
Under Mohammed bin Salman's leadership, Saudi sets gold standard for counter-terrorism
Yet, amid these diverse efforts, Saudi Arabia stands out for having developed a uniquely comprehensive and effective model of counter-terrorism under the decisive leadership of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
His vision has transformed the Kingdom's security doctrine into one that is neither reactive nor narrowly focused. Instead, it integrates military power, ideological engagement, digital innovation, regional diplomacy, and civic awareness into a broad-spectrum framework.
As terrorism continues to evolve—particularly with the rise of lone actors, digital radicalization, and transnational funding networks—Saudi Arabia's proactive and layered response offers a blueprint for others to follow.
What makes Saudi Arabia's strategy particularly notable is that it addresses the full life cycle of terrorism: prevention, detection, disruption, rehabilitation, and long-term reintegration. Rather than relying solely on force, the Kingdom has developed institutions and systems that strike at the root causes of extremism while also neutralizing its manifestations.
In doing so, Saudi Arabia has not only reduced attacks within its borders but has also emerged as a leader in regional and global anti-terror efforts. Its model deserves close study by other countries seeking long-term and sustainable security.
Digital innovation as the first line of defense
In an era where extremist ideologies are spread through social media and encrypted apps, Saudi Arabia has embraced technology as a core component of its counter-terrorism strategy. The Kingdom has invested heavily in digital monitoring systems, artificial intelligence, and advanced surveillance tools capable of detecting potential threats before they materialize. This digital vigilance is not confined to monitoring physical infrastructure or borders—it extends deep into cyberspace where radical content is most often disseminated.
One of the central pillars of this digital approach is the Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology, known as Etidal, which was inaugurated in 2017 and continues to evolve. Etidal's mission is to use artificial intelligence and data analytics to detect, analyze, and respond to extremist content online.
It maps out networks of radicalization and tracks the movement of extremist narratives across different languages and regions. This kind of proactive data mapping enables authorities to identify early-stage radicalization, dismantle online cells, and interrupt recruitment pipelines before they metastasize into violent action.
Saudi Arabia's use of digital technology is also preventative.
It aims not only to detect threats but to dilute their ideological impact. By amplifying counter-narratives, promoting moderate interpretations of religion, and flooding the internet with verified information, the Kingdom attempts to undermine the very foundation of extremist ideologies.
Military precision and institutional integration
While Saudi Arabia's digital strategy targets ideology and recruitment, its military and intelligence apparatus remains a robust and indispensable component of its counter-terrorism efforts. The Kingdom's military interventions are not indiscriminate campaigns of suppression. Instead, they are highly coordinated, intelligence-driven operations that work in tandem with national security agencies.
In recent years, Saudi Arabia consolidated many of its counter-terror functions under the Presidency of State Security. This powerful institution combines intelligence gathering, law enforcement, special operations, and technical surveillance under a single command structure. The result has been a more streamlined, responsive, and a unified security strategy that minimizes bureaucratic silos and enhances operational efficiency.
Furthermore, Saudi Arabia leads the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC), a multilateral alliance comprising more than 40 Muslim-majority nations. This coalition conducts joint exercises, facilitates intelligence-sharing, and trains member states in the latest counter-terrorism techniques.
Most recently, Saudi Arabia hosted advanced human-intelligence training sessions, further cementing its role as a hub for regional counter-terror excellence.
These military dimensions are not meant to replace other strategies but to complement them—targeting the operational and logistical capabilities of terror cells while digital and ideological efforts attack their moral and psychological roots.
Raising awareness and rehabilitating the mind
Recognizing that terrorism often begins in the mind before it materializes into action, Saudi Arabia has placed significant emphasis on education, cultural engagement, and public awareness.
A centerpiece of this effort is the widespread reform of school curricula, designed to promote tolerance, pluralism, and critical thinking. These reforms are not cosmetic; they are aimed at ensuring future generations are less susceptible to extremist ideology and more equipped to engage in constructive dialogue.
Saudi Arabia's public messaging campaigns also play a critical role.
Through television, radio, and digital platforms, the Kingdom actively counters extremist propaganda and offers narratives of national unity and religious moderation. Institutions like the King Abdulaziz Center for National Dialogue foster interfaith and intra-faith discussions, providing safe spaces for communities to express differences while reinforcing a sense of shared identity.
Another standout initiative is the Mohammed bin Nayef Counseling and Care Center, commonly known as the 'Care Center,' which focuses on rehabilitating and reintegrating individuals who were previously radicalized or involved in terrorist activity.
Unlike punitive models that simply incarcerate, the Care Center emphasizes psychological therapy, religious counseling, social reintegration, and even vocational training. This holistic approach helps ensure that individuals who have left extremist movements are not only de-radicalized but given a path back into society.
Security reforms and intelligence coordination
Security in Saudi Arabia is no longer seen as the job of isolated agencies or armed personnel scattered across checkpoints. It is a deeply integrated and systemic function, operating across multiple layers of government and society. The restructuring of national security under the Presidency of State Security brought with it a level of coordination that other nations often struggle to achieve.
