Rescue Dog Left Home Alone—Woman Left Heartbroken by Note From Neighbor
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A woman has revealed the heartbreaking note she received from her neighbors after adopting a dog who spent 7 years in a puppy mill.
Emily Hanson, 38, initially started fostering Otto, the Shih-tzu in June 2024. He was estimated to be around 7 years old, and it's likely that he'd spent his entire life in a cage.
There was no denying that the life he had to endure took its toll on Otto. Hanson told Newsweek that he was "so anxious that he didn't sleep" for the first 24 hours that she had him. Even when he did manage to rest, he would sleep in "very small increments" because he just couldn't settle.
It took Otto several weeks to develop a proper sleep schedule, and he's still afraid of certain things (plates and bowls to name a few). Nonetheless, he's come an awful long way, and he was officially adopted by Hanson in July 2024.
"I'm so proud of him and the progress he's made," Hanson, of Columbus, Ohio, said. "He's come such a long way. His Shih-tzu personality shines now, and he learned to go down steps and go in the grass."
Otto the rescue dog, and the note Hanson received from her neighbors.
Otto the rescue dog, and the note Hanson received from her neighbors.
@miltonandotto / TikTok
Shortly after adopting Otto, Hanson received a handwritten letter from her neighbors saying that the dog "has been pretty loud" and "seems to be anxious" whenever she's gone.
The note continued: "Wanted to make sure you knew about it, and get your pup feeling okay and comfortable when you're gone from the apartment. Thanks, your neighbors."
As soon as she read the letter, Hanson "felt terrible" for Otto and her neighbors too.
She has a pet cam in her apartment, so she was aware that Otto had separation anxiety, but she had hoped that it didn't bother her neighbors.
Hanson said: "I lived in a building with 9 other units, so the noise was likely disruptive. I had been taking him everywhere I could. I pretty much knew every dog friendly bar and restaurant in the Columbus area. And though I only worked in the office two days a week, he was not welcome at a corporate office. So, I guess I hoped the neighbors wouldn't be home during that time."
Upon reading the letter, Hanson knew she needed to make it up to her neighbors. She bought Starbucks gift cards for everyone on her floor and the person who lives directly beneath her apartment.
She also wrote notes for them to explain Otto's backstory, in which she told them he'd been rescued from a puppy mill "where he was kept in a cage for 7 years." She thanked them for their patience and understanding, and said she was actively working on his separation anxiety.
The note Hanson wrote for her neighbors to apologize and explain.
The note Hanson wrote for her neighbors to apologize and explain.
@miltonandotto / TikTok
While she isn't certain which neighbor wrote the letter, Hanson has spoken directly to some of the people in her building and they were very understanding.
It's been 12 months since she received that letter, and Otto has made great strides in that time. For the most part, he doesn't bark or whine when Hanson leaves now. Whenever she checks the pet cam, he's usually asleep with his blind rescue brother named Milton.
"He does get sad when I leave, but he is doing so well. He was not left alone for more than 30 minutes to an hour after that note. He either went to a friend's who was home, or a dog sitter. Little by little, I tried various ways to leave him, and one day, miraculously, there was no barking, crying or scratching. And it just got better from there," Hanson continued.
Indeed, Hanson told Newsweek that Milton "appreciates the peace" now too as they can both get their beauty sleep.
The proud owner often documents the lives of her rescue dogs on their dedicated TikTok account (@miltonandotto), and in July she shared a post about the note her neighbors wrote. The post has melted hearts in a matter of days, leading to more than 38,200 views and over 3,200 likes on TikTok at the time of writing.
The online response has been incredibly uplifting, as Hanson hopes to show that rescue dogs are capable of thriving if they're given patience and love.
"Everyone, for the most part, is supportive and proud of Otto for being such a champ. I hope we are helping to educate people on the horrors of puppy mills but also the strength and resilience of dogs. It has been one of the greatest joys of my life to watch Otto thrive," Hanson said.
Otto's story has generated over 100 comments on TikTok, as internet users praised the progress he's made so far.
One comment reads: "such a brave little soul!"
Another TikTok user wrote: "That was such a sweet and thoughtful note they left, glad he's doing better."
Another person responded: "Beautiful story and ending."
