logo
UK universities have been infiltrated by woke EDI culture that is stifling research into controversial issues like puberty blockers, major report warns

UK universities have been infiltrated by woke EDI culture that is stifling research into controversial issues like puberty blockers, major report warns

Daily Mail​14 hours ago
Universities have been infiltrated by a ' woke ' EDI culture that is stifling research into controversial issues like puberty blockers, a major report warns.
The review, commissioned by the last Government, said academics are being 'bullied, harassed and blocked from career progression' if they dare to question transgender ideology.
It says Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) staff are 'over-reaching' and sometimes even 'generate harassment' against academics.
And it warns many EDI departments have been captured by trans activists, and calls for their power to be scaled back.
Last night, Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott hit out at universities for 'suppressing research' and 'silencing controversial views'.
The 433-page document, the most extensive research of its kind, also records dozens of personal accounts of academics being shut down.
In one example, a paper was rejected by numerous journals because reviewers 'objected to the findings' that puberty blockers may not be safe.
Its writer, Professor Sallie Baxendale, a consultant clinical neuropsychologist, was told her research 'risked stigmatising an already stigmatised group'.
Another academic told how they had been 'ostracised' by a colleague for 'providing balance' during a seminar discussion of puberty blockers.
Today's report accuses universities of presiding over 'systemic and institutionalised suppression' of academic freedom, with 'far-reaching chilling effects'.
Titled 'Barriers to research on sex and gender', it is led by Alice Sullivan, Professor of Sociology at the UCL Social Research Institute.
She said: 'Researchers investigating vital issues have been subjected to sustained campaigns of intimidation simply for acknowledging the biological and social importance of sex.
'When fundamental issues cannot be investigated or debated openly, this undermines our academic institutions, it hurts individuals and it compromises the integrity of research.'
The paper is the second instalment of a review originally commissioned by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology under the Tories.
The first instalment, published in March, found that biological sex had been erased from official data in the police, NHS and even the military.
Among the many testimonies is that of Professor Kathleen Stock, who was hounded out of her job at Sussex University in 2021 for her gender critical views.
There is also James Caspian, whose research on 'detransitioning' was blocked by Bath Spa University in 2017, over fears it would damage the university's reputation.
The report highlights concerns that EDI departments are being used as 'levers for activists pursuing agendas which are not compatible with the truth-seeking mission of universities'.
It says EDI policies have a 'tendency' to 'promote highly contentious theories such as gender-identity theory as unchallengeable fact'.
Universities are also tolerating 'toxic' behaviour by 'a small minority of university staff' who 'de-platform' gender-critical academics, it says.
And it adds: 'The targets of these campaigns have disproportionately been lesbians.'
'For some academics, the line between activism and research has been completely blurred, so that 'research' ceases to be a truth-seeking activity,' it says.
There are also concerns about 'ethics committees', which 'use their positions to impose particular viewpoints or to block research that they dislike.'
'Ethics committees commonly direct researchers to draw on advice from university EDI teams,' the report added.
It comes after the Office for Students published new guidance earlier this month stating academics should not have to show 'commitment' to EDI.
The guidance was to help universities comply with the new Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, first drafted by the Tories, which comes into force from August 1.
Despite this, there are currently official proposals to have universities' access to public funds determined partly by their compliance with EDI.
Mrs Trott said: 'Labour opposed our Free Speech Act every step of the way, dismissing it as a Tory 'hate speech charter', and quietly tried to shelve before being forced to u-turn.
'Professor Sullivan's report shows why the Act is vital: universities have sadly suppressed research on sex and gender identity, silencing controversial views.
'The report exposes severe intimidation and legal battles over basic rights.
'As Conservatives, we will defend free speech on campus.
'I urge universities to follow the Office for Students' guidance and salute the brave academics standing for truth and free speech.'
A Government spokesman said: 'We are taking strong action to protect academic freedom and free speech, which are fundamental to our world-leading universities.
'This includes introducing new duties on universities to ensure they are robust in promoting and protecting free speech on campus.
'It also comes alongside the firm steps the Office for Students is already taking, through fines and new guidance, to ensure universities remain beacons of academic freedom.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No decision on Ipswich northern bypass until mayor elected
No decision on Ipswich northern bypass until mayor elected

