South Africa positions itself as a global hub for new energy vehicles, says Ramaphosa
Image: Willem van de Putte
President Cyril Ramaphosa says that with the electric vehicle white paper and the incentive programme, the country has committed to a stable, predictable and supportive framework for companies to be able to invest and grow in South Africa.
Speaking at the BMW plant in Rosslyn, Pretoria, with the theme 'A strategic vision for South Africa's automotive future', he was quick to praise the company for the work they have been doing.
BMW South Africa manufactures the X3 range of SUVs, exporting them to more than 24 different countries around the world.
More importantly, they are the sole manufacturer for the BMW X3 plug-in hybrid.
Transformation
'We are on an exciting journey of transformation, change, and development in numerous ways, and your efforts have been pivotal in driving this transformation forward.
'The automotive sector serves as the cornerstone of our industrial strategy, accounting for 4.9% of our GDP and directly supporting over 115 000 manufacturing jobs. Its impact extends far beyond these figures, affecting the livelihoods of more than half a million individuals throughout the value chain,' he said.
'South Africa stands as the 22nd largest vehicle exporter in the world, with key markets including the European Union, the United States, the United Kingdom, and several other countries. Moreover, the African continent, particularly within the SADC region, is emerging as an increasingly important export market.
'We have successfully positioned ourselves as a globally competitive hub for automotive manufacturing, and the BMW Group has played an essential role in this significant journey.'
Referring to New Energy Vehicles, Ramaphosa said: 'The transition to green mobility and the electrification of vehicle production aligns with our global commitment to reducing emissions and supporting the shift towards a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy, and we are proud to be part of this important movement.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ideally positioned
'We are truly encouraged by the significant milestones achieved by the BMW Group. As the shift towards battery electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen mobility gains momentum, South Africa is ideally positioned as a vital global manufacturing hub for the future of mobility.
'We are dedicated to creating an enabling regulatory and policy environment that facilitates innovation and creativity, allowing companies like BMW to play a leading role in this sector.
'Through initiatives like the Automotive Production Development Program, the recently introduced Electric Vehicle White Paper, and an accompanying incentive program, we are committed to establishing a stable, predictable, and supportive framework that encourages companies to invest, localise, and grow in South Africa.'
Opportunity
Ramaphosa added that the transition to NEVs offers an opportunity for the local component manufacturing sector, which has primarily focused on internal combustion engine (ICE) components.
'Given our substantial reserves of critical minerals, we have the potential to become a hub for processing and refining these minerals extracted from South African soil. Our goal is to enhance their value, allowing us to export finished products rather than just raw materials.
We are in the process of finalising targeted incentives aimed at promoting battery cell localisation, manufacturing electric vehicle components, advancing clean mobility initiatives, and fostering research and design - all of which are essential for our growth in this sector,' he said.
Trump tariffs
Touching on the increased tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump, he admitted that it would have a huge impact, but failed to elaborate.
'The United States is a key market for our vehicle exports, and it further underscores the need for us to diversify our export base and to accelerate domestic value creation as well.
As we navigate the challenges of higher tariffs, it's crucial for us to keep our eyes and ears open to explore new markets for our vehicles. While it's encouraging that the X3 is being exported to Europe, we also need to focus on expanding into the African market.'
Speaking to the employees, the President said that the plant was a vote of confidence in their abilities.
'The production locally of the BMW X3 plug-in hybrid is a symbol of trust, a trust in the skills all of you have and a vote of confidence in our partnerships and our potential,' he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
The 30% U. S. tariff and Its global ripple effects
On August 1, the United States will impose a 30% tariff on select South African exports, a move the Trump administration frames as a corrective to trade imbalances but which South Africa decries as a unilateral overreach. President Cyril Ramaphosa has rejected the U.S. justification, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, with an average tariff of just 7.6%. Yet, the policy threatens to derail South Africa's fragile economic recovery, destabilise global supply chains, and escalate protectionist tensions worldwide. South Africa will be hit with a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States from August 1, following a formal letter from US President Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and long-standing market restrictions. This article examines the tariff's sectoral impacts, systemic risks to multilateral trade, and strategic responses to mitigate the fallout. South Africa's automotive sector, a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), faces existential risk. Reuters reported that the U.S. absorbed 6.5% of South Africa's vehicle exports (worth $1.8 billion in 2024) and is a critical market for manufacturers like BMW and Ford. The 30% tariff could force plant closures and mass layoffs, eroding a sector contributing 5.2% to GDP. The U.S. accounts for 5–6% of South Africa's citrus exports ($100 million annually), supporting 35,000 jobs. Tariffs may cede market share to Chile and Peru. Wine: Producers are scrambling to redirect stock or absorb price shocks, but the U.S. market's premium margins are irreplaceable. High-value perishables face logistical hurdles in pivoting to new markets swiftly. The textile sector may lose competitiveness in the U.S., while aluminum exports face a $534.5 million risk, with 24.6% going to the U.S. Furthermore, the South African Reserve Bank warns of 0.3% GDP contraction and 100,000 job losses. Fiscal strain from reduced export revenues and a weaker rand. The tariffs will disrupt global logistics: Freight bottlenecks: A pre-tariff rush to ship goods to the U.S. has already caused 6–10-week delays on routes like China and South Africa. Cost inflation: U.S. consumers will pay more for South African goods, while