Border control, surveillance, biometric systems, and internal checkpoints are now synchronized with national intelligence databases, allowing real-time threat assessments and immediate responses.
Intelligence gathering is supported by ground operatives as well as cyber monitoring, ensuring that the country's response to terrorism is both swift and informed. What distinguishes Saudi Arabia's approach here is the prioritization of intelligence over brute force.
Arrests and raids are often preceded by extensive investigation, reducing the potential for error and limiting the risk of collateral damage.
The Kingdom's ability to disrupt domestic terrorist plots—often before they leave the planning phase—is a testament to this coordinated approach. These operations rarely make international headlines, precisely because they are so successful in neutralizing threats before violence occurs.
Regional and global cooperation
Saudi Arabia understands that terrorism does not respect borders.
To that end, it has become a major player in international counter-terror diplomacy. It has contributed substantial funding to global initiatives, including to the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Center. But its contributions are not merely financial; the Kingdom actively engages in shaping counter-terror policy through organizations such as the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), the Arab League, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
Through the IMCTC, Saudi Arabia works closely with African and Asian countries to address cross-border terror threats, with a particular focus on cutting off financing and recruitment in fragile states. In the Sahel, for instance, Saudi Arabia has supported regional security efforts and helped train local forces to deal with militant groups linked to al-Qaeda and ISIS.
Moreover, the Kingdom regularly hosts regional conferences and intelligence summits, creating platforms for information-sharing and joint planning. This globalized approach ensures that Saudi Arabia is not only protecting its own population but contributing meaningfully to international security architecture.
Why sole reliance on military power falls short
One of the key lessons from Saudi Arabia's experience is that military might, while necessary, is insufficient on its own.
Military campaigns can disrupt terrorist operations, but they cannot eradicate the ideological and social roots of extremism. The US and other Western nations have learned this the hard way in Afghanistan and Iraq, where military victories were often followed by ideological vacuums that enabled new forms of extremism to flourish.
Saudi Arabia's model emphasizes that the fight against terrorism must also be a fight for minds and hearts.
Without digital vigilance, ideological reform, social rehabilitation, and international cooperation, military victories are temporary at best. Countries that focus solely on armed responses risk creating cycles of violence and alienation that feed the very extremism they seek to defeat.
A model worth emulating
In conclusion, Saudi Arabia's counter-terrorism strategy is not just effective—it is exemplary.
Under the decisive leadership of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the Kingdom has combined traditional force with modern tools, tactical precision with ideological depth, and domestic vigilance with international solidarity.
This multifaceted approach recognizes the complexity of modern terrorism and rises to meet that challenge with a carefully layered response. By integrating digital innovation, educational reform, military coordination, security infrastructure, and global diplomacy, Saudi Arabia has built a resilient defense system that is adaptable and sustainable.
In a world where terrorist threats continue to evolve, Saudi Arabia's strategy offers not just inspiration, but a practical roadmap for others.
It is time for nations grappling with extremism to look beyond one-dimensional tactics and adopt a more holistic, forward-thinking approach—one that acknowledges, as Saudi Arabia does, that the true war on terror must be fought on every front.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Arab, Islamic foreign ministers condemn Netanyahu's ‘Greater Israel' remark
RIYADH: The foreign ministers of Arab and Muslim nations on Saturday denounced statements about a "Greater Israel" that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was reported to have made in the wake of pronouncements by his far-right allies to annex Palestinian territories. In a joint statement, the ministers said the pronouncements by Netanyahu and his ministers were "a blatant and dangerous violation" of international law. "They also constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, to the sovereignty of states, and to regional and international peace and security," said the statement carried by the Saudi Press Agency, or SPA. (Developing story)


Arab News
11 hours ago
- Arab News
All at sea: UK sends wrong signal on Gulf naval role
The British government recently announced that HMS Lancaster, a Royal Navy frigate permanently based in the Gulf, will return to the UK for scrapping by the end of the year. This will leave the UK without a permanent forward-based destroyer or frigate in the Gulf for the first time in many years. The decision comes at a bad time, given the fragile state of maritime security in the region. The removal of Britain's last warship from the Gulf, despite these realities, is reminiscent of US President Joe Biden's 2013 decision to withdraw all American tanks from Europe for the first time since the Second World War — only to see Russia invade Ukraine the following year. The Gulf region matters to the UK for many reasons. Britain's ties with the Gulf states stretch back decades, and in some cases centuries. The first recorded instance of the Royal Navy entering the Gulf occurred in 1620, when the East India Company sought to dislodge Portuguese influence from the region. Economically, the Gulf is one of the UK's most important trading regions outside Europe and North America, with billions in goods and services exchanged each year. British companies are heavily involved in the energy, finance, and defense sectors, while Gulf investment plays a major role in the UK economy, from infrastructure projects to property and technology ventures. Security cooperation has been just as important. Many Gulf countries have served alongside British forces in joint operations, whether in counter-piracy patrols off the Horn of Africa, counter-terrorism missions in the wider Middle