
Dharmasthala murders: Court-monitored SIT probe sought
Addressing a press conference at the Bengaluru Press Club on Thursday, retired Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. Gopala Gowda demanded that, 'Given the gravity of the alleged offences and the distressing information suggesting that these crimes may have been committed by highly influential and powerful personalities with significant political clout, we strongly recommend the following immediate actions.'
'We urge the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT), to be monitored by an Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) level Police Officer, in conjunction with a sitting or retired Judge of the Supreme Court or the High Court of Karnataka,' Justice Gowda stated. This will ensure impartiality, thoroughness, and public confidence in the Investigation, he underlined.
On July 11, an unidentified complainant, who had claimed that he was forced to bury several bodies of women who were raped and murdered in Dharmasthala village, appeared before a court in Karnataka's Mangaluru district last Friday and recorded his statement. According to his statement, he fled Dharmasthala 11 years ago. He alleged that the bodies of the women showed clear signs of sexual assault. They were found without clothes or undergarments and bore injuries suggesting violent acts.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Give up contempt action against lawyer, say rtd judges
Madurai: At least seven retired judges of Madras high court made an appeal to a division bench of Justice G R Swaminathan and Justice K Rajasekar to give up the proposed contempt action against a Madurai-based lawyer, S Vanchinathan, for sending a representation to the Chief Justice of India making certain remarks against Justice Swaminathan. The statement was issued by seven retired judges of Madras high court - Justice K Chandru, Justice D Hariparanthaman, Justice C T Selvam, Justice Akbar Ali, Justice P Kalaiyarasan, Justice S Vimala, and Justice S S Sundar. "We are issuing this appeal only in the interest of the judicial institution and we have no other interest in the matter," said the judges. The judges said the Supreme Court had held that no direct action can be launched by lawyers against the conduct, impropriety or misbehaviour of a judge. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai The apex court has directed that if anyone wants to send a petition against a judge's conduct, it should be sent to the CJI directly. If and when the CJI is of the opinion that it requires an investigation into the truthfulness or otherwise, he can constitute an 'in-house inquiry' into those allegations made against the judge. It is only when the in-house committee is of the opinion that there is a prima facie truth in the allegations made, he can take or order appropriate action in the matter. 'This is the established procedure as of now,'' the judges said. In the absence of any such action taken by the CJI on the petition sent by the advocate, it will be premature for the bench to initiate action against him. Hence, the judges appealed the bench to give up any action at this stage and also to await any decision to be taken by the CJI in the petition sent by advocate Vanchinathan, the judges said..


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
30 yrs on, man acquitted of abetting his wife's suicide
Mumbai: Nearly three decades after being convicted of abetting his wife's suicide by being cruel and harassing her about her complexion, among other things, a shepherd, then 23, was acquitted by Bombay high court. Domestic quarrels, including remarks about complexion and threats of a second marriage, do not constitute criminal harassment under the law, observed Justice S M Modak, who on July 11 set the man free. Quashing the man's conviction and five-year rigorous imprisonment for suicide abetment under section 306 of erstwhile Indian Penal Code (IPC) and one-year rigorous imprisonment for cruelty to his wife under section 498A, IPC, Justice Modak, sitting singly, said, "The legislature contemplates that every dispute, quarrel, or altercation arising from matrimonial life are not criminal offences. It will take the colour of criminal law only when there are no alternatives for the wife but to put an end to her life because of the harassment. " You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai In 1998, following his conviction, the man appealed before HC. He was in Satara jail at the time and later out on bail. The conviction was unsupported by evidence, HC said and criticised the trial court for having "forgotten basic principles and ingredients of section 306 of IPC (suicide abetment)". Abetment needs to be proved for suicide, HC said. On record, though wife "was being taunted on account of her complexion, I do not think that it will fall within the explanation to section 498-A..." said Justice Modak. The prosecution also failed to prove the wife's suicide was due to harassment. The shepherd's father, also a co-accused, complained of her cooking, it was alleged. The marriage was in 1993, and the wife died in Jan 1998. Both sides shared the wedding expenses, HC noted, and there was no dowry demand. As a goatherd, he was away from home, "for a long time" and she would go to her mother's house, complain about harassment, and ended her life one day, HC noted. There seemed to be quarrels arising out of matrimonial life. "They are domestic quarrels," HC said and offence of cruelty requires husband's wilful conduct to be "of a high degree," which HC said in the case could not be considered so high as to compel the suicide. "...the judgment of the trial court cannot be sustained in the eyes of the law," HC held and acquitted the husband.


