logo
‘I'll protect trans people to the end,' vows Co-op boss

‘I'll protect trans people to the end,' vows Co-op boss

Telegraph04-05-2025

The boss of Co-op has vowed to 'protect trans people to the end' after the Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of a woman.
The judges' decision last month forced businesses and institutions across the country to rip up policies on how to treat transgender people.
Shirine Khoury-Haq said the trans community brought a 'massive business benefit' to the Co-op. She told The Telegraph: 'These are highly talented people who, if they feel loved, if they feel valued, if they feel like they can bring their whole selves to work, their contribution is immense.'
The Co-op's Beirut-born chief executive wrote to its 54,000 staff in the wake of last month's Supreme Court ruling saying she would 'continue to advocate' for them and 'speak out against hate'. More than 1,000 staff identify as trans or non-binary.
Ms Khoury-Haq, 53, said in her letter that she wanted to extend her 'personal support to all of our trans and non-binary colleagues, those with trans and non-binary loved ones and anyone who will be feeling the impact of [the] ruling'.
Judges last month unanimously ruled that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act referred to biological sex rather than acquired gender.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which regulates the Equality Act, subsequently issued interim guidance saying that companies should no longer allow trans women into female-only facilities. It said this would 'mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities and must be open to all users of the opposite sex'.
Like other companies, the Co-op is now looking at what this means for its HR policies. An initial assessment has found that single-sex spaces are available in most of Co-op's locations, but the sprawling nature of the business means there are challenging areas. The Co-op runs more than 2,300 convenience stores, more than 800 funeral parlours and has insurance, legal and wholesale teams in the UK.
Ms Khoury-Haq said 'the key areas that we will need to look at differently are changing rooms', which are in funeral branches, funeral care centres and depots.
Some companies have already begun updating policies. Barclays, for example, has banned trans women from using female lavatories, reversing an earlier policy of allowing them to use whichever bathroom they feel most comfortable in.
However, Co-op has said it will wait until the EHRC publishes full guidance, expected in June, and until then will allow staff to 'continue to use toilets and changing facilities in accordance with their gender identity.'
Ms Khoury-Haq's staunch support of trans staff risks attracting attention from gender-critical campaigners, who for years have accused companies of promoting trans ideology under the banner of equality.
She said Co-op would continue to be a 'safe place for people, where they can do a great job but also be themselves', adding: 'If that's 'woke', I'm fine with it.'
Co-op follows Lloyds Bank in vowing to stand behind trans staff in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling. Britain's biggest lender has pledged 'solidarity' with transgender staff.
Ms Khoury-Haq said: 'On a personal level, I need to take care of my trans colleagues. I always will, and, as long as I'm there, they will be protected. I will absolutely protect those people to the end.'
The Supreme Court ruling on the definition of gender is one of many fast-moving issues Co-op's chief has to navigate. Just hours after sitting down with the Telegraph, Ms Khoury-Haq was told by her IT team that the company was the victim of an attempted hack.
Some back-office and call-centre systems were quickly taken down as part of 'proactive steps to keep systems safe'.
Attempted security breach
In a letter to staff, Co-op said security was of 'paramount importance' given the 'recent issues surrounding M&S and the cyber attack they experienced'.
On Friday, Co-op admitted that hackers had breached its systems and stolen data 'relating to a significant number of our current and past members.' While financial data is not thought to be included, cyber attackers have accessed people's names and contact details.
The cyber attack came in the wake of the crippling IT breach that has plagued Marks & Spencer for the past two weeks. However, Co-op declined to provide any additional comment on the incident. It said Ms Khoury-Haq would not be able to speak about the breach.
Speaking last week, the Co-op chief said she was planning to add more technology to shops to help offset the £150m in extra costs hitting the business this year. This includes rolling out electronic shelf labels, where prices are displayed virtually and can be updated more easily.
'There's a heavy burden on business at the moment when you look at it across the board,' Ms Khoury-Haq said. 'When labour is much cheaper, it's hard to make a business case for a large-scale technology rollout, but when labour is more expensive, that business case starts to look very different.'
Collectively, retailers face £7bn of extra costs as a result of Rachel Reeves's tax raid last October. The rise in the minimum wage and National Insurance changes that took effect on April 1 mean the cost of employing a worker in an entry-level retail job has risen by 10pc.
Ms Khoury-Haq wants ministers to do more to help retailers, rather than simply piling on extra costs. She said: 'We've been saying to ministers, if you can help us reduce the loss from our stores, then the National Insurance becomes something that we can balance.'
A shake-up of business rates would help the majority of Co-op stores but that is still some way off.
In the meantime, retailers have been hit by a recycling levy forecast to cost the industry £2bn. Ms Khoury-Haq tried to make the case for this to be delayed 'but they decided to bring it in anyway'.
The wave of costs have already started to feed into higher prices. Last month, food inflation rose to its highest level in 11 months, according to the British Retail Consortium. Ms Khoury-Haq said Co-op will 'absorb as much as we possibly can, as we have been all along, to keep prices as low as possible'.
Aside from the Co-op, Ms Khoury-Haq also co-chairs the Net Zero Council alongside Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, reprising a role she held with the previous government. The advisory group was set up to help businesses and the Government work together on net zero as Britain races to decarbonise its energy system by 2030.
The project has been the centre of controversy over the last week, following widespread power cuts in Spain, Portugal and France that may have been linked to a heavy dependence on solar power.
Sir Tony Blair last week claimed net zero policies were doomed to fail amid concerns the public was being asked to make 'financial sacrifices' with little impact on global emissions.
While the former prime minister later appeared to row back on the criticism, questions have continued to mount over the Energy Secretary's net zero policies.
Ms Khoury-Haq said: 'If we think net zero is not important, we need to think again. Because by the time our children grow up, it will be on their doorstep.
'We need to make sure that we do the right things in order to have energy security and food security, and make sure our GDP continues to grow.'
Again, the 'w' word comes up. For Ms Khoury-Haq, this 'is not about being 'woke''. 'It's about saying, 'Actually, sustainability is important for the planet. How can the UK benefit from this?''

