Houston readies for protests as Abbott deploys National Guard
City leaders say they're equipped to handle planned protests this weekend in Houston, while Gov. Greg Abbott says he will deploy the Texas National Guard "to ensure peace & order."
Why it matters: Abbott's decision comes amid a national debate about the militarization of law enforcement and the rights of protestors as thousands are expected to protest during "No Kings Day" on Saturday.
Driving the news: The National Guard will be deployed across the state, Abbott posted on X late Tuesday night, saying he's instructed them to "use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order."
"Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest."
Abbott didn't specify where troops will be deployed.
Catch up quick: Protesters will march on Houston City Hall at 10am Saturday, part of the nationwide demonstration to counter President Trump's multimillion-dollar military parade in Washington, D.C.
Texas state troopers are monitoring planned events and " stand ready," the Department of Public Safety said Tuesday.
The White House has already deployed the National Guard and Marines in response to protests in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids.
Zoom in: Mayor John Whitmire and Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo say law enforcement is ready to respond to potential unrest.
"I've monitored this very carefully. It's my highest responsibility," Whitmire told Houston City Council members Wednesday. "We will not tolerate civil disobedience."
The intrigue: U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Houston) sent a letter to Whitmire and county leadership this week offering federal assistance in quelling what he called "riots" on the horizon.
"Public servants, like us, must promote law and order and protect our city … from descending into violence and chaos like Los Angeles," Hunt wrote.
Yes, but: Whitmire declined to respond to Hunt's letter, telling council members Wednesday that Hunt's letter was "speaking about something that does not exist in Houston."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
41 minutes ago
- New York Times
Judge Signals Doubt About Trump's Use of National Guard to Deal With Protesters
A federal judge on Thursday expressed deep skepticism over the Trump administration's mobilization of California National Guard troops to support immigration enforcement against protesters in Los Angeles this week, signaling that he would decide 'very soon' whether to restrict the troops' use. But in evaluating California's request for a temporary restraining order against the federal government, the judge, Charles Breyer of the Federal District Court in San Francisco, also signaled that he was unlikely to limit President Trump's use of active-duty Marines because they have not yet deployed to the streets of Los Angeles. He said that if they did head to the city, it might raise a problem under a 19th-century law, the Posse Comitatus Act, but he did not think it was appropriate to rule on something that has not happened yet. 'I don't understand how I'm supposed to do anything with the Marines, to tell you the truth,' the judge said, later adding, 'I just sort of don't think that's my business.' Judge Breyer, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1997, opened the hearing with a heavy focus on whether the National Guard had been improperly activated. The statute President Trump cited as the authority for his move says that such orders must go 'through' governors, but Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth instead sent the directive to the general who oversees the Guard, bypassing Gov. Gavin Newsom of California. Through the first hour of court proceedings, Mr. Breyer, sporting a light-blue bow-tie, seemed skeptical of the Trump administration's arguments. He interrupted the Justice Department's lawyer repeatedly and at one point waved a small copy of the Constitution in the air. Some of his pointed replies drew laughs from the packed courtroom of more than 100 people. Though the state of California has for now requested an order limiting the military to guarding federal buildings, it is also making a broader argument that Mr. Trump has far exceeded his authority. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Buzz Feed
41 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Conservative Ideal America Video Goes Viral
If there's one thing conservatives love to do, it's making American cities feel like dangerous, scary trash heaps that are constantly burning to the ground. To them, New York is unlivable, Minneapolis was a war zone, and now, all eyes are on Los Angeles — a city Donald Trump claims was "once great" but is now being "invaded" by "illegal aliens and criminals." As someone who actually lives in LA, I can tell you that narrative is completely detached from reality. First of all, LA wasn't "once great" — it's always been great, and it's always been an immigrant city, which, contrary to conservative panic, isn't a flaw. It's the foundation. The name is LOS ANGELES, remember? Second of all, the city isn't under "attack" by "criminals and illegal aliens" — fear-mongering buzzwords the right loves to throw around to paint a false picture of chaos. Quite the opposite, actually. In truth, LA is hurting not because of its people, but because ICE is barging into homes and workplaces. The fear here isn't coming from the streets. It's coming from our own federal government. People have been protesting peacefully. Things didn't escalate until Trump sent in 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Yesterday, a coworker told me what's usually a 12-minute drive home downtown took him half an hour because the National Guard, not protesters or even local police, were standing around clogging the streets. Even Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move "reckless," "pointless," and "disrespectful to our troops" in a post on X. "This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego," he said. And yet, conservative media keeps pretending the city is being overrun by "insurrectionist mobs" (lest we forget who actually did storm the Capitol). Most people are still just trying