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? We want to see the best ones! Send them in to life@newsweek.com and they could appear on our site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Colleges Should Begin Putting Science First
One of my pet peeves is going to the drug store and seeing necessary items locked behind a plastic case. Whether it's razor blades, Advil, or skin cream, drug store shelves have become pharma jail cells as chains like CVS and Walgreens take draconian measures to combat shoplifting. A recent Washington Post column showed I'm not alone in my drug store distress, but rather part of community of curmudgeonly customers. In CVS was so worried about shoplifting that it stole its own soul, Matt Bai makes a convincing case that 'someone has turned the CVS I knew into a Museum of the American Pharmacy.' When we encounter a necessary item locked away, we're instructed to ring the service bell for assistance. So we ring and, after a minute or two, an employee shows up and opens the case. As Matt points out, the problem for infrequent shoppers is that most of the time we don't know exactly what we want. In Matt's case, his son asked for teeth whitening strips. So Matt's in a pickle: In the old CVS, I'd have happily spent five minutes idly breaking down the pros and cons. But now, this poor woman is standing there watching and waiting, and I'm self-conscious. She's the only one working here. She has things to do. It's not like the CVS has assigned me a personal shopper. I ask her for advice, and I can tell she wants to be helpful, but this is the CVS, and we all know that the employees are basically silent observers… 'I think they're pretty much the same,' she says hopefully… The pressure I'm feeling here is more than I can stand. I grab a random box, and the woman quickly locks the case before I can change my mind. Then the same thing happens two aisles over: When my new friend reappears and opens the case, I grab the first three bottles of bodywash I see. I cannot subject her to another round of anguished vacillation. We're not picking out a puppy here. Ring the service bell for assistance. Of course, he buys the wrong things. I've known Matt for 30 years since he worked with my (then future) wife at Newsweek. That's back when Newsweek was a respected weekly magazine owned by the Washington Post's Graham family – one where an old-school beverage cart provided libations to journalists working late Friday nights to 'close the book.' And back when CVS was a needed respite from our under-air-conditioned New York apartment, not a locus of stress and frustration. Matt's not a total crank – at least no more than me. And he's clearly onto something about likely consequences for organizations that close themselves off to the world. That's certainly the case in higher education. Colleges have locked themselves behind a plastic case in the two most important ways imaginable. First, programs of study haven't been responsive to economic needs. Nearly all schools continue to offer the same degree programs they've run for generations. The list of most popular majors – starting with business, nursing, psychology, biology, and engineering – looks like it could be wearing a poodle skirt, love beads, or sideburns. (Or if shopping in a drug store, buying Lustre-Crème Shampoo, Dippity-Do Hair Gel, and a carton of Chesterfields.) Only computer science (#11) would have been out of place when our grandparents were college-age, and we're merely missing classics and agricultural sciences. Unless forced by budgetary exigencies, colleges never discontinue programs in order to redirect teaching resources to more productive uses. In an economy that's experienced radical changes in the last few decades, this level of movement is glacial. Second, the people teaching at colleges and universities aren't responsive to economic needs. Tenured faculty – the highest paid, permanent faculty – are required to have terminal degrees, almost always PhDs. And having a doctorate typically means a straight line from college to graduate school to employment at a postsecondary institution. It's even true at community colleges. When full-time positions open up, competition is fierce and candidates without doctorates stand as little chance as cold symptoms after taking Nyquil, or heartburn post-TUMS. This means the people educating and preparing students for work in the real economy have never worked in the real economy. Just as CVS employees can't help us choose, faculty without real-world experience can't provide helpful career guidance. And because academic departments control curriculum and faculty control departments, the lack of real-world experience produces the museum-like quality of university offerings. With college safely locked away, undergraduate majors rarely offer a straight line to good first jobs. Lightcast has documented the lack of direct pathways: a swirl from the most popular majors to the most popular jobs. The unemployment rate for the last five classes of college graduates is up 40% in the last two years and 12% of grads in their 20s are currently unemployed, particularly men. Meanwhile, underemployment for college grads one year out is at 