Study pinpoints ‘critical time windows' for illnesses that pose dementia risk
Experts at the University of Oxford said up to 80% of dementia patients suffer from two or more chronic health conditions, but there is a 'lack of understanding' when it comes to specific illnesses, age of onset and the link to dementia.
They identified 'critical time windows' in which certain illnesses pose the greatest risk to patients.
For the study, published in Brain Communications, researchers analysed data from 282,712 people using the UK Biobank and looked at patterns for 46 chronic health conditions.
They found that heart conditions such as heart disease and atrial fibrillation, as well as diabetes, before the age of 55 was most strongly linked to dementia risk.
However, from 55 to 70 years of age, mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression, as well as conditions such as stroke, increased the risk of dementia two-fold.
Sana Suri, an associate professor and Oxford Brain Sciences senior fellow, said: 'Although we knew that multimorbidity increased the risk of dementia, it was unclear which combinations of health conditions had the most impact and in what sequence.
'This study has identified how specific illnesses tend to co-exist with each other, and also the critical time windows in which they could pose the greatest risk.'
Elsewhere, the study suggests people who have conditions such as heart disease and diabetes in middle age, followed later by conditions such as stroke and mental health disorders were at the greatest risk of developing dementia.
Ms Suri said the presence of other illnesses should be taken into account when estimating a person's risk of developing dementia, and could help develop strategies that aim to reduce risk at certain points in life.
She added: 'This study identified associations between multimorbidity and dementia risk but we need to understand more about why this happens.
'We also need to try to replicate the study in more diverse groups of people to ensure the results are representative of the population.
'Future studies could examine whether efforts to manage or prevent cardiovascular problems in early-to-midlife, followed by mental health and neurological disorders when people are in their fifties and sixties, might reduce the risk of dementia.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Covid aged our brains by six months, study finds
The Covid pandemic sped up the ageing process of people's brains and was detrimental to the function of the mind, a study has found. People infected with the virus were most affected, figures showed, but even those who avoided infection saw an impact. Scientists compared scans of people's brains around three years apart, using computer models to determine how much the brains had aged. A control group of people with two scans done pre-pandemic was compared to people who had one scan before, and then a follow-up after the virus emerged. The researchers, from the University of Nottingham, used UK Biobank scans from almost 1,000 people and found the pandemic group's brains had an average 5.5 months more than the control group. Academics suggested the strain on people's lives from lockdowns, with their isolation and uncertainty, may have aged people's brains. They found brain ageing during the pandemic was 'more pronounced' among men, older people and those from deprived The scientists discovered that for all people, irrespective of age, brains aged almost six months more than they should have done during the pandemic. Pandemic's strain on lives They also looked at the impact of the pandemic on the grey and white matter of the brain to see how a person was impacted based on their age. Grey matter is a type of tissue that is crucial for processing information, while white matter is a deeper tissue that allows different parts of the brain to communicate with each other. The white and grey matter of those who lived through the pandemic was, on average, three-and-a-half days older per year than that of the control group. The impact was more severe in people who contracted the virus, with an extra six days of ageing per year compared with the non-pandemic group. 'We found that the Covid-19 pandemic was detrimental to brain health and induced accelerated brain ageing … regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection,' the University of Nottingham experts wrote in the paper. Dr Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad, who led the study, said: 'What surprised me most was that even people who hadn't had Covid showed significant increases in brain ageing rates. It really shows how much the experience of the pandemic itself, everything from isolation to uncertainty, may have affected our brain health.' The research team also examined whether having Covid affected someone's cognitive performance by examining the results of tests taken at the time of the scans. They found that people who were infected with the virus showed a lower performance on cognitive tests when they were assessed again after the pandemic. Prof Dorothee Auer, who specialises in neuroimaging and was a senior author on the study, said: 'This study reminds us that brain health is shaped not only by illness, but by our everyday environment. The pandemic put a strain on people's lives, especially those already facing disadvantage. 'We can't yet test whether the changes we saw will reverse – but it's certainly possible, and that's an encouraging thought.'