to live their lives — working, commuting, taking care of their families — but now under the added weight of fear, anger, and disruption. The protests are mostly peaceful and, relative to the size of LA, contained. Genuinely, I don't think people realize how big this damn city is. It is not the same. Alas, this brings me to everyone's not-so-favorite conservative grifter: Charlie Kirk, who tried to contrast the moment by posting a clip of a "small town" set to the country song "Small Town USA." He wrote, "I wonder why America's small towns are so placid, lovely, and orderly. It's a total mystery." In the clip, a girl proudly shows off her idyllic idea of "small" town Americana. She shows us a covered porch with an American flag: A parade with American flag-waving locals: Cops on horseback: A pickup truck strolling by: A tractor strolling by: And, naturally, racks of American flag merch. She also takes us to a farmer's market. A lake house (with, you guessed it, more American flags). And a beach-themed bar. You get the picture: "placid," patriotic, white. As someone from Michigan myself, I instantly recognized the town; it's Rockford, MI, a wealthy suburb just outside Grand Rapids, the second largest city in the state. And many others did too, pointing out another crucial detail about this "lovely" little town: it voted blue in the last two presidential elections. "I love how every time these LARPers post 'small town' and 'real American' content to contrast with L.A. its always affluent suburbs that vote Democratic," one viral tweet said. Another pointed out: "because this town voted for harris by a 52–45 margin." Note: The Kent County margin was 52-46, rounded. Even former Republican Rep. Justin Amash weighed in: "This is Rockford, Michigan, which is a suburb of Grand Rapids, and part of the congressional district I represented. Rockford voted for Biden over Trump in 2020 and Harris over Trump in 2024. I didn't vote for any of those candidates. Just reporting the facts." Another person also remarked the absurdity of calling the area a "small town": "I love the framing of Rockford being a small town lol. 3rd biggest high school in GR and is essentially an annex of the city. But tractor on street." "This is clearly not a small town, which would be obvious if you'd ever spent time in one," another added. And while the county has recently leaned blue, it's still very white — Kent County is 72% white, compared to the national average of 58%. That might explain why Charlie Kirk was drawn to the video in the first place, which, notably, featured almost no Black or brown people. "So what Charlie Kirk is implying here is that small American towns are nice because there are no brown people," one person tweeted. "They don't even hide the blatant racism anymore," added another. All in all, this tweet may have said it best: "People who live in small towns are scared of cities, and people who live in cities are scared of small towns. People who have lived in both are only scared of small towns." As someone who's lived in both small towns (in Michigan too!) and now Los Angeles, I can't say I disagree. But, as always, let me know your thoughts in the comments.
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge invokes monarchy talk while mulling Trump's National Guard deployment
A federal judge warned at a Thursday hearing that accepting the Trump administration's assertion he has no authority to review the president's National Guard deployment in Los Angeles is a slippery slope. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said he hoped to rule later in the day on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) request to immediately restrict the troops' power on the ground, suggesting federal law at minimum required Trump to alert the governor. The judge repeatedly emphasized that Trump is exercising presidential authority — not a king's — and the role comes with limitations. 'That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said. 'It's not that a leader can simply say something and then it becomes it. It's a question of is a leader, a president or the governor, following the law as set forth in both the Constitution and statutes,' he continued. 'That's what a president, a governor or any leader must act under. Otherwise, they become something other than a constitutional officer.' Breyer seemed willing to agree with Newsom that Trump's deployment was legally defective, but it's still a question as to whether the judge will enjoin the president's directive or give the administration a chance to institute it the proper way. At the same time, Breyer appeared skeptical about blocking at this stage the 700 Marines sent to assist the several thousand guardsmen deployed. The Trump administration argues Breyer has no authority to review Trump's deployment of the National Guard because it is in the president's sole discretion. Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate argued that Trump was not required to seek approval from Newsom in mobilizing the guard, calling the governor 'merely a conduit.' The president does not have to call up a governor and 'invite them to Camp David' for a negotiation summit to call up the National Guard in their state, he said. 'There is one commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and when the president makes a decision, the states are subservient to the president's decision,' Shumate said. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) contend that Trump was required to receive Newsom's consent before deploying the National Guard. 'They suggest, your honor, that there are no guardrails,' Nicholas Green, a lawyer for the state. Amid the legal battle, Trump said Thursday that he 'doesn't feel like a king.' He was responding to questions about 'No King' demonstrations expected around the country this weekend set to coincide with a military parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' Trump said. Breyer during the hearing kept returning to monarchy talk, trying to determine how he could side with Trump without giving him unchecked power. 'What makes America great, different, is our Constitution and our robust discussion of views of the citizens,' the judge said.
