Hostile foreign powers could dim the SUN and weaponise weather to attack the West, UK fears
According to a ministerial letter, whose details were reported by the Telegraph, the Government is looking to understand the risks and implications of an 'independent or third party actor' using advanced technology to reflect light away from specific parts of the planet.
While this technology is being developed with the aim of drastically reducing global warming in a last ditch effort, experts fear hostile nations like Russia could use solar engineering to put their enemies into an environmental disaster.
Kerry McCarthy, the UK's climate minister, wrote in the letter: 'The UK is a longstanding leader on climate action and an active international collaborator in scientific research.
'The Government recognises the need to understand the risks and impacts of [solar radiation modification] approaches that could be deployed by an independent or third-party actor.
'Robust scientific evidence is essential for informing responsible and inclusive governance.'
Most, though not all, methods of solar radiation modification involve shooting reflective aerosols into the atmosphere.
Reflective particles then bounce the sun's light out of the atmosphere, before it has a chance to get trapped and heat it up.
Though these technologies are being developed for climate adjusting purposes, Matt Ince, the associate director at Dragonfly Intelligence, told the Telegraph that rogue nations could use them to create 'novel' problems for their enemies.
He said: 'In a context where we've had, for example, Russia increasingly expanding its use of hybrid warfare activities, it's possible – not immediately, but down the line – that they may look to broaden and diversify the types of activities that they're conducting, to include more novel types of activity of which solar geoengineering may be one.
'Not least because of its relative affordability and the feasibility of conducting it, but also because it would allow a relative degree of plausible deniability.
'We've seen migration patterns being intentionally influenced by the Russian state as a way of trying to push more pressure on to European countries.'
But other experts were less certain that states would use the technology for nefarious purposes.
Lt Gen Richard Nugee, an MoD expert on climate change and sustainability, said: 'No country has yet tried to weaponise the technology, quite possibly for a couple of reasons.
'It is seen to be very expensive for no defined and guaranteed output, and also it is not possible to predict the outcome – there are too many variables.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
New pics of Trump holding court in Oval Office branded ‘embarrassing' as world leaders sit around his desk: ‘Like schoolchildren'
New pictures showing Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office in front of major world leaders has been criticized as an "embarrassing" power play by the president, in what should have been a display of global unity. Some on social media noted that the set up, with Trump behind the Resolute Desk and his European counterparts on chairs opposite him, presented the president as hosting a bunch of 'unruly schoolchildren.' The president was joined for the photo-op by leaders including British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer, French president Emmanual Macron, German Chancellor Freidrich Merz, Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish president Alexander Stubb. Also in attendance were European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. Another photo showed a smiling Trump posing with a new golf club, gifted to him by Zelensky. However, the meeting of the circled leaders drew the ire of social media users, with some commenting that the staging and White House mantra of of 'peace through strength' was 'deeply disrespectful to U.S. history itself.' 'Permenant peace is never truly obtained through strength. It may hold for a while under pressure, but it won't last,' wrote one user. 'What a breathtakingly rude, narcissistic asshole,' another said. 'Instead of a conference table where everyone can meet equally, Chump lined them up like unruly school children in a row with himself as the authority figure. Chump can just f*** all the way off.' Others questioned how the leaders, who came to Washington D.C. as 'equals' had allowed such a belittling set up. 'Embarrassing,' wrote one user, with another going further, writing 'I cannot believe they let Trump seat them like a bunch of schoolchildren. 'Do none of these 'leaders' have any testosterone whatsoever or PR teams that can approve/reject seating arrangements. Most embarrassing thing I've ever seen for the EU.'
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Lithuania plans 30-mile ‘Baltic defence line' against Russian invasion
Lithuania has outlined its plan for a 30-mile-deep ribbon of defences along its borders with Russia and Belarus, including minefields and bridges primed for demolition in the event of an invasion. Alongside Poland, the three Baltic states have begun fortifying their frontiers to deter the Kremlin from considering an attack, supplementing existing metal fences with obstacles and redoubts partially inspired by techniques that the Ukrainians have used to fend off Russian assaults. When it is complete, the 'Baltic defence line' will stretch across large sections of the land perimeter of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, from the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad in the west to the mouth of the River Narva in the east. Although critics sometimes disparagingly liken the project to the ill-fated Maginot Line that France laid down along its border with Germany before the Second World War, local commanders and military analysts say the analogy is misplaced. The intent is not to establish a single physical barrier to stop an invasion but rather to slow down any land-based attack and to 'canalise' the enemy force into areas where it is easier to resist. The Baltic states announced the scheme in January last year, and work started on the first ditches, bunkers and embankments a few months after that. Last summer, Lithuania began setting up 27 'engineering parks' with stores of 'counter-mobility' tools such as razor wire, concrete roadblocks and antitank barriers nicknamed 'hedgehogs' (caltrop-like assemblies of crossed metal beams) and 'dragon's teeth' (concrete pyramids). • Edward Lucas: The six Baltic states that could decide the future of Europe However, an update from the Lithuanian defence ministry has sketched out a more ambitious series of layered fortifications that will stretch far enough inland to cover Vilnius, the capital, which is 20 miles from the Belarusian border. It will take the form of three 'echelons'. The first of these, roughly three miles in depth, will start with an anti-tank ditch next to the border fence, followed by an embankment, strips of dragon's teeth and minefields, and then two layers of strongpoints for defending infantry. Dovile Sakaliene, the defence minister, has previously indicated that it is likely to include anti-personnel mines after Lithuania and several other Nato members on the eastern flank withdrew from the Ottawa convention, which prohibits the weapons. Further back, in the second and third echelons, bridges will be prepared for demolition, and there will be further lines of infantry positions. There is also a plan to fell trees along the roads leading to towns and cities, presumably to make it easier to destroy any invading Russian armour. At the same time, Lithuania said it had placed a €10 million order for anti-tank mines, on top of previous deals to buy 85,000 of the mines for a total of €50 million. It has also replenished its stock of 155mm artillery shells, ordered 44 state-of-the-art Leopard 2A8 battle tanks from Germany, and taken delivery of €6 million worth of Israeli-made Spike LR2 anti-tank missiles. Last month, Sakaliene suggested that she would be prepared to ask Nato's international air-policing mission in the Baltic states to destroy drones that encroach on her country's airspace from Belarus after at least two such incidents in the preceding weeks. Lithuania can field about 23,000 professional soldiers and a further 104,000 reservists. It is modernising its equipment with a defence budget that has risen to 5.5 per cent of national GDP, one of the highest levels in Nato. Germany is also upgrading its multinational Nato battlegroup stationed at Rukla, about 40 miles northwest of Vilnius, to a full 5,000-strong armoured brigade. However, war games conducted last year suggested that these forces might struggle to hold their own against a large-scale Russian invasion until the rest of Nato could deliver meaningful reinforcements, particularly if Russia were to seize the Suwalki gap, a section of the Lithuanian-Polish border that is the alliance's only land bridge to the Baltic states. This means that the ability to slow and 'shape' any Russian offensive through the defence line could be decisive in buying more time. Poland and the Baltic states are seeking European Union funding for these projects, arguing that they will serve to protect the entire bloc.
