
Federal judge blocks Texas law requiring Ten Commandments displayed in public school classrooms
U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery issued a preliminary injunction in Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, ruling that Texas Senate Bill 10, set to take effect Sept. 1, likely violates both the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.
The lawsuit was originally filed in late June by several families after Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 10 into law. Parents argued the measure intruded on their rights to guide their children's religious education and forced religious mandates in public classrooms.
The ruling halts school districts from implementing the measure, which mandated a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom.
In his decision, Biery wrote that requiring the displays could amount to unconstitutional religious coercion, pressuring students into religious observance and suppressing their own beliefs.
"[T]he displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school," Biery stated.
The plaintiffs included Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious families with children in Texas public schools. They were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, and pro bono counsel from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.
Plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan called the decision a win for parents' rights: "Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools."
Heather L. Weaver, senior counsel for the ACLU's Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, said the ruling protects inclusivity in schools. "Public schools are not Sunday schools," Weaver said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court throws out Trump's $454 million civil fraud judgment
A New York appeals court has thrown out the half billion-dollar civil fraud judgment handed down last year against President Donald Trump, his family and his company. The Appellate Division's First Department upheld last year's ruling finding Trump, his eldest sons and his business liable for a decade's worth of business fraud. The appellate court, however, found the penalty of $454 million to be an excessive fine at odds with the Eighth Amendment. "The documentary evidence supports Supreme Court's conclusion that the Attorney General made a prima facie showing that each defendant participated in the fraudulent scheme," the opinion said. "The trial record is also replete with evidence supporting the court's determination that the individual defendants had the requisite intent to defraud, a necessary element of each Penal Law claim." MORE: Trump civil fraud case: Judge fines Trump $354 million, says frauds 'shock the conscience' However, said the opinion, "while harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award to the State." The decision allows either side to pursue an appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. "Today's ruling by the New York appeals court is a resounding victory for President Trump and his company," said Trump's former personal attorney Alina Habba, who helped represent Trump in the case and was later named interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey. "The court struck down the outrageous and unlawful $464 million penalty, confirming what we have said from the beginning: the Attorney General's case was politically motivated, legally baseless, and grossly excessive." After a three-month civil trial last year, New York Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump liable for committing a decade of business fraud by inflating his net worth to secure better business deals. In his written decision, Engoron said that Trump and his co-defendants engaged in frauds that "leap off the page and shock the conscience" including wrongly claiming that Trump's penthouse was three times its actual size and valuing his Mar-a-Lago estate as a personal residence, rather than a social club. "Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological. They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again," Engoron wrote, claiming that Trump and his co-defendants were "incapable of admitting the error of their ways." The former president has long criticized the case as politically motivated, including during an impromptu closing statement he delivered in court last year where he declared himself an "innocent man." "I've been persecuted by someone running for office," Trump said, referring to New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the case. "This statute is vicious. It doesn't give me a jury. It takes away my rights." In his February decision, Engoron temporarily barred Trump and his sons from leading New York-based companies and ordered Trump to pay a fine of more than $454 million. That number increased to around half a billion dollars based on interest accrued on the judgement. Trump has denied wrongdoing and argued that the alleged victims in the case were sophisticated counterparties who eagerly agreed to go into business with the Trump Organization and profited from the deals. Those arguments formed the crux of his appeal, filed in July, in which his lawyers argued that James violated the statute of limitations, misapplied the relevant law, and encouraged an exclusive penalty. MORE: Trump civil fraud case: Judge fines Trump $354 million, says frauds 'shock the conscience' During a hearing in September, several of the judges on the appellate panel appeared receptive to Trump's arguments seeking to reverse or reduce the his penalty, questioning the size of the massive judgment and the application of the fraud statute used to bring the case. Since Trump's reelection win in November, his lawyers have implored James to drop the case, citing the dismissal of Trump's federal criminal cases. Lawyers for James have rejected the request, arguing that Trump's return to the White House does not impact his civil cases. "The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution," New York Deputy Solicitor General Judith Vale wrote in a letter to Trump's lawyer. Trump owed more than $550 million between three civil judgments, including a $83.3 million judgment in damages for defaming former Elle magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll and a $5 million judgment awarded after a jury found he sexually abused Carol in the 1990s. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
N.J. police shooting of 68-year-old woman with disability sparks community outrage and is met with little details
