logo
One year after the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, why isn't it full?

One year after the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, why isn't it full?

Yahoo03-05-2025

The Canadian oilpatch has a brand-new pipeline, something it's pleaded for year after year, and it offers a relatively quick route to the West Coast and overseas markets.
But a year in, the newly expanded Trans Mountain Pipeline still isn't running at full capacity — though the CEO of the Crown corporation says he doesn't think it's a problem.
The pipeline has downgraded its forecasts for the amount of oil expected to flow through the system over the next three years, according to Reuters.
That suggests some companies are unwilling to pay higher tolls, charged due to the project's costs ballooning higher than expected. The federal government initially purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5 billion, but development and construction increased to $34 billion.
During that time, oil companies were excited about the prospect of a major new export project, while also growing concerned about the rising costs, which they'd ultimately have to shoulder, in part through tolls paid to ship their oil.
The oil companies that signed contracts more than a decade ago to use the Trans Mountain pipeline are now battling with the Crown corporation over the hefty price of tolls. The Canada Energy Regulator will hold hearings this summer into the disagreement.
If the pipeline is too expensive to use, oil companies could look to other pipeline systems to export crude. However, if tolls are too low, that could impact the profitability of the Crown corporation and the eventual multibillion-dollar amount the federal government could collect by selling the entire Trans Mountain system.
CEO Mark Maki sees the capacity issue differently.
"It's more of a statement about how fast supply has increased in Western Canada," said Maki. "I think the producers historically have been burned by being caught short [by] pipeline capacity."
In March, the pipeline moved 790,000 barrels of oil per day, he said. And as supply creeps up, he said, it will run close to capacity around 2027 or 2028. Full capacity is 890,000 barrels per day.
Maki's comments come at a time when oil production continues to climb. Alberta set new records in the first three months of this year, according to the latest oil production data. Oil production in Alberta was around 4.19 million barrels per day in March, according to ATB Financial, up from 4.04 million barrels the same time last year.
Some analysts say despite its cost, the newly expanded pipeline — which ships oil from Edmonton to the coast of British Columbia — has already translated into benefits for the oil industry and the economy more broadly.
"In light of a much more challenging relationship with the United States, which is Canada's largest customer, having the optionality to go offshore is incredibly valuable," said Kevin Birn, an analyst at S&P Global. "It gives Canada leverage, which it has not had traditionally."
About half of the oil flowing through the Trans Mountain Pipeline is now being sent to Asia, Maki said, much of it to China along with Korea, Japan, India and Brunei.
Since the pipeline opened, the price differential between Canadian and U.S. crude oil has also narrowed, lately falling to under $10 a barrel, down from around $18 to $20 a barrel in the past decade. Canadian producers tend to fetch a cheaper price for their oil because it's heavier and harder to refine, but having access to more diverse markets has helped reduce the discount on Canadian oil.
"That's huge," said Trevor Tombe, economics professor at the University of Calgary.
For every dollar the differential shrinks, Tombe said, the Alberta government recoups about $740 million in revenue, which also translates to indirect economic benefits for the rest of Canada.
And while many have debated whether it was worth it for Ottawa to buy the pipeline, Tombe said one of the more important metrics is whether it will be used for another two decades.
If so, he said, then tolls can not only cover its costs, but can also help repay a lot of the debt used to build it in the first place.
"So financially as a project, it will continue to make sense," said Tombe, who said he believes the pipeline will be used even beyond 2040.
If a private operator buys the project, he said, they could also take on the debt. It's always been the government's plan to sell, though Maki said earlier this year that perhaps Ottawa should consider hanging onto it longer.
Maki said he believes the project needs time to develop a slightly longer operating history, and work out any kinks.
One Indigenous group that's expressed interest in purchasing a stake in the pipeline said it's still hoping to move forward.
"If the federal government's finally going to get around to putting this up for sale we would like to continue to have that conversation," said Stephen Mason, managing director of Project Reconciliation. "I don't give up."
Asked if Trans Mountain could ultimately become an arm of the government, tasked with building infrastructure projects that can't generate interest in the private sector, Maki said it's a possibility but "we've got to earn that right."
"I think there's a place for Trans Mountain, either as a public company or a company owned by Canadian pensions, Indigenous [groups] as owners in the system," he said.
"I'd love to see that as an outcome before I leave the building."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US regulators push through last-minute delay to new private fund reporting rules
US regulators push through last-minute delay to new private fund reporting rules

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US regulators push through last-minute delay to new private fund reporting rules

By Chris Prentice NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. regulators scrambled on Wednesday to extend a deadline for new data reporting requirements for investment advisers to private funds, just one day before they were due to take effect. The rules, adopted by two U.S. markets regulators in February 2024, will require advisers to disclose more information to regulators in a bid to boost the government's ability to spot risks from private markets that have swelled in size in recent years. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission extended the deadline for compliance to later this year in a 3-1 vote on Wednesday, less than 24 hours before firms had to comply. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission also voted in favor of an extension, marking the second time the regulators decided to push back the deadline after previously postponing it in January. "Additional time is required for dialogue with filers, review of the reasonableness of the data demands, and review of the actual utility of the information collected," SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said during Wednesday's open meeting. Private funds have pressed the SEC to review this rule, among others, and have warned the new requirements are unnecessary and costly. The firms now have until October 1, 2025 to comply. The new data, which includes disclosure of events pointing to significant stress within 72 hours, would be accessible to the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which gathers top financial regulators across the U.S. government to monitor systemic risks. Regulators have cautioned for years that growing private markets could pose increasing risks, particularly as they are more opaque and less vigorously regulated than traditional markets. Federal agencies have begun a push to loosen regulations as part of Republican President Donald Trump's agenda since he took office in late January. "The SEC and other regulators, including FSOC, depend on these detailed data to better comprehend when the private markets may be experiencing turbulence that could affect our entire financial system, because these entities generally operate outside our regulatory purview," said Caroline Crenshaw, the lone Democratic SEC commissioner.

Pentagon cancels procuring M10 Booker combat vehicles due to 'current world events'
Pentagon cancels procuring M10 Booker combat vehicles due to 'current world events'

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pentagon cancels procuring M10 Booker combat vehicles due to 'current world events'

(Reuters) -The Pentagon on Wednesday said it would cancel plans to procure M10 Booker combat vehicles that it had agreed to in a 2022 contract with General Dynamics Land Systems "in response to current world events." "The Army will request to reallocate the remaining funds in fiscal 2025 to accelerate fielding of war-winning capabilities and anticipates additional significant savings to be fully realized within the next 18-24 months," the Pentagon said in a statement.

Australia to work closely with US on review of Biden-era submarine pact
Australia to work closely with US on review of Biden-era submarine pact

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Australia to work closely with US on review of Biden-era submarine pact

By Kirsty Needham and Renju Jose SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday his government would work closely with the United States while President Donald Trump's administration conducts a formal review of the AUKUS defence pact. "It is natural the administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery," a spokesperson for Marles said in a statement. Australia in 2023 committed to spend A$368 billion ($239.3 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, Australia's biggest ever defence project with the United States and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss tariffs and a request from the United States for Australia to increase defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product. Albanese had previously said defence spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target, saying Australia would focus on capability needs. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia from 2032. Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS class submarine expected to come into service from 2040. Britain recently completed a review of AUKUS. It has not released the results publicly, but it announced plans this month to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet. Marles' spokesperson said AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defence industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was "primarily an audit of American capability" and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear powered submarines when it was not meeting its own production targets. "Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor," Lee said. ($1 = 1.5380 Australian dollars)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store