52%. Between the Scylla of unemployment and the Charybdis of underemployment, two-thirds to three-quarters of the class of 2025 are struggling to launch. Like CVS customers, college graduates need to ring for assistance. In response to these criticisms, colleges and universities have offered bromides – i.e., vague ideas intended to placate, not Bromo-Seltzer which is no longer available at CVS – about building industry or employer partnerships. But partnerships ebb and flow and nothing really changes. Sooner or later, higher education will need to meet the problem head-on by addressing the source of the economic change we've witnessed over the past half-century: scientific progress and digital transformation. Prioritizing science worked for higher ed during the Cold War when, in search of solutions to military challenges, federal funding skyrocketed like CVS sales of Wegovy and other semaglutides. Today's biggest problems are environmental, socioeconomic, and biological. But if and when they are solved, they're more likely to be solved by science/tech than other disciplines. If more colleges and universities led with science, they'd launch more economically relevant programs. According to one study of new programs, only 15% were STEM; 75% were in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. And schools would be more likely to discontinue unproductive programs. Science tends to move on faster than other fields of study. After all, no college still offers programs in phrenology or alchemy. They'd also focus more resources on higher value programs. One of higher education's unsung scandals is enrollment caps for the most remunerative majors, namely the most technical and scientific. While student demand for quantitative programs – computer science, engineering, data science, and now machine learning/AI – doubles and doubles again, colleges and universities have added faculty slower than it now takes to shop at CVS. The result: not nearly enough seats, particularly at public institutions. Many publics play a bait-and-switch game, admitting students as freshmen then rejecting them from higher value technical programs as sophomores and juniors – ostensibly via use of outdated prerequisites, weed-out courses, and GPA requirements, but actually due to lack of capacity. So nearly half of all students who say they want to complete these programs never do. What would it mean to make science primus inter pares in American higher education? Here's a modest proposal: The education and labor market challenges we're facing are not unique to the U.S. As they're a byproduct of digital transformation of the economy and education's failure (so far) to keep up, everyone is in the same boat. A recent OECD survey of high school students across 80 countries found 'high levels of career uncertainty and confusion' because 'job expectations… bear little relationship to actual patterns of labor market demand.' Career-launch confrères in Canada and the UK are struggling like never before to land good first jobs. But all the more reason to build new educational models to keep up with economic change. New STEM programs delivered by faculty with industry experience are likely to provide straighter lines to more good first jobs. As America leads the world in digital transformation, we should lead in our response to digital transformation. A science-first system of higher education would also give us a better shot at preserving our AI lead because universities would attract more research funding. The federal government – at least this Administration – is more likely to provide Cold War-era levels of research support to universities that privilege and prioritize science. Although STEM faculty and researchers are the primary victims of Trump Administration attempts to cut federal research funding by a third, higher education's political and public funding challenges have hardly stemmed from STEM. Prioritizing science anew doesn't mean no room for arts, humanities, and social sciences. We need them not only to graduate well-rounded students, but also to push back when science yields inhumane outcomes (like locking up the pharamaceutical products you need). But that doesn't mean that 70% of students should concentrate in these fields, certainly not without a hybrid-tech component. The recent increase in double majors indicates that many students already intuit as much. And note that our economic rival, China, isn't putting humanities professors in charge of universities. The vast majority of Chinese university presidents are scientists, engineers, or economists. Not surprisingly, China is pulling ahead of us across a panoply of scientific metrics. If this isn't another Sputnik moment, I don't know what is. The alternative is to remain closed off from our changed world. Matt Bai notes one survey showed that 'less than 1 in 3 shoppers are willing to hang around once they realize that the item they want is behind glass.' So let's make CVS stand for Colleges Value Science rather than a Museum of the American University. Unless and until we begin putting science and technology first, colleges and universities will have a problem that neither teeth whitening strips nor body wash will fix.
