
Change to legislation on commission of investigation may be required
The Higher Education Minister described commissions of investigation as vehicles for producing 'very long reports'.
He also said the report which emerged from the Farrelly Commission was one of 'questionable usefulness', as it contained no executive summary, recommendations nor action plan.
The Farrelly Commission was set up in 2017 to examine the case of a woman, given the pseudonym Grace, who has profound intellectual disabilities and has been in state care all of her life.
Politicians and child protection experts expressed shock that the 2,000-page report, which took eight years and is expected to cost up to 20 million euro, did not come to more concrete conclusions.
Commissions of investigation are independent statutory inquiries, empowered to investigate matters of significant public concern.
Set up under the Commissions of Investigation Act 2004, it allows the Government to investigate matters of public concern.
Proceedings generally take place in private and were designed to be quicker and a more cost-effective than tribunals of inquiry, used by previous governments.
However, some have taken years and have been costly to the public purse.
Mr Lawless said that a commission of inquiry does not appear to be a quicker method to investigate matters.
Referring to the Grace report, he said: 'We have an historical incident or historical wrong that takes seven years to come to light, seven more years to actually investigate it, and then we get a report which is of questionable usefulness in this case. No executive summary, no recommendations, no particular action plan.
'They're not necessarily vehicles for finding facts. They're vehicles for producing very long reports.'
He said that the previous Oireachtas inquiries were 'reasonably good' but went a little bit astray and honed in on the wrongs.
'I think we can get a better model of that,' he told RTE's The Week In Politics show.
Asked if it required changing the legislation on the commission of investigation, he said: 'That may be required.'
Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon said that justice was not delivered in the Grace report.
Last week, legal representatives for Grace said that submissions made on her behalf were not included in the final report.
The statement was issued in the public interest and in the interest of Grace herself, they said in a statement.
In an unprecedented move, the general solicitor for minors and wards of court, which is responsible for Grace's personal and legal affairs, issued a statement to say that submissions made on behalf of Grace were not 'included nor referred to in any way in the report'.
Mr Gannon said there remains a 'job of work' to do following the report and the statement from her legal representatives.
'I don't think we can go back to a tribunal. They take too long,' he added.
'I also appreciate neither the tribunal nor the commission of inquiries have served as well to this point. I think we need to see adult safeguarding legislation being brought through to ensure that this situation, the horrible situation that happened to Grace, cannot be repeated.
'But then beyond that, we do need to understand how we get to the facts quicker and be able to deliver justice in a way that is satisfactory to victims.'
Mr Gannon also said that garda powers need to be strengthened, which was supported by Mr Lawless.
Sinn Fein TD Donna McGettigan said the report was 'shocking' and failed Grace in 'every way, shape or form'.
'It took eight years, 2,000 pages and 14 million to complete this, and there's still no answers here,' she said.
'There's serious questions hanging over why Grace was removed from the house and then put back into that deprivation, and nothing was done. It took a whistleblower to come back in, to get her back out of there. But the fact that there was substantial and extensive submissions made, and they were never referred to in this case.
'At the end of the day, we have 2,000 pages, 14 million and no answers, and the state has really failed Grace in this and many other people. Because there was more children involved in this, and nothing has been done about it.
'We need to find a better system, but we need to have accountability at the end of it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Rogue Labor MP reveals why Albo is 'seriously an idiot' after a stunning move that benefits absolutely nobody: PVO
Keep your friends close... Josh Frydenberg's former spinner Kane Silom has been appointed director of communications for the much-diminished federal opposition.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
State Pension's future under review amid retirement shake-up
The State Pension is facing a dramatic overhaul under a Government shake-up of retirement rules. The changes could see millions of future retirees having to wait longer to claim and receiving different levels of payment. Ministers have launched a wide-ranging review of the entire pension framework – looking at when people should be entitled to receive the state pension, how much they should get, and whether the current system is financially sustainable for the long term. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed that the second phase of its Pensions Review will examine 'the balance of all three pillars of the UK system – state, occupational and personal wealth'. It is expected to ask fundamental questions about how these components should work together to ensure a financially secure retirement for everyone. Full details and the panel leading the review are yet to be published. The review comes at a time of growing concern that the triple-lock guarantee – which ensures the state pension rises every year in line with wages, inflation or 2.5%, whichever is highest – is pushing up pension payments at an unsustainable rate. Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, said: 'Pensions minister Torsten Bell recently ruled out scrapping the triple-lock guarantee, but as the state pension grows ever closer to the frozen personal allowance threshold it could be that the Government is finally forced to address the question of how much the state pension should really offer, at what age, and how it can increase payments sustainably each year.' The announcement comes hot on the heels of a new Pension Schemes Bill, which lays the groundwork for major changes, including the creation of massive collective investment funds – dubbed 'megafunds' – to deliver better returns for savers. Ms Vahey said the review could be the most significant shake-up since the Turner Review 20 years ago, which brought in automatic workplace pension enrolment and transformed saving habits in the UK. 'It's now 20 years since the Turner Review was published,' she said. 'That comprehensive look at the UK's retirement system ushered in a new regime for pensions, resulting in the introduction of landmark automatic enrolment reforms which changed pension saving in the UK forever.' Those reforms have seen more than 11 million people newly enrolled in workplace pensions since 2012, bringing the total number of active savers to around 20 million. But experts warn that while the number of savers has surged, many still aren't putting enough aside for a comfortable retirement. Ms Vahey said: 'Not enough people are saving enough money for their later life, and although automatic enrolment has gone a long way to create millions of new pension savers, instead of resting on our laurels we now need to take a good look at whether they are saving a sufficient amount of money to realise their retirement ambitions.' The review is also expected to probe the interaction between the state pension and private savings – including personal assets – raising questions about whether those with higher wealth might ultimately be expected to rely less on the state. Ms Vahey added: 'While details of this new Pension Review are thin on the ground at this stage, it has the potential to be as significant and could have far-reaching implications for people saving for their retirement.' Campaigners are urging the Government to set out full terms of the review as soon as possible to give millions of savers clarity on what's coming. Ms Vahey said: 'The Government now needs to clearly set out the terms of this review as soon as possible to give savers and the industry certainty over its plans.'


Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
Thousands of people have gathered to 'send a message' to the Government with a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform. Campaign group The People's Assembly said it expected trade unionists, campaigners and activists to attend the event in central London on Saturday. MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'