Glasgow Times
13 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Oxford professors join opposition of battery storage site
A Clydebank councillor, together with local campaigners and academics from the University of Oxford, has submitted formal objections to the proposed Battery Energy Storage Site (BESS) at Braidfield Farm. After initial concerns were raised over the plan for a 100 MW Energy Storage facility submitted by Intelligent Land Investments Limited (ILI), Councillor William Rooney reached out to professors Peter Dobson and Peter Edwards at the University of Oxford. The proposals are being considered by the Scottish Government Energy Consents Unit (ECU) and have received, to date, a total of 315 public representations have been submitted, 24 in support and 291 in objection. In addition, an online petition titled Say NO to battery storage facility in Braidfield, Clydebank has gathered more than 1,360 signatures. William Rooney, Kilpatrick Councillor, said: 'I find it deeply unsettling that the site is located less than a quarter of a mile from local businesses, residential areas and St Peter the Apostle High School. 'I'm encouraged to see our concerns legitimised by renowned experts from the University of Oxford. 'It's clear that regulations are not keeping pace with technology. I'm worried that if this isn't addressed, it could lead to a serious incident.' READ NEXT: Council respond to concerns over missing alpacas at Glasgow Children's Farm READ NEXT: This is the plan for this iconic Glasgow city centre building Proposals for the site. (Image: Newsquest staff) Professors Peter Dobson and Peter Edwards claim that the consultation from the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) had "many flaws" and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) was "simply complacent" in their response. Additionally, they suggest that the plan should fall under the Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) regulations due to the supposed instability of lithium-ion batteries. (Image: Supplied) The ILI Group, in response, have said that if the Health and Safety Executive raised any concerns at all in relation to this development, then they "simply would not proceed." SEPA say they do not have a remit to regulate BESS site operation; however, they are a statutory consultee in the application. Craig Hughes, a local campaigner against the site, said: "If this is approved by the Scottish Government, then expect two years of traffic disruption on Kilbowie Road and Hardgate due to a construction traffic management plan involving slow-moving vehicles. 'Not to mention the extensive roadworks between Hardgate and Windyhill substation, which will involve digging up miles and miles of roads to lay the cables'. 'If you think the traffic is chaotic now, brace yourself.' In regard to traffic concerns and community disruption, the ILI Group say that the council's road department raised no objections. They say they are "committed" to working closely with West Dunbartonshire Council and relevant transport authorities to implement a Construction Traffic Management Plan when traffic is higher than usual towards the end of the construction period. West Dunbartonshire Council planning committee is expected to be discussing a report in August as a statutory consultee. A spokesperson from ILI Group said: "We acknowledge the objections raised by local representatives, campaigners, and academics regarding the proposed Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) in Clydebank, and we appreciate the opportunity to address these concerns directly and constructively. "The UK Government has reviewed the regulatory framework for Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) facilities recently, and specifically at the suggestion of academics, into whether these should be included under the Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) regulations. "The government, along with the Health and Safety Executive, concluded that it did not." The spokesperson continued: "ILI said at the outset that if the Health and Safety Executive raised any concerns at all in relation to this development, then we simply would not proceed. In fact, this important regulatory body has been consulted by the Scottish Government for this proposed development and raised 'no objection'." A spokesperson for the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) said: 'SEPA provides independent and evidence-based advice directly to planning authorities and Scottish Ministers to inform their decisions. 'Our remit with regards to BESS sites is limited to our role as a statutory consultee at planning stage and our role in regulating construction, water discharges and abstractions. 'We have published information and advice on various matters which relate to our remit. Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) do not fall within the Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) regulations or Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) regulations. "This means SEPA does not have a remit to regulate BESS site operation. 'Our consultation response, dated 11 February 2025, covers our regulatory role in regard to pollution prevention and flood risk management. SEPA is a statutory consultee, and the final decision on this application will be taken by the Energy Consents Unit. 'We recognise that there are potential environmental impacts associated with BESS. We will continue to work with planning authorities through the Heads of Planning Groups, directly with the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) and with the Scottish Government.' A HSE spokesperson said: 'Battery energy storage systems are covered by a robust regulatory framework which applies regardless of the size of the facility. 'The fundamental principle of health and safety law is that those who create risks are best placed to control them. 'Designers, installers, and operators all have a duty to ensure this is the case. 'We expect the duty holder to assess the specific situation and implement necessary control measures.' This is now the second proposed battery storage unit in Clydebank. In 2023, Green energy firm Apatura lodged plans for a battery storage farm at Cochno Farm in Faifley, on the outskirts of the town. This proposal remains ongoing.
Times
19 hours ago
- Times
Covid was bad for our brains (even for those who didn't catch it)
The Covid-19 pandemic was 'detrimental' to brain health, even for those who never contracted the virus, a study has suggested. Academics say that the strain of the pandemic on people's lives may have aged our brains prematurely. The team, from the University of Nottingham, found that brain ageing during the pandemic was 'more pronounced' among men, older people and those from deprived backgrounds. • Is your holiday making you ill? Dr Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad, who led the study, said: 'What surprised me most was that even people who hadn't had Covid showed significant increases in brain ageing rates. It really shows how much the experience of the pandemic itself, everything from isolation to uncertainty, may have affected our brain health.' The team trained a brain-ageing model on more than 15,000 healthy people, then applied the model to 1,000 people taking part in the UK Biobank study, a long-term piece of research tracking the health of British adults. Half of this group were assessed before the global pandemic, and half were assessed before and after. The research, published in Nature Communications, found that those who had lived through the crisis had a '5.5 month higher deviation of brain age gap' compared with the people who were only assessed before the pandemic. 'We found that the Covid-19 pandemic was detrimental to brain health and induced accelerated brain ageing … regardless of Sars-CoV-2 infection,' the experts said. The team also assessed cognitive performance by looking at tests taken at the time of the scans. Those infected with the virus were found to perform worse on cognitive tests when they were assessed before and after the pandemic. • Optimists all on same wavelength, but no two pessimists are alike Professor Dorothee Auer, a senior author of the study, added: 'This study reminds us that brain health is shaped not only by illness, but by our everyday environment. The pandemic put a strain on people's lives, especially those already facing disadvantage. We can't yet test whether the changes we saw will reverse, but it's certainly possible, and that's an encouraging thought.' Professor Masud Husain, from the University of Oxford and who is not affiliated with the research, urged 'caution' when interpreting the results. He said: 'The brain age difference between the two groups (as indexed by brain scanning) was on average only five months, and difference in cognitive performance between groups was only on the total time taken to complete one of the tests. 'Is this really going to make a significant difference in everyday life? The time between scans was much shorter in the people scanned before and after the pandemic, compared to those who had both scans before the pandemic. We therefore don't know if brain ageing would have recovered if more time elapsed.' Previous research has found that people who had Covid performed less well in cognitive tests, especially executive function. Scientists from Imperial College London found that those who had had Covid scored about three IQ points lower than those who had not been infected. Those who had been in intensive care scored nine points lower, and those who suffer from long Covid scored about six points lower than uninfected individuals.
