chinese American members of religious and political groups that the regime has labelled the 'five poisons' to the CCP, she said, calling the omission a 'major oversight' in the transnational repression section. 'A fuller picture is needed to accurately describe the totalitarian suppression of human rights under CCP rule today,' she said. The China report was part of the department's set of Country Reports on Human Rights Practices delivered annually to Congress.