logo
Primark unveils new mannequins to represent wheelchair users

Primark unveils new mannequins to represent wheelchair users

The retailer has unveiled its first seated mannequin designed to represent a manual wheelchair user.
Named 'Sophie', the mannequin was inspired by and co-created with British TV presenter, disability advocate and wheelchair user, Sophie Morgan.
It will initially launch in 22 flagship stores across nine countries, including UK stores like Oxford Street East, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, and Leeds.
A post shared by Primark (@primark)
'Sophie' will take centre stage in displays showcasing Primark's Adaptive range, which is a fashion collection designed specifically for those with disabilities, alongside its main fashion ranges.
Ann-Marie Cregan, trading director at Primark, said: 'This is another important milestone in our ambition to make Primark a more accessible place to shop and work.
"From introducing a wider range of mannequins to launching our Adaptive clothing range earlier this year, we've worked hard to better represent the diverse communities who shop with us.
"Seeing the 'Sophie' mannequin in our stores is a proud moment and a reflection of the brilliant collaboration between our teams and Sophie.'
Sophie Morgan, co-creator of the mannequin, said: 'This project is incredibly close to my heart - it's been over 15 years in the making.
Sophie Morgan with the new Primark mannequin (Image: Primark)
"To now walk into a major high street retailer like Primark and see a mannequin that looks like me is deeply emotional.
"'Sophie' represents more than just a mannequin, she's a symbol of progress and visibility."
Primark is actually an Irish brand that was founded in the country in 1969 under the Penneys brand, the retailer's website explains.
Recommended reading:
Tesco, Sainsbury's, Morrisons, Asda prices set to increase by 33%, experts warn
Aldi marks UK first as it raises hourly pay to at least £13 for shop workers
American shopper 'sent into coma' after discovering 'scary' British supermarkets
It adds: "Primark is an international fashion retailer employing more than 80,000 colleagues across 17 countries in Europe and the US."
The website continues: "With a focus on creating great retail experiences, Primark has 460 stores globally and continues to expand."
Primark's first UK store opened in Derby back in 1974, where it is the brand's largest market with more than 190 shops.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters
Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters

New Statesman​

time23 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters

Photo byThe French prime minister François Bayrou said it was a 'dark day' for Europe. Under the trade deal that Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced in Scotland on 26 July, the US would impose a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports, but the European Union would not increase tariffs on American imports in return. According to Bayrou, 'an alliance of free peoples' had 'resolved to submission'. It was definitely a climbdown for the EU. Ever since Trump was re-elected last year and threatened new tariffs on imports to the US, the European Commission had threatened counter-measures – just as it did during the first Trump administration, when it responded to US tariffs on European aluminium and steel with its own tariffs on American products like bourbon. In the end, though, the EU simply accepted the new US tariffs this time – and on top of that, promised to increase purchases of American liquified natural gas and weapons. To be clear, what was agreed in Scotland is a political or 'framework' deal and a lot of the important details have yet to be worked out. In particular, it is not yet clear whether pharmaceuticals – a hugely important sector for the EU and especially Germany – will be included or how much steel will be exempt from tariffs. Moreover, the promises that von der Leyen made to increase investment in the US have already turned out to be empty – there is no way the EU can buy $750bn of American oil and gas in the next few years and it cannot direct companies to invest in the United States. Nevertheless, in the few days since the deal was announced, it has widely been seen as a humiliating European capitulation to Trump. Many critics of deal – especially EU boosters who fantasise about the idea of 'strategic autonomy' or a 'geopolitical Europe' – seem to imagine that the EU could have followed an alternative approach and stood up to Trump. In reality, though, there was little alternative to what Bayrou called 'submission'. Critics of the deal think EU member states undermined von der Leyen and forced her to negotiate from a position of weakness. It is true that some member states, especially Germany and Italy, ultimately backed off from threats of retaliatory measures because they feared that a full-on transatlantic trade war would ultimately hit important sectors of their economies harder than they are now being hit by the new US tariffs. But the idea that the EU had leverage over the US that it had but did not use – and that if it had used it, it could have struck a much better deal – is wishful thinking. As the world's largest trading bloc, the EU has long thought of itself as an economic superpower and prided itself on its ability to negotiate trade deals – that, of course, was one of main arguments why the UK should remain within in the EU. This deal has somewhat undermined that self-image. After all, in May, the UK was able to negotiate a slightly better deal with the Trump administration, with a baseline tariff of 10 per cent. But what really makes the EU weak relative to the US is its vulnerability in security terms. The idea that the EU had leverage over the US that it did not use only makes sense if you think that economics and security are completely separate realms and that security issues are irrelevant to trade negotiations and cannot be linked. But deep down, despite all the tough talk and the threats of retaliation to Trump's tariffs, European politicians knew that taking such a confrontational approach could have consequences for US support for Ukraine – or even for Nato and the US security guarantee to Europe itself. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It's striking that this trade deal was being negotiated just as Trump seemed to be becoming increasingly frustrated with Vladimir Putin and more supportive of Ukraine. Earlier in July, Trump had reinstated supplies of US weapons to Ukraine – albeit paid for by Europeans – and threatened new economic sanctions against Russia if Putin did not make progress in negotiations within 50 days. (The day after the EU-US trade deal was announced, Trump said he was now giving Putin even less time.) As tentative as European leaders know Trump's shift on Ukraine is, they do not want to jeopardise it. EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič, who apparently spent hundreds of hours in frustrating negotiations with Trump administration officials, hinted at this in a briefing the morning after the announcement of the deal. He said he could not go into the details of everything that was discussed with Trump in Scotland, but 'it was not just about trade'. In the end, what has made the EU so dependent on the US, and made the EU's 'submission' inevitable, is the war in Ukraine – or, to be more precise, the way that, for the last two and half years since the Russian invasion in 2022, European leaders have insisted that their own security depends on a Ukrainian victory. Related