businesses face redundant inventory and working capital crunches. The U.S. has threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS-aligned nations, politicizing trade. South Africa may expand its exports by increasing trade with markets in the EU and Asia. The trade deal reached on July 27, between the United States and the European Union will ease tariff barriers and improve market access between the two economies. For South Africa, this development could have significant ramifications. First, EU exporters may displace South African goods in U.S. markets, particularly in competitive sectors like wine, citrus, and manufactured components. Second, the EU may divert more of its exports to the U.S., limiting the space for South African exports to expand into Europe. Unless offset by diplomatic interventions and aggressive trade diversification, this deal risks marginalizing South Africa in both the U.S. and EU markets simultaneously. To navigate the crisis, South Africa must leverage trade finance tools: Export Credit Facilities: Bridge cash flow gaps for exporters facing margin compression. The U.S. tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resilience. While the short-term pain is inevitable, strategic diplomacy, trade finance innovation, and market diversification could transform this threat into an opportunity for long-term resilience. The world will watch whether South Africa and the global trading system can adapt without fracturing further. Nyaniso Qwesha, MBA, is a trade finance consultant with expertise in global commerce and risk management. He advises clients on trade policy, market access, and financial solutions in emerging economies.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Market keeps eye on MPC rate decision this week
All eyes on the Reserve Bank's rate decision this week. Image: Bloomberg It was an interesting week with the JSE All Share index hitting 100 000 points on Wednesday morning and the gold price breaking through $3 400 an ounce again. Internationally, US President Donald Trump announced trade deals with Japan and with the Philippines, and there are reports that the EU and US are nearing a deal. In local news the Government of National Unity held together once more as the DA agreed to support the Appropriation Bill after President Cyril Ramaphosa dismissed Higher Education and Training Minister Nobuhle Nkabane. On Thursday, Trade, Industry, and Competition Minister Parks Tau said that a 'condition precedent document' has been signed as a precursor to finalisation of the trade negotiations with the US, but little details were available. It was reported that the Framework Deal aims to resolve long-standing market access issues that both sides are interested in and to promote bilateral investments in a mutually beneficial manner. It is unlikely that South Africa and the US will reach an agreement by the 1 of August, when 30% tariffs kicks-in. The key local indicator was the June Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation figure released on Wednesday. The inflation rate rose from 2.8% to 3%. The main driver was higher food prices, while lower year-on-year fuel prices helped to counter the increase. The inflation rate remains safely below the midpoint of the Reserve Bank's target band, and markets are still expecting one more 25 basis point cut to the repo rate this year. But will it happen at Thursday's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting? Based on the June inflation number and the outlook for inflation there is a strong case for a cut. Almost all models suggest that inflation will increase slowly during the rest of this year, but remain below the midpoint of the target band for the next year or two. The MPC has often argued that international uncertainty poses an upside risk and is an argument for keeping the repo, and our interest rate differential with the US, unchanged. The concern is that if we cut the repo rate while the Americans keep their policy rate unchanged, the rand-dollar exchange rate will weaken, increasing the cost of imported goods. This week the Federal Reserve meets the day before our MPC and their decision will play a role. They are waiting to see the inflationary impact of their tariffs and will probably keep their policy rate unchanged. Yet, from the South African point of view the dollar is relatively weaker, and the interest rate differential is less of a concern. Keeping the repo unchanged runs the risk of applying contractionary monetary policy in an economy that is barely growing. Another view is that repo rate decisions are no longer about the midpoint of the target band, but rather about the proposed new target of 3%. With a lower target in mind, it may not make sense to cut the repo rate just yet. I think the Reserve Bank has already made a strong case for the benefits of a lower target. Their models show that because inflation is already low, the cost of moving to a lower target is minimal. They don't believe interest rates will need to stay high for long, nor that much economic growth will be sacrificed in the process. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading However, their whole story rests on several assumptions, and recent research by Codera Analytics shows that there are many factors to consider. One question is how quickly inflation expectations can be anchored to the lower target. It's no use having a lower target if unions continue to base wage demands on historically higher inflation rates. Another question is whether fiscal policy can support the lower target. If public finances deteriorate, long-term interest rates on government debt will rise, and stimulatory fiscal policy could increase inflation. A lower target requires fiscal discipline. Lastly, the government as a price setter must also buy into the lower target. More than 30% of the CPI basket consists of administered prices, which in recent years have increased at rates far above the headline inflation rate. To achieve a lower average inflation rate while, for example, electricity tariffs, rates and taxes are rising steeply, those parts of the economy where prices are flexible will take interest rate strain at a high cost for the private sector. I don't think the MPC's decision will be driven by the idea of a new lower target. They need political buy-in and the inflation targets set for the next Budget cycle are at the 4.5% mid-point. But I also think that the decision about the target cannot be delayed much longer. Uncertainty does nothing to help manage expectations. Waldo Krugell is a Professor of Economics, North-West University, Potchefstroom. Image: Supplied Waldo Krugell is a Professor of Economics, North-West University, Potchefstroom. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL BUSINESS REPORT
Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Who will steer the R55bn marriage of MultiChoice and Canal+?