The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How do internal complaints committees work?
The story so far: A young student's self-immolation at a college in Balasore, Odisha has put the spotlight on the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) which failed to validate her complaints of sexual harassment against her head of the department. The victim's family has claimed the members of the ICC were not trained adequately and that the environment in the college and within the ICC was biased in favour of the accused. What is the law behind the ICC? The Supreme Court first called for complaint committees to be set up in its 1997 judgment in response to a petition filed after Bhanwari Devi, a social worker in Rajasthan, was gang-raped when she tried to stop a child marriage. The Court provided basic definitions of sexual harassment in the workplace, and guidelines to combat it. Known as the Vishaka Guidelines, they called for an appropriate mechanism to be created by employers to ensure time bound treatment of complaints of sexual harassment. It said that the Complaints Committee should be headed by a woman, and include women as at least half its members, as well as a third party to prevent undue pressure from senior levels within the organisation. It was not until the Nirbhaya killing in Delhi in December 2012 that the provisions were actually written into law. One of the several legislations that were enacted was The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, often called the POSH Act, which superceded the Vishaka Guidelines. It mandated the constitution of ICCs at all workplaces which employed more than 10 people. Women working in smaller enterprises in the informal sector could complain to Local Committees to be set up by district authorities. What are the powers of an ICC? Each ICC is to be headed by a Presiding Officer, who is to be a woman employed at a senior level at the workplace. At least two members should be employees preferably committed to the cause of women or who have had experience in social work or have legal knowledge, and another member should be from an NGO devoted to women's rights or a person familiar with sexual harassment issues. At least half of the members should be women. Any aggrieved woman can complain in writing to the ICC or local committee within three months of the date of the harassment incident or series of incidents. The committee can help to settle the matter at the request of the woman or begin an inquiry into the complaint. The ICC has the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure. The inquiry is to be completed within 90 days. If the complaint is proved, the ICC must recommend the action to be taken against the accused. The employer is also required to aid the victim if she wishes to file a criminal complaint. The law mandates confidentiality regarding the contents of the complaint, the identity and addresses of the aggrieved woman, the respondent and witnesses, any information relating to conciliation and inquiry proceedings, and the recommendations of the ICC. What is the status of their implementation? In the decade since the law was passed, though ICCs have been set up in some institutions, their coverage is far from universal. In December 2024, the Supreme Court took stock of the 'sorry state of affairs', pointing out that it was 'disquieting' to note 'serious lapses' in the enforcement of the POSH Act. It directed immediate compliance within the government, and a survey of public and private organisations as well. 'This law was designed to be monitored, but who is doing it? District officers are supposed to collect annual reports on compliance and sexual harassment cases from the Local Committees and ICCs, but what is done with that material?' asks Madhu Mehra, a lawyer advocating for women's rights, and the founder of Partners for Law in Development. Ms. Mehra points out that while the Women and Child Development Ministry is the line Ministry for the POSH Act, it is the Labour Ministry and Industries Ministry that deal with workplaces and employers. 'Accountability is falling between the cracks. Where is the evidence-based analysis on how this law is functioning? It's a black hole.' She says the Balasore case shows that even where ICCs are in place, they are merely a 'dead letter' if there is insufficient training for members, if the power imbalance in a workplace is not addressed, and if there is no confidentiality being maintained. (Those in distress or having suicidal thoughts are encouraged to seek help and counselling by calling the helpline numbers here)