Political opinion: Poynton backs Heathrow expansion: 'Now is the time to face down the blockers'
Political opinion: Poynton backs Heathrow expansion: 'Now is the time to face down the blockers'

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Political opinion: Poynton backs Heathrow expansion: 'Now is the time to face down the blockers'

Scottish Labour MP Gregor Poynton has today backed plans for a third runway at Heathrow Airport, describing the project as a key test of the Labour Government's drive to deliver growth across the UK and tackle years of 'dither and delay'. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Writing in LabourList, the Livingston constituency MP says that unlocking Heathrow's potential will support Scottish exporters, including the country's world-leading whisky industry, and is part of Labour's wider strategy to get Britain building again. 'Expanding Heathrow not only represents this Government's ambition to remove barriers to new infrastructure. It will underpin Britain's international competitiveness, unlocking new trade routes, attracting investment, and enabling British businesses, including Scotland's world class scotch whisky industry, to trade around the world.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Poynton argues the project reflects a wider shift in Labour's approach to delivering for working people: 'Now is the time to face down the blockers, go further for growth, and deliver national prosperity for working people. It is why our Labour Government has greenlit and announced a multi-billion investment in Sizewell C in Suffolk, which will create 10,000 new jobs and apprenticeships, while the SNP Government has failed Scottish workers by refusing to back nuclear energy.' Gregor Poynton MP is backing the expansion of Heathrow. He adds: 'Labour is ending the cycle of dither and delay. We are getting Britain building. And we are determined to ensure people, businesses and communities across the country both see and feel the benefits of growth.' The Labour Government is expected to bring forward new legislation later this year to streamline planning and fast-track major infrastructure projects.

EU wine, spirits to face 15% US tariff from August 1, EU says
EU wine, spirits to face 15% US tariff from August 1, EU says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

EU wine, spirits to face 15% US tariff from August 1, EU says

BRUSSELS, July 31 (Reuters) - European wine and spirits will face a 15% U.S. import tariff until a different deal is agreed in talks expected to continue in the autumn, the European Commission and EU diplomats said on Thursday, dashing producers' hopes of an immediate reprieve. A framework trade deal between Brussels and Washington on Sunday agreed a 15% tariff for most EU imports into the United States, although some sectors were expected to be exempted. The U.S. tariff on European wine and spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms. "The Commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs including ... wine and spirits," Commission spokesperson for trade Olof Gill said. "It is not our expectation that wine and spirits will be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the U.S. tomorrow. And therefore that sector will be captured by the 15% ceiling," he said. Wine-makers said the tariff, even if temporary, would hurt the sector, especially when combined with the stronger euro. "The 15% duty on EU wines, even if applied for some months until the negotiations are closed, would cause significant economic losses not only for EU wine producers but also for U.S. businesses involved throughout the supply chain," said Ignacio Sanchez Recarte, secretary general of European wine producers group CEEV. "When combined with the currency shift in the dollar/euro exchange rate, the overall financial burden on the sector could reach 30%. Investments will be halted and export volumes will decline while waiting for the final agreement," he said. U.S. Distilled Spirits Council President and CEO Chris Swonger also urged a quick deal to bring tariffs down to zero. "It is extremely disappointing and utterly exasperating that the U.S. and EU have not yet come to an agreement on spirits, which is an easy win for the United States that will help secure our economic vitality during this challenging time for the hospitality industry," Swonger said. "It is critical for our great American distilleries, farmers and hospitality workers across the country that President Trump secure a permanent return to zero-for-zero tariffs on spirits with the European Union," he said in a statement. The U.S. is to publish an executive order on Friday, implementing the framework trade deal that was agreed on Sunday between U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Separately, the EU and the U.S. are to publish a joint statement spelling out the details of the framework deal. A senior diplomat said that talks on wine and spirits tariffs would continue after the joint statement. "(This will take place) probably in the autumn," the diplomat said. Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the U.S. and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan. That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to U.S. steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on U.S. bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021. U.S. MFN rates for wine are 19.8 cents per litre for sparkling and 6.3 cents per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store