
JC Republicans to host Family Freedom Fest
In the first of what members hope will become an annual event, the Johnson County Republican Party will host Family Freedom Fest May 17.
The free family-friendly event runs from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Hulen Park in Cleburne.
Scheduled to attend are: state Sen. Phil King, R-Weatherford, Agricultural Commissioner Sid Miller, Railroad Commissioner Christi Craddick and state Comptroller candidate Don Huffines.
Craddick is also running for comptroller.
Local officials from throughout the county have also been invited, JCRP member Don Wilson said.
The event will afford attendees opportunity to meet the office holders and candidates and ask questions, he said.
The event also includes music, family fun and entertainment and food will be available. Sponsorship opportunities remain available as well.
Funds raised from the event will help JCRP with various election integrity initiatives, JCRP Chair Robin Wilson said.
'As our county continues to grow, the need for effective voter outreach programs and trained election workers has never been more crucial,' Robin Wilson said. Join us in making a lasting impact on our community.'
Funds raised will contribute to:
— Training for election workers
— Voter outreach programs
— Student election clerks
— JCRP headquarters maintenance and upgrades
For information, visit jcrp.org or call 817-558-3135.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
13 hours ago
- CBS News
Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year
Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year Republicans' sweeping measure to cut taxes and reduce spending is expected to hit the Senate floor next week. In addition to making big changes to Medicaid, the bill also allows tax credits for those who get health insurance on the state exchange to expire. Connect for Health Colorado says Coloradans on the exchange could see premiums increase by $3,000 a year if that happens. Approximately 80 percent of people who get insurance on the state exchange receive a federal subsidy. While credits were initially tied to income, the American Rescue Plan expanded them to everyone. In rural and mountain communities where insurance can run a family upwards of $30,000 a year, those credits have made insurance affordable for tens of thousands of Coloradans, including Ryan and Robin Wilson. You'd be hard pressed to find a couple more civic-minded. Both work for nonprofits in the town of Fraser. He runs a community radio station. She manages an affordable housing community. CBS Together, they make just enough to make ends meet, which made them eligible for tax credits under the Affordable Care Act -- until this year. To qualify, they can't make more than 400% of the federal poverty level, which is $85,000 for a couple. "We're at 402%, so we're just 2% over," said Robin. She considered quitting a community college teaching job to lower their income until she heard the about another advanced premium tax credit created during COVID. It caps premiums -- regardless of income -- at 8.5% of a household's earnings, which has made insurance affordable and led to record enrollment on the state health exchange. The average premium on Connect for Health is now $115 a month. But CEO Kevin Patterson says when the expanded tax credit expires in December, premiums will more than double to $235-$279 a month. "Across the board, we expect monthly premiums to increase by about 50%. For the folks that have financial assistance - which is about 80% of our 280,000 customers - we anticipate those premiums could increase by about 104%." The Wilsons say instead of expanding their nonprofits, they will now likely have to shrink their income to qualify for the original credit. "It shouldn't be a financial sacrifice to do good work in a good place," said Robin. "We've been able to dedicate our lives to our local community more so than if the tax credits weren't there," said Ryan. "A vote against these premium subsidies is vote against the middle class. It's a vote against the poor." Connect for Health says Coloradans receive about $328 million a year in tax credits. The state Reinsurance program -- which has lowered premiums by about $2 billion over the last five years in Colorado -- would also take a hit if the tax credits expire. The credits are based on the cost of premiums so, when premiums drop, the federal government pays less in tax credits. The feds have passed those savings on to states and Colorado has used the money to bolster the Reinsurance program and lower premiums further. But those savings -- about $100 million a year in Colorado -- would be lost with the elimination of the tax credits. Gov. Jared Polis is lobbying Colorado's congressional delegation to keep the credits rather than allowing them to expire in December.