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Experts Hopeful for 'Once-in-a-Lifetime' Treaty to Tackle Plastic Waste
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The amount of plastic waste around the world continues to grow, ushering in a rising environmental, economic and public health crisis that affects everyone and everything on the planet. A 2022 report from the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) projects that humans produce about 460 million tons of plastic each year. Without immediate action, that amount is projected to triple by 2060. On Thursday, July 24, environmental experts gathered for Turning the Tide on Plastic Waste: A Newsweek Live Event hosted by Newsweek's Environmental and Sustainability Editor Jeff Young. During the hour-long virtual event, panelists discussed the state of the plastics issues and how the global community is coming together to help solve it. The panelists included Steve Alexander, president and chief executive officer of the Association of Plastic Recyclers (APR); Dr. Douglas McCauley, a professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara and adjunct professor at UC Berkeley; and Erin Simon, the vice president and head of plastic waste and business at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). This panel comes weeks before the UN meets again in hopes of finalizing a historic treaty that would address the full lifecycle of plastic, from production and design to collection, disposal and recycling. Talks began three years ago and the last round of talks in December ended in a stalemate without a treaty. McCauley said the scale of the plastics problem the global community is facing is "immense," which makes the opportunity to solve it with new negotiations "really exciting." As a marine biologist, he outlined the real negative impacts of plastic pollution. There is a threat to biodiversity and the habitats of marine life, and a human health impact with the rise of microplastics in our food and water supply. In terms of climate change, McCauley said that without a solution, greenhouse gas emissions from continued plastic production will increase by 37 percent. "It's pretty serious for us, pretty serious for our planet, and the problem is only growing," he said. "Without intervention, without a strong treaty, business as usual will take us to a 2050 where we double the amount of plastic pollution on our planet." So what's the solution? Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Erin Simon has been present at the previous rounds of UN negotiations and is optimistic that the next meeting will yield positive and impactful results. She said that while there is "no silver bullet" for the problem of plastic waste, the opportunity for a collective global agreement has the potential to accelerate humanity's ability to solve it. While the final draft of the treaty is still in the works, Simon said the 193 countries are aligned on a few measures. This includes getting "problematic" materials out of production, designing more sustainable plastic, financing the transition to a recycling infrastructure and making sure these agreements can be strengthened over time. "In this next session, it is our hope that we set the glide path for all of those in the right direction," she said. "It is our hope that we find ways to build more bridges than we seem to have burned in the last sessions of negotiations." At APR, Steve Alexander said the organization has design and testing guides for plastic packaging and recycling that are referenced around the world. While these guidelines, and many others related to sustainability and recycling, are helpful, they are also voluntary. He said the UN treaty needs to have some level of standardization. Having a global standard will allow countries to work together along the plastic waste chain to promote a more circular system of reuse and recycling at every stage of life for plastics. Simon agrees with this point, noting that the policies of individual companies, states or countries are not enough to solve the overall problem. "That's why we have the process to develop global agreements, because those come about when countries realize they cannot solve a problem on their own, that it needs to be something that is coordinated," she said. "It's not going to solve for everything, but it has the ability to create this coordination [and] standardization." In the three Rs of sustainability, reduction comes before reuse and recycling. The panelists agreed that the first step to reducing waste is to reduce the production of new, or virgin, plastics. Alexander said that using recycled materials instead of virgin materials reduces energy utilization and greenhouse gas emissions by about 80 percent. He added that policymakers and other stakeholders say they would love to use more recycled material, but the price is too high. "When you're taking a material and you're adding to it, there is a cost," he said. "And typically, recycled costs more money than virgin. That is the reason or excuse that is used a lot for why we don't have a market for recycled material." But McCauley notes that the cheaper upfront cost of producing virgin plastic is "deceptive" because countries will have to bear the environmental and public health costs of increased plastic waste. By pairing incentives, such as the threat of hefty fees for non-recyclable plastics, with investments in recycling and waste management, the panelists explained, countries can drive job growth and economic activity while achieving substantial environmental benefits. For example, Maryland and Washington recently joined California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota and Oregon in adopting extended producer responsibility (EPR) policies that hold plastic producers accountable for the costs of dealing with the management of end-of-life plastics. "There's just money on the table for us through EPR systems because it creates a more valuable product, more jobs, it creates more domestic production and for companies, it helps them to have clear guidelines of how they can produce, where they design, and where it should go so that they can get it back again and use it over and over again," Simon said. Looking ahead to the next round of UN treaty talks in Geneva, Switzerland, next month, the panelists were overall hopeful and determined to get a result that will make a real impact. "I am, by construction, an optimist," McCauley said. "I think that the world has got the memo that this is a grand problem. I'll underline again, that this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for us to actually come together and solve this. So this makes me want to move as far forward as we can with this international solution."