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trans barrister accosted outside Commons toilet by gender critical activists
Trans barrister accosted outside Commons toilet by gender critical activists

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Trans barrister accosted outside Commons toilet by gender critical activists

Lawyer Robin Moira White was attending a meeting of the women and equalities committee in Westminster last week when the incident took place. White, 61, told The Times that she had a health condition and so staff were instructed to allow her swift access to facilities. She was shown to the closest ones near the Thatcher Room, where the committee had met in Portcullis House. READ MORE: For Women Scotland mull new legal action against Scottish Government White said that Kate Harris, of LGB Alliance, and Heather Binning, Women's Rights Network, began 'shouting' at her and started to cross-examine her on her intentions. Harris has denied shouting at White. The Commons issued an apology following the confrontation, and said White should not have been directed to use the female facilities. The committee was hearing evidence from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) chair Baroness Kishwer Falkner, on the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on gender. White, who specialises in discrimination cases at Old Square Chambers, said: 'I have some health challenges and the [parliamentary] staff had kindly sat me at the back of the committee room, right by the door, so that I could pop along the corridor [to the ladies' loo], which I had to do once earlier. 'We got to the end of the select committee and they directed me [again] to the facilities I used.' The barrister said she then saw Harris and Binning, adding: 'They rather rudely started to cross-examine me about what my intentions were, and what I was going to do. 'I had to go [to use the lavatory] so went to use the facilities and they continued shouting [while I was inside].' Harris disputed White's account of the incident, but told The Times she and Binning were informing women in cubicles that there was a 'biological male' using the facilities and asked for security to intervene. 'There was certainly no shouting and no questioning of what [White] might be about to do in the loo,' Harris said. She then claimed Commons staff told her 'we don't do that here', referring to excluding trans women from female toilets. READ MORE: UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Keir Starmer refuses to rule out defending Israel Following the Supreme Court judgment, the Commons refused to ban trans women from female restrooms until official guidance was released. The interim EHRC guidance banned trans people from using the bathroom of their acquired gender. The Scottish Parliament barred trans women from using female toilets in May. A senior staff member in the Commons apologised to Harris and Binning following the incident. They said in an email: 'You noted that an individual, understood to be biologically male, had seemingly been directed to the female facilities … At this point you made it clear that you were uncomfortable, left the facilities, and reported the matter to members of my team. 'We acknowledge that it is likely the individual you complained about should have not been directed to the female facilities and we apologise for that.' They also directed the two women to the parliament's code of conduct which provides 'clear guidelines as to how we expect all users of the parliamentary [estate] to interact with each other'. The House of Commons said: 'We continue to act in full compliance with the law as set out in the Supreme Court's judgment and we remain committed to treating all those who work in or visit parliament with respect, providing support to colleagues where needed. 'Like many organisations, we are awaiting full guidance from the EHRC on this issue and are reviewing the facilities that are available on the estate.'

For Women Scotland mull new legal action against Scottish Government
For Women Scotland mull new legal action against Scottish Government

