
Reconsidering Manitoba's war on ‘pests'
Opinion
As Danae Tonge made her way to Warren, Man. last month, to peacefully protest a wildlife hunting contest taking place the next day, it quickly became apparent that her plans would need to change.
Tonge, along with other members of activist group Manitoba Animal Save, were greeted by a group of hostile hunters, blocking the road with a sign draped by animal skin and antlers, reading 'No tree huggers.' Tonge says she felt unsafe, so she told her group to go home.
The plan had been to protest, and to bear witness to the crows and magpies due to be hunted down the following day as part of a contest held by Woodlands and District Wildlife Federation. 'Teams of two will compete to harvest the most birds,' the flier reads, 'with cash prizes awarded to the top scoring teams.' The birds are considered by some to be 'pests,' potentially harmful to young livestock (who of course will eventually be killed, too).
In Manitoba, ravens are protected under the provincial Wildlife Act, but crows and magpies are not, and shooting them for fun appears to be a common springtime activity in some Manitoba communities. Minnedosa will be holding a similar contest this weekend, but this one will also include gophers. Killing a gopher will get you one point. Magpies are worth three.
Manitoba Animal Save won't be protesting the Minnedosa event. Instead, they, along with other advocacy groups, Animal Justice and The Winnipeg Humane Society, are calling on the provincial government to amend the Wildlife Act to include crows and magpies, or even better — to ban these contests altogether.
'The Winnipeg Humane Society strongly opposes the killing of crows, magpies, gophers and all other species for sport,' says director of animal advocacy, Krista Boryskavich. The organization is also advocating for 'legislative amendments to require an independent, third-party scientific report prior to undertaking population management measures, which would ensure that population management is only carried out if … necessary,' and 'in the most humane manner possible.'
Concerns about population control also extend to the issue of ground squirrels — another small animal deemed by some as 'pests.'
Later this month the City of Winnipeg plans to gas ground squirrels to death in their burrows across eight city parks, due to their holes supposedly being a danger to people and pets.
The lethal pesticide is called 'Giant Destroyer,' and Kaitlyn Mitchell, a Winnipeg lawyer with Animal Justice, says it can take up to an hour or more to actually kill the squirrel. She calls the method cruel and says there are better options. 'A more effective approach would be to hire experienced biologists or other experts' she writes in a statement, 'to live-trap animals if absolutely necessary in March, before young are born.' Waiting until May means baby squirrels will also be gassed.
Ultimately, it's the labelling of certain wild animals as 'pests' that allows for this type of treatment to take place. But this branding is both misguided and dangerous. Such language shapes perception — and policy — toward eradication rather than co-existence. Across Manitoba and beyond, these animals are treated as nuisances simply for surviving among us.
But who's encroaching upon whom? These wild animals are simply adapting to the spaces we've created in their habitats. They aren't invaders; they're survivors. And unfairly categorizing them as 'pests' allows for the casual use of terrifying killing methods like trapping, poisoning, hunting and culling.
'We need solutions rooted in ecology, not extermination,' says Lesley Fox, executive director of wildlife advocacy group, The Fur Bearers. The term 'pest' inaccurately implies worthlessness, but all species play important roles in our shared ecosystems. Ground squirrels, says Fox, are a species whose burrows help aerate our soil. They also help disperse seeds and support biodiversity. 'Labelling these and other animals as 'pests' oversimplifies complex ecosystems,' she says, adding that 'co-existence isn't just possible, it's necessary.'
As for this weekend's hunting contest in Minnedosa, Tonge is encouraging Manitoba animal lovers to contact provincial Natural Resources Minister Ian Bushie to add pressure to the campaign to amend the Manitoba Wildlife Act.
And for those wanting to speak up for Winnipeg ground squirrels, Mitchell says to reach out to your city councillor. 'It's not too late,' she says, for the city to take a second look at this 'cruel plan.'
Thinking of certain animals as mere pests ignores our responsibility in the natural imbalances we've created — and the respect owed to fellow beings who are simply trying to live. Other solutions exist, we just need to be a society that insists on them.