New Brunswick and state officials are facing heated questions from residents and family members about transparency and accountability after a 68-year-old woman was shot and killed by police earlier this month. Deborah Terrell was killed by New Brunswick police on Aug. 8 when they responded to a 911 call that a resident was walking around with a knife. Terrell was known by community members to have a mental disability, and they're asking why weren't mental health providers sent to co-respond with the police. The Attorney General's office, which investigates all police-involved shootings, said the police officers first communicated with Terrell through the closed door. Then, she came into the hallway with a knife. Police then used pepper spray and a taser, and then one officer shot her. The Attorney General's office said the officers provided first aid and took her to a nearby hospital where she pronounced dead. However, bystander video shows how quickly the encounter happened and few chaotic seconds in which one of the officers trips and falls into the other cops. The video raised questions among some community members about whether this commotion, rather than Terrell's actions, prompted officers to pepper spray, tase, and shoot her. WARNING: This video includes scenes of fatal violence. 'You call the cops to help you out and then there's a problem,' said Linda McCalla, Terrell's sister. Community members packed New Brunswick city hall Thursday with signs and pictures, as they asked local officials during the public comment portion of the meeting to release more info. The New Jersey Attorney General's declined to give a recent update. Sources close to the investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the investigation was 'substantially completed' and that additional details and body camera footage would be released. Hours before the gathering, Assemblyman Joe Danielsen, D-Middlesex, released a statement on social media saying he was taken aback by the shooting. 'Like many, I was shocked to learn her life ended during a police-involved shooting in New Brunswick,' Danielsen said. 'Deborah Terrell was a lifelong resident of New Brunswick, a mother and a sister. I can't begin to imagine the pain Ms. Terrell's family and friends are feeling right now.' Residents had a right to answers, Danielsen said. 'I strongly believe the law and justice demand that the process be allowed to run its full course before we come to any conclusions,' he said. 'I also suggest that our community continue to demand answers using a thorough process and without unnecessary delays.' To better assist police officers who respond to mental health calls, New Jersey launched the ARRIVE Together program in 2021 and it has since been made available in more than 200 towns. The program pairs a crisis intervention trained officer with a crisis screener to provide on-scene assistance to those experiencing a mental health or behavioral health emergency. The program is meant to reduce the use of force in encounters between law enforcement and people with mental illness or substance use disorder. The Attorney General's office and city officials would not say whether or not a request for mental health professionals was put in, but a representative for the ARRIVE Together of Middlesex County did say the program responds in New Brunswick. Zayid Muhammad, an activist with New Jersey Communities for Accountable Policing asked why the program wasn't used in this instance. 'Why can't four professionally trained armed men detain a 120 pound 68-year-old woman without killing her? Why wasn't Attorney General [Matthew] Platkin's highly touted ARRIVE Together unit available, and why hasn't Middlesex County put in and made an effort to build out a community-led crisis response team after being designated a county able to develop such a pilot?' The meeting started with council members giving condolences for the killing. Those in attendance found little consolation in the words. Some constituents asked the council why police and mayoral leadership was absent from the room. 'I don't know,' replied city council president John Anderson. The exchange was one of many heated interactions with constituents that defined the night. The council meeting was switched from City Hall to a municipal court venue, where increased security and a metal detector was present, a detail that wasn't lost on residents as they criticized the council in unison. During the public meeting, some went inside and continued to protest outside, with some expressing anger at not being let in and given the chance to speak. Chants of 'ask them' echoed in the public meeting chambers when city council members mentioned the shooting was being investigated by the state. 'It's out of local hands,' said city council president John Anderson. Two council members, Petra Gaskins and Glenn Fleming, agreed to a resolution asking the Attorney General's office to release the videos and names of the police officers involved, but Anderson declined to take it up – even after other council members agreed to do so. The city attorney, T.K. Shamy, interrupted the attempt and asserted that the resolution could not compel the state to release evidence. Dupre McCalla, Terrell's nephew, said during the public comment session that he was distraught by the news of the shooting. 'My aunt, she had disabilities, but you can't spell the word disability without the word ability, and my aunt had great abilities,' he said. Minister Archange Antoine of the Clergy Coalition for Liberation called for the city to set up a fund to pay for the funeral expenses for the families of those killed by the police. Linda McCalla, Terrell's sister, said the city and the state's response left her and other family members in the dark. 'It's hard,' she said. 'It's just hard.' Jelani Gibson may be reached at jgibson@

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's Your Call for Aug. 21
Will never vote for the GOP again Donald Trump has effectively ruined the Republican Party. I'll never vote Republican again. Never win another election If the Democrats' only policy is to fight Trump on everything, you will never win another election. Thank you for that. Poor planning I just delivered a grandson to Mid-Buch school, a two-lane road that was full of traffic. So that's the day MoDOT decided to mow the road and blocked one lane. Somebody needs to wake up out there. Pot calling kettle black Governor Kehoe accuses the Democrats of gerrymandering. President Trump admits to gerrymandering so he can gain another seat in the house in the state of Texas. Rejecting reality It's time for Trump to admit that Russia invaded Ukraine, not that Ukraine invaded Russia, but then that should come right after he admits that he lost the election to Biden. His ability to reject reality is truly amazing. Taking notes from Putin Is it not comforting to hear that our fearless leader is taking advice on how to run elections from someone who has basically run corrupt rigged elections for years? Putin says mail in ballots are bad, his little puppet jumps to issue an executive order to ban them. Pretty sure they discussed elections more than they did the war in Ukraine while in Alaska.