Newsweek
11 hours ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z Males 3 Times More Likely Than Boomers to Prioritize 'Dominance'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Gen Z males were three times more likely to prioritize "dominance" than baby boomers in a new study by consumer insights platform GWI. Males from the Gen Z population—ages 13 to 28—ranked as more traditional in several of their ratings. While 71 percent of male baby boomers said "caring" is a quality men should possess, just 43 percent of Gen Zers said the same. That was the lowest rating of any generation. Why It Matters Gen Z is navigating a largely unforeseen dating scene, growing up in a world where dating is often conducted by apps, and algorithms may decide the fate of who your partner is. The rise of "manosphere" content creators like Andrew Tate has also preached the importance of being an "alpha male," while encouraging disrespect and even sometimes violence toward women in the process. The shifting views on masculinity and dating could have long-standing ramifications, especially as many women are simultaneously frustrated over dating in the modern age. An AppsFlyer survey from last year found a whopping 65 percent of dating apps get deleted within just a month. And of those who uninstall the apps, 90 percent do it within a week. A 13-year-old boy looks at an iPhone screen on May 26 in Penzance, England. A 13-year-old boy looks at an iPhone screen on May 26 in Penzance, To Know In the new GWI report, Gen Z males consistently showed a preference for what's largely seen as "traditional" gender roles, more so than their baby boomer elders. While Gen Z males were nearly three times more likely than boomers to prioritize "dominance" as a key trait, at 23 percent versus 8 percent, they also valued strength more than older generations. The priority of "strength" as a trait declined with age across the generations, as 52 percent of Gen Z males said it was the most valued trait. That was compared to 51 percent of male millennials, 46 percent of Gen X and 44 percent for boomers. "The biggest biological reason that baby boomer men are less likely to prioritize, dominance and strength, and more likely to prioritize caring, has to do with the fact that their testosterone has gone down," Dr. Wendy Walsh, relationship expert from DatingAdvice, told Newsweek. "Thank goodness! Men over 60 are the sweetest gentlest men. It's wonderful to see. Gen Z men might prioritize dominance partly because their testosterone is raging." However, there are also social and psychological factors at play, Walsh added. "Baby boomers are fathers and grandfathers. They've spent their days slaying dragons and now want to spend time nurturing the things that are very good for their health, their friends and family," Walsh said. "As for those Gen Z men, many of them have lost their 'place' in society, as women are surging ahead in education and economics. Rather than understanding that masculinity can be correlated with caring and nurturing, they may be attempting to assert their masculinity through dominance in reaction to women's perceived strength." Across the board, males had traditional views toward what women should act like, with the top three traits they think women should possess being "caring" (61 percent), "gentle" (52 percent) and "nurturing" (52 percent). Females, meanwhile, valued confidence and independence as the top traits in women, at 68 percent and 63 percent. And the traits females valued in men differed dramatically from what males valued in themselves, GWI found. Across generations, the top qualities females valued in men were being caring (62 percent), confident (56 percent) and empathetic (55 percent). While 57 percent of males also viewed confidence as the top quality for men, Gen Z males especially valued more traditional, tough traits in men. "The data reveals an important shift in mindsets, and in some cases a reversal, in how different generations view gender roles," Chris Beer, data journalist at GWI, said in a statement. "While many women are embracing confidence and independence, young men are being drawn toward traditional ideas of masculinity, placing a greater importance on strength and dominance compared to older generations. What People Are Saying Hallie Kritsas, licensed mental health counselor with Thriveworks, told Newsweek: "It may seem surprising to some that male Gen Z individuals are leaning into more traditional traits such as dominance and strength, and may be doing so even more than male Boomers. However, this reflects deeper uncertainty. We are in a world of shifting roles, and so many younger men are searching for identity and control. These young men are often doing so without strong models of healthy masculinity, which might lead them to fall back on 'outdated ideas.'" Walsh also told Newsweek: "I think Gen Z men may want to see a return to traditional gender roles so that they can recapture some sense of "lost" male identity rather than evolve into the new masculine man, that is one who is caring, nurturing and emotionally attuned." What Happens Next The Gen Z males who prioritize dominance above all else might reflect their own insecurity and confusion, Kritsas said, adding, "As a result, we are seeing a generation of examples that are struggling to reconcile emotional vulnerability, such as being caring, gentle, and nurturing, with a culture that still rewards power."