East, or maritime security cooperation in the Gulf itself. These shared missions have built strong operational ties and mutual trust between the UK and its Gulf partners, strengthening both regional stability and the global commons. Gulf investment plays a major role in the British economy Luke Coffey The UK military continues to play a significant role in training and, in some cases, equipping the armed forces of the region, fostering close professional bonds among senior officers. The Royal Navy, in particular, holds a special place, with the UK ranking second only to the US in terms of foreign naval influence in the Gulf. The UK has also reduced its mine countermeasures vessels in the region, a vital asset given Iran's repeated threats to close the Strait of Hormuz. A Royal Fleet Auxiliary support ship traditionally stationed in the Gulf has also been brought home, with no plans for its return. The Labour government's own 2025 Strategic Defense Review, a document it describes as a 'root-and-branch' analysis of Britain's national security and armed forces, runs to 144 pages, but devotes only about half a page to the Gulf. It does highlight, though concisely, the importance of the region, stating: 'The Middle East is significant to UK security and prosperity due to its position as an artery of global trade and its role in global energy supplies. The UK's footprint in the region and increased investment in strategic defense partnerships supports the government's economic growth agenda.' If Prime Minister Keir Starmer truly sees the Gulf as a geopolitical priority, his first year in government has done little to prove it. By contrast, when the Conservatives returned to power in 2010 after 13 years in opposition, David Cameron moved quickly to elevate relations with the region. He immediately launched the Gulf Initiative, a cross-government effort to deepen relationships with the Gulf Cooperation Council states. This paid off handsomely. In 2011 alone, UK exports to Gulf countries exceeded those to India, Russia, and Mexico combined. By contrast, under Starmer there has been no comparable deepening of relations, apart from the approaching completion of a GCC–UK free trade agreement — an effort that began under the previous Conservative government. The removal of HMS Lancaster from the Gulf and its scrapping by the end of this year is part of a wider maritime crunch facing the Royal Navy. Once Lancaster leaves service, the fleet will be reduced to just six destroyers and six frigates — the lowest number in modern history. This downsizing comes at a time when global shipping volumes are increasing and the threats to maritime trade are growing. For a globally engaged, free-trading island nation such as Britain, these choices are difficult to reconcile with its strategic posture. Under Starmer there has been no deepening of relations Luke Coffey In the 2025 Strategic Defense Review, Starmer reaffirmed that the UK would pursue a 'NATO-first' policy — an approach that makes sense. Yet this does not mean Britain can neglect other key regions, particularly the Middle East. In recent years, NATO has moved to strengthen ties with the Gulf states and expand cooperation on issues such as maritime security, counter-terrorism, and regional stability. One of NATO's strengths is that different member states bring different contributions to the table. Since Britain is a global power with global interests, its reach and capabilities help NATO act more effectively beyond the Euro-Atlantic area. The UK's decision to scale back its naval presence in the Gulf runs counter to this dynamic, undermining one of the most significant ways Britain can contribute to NATO's efforts in the Middle East. Britain cannot afford to send the wrong message to friends or foes about its staying power in strategically vital regions. The Gulf is not only a hub of global commerce and energy but also a testing ground for Britain's ability to project influence and safeguard the rules-based order beyond Europe. If the UK truly intends to be a global power with global interests, then maintaining a credible, visible, and capable naval presence in the Gulf must remain a priority — not an afterthought. • Luke Coffey is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. X: @LukeDCoffey


Arab News
12 hours ago
- Arab News
UN says at least 1,760 killed seeking aid in Gaza
JERUSALEM: The UN human rights office said Friday that at least 1,760 Palestinians had been killed while seeking aid in Gaza since late May, a jump of several hundred since its last published figure at the beginning of August. 'Since 27 May, and as of 13 August, we have recorded that at least 1,760 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid; 994 in the vicinity of GHF (Gaza Humanitarian Foundation) sites and 766 along the routes of supply convoys. Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military,' the agency's office for the Palestinian territories said in a statement. That compares with a figure of 1,373 killed the office reported on August 1. The update came as Gaza's civil defense agency said at least 31 people were killed by Israeli fire on Friday, including 12 who were waiting for humanitarian aid. The Israeli military said its troops were working to 'dismantle Hamas military capabilities,' adding its forces were taking precautions 'to mitigate civilian harm.' Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing swathes of the territory mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defense agency and the Israeli military. On Wednesday, the chief of staff of the Israeli military said plans had been approved for a new offensive in Gaza, aimed at defeating Hamas and freeing all the remaining hostages. The military intends to take control of Gaza City and nearby refugee camps, some of the most densely populated parts of the territory, which has been devastated by more than 22 months of war. In recent days, Gaza City residents have told AFP of more frequent air strikes targeting residential areas, while earlier this week Hamas denounced 'aggressive' Israeli ground incursions in the area. The Israeli government's plans to expand the war have sparked an international outcry as well as domestic opposition. UN-backed experts have warned of widespread famine unfolding in the territory, where Israel has drastically curtailed the amount of humanitarian aid it allows in. Hamas's October 2023 attack which triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,827 Palestinians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza which the United Nations considers reliable.