Yahoo
09-06-2025
- Yahoo
Bay Area marches show support for Jewish and Palestinian communities
The Brief People marched in solidarity with the Jewish community in the South Bay, denouncing a rise in antisemitic threats and violence across the country. An interfaith group held a 22-mile march in the East Bay to highlight the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and call for a lasting ceasefire. LOS GATOS, Calif. - Two separate solidarity marches unfolded across the Bay Area Sunday, reflecting the deepening tensions and divisions over the war in Gaza and rising antisemitism in the United States. In Los Gatos, the nonprofit Jewish Silicon Valley led a walk Sunday in support of the Jewish community, following a string of antisemitic incidents nationwide, including a recent attack on demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, who were calling for the release of Israeli hostages. Supporters carried Israeli flags and signs with photos of hostages, some still in captivity, as a symbol of resilience and unity. Organizers said the message was clear: the Jewish community will not be silenced by fear or hate. "I wanted to also elevate the voices of many in our Jewish community that do not feel safe going to synagogue, Jewish community centers, other Jewish institutions, or even participate in this walk today," said Daniel Kline, CEO of Jewish Silicon Valley. "They feel they need to hide their star of Davids, and they need to rip their mezuzahs off their doors. That is unacceptable." The event was supported by organizations including the Anti-Defamation League, JCRC Bay Area, and Run for Their Lives, a grassroots initiative that began in October 2023. The march followed a violent incident in Boulder where demonstrators advocating for Israeli hostages were physically attacked. "The Jewish community is facing an alarming rise in antisemitism, whether in the form of vandalism, threats, harassment or violence," said Jessica Blitchok of JCRC Bay Area. "The message is the same: you are not safe. But we refuse to be silent, and we will not stand alone. What makes JCRC unique is that we don't just respond, we convene, we educate. We act." Meanwhile, in the East Bay, an interfaith group of activists, religious leaders, and supporters participated in a symbolic 22-mile "Right of Return" pilgrimage from Alameda to Berkeley. The walk was designed to mirror the distance between Rafah and Gaza City, highlighting the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and advocating for the rights of displaced Palestinians. "We are walking in solidarity with the Palestinian right of return to their homes, the right of people to remain and to live in safety," said Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb, board chair of the Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity. Marchers called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and urged U.S. lawmakers to take action. "We are calling for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, and we are asking our senators to initiate an arms embargo," Gottlieb said. Participants made stops along the route, including a visit to the Islamic Cultural Center of Northern California in Oakland. Though held separately and with different focuses, both events underscored the impacts of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

Yahoo
09-06-2025
- Yahoo
Lawmakers passed bills this session to boost the state power grid but failed to limit renewables
The Texas Legislature only partially got what it wanted from its plans to help the state meet its growing energy demands. Lawmakers passed bills that give the state more control over the electricity that flows through Texas, fund power generation projects and create an office to advance the state's nuclear energy interests. But experts said the 140-day session was also defined by the bills that didn't survive — namely, all legislation meant to hamstring renewable energy. 'I think (the legislative session) ended in a decent place, particularly considering how it might have gone,' said Doug Lewin, author of the Texas Power and Energy Newsletter. 'I think the proposals that would have been most damaging to the Texas economy, consumers, and reliability … did not make it through.' Texas faces a soaring demand for energy, driven predominantly by data centers and new petrochemical facilities. The expected spike in demand will require the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the state's main grid manager, to deliver nearly double the amount of electricity in six years. Throughout the session, lawmakers stressed that their intent was to craft legislation that will help ERCOT keep the lights on for everyday ratepayers during emergencies or demand spikes. Senate Bill 6, by state Senator Phil King, R-Weatherford, gives ERCOT the authority to shut off power to facilities that use at least 75 megawatts of electricity, such as industrial factories and data centers, during an emergency, which the bill defines as extreme weather events that drive up demand. ERCOT must first deploy every emergency response at its disposal, issue a 24-hour warning and set the rules under which this would occur. The goal is to have as much electricity available to the grid as possible when demand spikes. 'I think that's a manageable risk for anybody who really wants to make sure their power is dependable and reliable,' said Pat Wood, chief executive officer of Hunt Energy Network and former chair of the Public Utility Commission. 'That's a pretty good balancing point, because nobody's rights are ever absolute in a system like this, where we're all interconnected with each other.' Under the bill, very large energy users hoping to connect to the state grid must disclose whether they have similar requests for other projects in Texas, and if the connection is approved, they must pay $100,000 for studies to determine the cost of the infrastructure necessary for the connection. The goal is to give ERCOT a clearer picture of future demand by knowing which projects companies are serious about building. Legislators also approved more money to encourage construction of power infrastructure including natural gas plants, backup generators and nuclear power. The Texas Energy Fund, a low-interest loan program aimed at encouraging companies to build more power infrastructure, will receive an additional $5 billion on top of the $5 billion lawmakers approved in 2023. Of that amount, $1.8 billion can be used for strengthening existing backup generators. Renewable energy companies don't qualify for the program. Lewin said this money 'might be the most impactful thing, honestly, because that puts us on the leading edge of all the states' in promoting smaller energy projects like small power plants and backup generation. Nuclear power will also get a boost. As part of the state's budget, a fund dedicated to nuclear power will receive $350 million. The Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office, also established by the Legislature, will administer the money. It will be up to Gov. Greg Abbott to determine the composition of the office. Solar, wind and battery storage account for most of the new energy generation in Texas, according to ERCOT, and Texas is a national leader in renewable energy — a trend lawmakers unsuccessfully tried to reverse. The most sweeping effort was Senate Bill 819 by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, which would have imposed new rules and fees on renewable projects — such as requiring county governments within 25 miles of a new renewable project to hold local hearings on each project before the state Public Utility Commission could consider a permit application. The bill also would have required renewable projects be located at least 100 feet from a property line and 200 feet from any habitable structure. Senate Bill 388 by King would have required that at least half of the state grid's supply come from so-called dispatchable power, or energy that can be turned on and off at will. That excludes wind and solar, which can only produce energy when the wind blows or the sun shines, and the bill would have imposed fees on renewable companies to help the state reach that goal. Another bill, sponsored by state Sen. Kevin Sparks, R-Midland, would have required renewable energy facilities to have backup natural gas generation, a proposal that was broadly opposed by natural gas trade and renewable energy groups. 'Cooler heads prevailed in blocking some of the most extreme anti-energy proposals, as most legislators recognize that Texas can't afford to forfeit any source of affordable, predictable power when every megawatt is needed to meet growing demand,' said Judd Messer, the Texas vice president of Advanced Power Alliance, a trade group. He added the bills posed a threat 'to the deeply held Texas principles of free markets, limited government, and private property rights.' Disclosure: Advanced Power Alliance has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.