There's a new power couple in African media. After nearly five years of courting, Canal+ has finally put a ring on MultiChoice to form a pan-African content colossus with global ambitions. French media titan Canal+ has secured the final go-ahead to acquire MultiChoice in a landmark R55-billion deal. After years of quiet manoeuvring and regulatory hurdles, the merger is now a question of who controls what. The Competition Tribunal's conditional approval, granted late last week, closes the chapter on a five-year 'creeping takeover' and opens a new era in African broadcasting. Now it's a balancing act weighing foreign capital with national sovereignty on a digital scale with local content. Enter the media monarchy In return for its princely sum, Canal+, owned by the French conglomerate Vivendi, gets access to MultiChoice's 14.5 million Anglophone and Lusophone subscribers, the DStv powerhouse, sports juggernaut SuperSport, and a foothold in streaming via Showmax. MultiChoice, facing rising costs and subscriber declines, finds itself rescued by a suitor with deep pockets and pan-African ambition. Combined, the merged entity will serve more than 24 million subscribers across 50 countries — instantly becoming the largest pay-TV and streaming provider on the continent. However, if Canal+ was hoping for free access, South African regulators had other plans. The deal's approval came wrapped in layers of red tape — not as a deterrent, but as a deliberate design feature. Transformation goals Central to the regulatory conditions is the creation of LicenceCo, an independent company that will hold MultiChoice South Africa's broadcast licence. It will be majority-owned and controlled by historically disadvantaged South Africans and employees. Crucially, Canal+ has no control and no board seats. This structural firewall protects South Africa's legal requirements around media ownership, ensures transformation goals are met and serves as a template for foreign investment in other sensitive sectors. Phuthuma Nathi, the B-BBEE shareholder darling, increases its economic interest in LicenceCo to 27%, with a new employee trust added. The licence, and the local airwaves it governs, stay South African. The R30bn lobola The Competition Tribunal didn't just demand structural separation; it also extracted a commitment package valued at more than R30-billion. This includes: A three-year moratorium on retrenchments linked to the merger; Significant investment in local content production, sports broadcasting, SMME procurement and Corporate Social Investment programmes; Ongoing free-to-air broadcast access for key sporting events, safeguarding the public's ability to view major matches without a subscription; and Local skills development through Canal+'s 'University Programme', to train historically disadvantaged individuals in broadcasting and production. In a media environment where Netflix and Amazon Prime are increasingly dominant, this local-first approach is designed to future-proof South African media. Showmax, SuperSport and scale Behind the regulatory muscle lies a clear commercial imperative. MultiChoice has struggled in recent years, shedding 2.8 million linear subscribers and burning cash to prop up Showmax 2.0, its streaming reboot built on Comcast tech and bolstered by NBC Universal's 30% equity stake. Canal+ brings financial stability and scale. It also inherits Irdeto, MultiChoice's profitable cybersecurity unit, and Showmax's potential to become Africa's answer to global streamers. Vivendi, Canal+'s parent company, views this merger as critical to its own transformation and part of a plan to split into three listed entities, with Canal+ as its global growth engine. Listing Canal+ on the JSE within nine months of deal completion is a further nod to local inclusion, visibility, and capital market confidence. The shiny ring can't cover controversial holes While South Africa celebrates a structurally sound deal with tangible local benefits, not all observers are convinced. Critics warn that Canal+'s track record and the Bolloré Group's 30.4% stake in it come with baggage. Vivendi's past includes one of the largest corporate losses in history and regulatory infractions that still cast a shadow. Vincent Bolloré, the billionaire behind the curtain, faces corruption charges in France and has been accused of turning Canal+'s French media outlets into right-wing political mouthpieces. With Canal+ now embedded in South Africa's broadcasting ecosystem, some fear creeping influence over editorial independence, particularly if there are future attempts to deepen ownership or control beyond the current firewall. Marriage isn't buying a horse Mergers are easy to announce but hard to manage. However, the competition bodies have played their hand cleverly — extracting commitments, safeguarding jobs and setting a precedent for how global capital must behave when it enters South Africa's strategic sectors. The long-term test lies ahead. Can Showmax truly compete with Netflix? Can SuperSport keep its sports crown as global streamers outbid for rights? Will LicenceCo be a transformative force or a regulatory box-ticker? Will Canal+ respect the firewall, or try to chip away at it over time? The merged entity is now king of the hill in African broadcasting, but it's a kingdom that won't run on size alone. Trust, execution and transformation will be the currencies of success. DM