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

No decision on Ipswich northern bypass until mayor elected

There will be no solution to long-running traffic issues in Suffolk until an elected mayor is in place, a transport boss Orwell Bridge on the A14 south of Ipswich is currently operating with lane closures while £6m repair works are carried have been calls for a northern bypass around Ipswich for decades, but there has been a lack of funding commitment, coupled with local opposition in villages any road would go Chambers, cabinet member for transport at Conservative-run Suffolk County Council, said no decision was likely to be made until after the elections for a new mayor-led authority for Norfolk and Suffolk in May 2026. "We're not going to build a northern bypass in a year. It will be the mayor that will deliver a northern bypass," said new post would be created as part of the government's devolution plans which would replace the two-tier county and district council set-up with unitary councils in Norfolk and Suffolk, with a directly elected mayor overseeing both comes as rush-hour drivers have faced long delays as lanes on the two-lane dual carriageway are closed on the bridge, resulting in slow eastbound carriageway was closed on Monday, 23 June, which was followed by a westbound lane on it happened: Live updates on the Orwell Bridge, Thursday, 26 JuneWhile the lanes were shut, traffic was limited to the usual 60mph on the eastbound side, but cut to 40mph for those travelling west while the contraflow system was in to replace 37-year-old joints on the bridge was expected to be completed by late including container trucks for the Port of Felixstowe, have been advised to "allow extra time" for their journeys. On the northern bypass, Chambers said: "Six years ago [in 2019] we commissioned a strategic outline business case."The only way you can access the funding is to put forward a housing growth plan. "Our business plan six years ago was that [that] required building 15,000 homes, in and above the targets they have to build homes at the moment to access that funding."He added: "The prime minister was only in Suffolk a few weeks ago green lighting Sizewell C."It was a shame while he was here he didn't agree to funding for the major road network that will actually increase capacity on the key road for Sizewell C." Jack Abbot, Labour MP for Ipswich, believed a northern bypass would solve "long-term issues", because improving the railway to increase its capacity to take more container freight for Felixstowe would not solve the road traffic issue."Things like Ely/Haughley [rail junctions] are a really important project for the region and the Port of Felixstowe, [but] this isn't a solution... he [Chris Chambers] mentioned it would take 100,000 HGVs off the road a year. "We have up to 20,000 a day crossing the Orwell Bridge."The northern bypass isn't just about traffic congestion in and around Ipswich, there's the long-term future of Felixstowe port at risk."We have thousands of jobs on the line in our local economy, millions if not billions of investment in our local economy... we have to look at the bigger picture not just for Ipswich and Felixstowe, but for our county as a whole." The BBC has contacted the Department for Transport for comment. Plans for a river crossing over Ipswich's waterfront and wet dock just south of the town centre were abandoned by the Conservative county council in 2018 as costs rose and extra funds were needed, despite the Conservative central government committing £77m. That route was meant to provide another cross-town option for traffic, easing pressure on the the time, council leader Matthew Hicks said they had "exhausted all [further] funding opportunities including the Department for Transport, HM Treasury, local businesses and other stakeholders". Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Angela Rayner reveals why she'd never want to be prime minister
Angela Rayner reveals why she'd never want to be prime minister

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Angela Rayner reveals why she'd never want to be prime minister