Jessica Scott-Reid is a Winnipeg journalist and independent animal advocate. She is also the disinformation correspondent for Sentient, and a former member of the Winnipeg Humane Society board of directors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
30-05-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Province kills city's sulfur gas ground squirrel extermination plans
The City of Winnipeg won't be allowed to carry out its controversial plan to use a lethal pesticide on ground squirrels. In a Thursday letter to Mayor Scott Gillingham, Manitoba Environment and Climate Change Minister Mike Moyes advised the city it won't receive a permit to use the sulfur gas product known as 'Giant Destroyer.' 'I write to encourage the City of Winnipeg to explore alternative options that prioritize the safety and well-being of Manitobans… I recognize the challenge involved in balancing the safety of park visitors, environmental protection and public access,' wrote Moyes. A provincial spokesperson said the minister wasn't available for an interview Friday, due to the province's ongoing response to wildfires. In an email, Moyes said the decision followed a 'careful and thorough review.' 'The department consulted with experts in health, environment, and wildlife to inform the decision not to proceed with the application. Additionally, the department received nearly 6,300 public submissions expressing concern about the proposed control program,' the statement said. Moyes also 'strongly' recommended the city devote some of its provincial funding to fill in ground squirrel holes. The city initially planned to start using Giant Destroyer to euthanize animals at eight parks and community centre fields on May 20, but the program was delayed due to the wait for a provincial permit. (Matt Goerzen/The Brandon Sun files) The city initially planned to start using Giant Destroyer to euthanize animals at eight parks and community centre fields on May 20, but the program was delayed due to the wait for a provincial permit. (Matt Goerzen/The Brandon Sun files) The city initially planned to start using Giant Destroyer to euthanize animals at eight parks and community centre fields on May 20 but the program was delayed due to the wait for a provincial permit. If no treatment occurs, city officials have warned ground squirrels can create deep holes in athletic fields where people and pets can trip and hurt themselves. A request to interview a city official was not granted Friday. In an email, a spokeswoman said the province noted public concern and 'insufficient consideration of alternative methods' as reasons for denying the permit. 'We do not have any other feasible options… The public safety risk of deep, exposed holes in parks and playing fields is already significant and will only grow without control,' wrote spokeswoman Julie Horbal Dooley. By contrast, an opponent of the treatment plan welcomed the province's choice. 'I'm actually very pleased with that decision … First and foremost, the proposed method of euthanasia (was) neither humane nor efficient,' said James Hare, a University of Manitoba professor emeritus in biological sciences. Hare said the sulfur gas poisoning would cause a painful death. 'If you place these gas bombs in a burrowing system… you are going to have individual (animals) that are going to be exposed, in many cases, minimally to that gas, so they will suffer but not die. You will also have individuals who are exposed to even a moderate concentration… who will suffer an incredibly painful and slow death, sometimes taking over an hour,' he said. Hare said trapping ground squirrels between mid-March and early April, when adults are emerging from hibernation and have not yet started breeding, would offer much more effective population control. The animals could then be given an anesthetic and euthanized with a fast-acting drug, he said. Hare said the city's concern with the hazard posed by ground squirrel holes is valid, though he expects the level of field damage has already reached its peak for this year. 'I understand, begrudgingly, how ground squirrels do have to be controlled. But if you're going to do it, do it right,' he said. Mayor Scott Gillingham said Thursday he believes some treatment is needed to protect people using city sports fields. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun files) Mayor Scott Gillingham said Thursday he believes some treatment is needed to protect people using city sports fields. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun files) Mayor Scott Gillingham said Thursday he believes some treatment is needed to protect people using city sports fields. 'Right now, when you've got a soccer field or a baseball diamond that's riddled with gopher holes, it's dangerous for everyone that's using it,' he said. 'I, for one, am open to any solution that can assist us in getting rid of these ground squirrels so that we can make our fields playable again.' The mayor expressed concern about the province's rejection of the permit on Friday. 'I'm disappointed in this decision. These sports fields are heavily used and keeping them in safe condition for kids and adults should be a priority,' he said in a written statement. The city had planned to use the pesticide at Charleswood Place, Beryl Watts Park/Vince Leah Community Centre, Fairgrove Bay Park, Woodsworth Park, Shaughnessy Park, Weston Memorial Community Centre, Theodore Niitzhotay Fontaine Park and St. James Memorial Sports Park. The decision came after mounting opposition directed at city hall, where protesters gathered Thursday morning. 'For the ground squirrels, specifically, it's a very cruel method of getting rid of them. They die a very slow, agonizing death … And then (there are) also the broader (affects) on non-target species (and) wildlife,' said Danae Tonge, an organizer with Manitoba Animal Save. Those concerns include putting predators, pets and people at risk of exposure to sulfur gas, she said. X: @joyanne_pursaga Joyanne PursagaReporter Joyanne is city hall reporter for the Winnipeg Free Press. A reporter since 2004, she began covering politics exclusively in 2012, writing on city hall and the Manitoba Legislature for the Winnipeg Sun before joining the Free Press in early 2020. Read more about Joyanne. Every piece of reporting Joyanne produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.


