City faces backlash over Lansdowne mixed-use development
City of Cape Town faces backlash over mixed-use development approva Residents of the Lansdowne-Crawford community express strong opposition to a newly approved mixed-use development, citing concerns over traffic, noise, and the impact on their residential area.
Image: supplied
The Lansdowne-Crawford community is strongly opposing a mixed-use development on Rokeby and Lawson Roads, arguing it clashes with the residential area and will cause major traffic, noise, and spatial issues.
They have expressed their dissatisfaction with its approval by the City of Cape Town despite their appeals.
In an open letter addressed to Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis, the ward councillor, mayco member for Spatial Planning and Environment Eddie Andrews, and the developers and architects involved, the residents cited that the size, height, and the proposed business development, namely a supermarket and residential units, would cause traffic and noise congestion.
The site has since gone through the process of clearance by heavy-duty construction trucks in preparation for the development.
Despite objections, including a town planner's report citing zoning issues, their appeals failed.
The Lansford ( Lansdowne and Crawford) Ratepayers Association, via the appointment of their own town planning experts, lodged an eight page objection with the City.
They are now questioning the City's approval, why the entrance is on Rokeby instead of Jan Smuts Drive, and whether residents' concerns are ignored in favor of developers profits.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The City maintains the application followed due process and access from Rokeby Road was deemed necessary.
The development is set to take place on a vacant piece of land where five separate properties are situated, which belongs to Argento Properties, who previously said they would not comment, while another request for comment has been made.
The City said in their response to the approval of the development that the residents' appeal was taken into consideration and that the Municipal Planning By-Laws were adhered to.
'The land use application went through the proper land use application process as prescribed by the Municipal Planning By-law, and was considered appropriate in its location,' said the City.
'It should be noted that comments and objections form part of the consideration of such an application, but taking various factors into consideration the application was supported and approved.
'Note that where there are objections received against a land use application, it does not necessarily mean that an application will be refused.
'The application was assessed as prescribed by the Municipal Planning By-law, taking various aspects into consideration and the application was supported."
The residents said they would continue to show disapproval for the approval of the application.
'On behalf of the community of the Lansdowne-Crawford area, represented in part by the persons attached, we hereby wish to loudly declare our ongoing objection and vehement disapproval of the planned mixed-used development on the corners of Rokeby and Lawson Roads,' the residents said jointly from the Lansford community
'Not only is the development not in keeping with the existing, mainly residential make-up of the area, but the retail/commercial nature will seriously impact the entire residential area.
'The size, including the height, of the development, as well as the nature of the proposed business, namely large supermarkets and smaller shops, will have major traffic, noise, and spatial impact.
'Delivery and shopper access is planned to be on Rokeby Road, meaning that, daily, there will be dozens of trucks and hundreds of cars entering Lawson, into Rokeby.
'This will further choke up an already congested primary road, used by the community.'
City of Cape Town faces backlash over mixed-use development approval Residents of the Lansdowne-Crawford community express strong opposition to a newly approved mixed-use development, citing concerns over traffic, noise, and the impact on their residential area.
Image: supplied
They added that existing commercial developments along Kromboom Road, such as a supermarket on the corner of Kromboom and Sunnyside Roads, were already a significant inconvenience to the community, which brought constant traffic congestion.
Videos of how the construction impacted their daily lives were shared with the Cape Argus, showing pots and pans rattling in kitchen cupboards.
The City explained why the entrance would be along Rokeby: 'As part of the processing of the application, it was indicated that access to the site would only be permissible from Rokeby Road, due to the class of road (Jan Smuts Drive) and also the permissible access distances permitted from the intersection of Jan Smuts Drive and Lawson Road. '
Ward 60 councillor, Mark Kleinschmidt, who was included in the correspondence, said: 'The development is in ward 48 and when the area was in ward 60, I advised the developer to meet with local residents because if they were going to be neighbours it should be amicable.
"That was the last I heard.
'Neighbours must be consulted and the issue falls in ward 48 currently.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.
