Primary care is in crisis — and Rhode Island can't delay addressing it any longer
Primary care providers are being asked to do more than ever before: manage complex chronic conditions, integrate behavioral health services, address social needs, and navigate fragmented systems. But they're doing it with fewer staff, declining reimbursement, and an unsustainable administrative load — particularly prior authorization and denials that delay or block needed care.
Get Rhode Island News Alerts
Sign up to get breaking news and interesting stories from Rhode Island in your inbox each weekday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
There are efforts underway. The Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner has taken meaningful steps to highlight the value of primary care. Governor Dan McKee and the Executive Office of Health and Human Services have included targeted investments in the state budget.
Advertisement
We can't fix this overnight, but we can take meaningful steps now. Increasing Medicaid rates, removing prior authorization barriers, and creating a safe harbor for physicians seeking mental health support won't solve everything, but they will keep more doors from closing while we work toward a better system.
House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi and Senate President Valarie Lawson have both said that fixing health care is a top priority. Now we need to see that commitment reflected in action. Legislative and budget decisions made in the coming weeks will determine whether we're managing decline, or rebuilding the foundation we know we can't do without.
This isn't just about physicians. It's about every Rhode Islander who has been told to wait six months for an appointment. It's about children overdue for physicals and older adults unable to refill a prescription. The erosion of primary care affects all of us — regardless of income, ZIP code, or insurance status.
Rhode Island has the tools and talent to lead the nation in building a stronger, more equitable primary care system — one that respects clinicians, pays for what matters, and removes the bureaucratic roadblocks between patients and care. But we have to choose to act — and that time is now.
The real fix will take time, funding, and the political will to follow through. But the longer we wait, the harder it will be to rebuild. If we don't act, we won't just lose practices — we'll lose the foundation of health care in Rhode Island.
Advertisement
Dr. Peter Hollmann is a board member of the Rhode Island Medical Society.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Financially strained Brockton Hospital and its parent cut 80 jobs and service lines
Signature said its financial pains are tied not only to the massive fire that shut down Brockton Hospital for more than a year, but also to inadequate Medicaid and Medicare payments that 'have not kept pace with the rising cost of care delivery.' Nearly 80% of Signature's revenue is tied to the federal insurance programs for low-income or disabled adults and for those over 65. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The health care organization, which also owns a physician group, posted a $42 million operating loss in the first half of fiscal year 2025, according to the most recent state data. Brockton Hospital alone lost more than $34 million during that time. Advertisement 'These were extremely difficult decisions that were not made lightly,' Robert Haffey, president and CEO of Signature Healthcare, said in a statement. 'We are deeply grateful for the hard work and commitment of every member of our team.' Advertisement Haffrey's statement said the moves 'are necessary to ensure that we can continue delivering safe, high-quality, and compassionate care to the communities we serve.' Layoffs and unfilled job openings account for the workforce cuts, which did not include bedside positions, Signature vice president of marketing and development Beth MacNeill said. The cuts instead were directed at leadership and administrative positions. Signature will end its bariatric surgery services — a weight-loss procedure — in part because of the MacNeill said that, while Signature is monitoring the looming Medicaid cuts, which could cost Massachusetts providers $3.5 billion, they did not affect the decision to make these recent changes. 'We've been here almost 130 years and our goal is to be here for the long run,' MacNeill said. 'We recognize after the fire how much our community needs us and we need to make sure we're here for them.' Marin Wolf can be reached at
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Why AI therapy might be inevitable (and that's not necessarily bad)
Artificial intelligence therapy is here. For now, it still probably strikes most people as a little weird to talk to a chatbot about your most private fears or let an algorithm offer comfort when you're in pain. But strangeness fades quickly in the face of convenience and affordability. One reason that AI therapy might be attractive is a service-sector phenomenon called 'cost disease.' Cost disease is shorthand for a dynamic first described by economist William Baumol. Some industries, like manufacturing, can achieve dramatic gains in productivity over time. The same number of workers can make more widgets faster and cheaper thanks to automation, technology and process improvement. But in labor-intensive fields like health care, education or the performing arts, productivity growth is limited. Mental health care is squarely in this category. Most treatments require a trained person to spend time with a patient. Over time, wages in the broader economy rise with productivity gains elsewhere, so therapists' salaries rise, too. But without corresponding efficiency gains, the cost of providing therapy goes up. HIcks: AI won't steal your job. It will make human tasks more valuable. That's the cost disease: the gap between what it costs to provide the service and what you get for those costs keeps widening. That's why simply 'expanding access' to traditional therapy in a cost-challenged fiscal environment cannot work by itself. AI therapy, at least in theory, sidesteps