B.C. Premier to discuss tariffs and pipelines during annual summer summit
B.C Premier David Eby joined his counterparts in Ontario's cottage county Monday for an annual summer summit, hosted this year by Premier Doug Ford.
The focus of the three-day summit is fighting U.S. President Donald Trump's looming tariffs, set to kick in Aug. 1.
Eby said Monday that he wants to see softwood lumber front and centre in trade negotiations and is open to export quotas on Canadian lumber.
'If we could get a deal on this, it would support Americans, it would support Canadians and it would be a net win,' he told reporters.
'I'm a huge fan of the idea, I've been advocating for that with the prime minister. Let's get a deal done, and I'm hopeful he's been hearing that message.'
Monday's events included a session with First Nations leaders who have pushed back on legislation designed to fast-track infrastructure and energy projects and are calling for more consultation.
The premiers emerged from the day's meeting expressing support for including the prime minister in a follow-up meeting with First Nations leadership.
Another issue on deck is removing inter provincial trade barriers, something the provincial leaders seem to unanimously support.
More controversial are ongoing calls, particularly from Alberta Premier Danielle Smith for more pipelines through B.C. Eby is on record as opposing the idea, but the Opposition says the province would benefit.
'British Columbia is in a unique position where we could be the nation builder, we could be opening up our ports, getting our natural gas out to international markets, getting our oil out to international markets and becoming that unifying factor of all of Canada,' said B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad.
Pipelines didn't come up during the day's meetings, but Ford said he expected they would during an evening barbecue at his family's cottage.
'There's going to be a great conversation around the dinner table tonight, and everyone lets their hair down,' he told reporters.
The premiers will be back at it Tuesday, along with the prime minister, plotting ways to strengthen Canada's economy to respond to the latest tariff threats from Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Peace activists lament unravelling of landmine pact named after Ottawa
Social Sharing Paul Hannon remembers being in Ottawa in 1997 when representatives from across the globe came to the city to sign an agreement banning the production and use of landmines. At the time, Hannon was volunteering for Mines Action Canada, a coalition of groups advocating against the use of mines in armed conflicts. "It was a pretty magical moment in December, the first week of December 1997, when 122 countries from around the world came here to sign the treaty," he told CBC News. But 28 years later, the agreement is being challenged. Ukraine and five other countries, some of which are members of NATO, have either moved to withdraw from the convention or have indicated they would do so, citing growing military threats from Russia. Hannon and others who pushed for the treaty are lamenting how its being undone. They're also arguing that Canada, the country that brokered it, should play a more active part in keeping countries from withdrawing. "Once they've gone through that process and they've left, then people are going to start thinking, 'Where are those countries that were calling for this treaty, where were the countries that were the big leaders?'" Hannon said. 'We were where the landmines got banned' Lloyd Axworthy, who served as foreign affairs minister from 1996 to 2000, was the driving force behind the treaty in 1997. He said the inspiration for the initiative came after he and his 11-year-old son visited an exhibit on landmines. "He said, 'Well, aren't you the foreign minister, dad?' I said, 'Yeah.' He said, 'Why can't you do something about it?'" he told CBC. The way Axworthy went about forging the treaty, by including civic groups that typically weren't included in such agreements, would also come to be known as the "Ottawa process." Alex Neve, a human rights lawyer and former secretary-general of Amnesty International Canada, said the treaty — and Ottawa by association — became widely known in international circles. "The degree to which other states have come to regularly call it the Ottawa Treaty or the Ottawa Convention — you hear both — is a real sign that the rest of the world recognizes Canada's leadership as well," Neve said. 'We're not playing that role anymore' Last month, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a decree on withdrawing from the convention, though it still needs parliamentary approval to take effect. The country's foreign affairs ministry said that Russia's use of anti-personnel mines "has created an asymmetric advantage for the aggressor." Neve said the move sets a bad precedent. "Anytime a nation shows the rest of the world that you can back away from your international obligations, you can retreat from your international obligations, it risks encouraging other governments to do the same thing," he said. Neve and Axworthy also said that Canada ought to engage more with countries to ensure they stay signed on to the convention. "We were one of the leaders in non-proliferation of weaponry," Axworthy said. "And we're not playing that role anymore." For Hannon, the crumbling of the treaty also stings on a local level, as it's something that everyone in Ottawa — and Canada — should be proud of. "Everybody thinks that the world knows about us because of hockey or Wayne Gretzky. And I would say now most of the world knows about us because we were where landmines got banned. That was a really significant thing," he said. "I would certainly like people to remember [the treaty] much more than this is the city where the convoy took over ... for two weeks. I think that's a much better memory to have and a much better claim to fame."
CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Ontario Land Tribunal approves controversial Davis Tannery development in Kingston
The Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) has approved a controversial development in Kingston, Ont., that would see more than 1,500 homes built at what's currently a site contaminated by decades of industry. In 2022, city council voted against the Davis Tannery project — named after a business that once operated there — in a move that was celebrated by environmental groups, but promptly appealed by the developer, identified in multiple media reports as Jay Patry. In a statement released Monday, the city said the OLT had weighed in with a decision that "approves the development in its entirety, through amendments to both the Official Plan and the Zoning By-Law." Those amendments will be shared in a draft of the new official plan, which the city said will be released to the public in mid-August. "This development marks a major step forward for Kingston, bringing much needed housing to the urban core, and remediating the largest brownfield property in the city," read a statement attributed to Mayor Bryan Paterson. "I'm excited to see how this project will contribute to the renewal and revitalization of Kingston's Inner Harbour." Concerns about contamination The project proposes four phases which would see mid-rise, mixed-use commercial and residential buildings with 1,500-1,670 homes at the site sandwiched between River Street and Belle Park, according to the city. A minimum of 3,600 square metres of commercial space and a new park along the Cataraqui River are also outlined in the proposal. The project was opposed by organizations including No Clearcuts in Kingston (NCK), which was a party in the tribunal and argued against removing trees — including a 200-year-old oak — and releasing toxins trapped in the soil. A media release shared by the group Monday said it was "deeply disappointed" by the decision, adding it allows the "clearcutting of 2000 trees." "We are extremely upset and disheartened to learn that the desire of so many Kingstonians to preserve the Tannery urban forest has been thwarted by the Tribunal's decision," read a quote from NCK member Kathleen O'Hara. The group said it has concerns about "dangerous chemicals," including chromium in the ground and asked how the developer and various levels of government plan to coordinate a safe cleanup. "Will there be credible, independent monitoring of environmental impacts on a daily basis while the pre-construction clearcutting is underway?" asked Kerry Hill, who was identified in the release as a retired biologist. NCK also said its members will continue to monitor the project in order to minimize the environmental damage it could cause. In a 78-page document dated July 25, OLT vice-chair Steven Cooke wrote he "accepts and adopts the majority of the contested evidence" and expert opinions provided by the developer. "The Tribunal is persuaded by the evidence that the proposal promotes efficient development of land, accommodates a range of appropriate mixed uses, intensifies uses within the settlement area, and contributes to the range of housing options, and in particular, remediation of a brownfield as desired by the City," it reads. Cooke added that the OLT considered the points raised by those against the project, but "was not persuaded that the concerns they have raised are either sustainable given the evidence offered in support of the planned development, or otherwise bears relevance to the land use planning merits of the proposal." However, the tribunal did deny the developer's proposal to cap part of a wetland, with Cooke writing the provincial policy "clearly states that 'development and site alterations shall not be permitted.'"
CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Digital identity copyrights + Protecting affordable rentals
The National breaks down Denmark's move to stop unauthorized deepfakes by allowing people to copyright their digital identities. Plus, how B.C. is trying to protect affordable rent.