Cape Argus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
City faces backlash over Lansdowne mixed-use development
City of Cape Town faces backlash over mixed-use development approva Residents of the Lansdowne-Crawford community express strong opposition to a newly approved mixed-use development, citing concerns over traffic, noise, and the impact on their residential area. Image: supplied The Lansdowne-Crawford community is strongly opposing a mixed-use development on Rokeby and Lawson Roads, arguing it clashes with the residential area and will cause major traffic, noise, and spatial issues. They have expressed their dissatisfaction with its approval by the City of Cape Town despite their appeals. In an open letter addressed to Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis, the ward councillor, mayco member for Spatial Planning and Environment Eddie Andrews, and the developers and architects involved, the residents cited that the size, height, and the proposed business development, namely a supermarket and residential units, would cause traffic and noise congestion. The site has since gone through the process of clearance by heavy-duty construction trucks in preparation for the development. Despite objections, including a town planner's report citing zoning issues, their appeals failed. The Lansford ( Lansdowne and Crawford) Ratepayers Association, via the appointment of their own town planning experts, lodged an eight page objection with the City. They are now questioning the City's approval, why the entrance is on Rokeby instead of Jan Smuts Drive, and whether residents' concerns are ignored in favor of developers profits. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The City maintains the application followed due process and access from Rokeby Road was deemed necessary. The development is set to take place on a vacant piece of land where five separate properties are situated, which belongs to Argento Properties, who previously said they would not comment, while another request for comment has been made. The City said in their response to the approval of the development that the residents' appeal was taken into consideration and that the Municipal Planning By-Laws were adhered to. 'The land use application went through the proper land use application process as prescribed by the Municipal Planning By-law, and was considered appropriate in its location,' said the City. 'It should be noted that comments and objections form part of the consideration of such an application, but taking various factors into consideration the application was supported and approved. 'Note that where there are objections received against a land use application, it does not necessarily mean that an application will be refused. 'The application was assessed as prescribed by the Municipal Planning By-law, taking various aspects into consideration and the application was supported." The residents said they would continue to show disapproval for the approval of the application. 'On behalf of the community of the Lansdowne-Crawford area, represented in part by the persons attached, we hereby wish to loudly declare our ongoing objection and vehement disapproval of the planned mixed-used development on the corners of Rokeby and Lawson Roads,' the residents said jointly from the Lansford community 'Not only is the development not in keeping with the existing, mainly residential make-up of the area, but the retail/commercial nature will seriously impact the entire residential area. 'The size, including the height, of the development, as well as the nature of the proposed business, namely large supermarkets and smaller shops, will have major traffic, noise, and spatial impact. 'Delivery and shopper access is planned to be on Rokeby Road, meaning that, daily, there will be dozens of trucks and hundreds of cars entering Lawson, into Rokeby. 'This will further choke up an already congested primary road, used by the community.' City of Cape Town faces backlash over mixed-use development approval Residents of the Lansdowne-Crawford community express strong opposition to a newly approved mixed-use development, citing concerns over traffic, noise, and the impact on their residential area. Image: supplied They added that existing commercial developments along Kromboom Road, such as a supermarket on the corner of Kromboom and Sunnyside Roads, were already a significant inconvenience to the community, which brought constant traffic congestion. Videos of how the construction impacted their daily lives were shared with the Cape Argus, showing pots and pans rattling in kitchen cupboards. The City explained why the entrance would be along Rokeby: 'As part of the processing of the application, it was indicated that access to the site would only be permissible from Rokeby Road, due to the class of road (Jan Smuts Drive) and also the permissible access distances permitted from the intersection of Jan Smuts Drive and Lawson Road. ' Ward 60 councillor, Mark Kleinschmidt, who was included in the correspondence, said: 'The development is in ward 48 and when the area was in ward 60, I advised the developer to meet with local residents because if they were going to be neighbours it should be amicable. "That was the last I heard. 'Neighbours must be consulted and the issue falls in ward 48 currently.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
City faces backlash over Lansdowne mixed-use development
City of Cape Town faces backlash over mixed-use development approva Residents of the Lansdowne-Crawford community express strong opposition to a newly approved mixed-use development, citing concerns over traffic, noise, and the impact on their residential area. Image: supplied The Lansdowne-Crawford community is strongly opposing a mixed-use development on Rokeby and Lawson Roads, arguing it clashes with the residential area and will cause major traffic, noise, and spatial issues. They have expressed their dissatisfaction with its approval by the City of Cape Town despite their appeals. In an open letter addressed to Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis, the ward councillor, mayco member for Spatial Planning and Environment Eddie Andrews, and the developers and architects involved, the residents cited that the size, height, and the proposed business development, namely a supermarket and residential units, would cause traffic and noise congestion. The site has since gone through the process of clearance