Winnipeg Free Press
09-05-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Reconsidering Manitoba's war on ‘pests'
Opinion As Danae Tonge made her way to Warren, Man. last month, to peacefully protest a wildlife hunting contest taking place the next day, it quickly became apparent that her plans would need to change. Tonge, along with other members of activist group Manitoba Animal Save, were greeted by a group of hostile hunters, blocking the road with a sign draped by animal skin and antlers, reading 'No tree huggers.' Tonge says she felt unsafe, so she told her group to go home. The plan had been to protest, and to bear witness to the crows and magpies due to be hunted down the following day as part of a contest held by Woodlands and District Wildlife Federation. 'Teams of two will compete to harvest the most birds,' the flier reads, 'with cash prizes awarded to the top scoring teams.' The birds are considered by some to be 'pests,' potentially harmful to young livestock (who of course will eventually be killed, too). In Manitoba, ravens are protected under the provincial Wildlife Act, but crows and magpies are not, and shooting them for fun appears to be a common springtime activity in some Manitoba communities. Minnedosa will be holding a similar contest this weekend, but this one will also include gophers. Killing a gopher will get you one point. Magpies are worth three. Manitoba Animal Save won't be protesting the Minnedosa event. Instead, they, along with other advocacy groups, Animal Justice and The Winnipeg Humane Society, are calling on the provincial government to amend the Wildlife Act to include crows and magpies, or even better — to ban these contests altogether. 'The Winnipeg Humane Society strongly opposes the killing of crows, magpies, gophers and all other species for sport,' says director of animal advocacy, Krista Boryskavich. The organization is also advocating for 'legislative amendments to require an independent, third-party scientific report prior to undertaking population management measures, which would ensure that population management is only carried out if … necessary,' and 'in the most humane manner possible.' Concerns about population control also extend to the issue of ground squirrels — another small animal deemed by some as 'pests.' Later this month the City of Winnipeg plans to gas ground squirrels to death in their burrows across eight city parks, due to their holes supposedly being a danger to people and pets. The lethal pesticide is called 'Giant Destroyer,' and Kaitlyn Mitchell, a Winnipeg lawyer with Animal Justice, says it can take up to an hour or more to actually kill the squirrel. She calls the method cruel and says there are better options. 'A more effective approach would be to hire experienced biologists or other experts' she writes in a statement, 'to live-trap animals if absolutely necessary in March, before young are born.' Waiting until May means baby squirrels will also be gassed. Ultimately, it's the labelling of certain wild animals as 'pests' that allows for this type of treatment to take place. But this branding is both misguided and dangerous. Such language shapes perception — and policy — toward eradication rather than co-existence. Across Manitoba and beyond, these animals are treated as nuisances simply for surviving among us. But who's encroaching upon whom? These wild animals are simply adapting to the spaces we've created in their habitats. They aren't invaders; they're survivors. And unfairly categorizing them as 'pests' allows for the casual use of terrifying killing methods like trapping, poisoning, hunting and culling. 'We need solutions rooted in ecology, not extermination,' says Lesley Fox, executive director of wildlife advocacy group, The Fur Bearers. The term 'pest' inaccurately implies worthlessness, but all species play important roles in our shared ecosystems. Ground squirrels, says Fox, are a species whose burrows help aerate our soil. They also help disperse seeds and support biodiversity. 'Labelling these and other animals as 'pests' oversimplifies complex ecosystems,' she says, adding that 'co-existence isn't just possible, it's necessary.' As for this weekend's hunting contest in Minnedosa, Tonge is encouraging Manitoba animal lovers to contact provincial Natural Resources Minister Ian Bushie to add pressure to the campaign to amend the Manitoba Wildlife Act. And for those wanting to speak up for Winnipeg ground squirrels, Mitchell says to reach out to your city councillor. 'It's not too late,' she says, for the city to take a second look at this 'cruel plan.' Thinking of certain animals as mere pests ignores our responsibility in the natural imbalances we've created — and the respect owed to fellow beings who are simply trying to live. Other solutions exist, we just need to be a society that insists on them. Jessica Scott-Reid is a Winnipeg journalist and independent animal advocate. She is also the disinformation correspondent for Sentient, and a former member of the Winnipeg Humane Society board of directors.


