EXCLUSIVE I make a living inspecting dodgy new properties… here are six steps you can take to stop your dream home turning into a nightmare
Zeher Khalil, who goes by the moniker ' TikTok Inspector', has used his decade in construction to inform potential buyers on how to avoid poorly built homes.
Clad in black clothes, the 43-year-old uses a body camera and phone to shine a light on every crack or shaky awning at new properties.
The videos are a way to raise awareness about his day-to-day, Melbourne-based business 'Site Inspections', which provides customers with forensic assessments.
The aim, he told Daily Mail Australia, is to save people from losing money by highlighting issues before they move in and the builders leave the property.
'It's one of the biggest investments you will ever have in your life,' he said.
'These guys that we're busting, they're just scammers and I'm glad we're naming and shaming most of them.'
While inspections by his company can cost up to a few thousand dollars, Mr Khalil has shared some steps for buyers to avoid their dream homes becoming a nightmare.
Don't trust the display home
'Sometimes a display home is made by the A-team,' he said, adding that this doesn't always guarantee they will also be the builders behind the other properties.
'The company will get different supervisors for different jobs, and you might end up with a different kind of home,' he said.
As a result, Mr Khalil advised buyers to keep an eye on the property during its progress to follow changes that are made.
Always get an independent inspection
Leading on from his first suggestion, Mr Khalil advised bringing in an expert throughout the construction process.
'If you're building (a home), before you make a payment, or you go to make a final stage payment, get it checked,' he said.
'Because you might not see it again, and you might not be getting what you're paying for.'
But even if a buyer isn't able to afford an independent inspector, Mr Khalil suggested customers tell the builders they are planning to.
'If they resist, that is a massive indicator that you have to get someone to look at it because these guys are trying to hide something,' he said.
He said homeowners he previously worked for have told builders they are bringing in an independent inspector and the job has been delayed, cleaned up or fixed.
Read the contract
'Read the contract like you're suing them tomorrow,' Mr Khalil said, warning that there could be clauses that customers might not expect.
'If you're late on payment, or you have to accept alternative solutions, there's all these things that come up later on.
'People just sign the contract, they don't even read it.'
The inspector said a lawyer costs a few hundred dollars but it would be worth it to make sure 'no shifty things' are in the contract.
Never use the builders' surveyor or certifier
Builders sometimes recommend a surveyor who gives a building permit, but Mr Khalil advised buyers to 'always consult someone else'.
'Get someone independent, not someone who's recommended by a builder, because most likely, they'll be more lenient,' he said.
'You want somebody to be really assertive and stringent with their findings.'
What to focus on
Mr Khalil suggested there are three features on properties that should always be checked when buying: the roofing, bathrooms and balconies.
He said these locations are the most common areas that have potential issues with water.
'Water just destroys everything and that's the biggest problem here in Australia,' he said.
'Get those assessed properly and watch out for what's going on.'
He also advised that, if there is any subsidence in the pavement around the home or if there are cracks in the external walls, this could mean there is 'movement in the slab'.
The Victorian Building Authority has previously described this issue as 'foundation movement' or 'slab heave'.
When the foundation lifts excessively in part of a house, this can then develop cracks.
Mr Khalil also pointed to 'patched up bricks' as a sign that vendors might be 'trying to hide something'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tragic development after a body of a newborn baby was found in a stormwater drain in Alexander Heights, Perth
A woman has come forward two days after a baby boy was found dead in a stormwater drain. Tradesmen made the grim discovery while cleaning a drain on La Salle Road in the Perth suburb of Alexander Heights on Monday afternoon. Detectives believe the newborn, wrapped in a sheet, had been placed in the drain several days earlier, sparking an urgent search for the baby's mother amid 'serious concerns' for her welfare. Police confirmed on Wednesday night that a woman aged in her 30s was assisting with inquiries. 'The Western Australia Police Force would like to thank the community for their concern, support and assistance,' the statement read. 'Given the sensitivities, we will be making no further comment at this time.' The woman is receiving appropriate care and support. 'The care of the mother should be all of our priorities at the moment,' WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch told ABC Radio earlier in the day. 'There's probably a range of reasons (she hadn't come forward), including legal, but health reasons, mental health reasons, all sorts of reasons why that mother needs the best care we can give them, and I think that's got to be everyone's priority right now.' The tradesmen were clearing the drains of debris and assessing for blockages when they came across the the grim discovery. 'It was by coincidence that they were there,' Detective Senior Sergeant Cleal said. 'There was no information that sent workers to that drain. This was a chance discovery. 'Not that you can prepare for a discovery like this, but they were very unprepared.' The tragedy has shocked locals, who have placed tributes near the scene and will hold a candlelight vigil at Highview Park on Saturday night. 'Having to physically be in the area where a poor innocent infant is just heartbreaking,' one woman told Seven News. WA Premier Roger Cook added: 'This is a horrifying, horrifying scenario, from the mother of this child through to the discovery of this child's body by those drain workers. 'I cannot think of a more harrowing set of circumstances for people to be confronted with. 'This goes to the heart of everyone's sense of humanity, a small child whose life has passed under tragic circumstances.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Major change for millions of Aussie workers next week