Angela Rayner has said she would never want to be prime minister because 'it would age me by 10 years within six months'. 'Have you ever seen a prime minister after a year or two in government?' the deputy prime minister joked. The morning after Sir Keir Starmer scraped through a major rebellion over his watered-down welfare reforms, Ms Rayner was asked whether she is waiting in the wings to take the embattled PM's place. 'Not a chance,' she told ITV's Lorraine. She said: 'It would age me by 10 years within six months, it does, anyone who has been prime minister it is a very challenging job.' Amid mounting questions about the prime minister's future following a disastrous first year in power, she defended Sir Keir, saying he is 'doing the job for Britain', adding 'there's been a lot going on' in the 12 months since the PM entered Downing Street. She said: 'He's been all around the world trying to repair the relationships in Europe. We've got the trade deals that the previous government wasn't able to do, tackling the things like the tariffs that the president in the US wanted to put onto the UK, which would have damaged our economy again. 'There's a lot going on, and the prime minister's been […] here, there and everywhere, doing the job for Britain.' It comes after polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice referred to Sir Keir's first year in office as 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister'. He told Times Radio that the prime minister was 'never especially popular' and that 'the public still don't know what he stands for.' Asked if she would be interested in being prime minister at some point, Ms Rayner told the ITV programme: 'No'. She said that she is 'passionate' about issues including workers' rights and council housing. 'I'm very interested in delivering for the people of this country, because … to be elected as an MP from my background was incredible,' she said. 'Having that opportunity to serve my community that have raised me, looked after me, given me opportunities, and I don't forget that. And to be deputy prime minister of this country … it's got to count for something.'

Flying ant day 2025: When is it and why does it happen?
Flying ant day 2025: When is it and why does it happen?

The Independent

time43 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Flying ant day 2025: When is it and why does it happen?

The much-maligned "flying ant day", a summer phenomenon in Britain and Ireland, is poised to return as warmer weather persists across the UK. Swarms of winged black garden ants, typically Lasius niger, erupt from their nests under lawns, flower beds, and stone patios to invade personal space, cling to laundry, and splatter against car windshields. Their sheer numbers can be so immense that they have previously registered as drifting clouds on weather radars. Met Office forecaster Simon Partridge told the BBC that distinguishing them from patches of showers can be difficult. The occurrence can be unpleasant and occasionally very irritating – memorably, tennis stars Caroline Wozniacki and Ekaterina Makarova had to interrupt a Wimbledon match in July 2018 to spray themselves with bug repellent as the result of an influx of flying ants to Court 1 – but it is largely harmless to humans and not something to worry about. Nevertheless, to be forewarned is to be forearmed, so here is everything you need to know about this strangest of annual events. Why does it happen? The reason ants emerge from the ground in this sudden fashion is because they have reached the 'nuptial flight' phase of their reproductive cycles, at which point those with wings (known as alates) – virgin queen ants (or princesses) and male drones, but not flightless female workers – depart their nests in search of new colonies, moving as one for protection. As the queens race off, they emit pheromones to attract mates while flying as fast as they can to ensure that only the fastest and most capable males can reach them. This is an example of natural selection in action, as the race makes certain that only the strongest examples of the species get to pass on their genes to a next generation. The spread to fresh colonies further afield also serves to limit inbreeding as it means ants commingle with mates from other nests. A queen – which can grow to 15mm in length and live for as long as 15 years in the wild, according to the Natural History Museum (NHM) – may have several mates during the nuptial flight and preserve their semen within her abdomen for a lifetime, with a view to fertilising future eggs. She will go on to discard her wings by chewing them off and form new nests underground but her male suitors will simply fall to the ground and die without so much as a post-coital cigarette, their final moments on Earth presumably also among their happiest. What weather conditions encourage it? In Britain and Ireland, flying ant days typically occur in July or August, often in warmer urban areas first, when the weather is hot and humid and when winds are low. Temperature is a key factor, with the Royal Society of Biology (RSB) noting that ant swarms rarely emerge if it is cooler than 13C and that 25C is their preferred seasonal average. The RSB, incidentally, argues that we should think of flying ant seasons, rather than isolated days, as ants may well take to the air on multiple occasions over the course of a British summer, depending on the atmospheric conditions, the species of ant in question and the nature of their habitat among other variables. What can be done about it? Not a great deal, unfortunately. Some might advocate flooding the ants' nests with water or detergent or attempting to snare them in sellotape around the home but that all feels distinctly inhumane. Instead, your best bet is to stay out of their way as much as possible and console yourself with the integral role ants play in the maintenance of natural ecosystems. Their colonies help to keep the soil aerated and they themselves are a vital source of food to birds like swifts and gulls, who in turn make important contributions to the natural order. If you do get bitten or stung, do not be alarmed. The NHS states that ant bites are 'generally harmless, although you'll probably feel a nip'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store