
Govt planning rules could 'override the community'
New planning rules proposed by the Government could override community aspirations, says a Canterbury council boss.
Hurunui District Council chief executive Hamish Dobbie said he struggles to see how a proposal to stop councils defining rural-urban boundaries would work.
''If they override something in the planning document, they are not overriding the council - they are overriding the community," he said.
Resource Management Act Reform Minister Chris Bishop announced proposed changes last week which he said will stop councils from stalling housing developments.
''We have had decades of local councils trying to make housing someone else's problem, and we have a planning system that lets them get away with it,'' Bishop said at the time.
The Government proposal would stop councils from imposing rural-urban boundary lines in planning documents.
A Rural Urban Boundary identifies land suitable for urban development, and areas to be kept rural.
The proposal would give the Government the power remove provisions in council plans which impact on growth, and replacing development contributions with a development levy system, increased flexibility of targeted rates, and strengthening the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Act.
But Mr Dobbie said preparing a District Plan is ''a long and tortuous process'', as councils strive to find a balance between community aspirations, the need for growth, aspirations of developers and Government legislation.
He said rural-urban boundary lines allowed councils to ensure development occurred where there is council infrastructure.
Drawing rural-urban boundaries was integral to developing spatial plans, which identified areas for future housing growth and protected agricultural land.
The proposal appeared to go against the national direction of developing regional plans, which included spatial planning, to replace district plans, he said.
''I don't know how you can identify areas for housing and agriculture without drawing lines on a map,'' Mr Dobbie said.
''But I might be about to learn something.''
The clause allowing the Government to override District Plan provisions which impacted on growth would be open to interpretation, he said.
''Imagine somebody wanted to build a nuclear power plant or a whale slaughtering station.
''It might be something the community would not want, but the Government would have the power to override it.''
Environment Canterbury chairperson Craig Pauling said the council is considering the proposals and will be making a formal submission.
Parts of the region are facing significant population and demographic change, particularly Greater Christchurch, he said.
''We need to make sure we get the balance right, and we're actively safeguarding the environment, as well as social, and cultural values at the same time.''
Any decisions needed to consider the region's infrastructure capacity, housing availability, labour market, transport connectivity and natural hazards.
Public consultation on the Going for Housing Growth discussion document closes on August 17.
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Talk of axing regional councils 'unhelpful'
Environment Canterbury's chairperson says he's open to talking about the future of regional councils, but the current chatter is unhelpful. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Resources Minister Shane Jones have suggested regional councils could be abolished as part of the Resource Management Act (RMA) reforms. Speaking at Wednesday's (June 25) council meeting, Canterbury's regional council (ECan) chairperson Craig Pauling said the recent commentary was unhelpful. ''There has been some discussion over the last week on scrapping regional councils, and I don't think the conversation in the way it is happening is very helpful,'' Mr Pauling said. ''But it is a conversation which needs to happen and we have been doing it. ''We agree the current structure and funding is unsustainable, but it is not simple and it is just about scrapping regional councils and creating unitary authorities. ''As a regional council, our job is to strike a balance between environmental and economic considerations, along side our treaty partners.'' Mr Jones, a New Zealand First MP and Minister for Regional Development, repeated his warnings to Local Democracy Reporting this week that regional councils are on borrowed time. "Regional councils in my view have reached a very low ebb." With the abolition of the Resource Management Act, he said he believed regional councils did not have a future. 'Which is why after the next election there will be local government rationalisation and the very strong stance we're taking is that there is no longer a purpose for regional councils." With the RMA split into two new Acts, people working for Regional Councils would no doubt end up playing some kind of role in a reformed level of regional governance, the Minister said. The Prime Minister has said there were too many layers of government and the question would be considered as part of the RMA reform. There are 11 regional councils throughout New Zealand, which are tasked with managing natural resources such as land and water, supporting biodiversity, providing regional transport and building resilience to natural hazards and the effects of climate change. In some parts of the country these roles are taken on by unitary authorities, which combine the functions of a local and a regional council. Mr Pauling said debate around the role of regional councils is not new. The Canterbury Mayoral Forum, which represents local mayors, has been exploring what the future of local government could look like and ECan has a workshop planned for next month. Speaking to Local Democracy Reporting last month, Mr Pauling said he saw a future for separate district and regional councils. ''There needs to be a partnership between local, regional and central government and we (ECan) are good at bringing people together. ''If you are in Kaikōura, your main focus is Kaikōura, but at a regional level my focus is Canterbury.'' A single regional plan has been signalled as part of the RMA reform. ECan is already working on an integrated regional plan which would bring together seven regional plans, four river plans, the 10 District Plans and the various spatial plans developed by local councils. Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger has expressed support for establishing a unitary authority. However, North Canterbury mayors Dan Gordon (Waimakariri), Marie Black (Hurunui) and Craig Mackle (Kaikōura) have previously expressed support for Environment Canterbury continuing to have its regionwide functions. It is unclear how public transport and other Greater Christchurch issues would work, if the Christchurch City Council became a unitary authority. The future of local government was the subject of a review led by former Waimakariri District Council chief executive Jim Palmer and presented to Government in 2023. The panel proposed a greater role for regional councils. Local Government New Zealand has also been pushing for changes. By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Resource Management Act changes spark mixed reactions in Northland
RMA reforms are welcomed by farmers in Northland but could go further, they say. Photo / NZME As the Government seeks feedback on major changes to the Resource Management Act, Northland stakeholders are responding with cautious support, concerns over consultation and calls for deeper reform. The proposed updates to the act's national direction – the underlying rules and policies of the Resource Management Act (RMA) that inform


Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
War On Nature Targets National Parks
Forest & Bird is condemning a new Government plan to accept pests like deer and tahr in our national parks. The Game Animal (Herds of Special Interest) Amendment Bill passed its first reading in Parliament today, welcoming invasive pests into our national parks when designated as 'special'. 'This is a dangerous step towards turning our national parks into game parks, putting trophy hunting above protecting nature,' says Forest & Bird spokesperson Nicky Snoyink. 'Out-of-control populations of these pests are eating and trampling our native alpine plants and forest understories, preventing regeneration. 'Instead of clamping down on these pests, this Government is doing the opposite and opening up the jewels in our country's crown – our national parks – to permanent damage and destruction. 'National parks like Westland Tai Poutini, Aoraki Mount Cook, Mount Aspiring, and Fiordland are core to the Te Wāhipounamu UNESCO World Heritage Area, which means they are as important as the Egyptian pyramids. 'These iconic national parks contain rocks, native plants and wildlife which take us back 80 million years to a time when New Zealand was part of the ancient super continent Gondwana. New Zealand's obligation is to protect these values. 'Pests like deer and tahr wreck these world heritage values. The impacts of introduced pests on our native forests and alpine ecosystems are devastating, long lasting, and trash the ecosystem's ability to be an effective carbon sink. 'New Zealanders and international visitors alike love our national parks and world heritage areas, and these should be looked after properly – their incredible and unique biodiversity is what makes them special. 'Our national parks are the last fully protected refuges for rare and threatened native species like kea, whio blue duck, and native mistletoe. 'This Bill weakens the protection provided to our native species and puts them in the way of greater harm from these pest animals,' says Ms Snoyink.