More than 5.1million Aussies who work for a small business will soon have the right to ignore calls and texts from their bosses after hours. The second stage of 'right to disconnect' laws comes into effect next Monday, exactly one year after the Albanese government enforced the rule for companies with more than 15 employees. The controversial laws give employees the right to refuse to monitor, read, or reply to contact outside their working hours, unless doing so is unreasonable. This includes contact from an employer, colleagues and third parties such as clients and suppliers. But the laws don't make it unlawful for an employer to contact an employee outside working hours. 'Instead, they give employees a right to refuse to monitor, read or respond to the contact, unless doing so is unreasonable,' the Fair Work Ombudsman website states. Whether or not a refusal is unreasonable will depend on the circumstances. Factors could include the nature of the worker's role and level of responsibility, their personal circumstances and extra pay, or compensation received for working additional hours or being available after hours. Ahead of the major change, the NSW Small Business Commissioner has urged employers and employees from the outset to have a conversation about what out-of-hours contact might mean. 'They should set expectations about contact and responding to contact when either party is not working,' the website states. However, many questions remain, including what is considered unreasonable. There isn't any advice in the legislation, which encourages businesses to consider whether employees are being paid for this time after-hours or if the request is urgent. Those who don't comply with the laws have been threatened with hefty fines of up to $18,780 for individuals and $93,900 for companies per breach. However, no cases involving large companies have yet made it to court in the first year of legislation. The laws have reignited online debate among employees and small business operators. 'I'm a manager and constantly get calls and texts after hours, weekends and holidays. Staff wanting to swap shifts, calling in sick, and security call-outs,' one woman posted online. 'Wow, I'm gonna be getting paid 24/7. Shouldn't this work both ways? Staff should respect their bosses' time off also.' A worker added: 'Your boss is only your boss during work hours, after work hours he's just another person & I decide if I answer their calls or not.' Workers on call 24-7 were concerned about the potential impact the laws could have on their role. 'I work a job doing supermarket refrigeration service, does this mean I can ignore emergency breakdowns, even though I'm on call 24/7?' one wrote. 'Or can I ignore texts telling me which job I will be at next morning? Or what about important information about jobs I need to pass onto my boss? Can I just not do that because it's out of hours?' However, others had no problems with being contacted after hours by their bosses. 'I work for a small company and sometimes it just happens. If you have a respectful relationship with your management it shouldn't be an issue from time to time,' one woman commented.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
SAS soldier ‘who shot farmer' faces Australia's first war crime trial
A former member of the SAS is due to become the first Australian soldier to face a war crime trial, 13 years after allegedly shooting an unarmed farmer in an Afghan wheat field. Oliver Schulz, 43, is accused of murdering Dad Mohammad, a young father of two, in May 2012 in Dehjawze, a village in the Uruzgan province of southern Afghanistan. After his arrest by police in the Southern Highlands of New South Wales in March 2023, the case was bogged down in the local courts. On Wednesday Greg Grogin, a magistrate in Sydney, finally committed it to trial, having expressed frustration that it had taken so long to get to that stage. The landmark case is now set to begin in the supreme court in October and Schulz, who denies the charge, faces life in jail if found guilty. Schulz was already the first Australian soldier to be charged with a war crime. Despite the gravity of the alleged offence, he was granted bail because of the risk that he could be targeted by Taliban sympathisers while in jail. The catalyst for his arrest was the decision by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) in 2020 to air graphic video of the alleged murder of Mohammad, who was shot three times while lying on his back. It was taken from the helmet camera of a dog handler who joined Schulz on the fateful patrol in March 2012. Mohammad is believed to have been 25 or 26. The video prompted a public outcry and a three-year criminal investigation after the prime minister at the time, Scott Morrison, described the video as shocking. Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, a killing constitutes a war crime of murder if the victim is not a combatant or is out of action due to injury or damage. Prosecutors must prove that the perpetrator knew, or was reckless regarding, the status of the victim. Schulz completed multiple tours of Afghanistan and was commended for gallantry before being stood down by the ADF after the video was broadcast in 2020. ABC revealed that the military had investigated the killing months after the alleged incident, having received complaints from Afghan villagers, but cleared the soldier of wrongdoing. An extended version of the helmet camera video, which is likely to feature prominently in the trial, was played at the committal hearing in April and May, when former SAS colleagues who witnessed the alleged murder were questioned. The video shows Schulz aboard a Black Hawk helicopter before it lands, and the soldiers running about 50 metres across a wheat field. The purpose of the mission was to kill or capture a Taliban insurgent called Mullah Payend, codename Objective Young Akira, the court was told. The dog handler and Schulz can be seen moving towards an open field and coming across Mohammad, who had been trying to fight off the dog. Schulz points his gun at Mohammad as the dog is called off. He looks around and asks three times whether he should 'drop this c***' before firing three shots at Mohammad, who had a condition that stunted growth in one leg. The initial ADF investigation, which cleared Schulz, painted a different picture. A military report claimed Mohammad had been seen 'tactically manoeuvring' on the ground as Schulz's helicopter approached. Smoke and flares were dropped from the helicopter but soldiers were forced to pursue him on foot as he could not be engaged from the air. He was then killed after being ordered to stop, according to the report. The police investigation was taken over by the Office of the Special Investigator, the body set up to prove alleged war crimes after an inquiry led by Paul Brereton, an army reserve major general and New South Wales supreme court judge. The Brereton inquiry concluded November 2020, recommending that 23 incidents and 19 individuals be referred for further investigation. It recommended that any alleged war crime should be tried in civilian court rather than in a military tribunal. Until now, Schulz's case had been overshadowed by that of another former SAS trooper, Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia's most decorated living soldier. The 46-year-old corporal started a defamation case against Australian newspapers after they reported he had murdered four unarmed civilians in Afghanistan. The legal action backfired when a federal court judge ruled against him in June 2023. Roberts-Smith, who was awarded the Victoria Cross in 2011 for his service in Afghanistan, lost his appeal in May but had vowed to fight on.