this dynamic. A chatbot or AI-driven tool can be replicated infinitely at a near-zero marginal cost, making it dramatically cheaper to provide support at scale. That doesn't mean it's a replacement for human care, but it does explain why, in a cost-diseased world, the idea has such appeal. Our beliefs about what therapy is will shape how we see and use AI. Here are four different lenses: No single model is right, but each suggests different possibilities and limits for AI therapy. If you see therapy as either a path to self-optimization or a way to manage symptoms, AI could fit neatly into that role. It is available 24/7, infinitely patient, low-cost and able to monitor progress, reinforce skills, and provide guidance between human-led sessions. But if you see therapy as deep healing or social connection, AI is at best an adjunct. It can mimic empathy, but it cannot share the lived mutuality of a human relationship. Jay Chaudhary: Indiana prides itself on work. What happens when AI takes our jobs? | Opinion The reality of cost disease means we will keep feeling pressure to find cheaper options for care. In Indiana, rapidly rising Medicaid costs have led state officials to explicitly float using technology, including AI, to help bridge the state's mental health gap. We should encourage such exploration while also remembering that cost isn't the only variable that matters. The unsatisfying truth is that we will need to let AI therapy play out instead of making snap judgments, like Illinois' preemptive ban. AI therapy may turn out to be a breakthrough, a disappointment, or something in between. As we are deciding if and where it fits into the broader mental health space, we should be honest about the trade-offs, and about which mental models we're using when we call something 'therapy.'
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Judge orders RFK Jr's HHS to stop sharing Medicaid data with immigration officials
Print Close By Landon Mion Published August 15, 2025 A federal judge ordered the Department of Health and Human Services to stop providing access to Medicaid enrollees' personal data, including their home addresses, to immigration officials. District Judge Vince Chhabria, an Obama appointee, granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Department of Homeland Security from using Medicaid data obtained from 20 states that filed a lawsuit to stop the data sharing. The order, handed down Tuesday, blocks HHS from sharing data on Medicaid enrollees in these states with Immigration and Customs Enforcement for the purpose of targeting migrants for deportation. "Using CMS data for immigration enforcement threatens to significantly disrupt the operation of Medicaid—a program that Congress has deemed critical for the provision of health coverage to the nation's most vulnerable residents," Chhabria wrote. CALIFORNIA SUES TRUMP ADMIN AGAIN, THIS TIME OVER MEDICAID DATA TRANSFER TO DHS The judge wrote that while there is nothing "categorically unlawful" about DHS collecting data from other agencies for immigration enforcement purposes, ICE has had a policy against using Medicaid data for that reason for 12 years. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has also long maintained a policy of using patients' personal information only to run its healthcare programs. "Given these policies, and given that the various players in the Medicaid system have relied on them, it was incumbent upon the agencies to carry out a reasoned decision-making process before changing them," Chhabria wrote, adding: "The record in this case strongly suggests that no such process occurred." Chhabria said the preliminary injunction will remain in effect until HHS provides "reasoned decision-making" for its new policy of sharing data with immigration officials or until litigation concludes. The disclosure of Medicaid data is part of the Trump administration's broader effort to give DHS more data to help locate migrants and carry out the president's mass deportation plan. In May, a federal judge refused to block the Internal Revenue Service from sharing immigrants' tax data with ICE officials. BIDEN-APPOINTED JUDGE HALTS TRUMP HHS OVERHAUL AFTER DEMOCRAT-LED LAWSUIT "The Trump Administration's move to use Medicaid data for immigration enforcement upended longstanding policy protections without notice or consideration for the consequences," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement. "As the President continues to overstep his authority in his inhumane anti-immigrant crusade, this is a clear reminder that he remains bound by the law." HHS first provided the personal information of millions of Medicaid enrollees in June, prompting a lawsuit from the 20 states to block the new policy. In July, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services entered into a new agreement that allowed DHS to have daily access to the personal data of the country's 79 million Medicaid enrollees, including their Social Security numbers and home address. Neither agreement was announced publicly. HHS has insisted that its agreement with DHS is legal. Medicaid officials had attempted to block the data transfer, but they were overruled by top advisers to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Immigrants – both legal and illegal – are not authorized to enroll in the Medicaid program, which offers nearly free coverage for health services. However, under federal law, all states must offer emergency Medicaid, a temporary coverage that only covers lifesaving services in emergency rooms to anyone, including people who are not U.S. citizens. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "Protecting people's private health information is vitally important," Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement. "And everyone should be able to seek medical care without fear of what the federal government may do with that information." The sharing of Medicaid enrollees' personal data could cause concern among people seeking emergency medical help for themselves or their children, immigration advocates have warned. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Print Close URL