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

For Women Scotland mull new legal action against Scottish Government

The anti-trans campaign group who took the case over the meaning of biological sex to the UK's highest court, and won, has now claimed the key motivation of the case has been lost amongst a growing debate on toilets. The Supreme Court ruled that under the Equality Act 2010, a woman was defined by biological sex, excluding trans people with a gender recognition certificate (GRC). Following the judgment in April, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance that banned transgender people from using the toilets of their acquired sex. READ MORE: Ian Murray 'does not understand how devolution works', minister says The contentious guidance was branded as 'cruel', and now a consultation, which has been extended, is now underway before full guidance is published. The fallout from the ruling also saw trans women banned from taking part in women's football and cricket. Speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh this weekend, For Women Scotland (FWS) co-director Susan Smith claimed there has been 'extraordinary pushback' following the judgment. 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider,' she told journalists afterward. Smith (below, left) said there were concerns about the lack of action by the Scottish Government on prisons and school guidance. 'We have spoken to the Scottish government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action,' she said. 'They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' The EHRC guidance said that it is 'compulsory' for workplaces to offer single-sex toilets and changing facilities. It said that trans women should not be allowed to use women's facilities and trans men should not be allowed to use men's facilities as 'this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities and must be open to all users of the opposite sex'. The guidance then went on to say that trans people 'should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use'. ​READ MORE: UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Keir Starmer refuses to rule out defending Israel Smith claimed there has been too much focus on the issue of toilets. 'I wish we could stop talking about toilets all the time, because that wasn't really the reason we went to court,' she said. 'We went to court about the prisons, about the rape crisis centres, about the hospitals, where people are uniquely vulnerable.' It comes after Harry Potter author JK Rowling, who donated to FWS crowdfunder to take their case to the Supreme Court, set up a fund to challenge public service providers and employers over the issue. 'We really need people to start challenging where they feel that organisations, local councils are not implementing the law,' Smith said. 'We're very fortunate to have the fighting fund that JK Rowling set up and that will make a massive difference because when people start to realise that there's a cost maybe they will start to apply the law.' Current Scottish Prison Service (SPS) guidance states trans women prisoners cannot be housed on the female estate if they have been convicted of serious offences. A spokesperson for SPS said: 'We have received the supreme court's judgment and are considering any potential impact it may have.' The Scottish Government said it has 'been clear that we accept the supreme court judgment'. 'As the judgment relates specifically to the guidance issued under the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards 2018 Act and stated that it was incorrect in relation to the definition referred to of 'woman' under the Equality Act, the guidance has now been removed and will be updated shortly to reflect the judgment,' a spokesperson said. 'The Scottish Government has already begun work on implementation. We have established a Short Life Working Group to ensure support and consistency across Government.'

Americans don't see Supreme Court as politically neutral, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Americans don't see Supreme Court as politically neutral, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

Americans don't see Supreme Court as politically neutral, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

WASHINGTON, June 15 (Reuters) - Americans are divided on major issues that the U.S. Supreme Court is due to rule on in the coming weeks, but most agree on one thing - neither Republicans nor Democrats see the nation's top judicial body as politically neutral, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. Just 20% of respondents to the poll agreed that the Supreme Court is politically neutral while 58% disagreed and the rest either said they did not know or did not respond. Among people who described themselves as Democrats, only 10% agreed it was politically neutral and 74% disagreed, while among Republicans 29% agreed and 54% disagreed. The two-day poll, which closed on Thursday, was based on responses from 1,136 U.S. adults. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. The court has issued major rulings in recent years including in cases rolling back abortion rights, expanding gun rights, recognizing presidential immunity from prosecution for official acts, rejecting race-conscious collegiate admissions and curbing the power of federal agencies. Its 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Republican President Donald Trump in his first term in office. In the Reuters/Ipsos poll, 44% of respondents expressed a favorable view of the court, including 67% of Republicans and 26% of Democrats. The Supreme Court's popularity has declined since its June 2022 decision to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that had legalized abortion nationwide. Some 57% of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted at the end of 2021 expressed a favorable opinion of the court. By the end of June 2022, that figure had fallen to 43%. The justices are expected to issue rulings in major cases in the coming weeks as they near the end of their current term that began in October. Among these cases are one on the legality of Tennessee's Republican-backed law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors and one involving Trump's executive order restricting automatic birthright citizenship, part of his hardline approach to immigration. Some 53% of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they supported "laws that prevent transgender children under the age of 18 from getting medical treatment related to gender identity and gender transitioning." Another 28% opposed such laws and the rest were unsure or did not answer the question. Among Republicans, support for such laws was at 57% and opposition at 28%, while among Democrats support was at 23% and opposition at 54%. The Tennessee law prohibits medical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormones for transgender minors. During December 4 arguments in the case, the court's conservative justices signaled their willingness to uphold the law. The eventual ruling could affect other state laws targeting transgender people. After Trump signed his birthright citizenship directive in January, 22 states as well as immigrant rights advocates and pregnant immigrants sued, arguing that it was a violation of citizenship language in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. In the Reuters/Ipsos poll, only 24% of all respondents supported ending birthright citizenship and 52% opposed it. Among Democrats, 5% supported ending it, with 84% opposed. Among Republicans, 43% supported ending it, with 24% opposed. The rest said they were unsure or did not respond to the question. The court also by the end of this month is expected to issue a ruling on the legality of a Texas law that requires people to verify the age online before accessing pornographic websites. The Reuters/Ipsos poll found strong support for such laws. Among all respondents, 70% were in support and 14% opposed. Among Democrats, 65% supported and 18% opposed, while among Republicans 80% supported and 7% opposed. During January 15 arguments in the case, the justices seemed to agree that states can try to keep adult material from minors but also voiced concern over burdens imposed on adults to view constitutionally protected material.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store