logo
Fishy promises? Ocean protection goal drifts off course as US backpedals

Fishy promises? Ocean protection goal drifts off course as US backpedals

Malay Mail2 days ago

BREST (France), June 3 — A global target of having 30 per cent of the oceans become protected areas by 2030 is looking more fragile than ever, with little progress and the United States backing away, conservationists say.
'With less than 10 per cent of the ocean designated as MPAs (marine protected areas) and only 2.7 per cent fully or highly protected, it is going to be difficult to reach the 30 per cent target,' said Lance Morgan, head of the Marine Conservation Institute in Seattle, Washington.
The institute maps the MPAs for an online atlas, updating moves to meet the 30 per cent goal that 196 countries signed onto in 2022, under the Kunling-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
The ambition is notably at risk because 'we see countries like the US reversing course and abandoning decades of bipartisan efforts' to protect areas of the Pacific Ocean, Morgan said.
That referred to an April executive order by President Donald Trump authorising industrial-scale fishing in big swathes of an MPA in that ocean.
Currently, there are 16,516 declared MPAs in the world, covering just 8.4 per cent of the oceans.
But not all are created equal: some forbid all forms of fishing, while others place no roles, or almost none, on what activities are proscribed or permitted.
Fish farmers take part in trap fishing in a pond in the Dombes plateau, Saint Germain sur Renom in France. — AFP pic
'Only a third of them have levels of protection that would yield proper benefits' for fish, said Joachim Claudet, a socio-ecology marine researcher at France's CNRS.
Daniel Pauly, a professor of fisheries science at Canada's University of British Columbia, said 'the marine protected areas have not really been proposed for the protection of biodiversity' but 'to increase fish catches'.
A proper MPA 'exports fish to non-protected zones, and that should be the main reason that we create marine protected areas -- they are needed to have fish', he said.
When fish populations are left to reproduce and grow in protected areas, there is often a spillover effect that sees fish stocks outside the zones also rise, as several scientific journals have noted, especially around a no-fishing MPA in Hawaiian waters that is the biggest in the world.
One 2022 study in the Science journal showed a 54 per cent in crease in yellowfin tuna around that Hawaiian MPA, an area now threatened by Trump's executive order, Pauly said.
Fishing bans
For such sanctuaries to work, there need to be fishing bans over all or at least some of their zones, Claudet said. But MPAs with such restrictions account for just 2.7 per cent of the ocean's area, and are almost always in parts that are far from areas heavily impacted by human activities.
Port Cros National park guard monitor and diver Vincent Bardinal observes marine plants known as Posidonia, the pearl of the Mediterranean sea, during a dive in the bay of La Palud off the National Park of the island of Port Cros in Hyeres, southeastern France, on May 8, 2025. — AFP pic
In Europe, for instance, '90 per cent of the marine protected areas are still exposed to bottom trawling,' a spokesperson for the NGO Oceana, Alexandra Cousteau, said. 'It's ecological nonsense.'
Pauly said that 'bottom trawling in MPAs is like picking flowers with a bulldozer... they scrape the seabed'.
Oceana said French MPAs suffered intensive bottom trawling, 17,000 hours' worth in 2024, as did those in British waters, with 20,600 hours. The NGO is calling for a ban on the technique, which involves towing a heavy net along the sea floor, churning it up.
A recent WWF report said that just two per cent of European Union waters were covered by MPAs with management plans, even some with no protection measures included.
The head of WWF's European office for the oceans, Jacob Armstrong, said that was insufficient to protect oceanic health.
Governments need to back words with action, he said, or else these areas would be no more than symbolic markings on a map. — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manila's debt hits fresh high in April as govt borrowings rise
Manila's debt hits fresh high in April as govt borrowings rise

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Manila's debt hits fresh high in April as govt borrowings rise

Since the beginning of the year, the country's debt has risen by 4.37% or 701.37 billion peso. — Philippine Daily Inquirer MANILA: The latest data from the Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) show state liabilities inched up by 0.41% or 68.89 billion peso (US$1.2bil) on a month-on-month basis. Since the beginning of the year, the country's debt has risen by 4.37% or 701.37 billion peso. While the government had to incur more borrowings in April to plug its budget deficit, the BTr said a rallying peso helped minimise the growth of obligations. The local currency has been gaining ground in the past weeks as US President Donald Trump's erratic trade policies bruise confidence in the US dollar. 'The government continues to follow a disciplined debt strategy, ensuring that borrowings support productive investments while keeping fiscal sustainability,' the bureau said. Broken down, domestic obligations, which accounted for 69.2% of the total debt load, went up by 1.85% to 11.59 trillion peso in April. The BTr said the increase was driven by robust demand for government securities, including the 300 billion peso benchmark bonds that the state offered during the month. The local currency's appreciation also reduced the peso equivalent of US dollar-denominated domestic securities by 3.85 billion peso. Meanwhile, external borrowings declined by 2.68% to 5.16 trillion peso because of the 124.74 billion peso decrease in the peso-value of foreign debt. — Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN

Canadian bill seeks to deny hearings to some asylum-seekers
Canadian bill seeks to deny hearings to some asylum-seekers

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

Canadian bill seeks to deny hearings to some asylum-seekers

FILE PHOTO: A group of asylum seekers claiming to be from Haiti take their luggage out of a taxi as they arrive near a checkpoint on Roxham Road near Hemmingford, Quebec, Canada April 24, 2022. Picture taken April 24, 2022. REUTERS/Christinne Muschi/File Photo TORONTO (Reuters) -A Canadian border-security bill introduced by the Liberal government earlier this week may deny some asylum-seekers a refugee hearing and make it easier for the government to revoke migrants' status. The bill comes as the government seeks to address U.S. concerns about its border security and reduce the number of migrants in the addition to denying some refugee hearings and allowing the suspension, cancellation or variance of immigration documents, the bill facilitates sharing people's information and makes it easier to read people's mail, among other measures. President Donald Trump has said Canada had failed to do enough to stem the flow of illicit fentanyl into the U.S., using that as justification for some of his tariffs. This week Trump doubled the tariffs in place on steel and aluminum, prompting calls for Canada to boost retaliatory measures of its own. Late last year Canada pledged C$1.3 billion to beef up its border. As Canada reduces the number of new permanent and temporary residents, its refugee system faces a historic backlog of more than 280,000 cases. This week's bill follows through on some of those border promises as well as on suggestions from some top ministers that Canada would fast-track refusals for some refugee claims. If the bill passes, asylum-seekers who have been in Canada more than one year would not be eligible for refugee hearings. Instead, they would have access to a pre-removal risk assessment, meant to determine whether they would be in danger in their country of origin. According to data published by Canada's Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Department, 30% of pre-removal risk assessments in 2019 for people deemed ineligible for refugee hearings were approved; by contrast, according to Immigration and Refugee Board data, that year 60% of finalized refugee hearings were approved. Asylum-seekers who wait two weeks to file claims after crossing from the U.S. to avoid being turned back under a bilateral agreement would also not get hearings. The bill, which needs to go through multiple readings before the House of Commons votes on it and sends it to the Senate, would also allow the government to "cancel, suspend or vary" immigration documents if deemed in the public interest. Migrant and refugee advocates worry the changes could leave vulnerable people deported to dangerous situations in their home countries without adequate due process. A spokesperson for Canada's Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab said on Wednesday that the government recognizes the conditions in people's home countries may change, but the pre-removal risk assessment will prevent them from being returned to persecution or torture. "The asylum ineligibilities introduced yesterday seek to maintain protection for those fleeing danger while discouraging misuse that bypasses the asylum system's function – which is to protect the vulnerable," the spokesperson wrote in an email. "Canada is reneging on its basic human rights obligations to do individual arbitration," said Migrant Rights Network spokesperson Syed Hussan. "This is teeing up a deportation machine." (Reporting by Anna Mehler Paperny; editing by Diane Craft)

EU says ‘fully invested' in Trump trade talks after US court ruling
EU says ‘fully invested' in Trump trade talks after US court ruling

Free Malaysia Today

time2 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

EU says ‘fully invested' in Trump trade talks after US court ruling

EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic has intensified talks with US counterparts after last week's tensions. (EPA Image pic) BRUSSELS : The EU is 'fully invested' in reaching a deal with the US to avoid sweeping tariffs, the bloc's trade chief said today, after US judges ruled the controversial measures were unconstitutional. 'Our time and effort fully invested, as delivering forward-looking solutions remains a top EU priority. Staying in permanent contact,' EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said on X after a call yesterday with US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. But Sefcovic did not make any comment on the court drama across the Atlantic. In a ruling Wednesday, the US court of international trade had barred most of the tariffs announced since president Donald Trump took office, but an appeals court the next day preserved his sweeping import duties on China and other trading partners. The short-term relief will now allow the appeals process to proceed. Sefcovic has previously said he had calls with his US trade counterparts on Friday, Saturday and Monday as the two sides intensify talks after last week's tensions. US President Donald Trump threatened last Friday, but then postponed, to hit EU goods with a huge tariff, voicing frustration that talks with the EU were 'going nowhere'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store