Winnipeg Free Press
28-04-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
In defence of facts and farmers
Opinion Jessica Scott-Reid and Kaitlyn Mitchell's recent opinion piece, Canada's horse export trade and the election (Think Tank, April 23) casts Canada's live horse export industry as a national disgrace. However, their article relies heavily on emotionally charged language, exaggerated claims, and misleading portrayals that do little to inform a thoughtful public debate. Their narrative leaves no room for the facts on the ground. As the Senate critic of Bill C-355, An Act to prohibit the export by air of horses for slaughter and to make related amendments to certain Acts, I made it a priority to observe first-hand how the industry works from one end to the other. I met with farmers, feedlot owners, veterinarians, animal transportation experts, exporters, animal rights groups, and more. I visited feedlots to observe the loading process, followed the trucks to the airport, and watched as the horses were loaded into crates and then onto the plane. At every stage, I examined the claims made by animal rights activists and found them riddled with distortions and misrepresentations. For example, Animal Justice repeatedly asserts that horses 'are crammed into wooden crates so tightly they can barely move around or balance during turbulence.' This is categorically false. The spacing provided for each horse not only meets but exceeds the mandatory standards established by the International Air Transport Association. Unlike stalled horses, which are often cross-tied and cannot raise and lower their heads or turn around, export horses have free range of movement within their crates. But the factual misrepresentations go beyond transport conditions. Animal Justice also claimed that I 'refused to allow the bill to be voted on and sent to committee study.' This, too, is categorically false. The timetable of a bill's passage is not determined by any one senator, but by the Senate as a whole. Suggesting otherwise is absurd and betrays a poor understanding of Senate rules. Senate procedure permits any senator who wishes to speak to a bill to do so before it proceeds to a vote. A number of senators had indicated to me their desire to do so and as critic of the bill, I was ready to speak to the bill as soon as these other senators had their opportunity. In actual fact, my speech on Bill C-355 was written last November, and I was looking forward to giving it in order to counter the constant stream of misinformation disseminated by Animal Justice. Regrettably, due to the government's prorogation of Parliament, I now will not have the opportunity to do so. That lost opportunity matters, because the bill's stated intent did not match its content. Bill C-355 claimed to address animal welfare and yet it would have made it illegal to transport horses by air only if their end use was human consumption. The same horses could still have been transported the same way under the same conditions to the same destination for any other purpose. This demonstrates that the legislation was not about animal welfare but rather a tool of animal activists who are ideologically opposed to the human consumption of horse meat. While some may find the idea of raising horses for livestock distasteful, it is a long-standing and common practice both in Canada and around the world. Horse meat is a significant part of the culinary traditions of over one billion people in 77 countries worldwide and is a legitimate part of our agricultural trade. As our current trade challenges have reminded us, we should be strengthening Canadian export markets, not undermining them based on political opportunism and unsound evidence. Senator Donald Plett is Leader of the Opposition in the Canadian Senate, and a senator from Manitoba.