by heavy-duty construction trucks in preparation for the development. Despite objections, including a town planner's report citing zoning issues, their appeals failed. The Lansford ( Lansdowne and Crawford) Ratepayers Association, via the appointment of their own town planning experts, lodged an eight page objection with the City. They are now questioning the City's approval, why the entrance is on Rokeby instead of Jan Smuts Drive, and whether residents' concerns are ignored in favor of developers profits. The City maintains the application followed due process and access from Rokeby Road was deemed necessary. The development is set to take place on a vacant piece of land where five separate properties are situated, which belongs to Argento Properties, who previously said they would not comment, while another request for comment has been made. The City said in their response to the approval of the development that the residents' appeal was taken into consideration and that the Municipal Planning By-Laws were adhered to. 'The land use application went through the proper land use application process as prescribed by the Municipal Planning By-law, and was considered appropriate in its location,' said the City. 'It should be noted that comments and objections form part of the consideration of such an application, but taking various factors into consideration the application was supported and approved. 'Note that where there are objections received against a land use application, it does not necessarily mean that an application will be refused. 'The application was assessed as prescribed by the Municipal Planning By-law, taking various aspects into consideration and the application was supported." The residents said they would continue to show disapproval for the approval of the application. 'On behalf of the community of the Lansdowne-Crawford area, represented in part by the persons attached, we hereby wish to loudly declare our ongoing objection and vehement disapproval of the planned mixed-used development on the corners of Rokeby and Lawson Roads,' the residents said jointly from the Lansford community 'Not only is the development not in keeping with the existing, mainly residential make-up of the area, but the retail/commercial nature will seriously impact the entire residential area. 'The size, including the height, of the development, as well as the nature of the proposed business, namely large supermarkets and smaller shops, will have major traffic, noise, and spatial impact. 'Delivery and shopper access is planned to be on Rokeby Road, meaning that, daily, there will be dozens of trucks and hundreds of cars entering Lawson, into Rokeby. 'This will further choke up an already congested primary road, used by the community.' City of Cape Town faces backlash over mixed-use development approval Residents of the Lansdowne-Crawford community express strong opposition to a newly approved mixed-use development, citing concerns over traffic, noise, and the impact on their residential area. Image: supplied They added that existing commercial developments along Kromboom Road, such as a supermarket on the corner of Kromboom and Sunnyside Roads, were already a significant inconvenience to the community, which brought constant traffic congestion. Videos of how the construction impacted their daily lives were shared with the Cape Argus, showing pots and pans rattling in kitchen cupboards. The City explained why the entrance would be along Rokeby: 'As part of the processing of the application, it was indicated that access to the site would only be permissible from Rokeby Road, due to the class of road (Jan Smuts Drive) and also the permissible access distances permitted from the intersection of Jan Smuts Drive and Lawson Road. ' Ward 60 councillor, Mark Kleinschmidt, who was included in the correspondence, said: 'The development is in ward 48 and when the area was in ward 60, I advised the developer to meet with local residents because if they were going to be neighbours it should be amicable. "That was the last I heard. 'Neighbours must be consulted and the issue falls in ward 48 currently.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
Daily Maverick
20 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘No problem,' says Joburg as R1bn tender goes to officials' families or friends
The City of Johannesburg defends the award of massive transport contracts to politically connected families, despite concerns from the Auditor-General and civic watchdogs A week after Auditor-General revealed that the City of Johannesburg had awarded R972-million in dodgy family-linked tenders, city spokesperson Nthatisi Modingoane has confirmed that the metro government sees no problem and will not investigate. Six awards (or contracts) valued at almost R1-billion were made to the family of either a city official or councillor for the extension of the BRT/Rea Vaya bus system in 2023. The extension of the city transport service is eight years behind schedule, and a final deadline for the end of 2024 was also missed. 'There is no regulatory provision that prohibits the Municipality to award contracts to the category of people in question (spouse, child or parent of a person in service of state either actively or in the past twelve months). Therefore, the question whether the City failed in oversight and due diligence is misplaced,' said Modingoane. The Auditor-General has a different view. 'Although there is no legislation that prohibits municipalities from making awards to suppliers in which close family members or business associates of employees or councillors have an interest, such awards create conflicts of interest for these employees or councillors and/or their close family members or business associates. The possibility of undue influence cannot be discounted, especially if the person could have influenced the procurement processes for these awards, potentially creating opportunities for irregularities.' While Modingoane confirmed the awards were made for the BRT/Rea Vaya extension, he would not provide further details. He said the connected council official had not sat in on the award decision. Asked if the award would be rescinded or investigated, Modingoane said, 'To rescind such an award will be unlawful and the Municipality will be exposed to litigation risks as a result'. He said that the transactions had been disclosed in the city's annual financial statements as required by law, and no further investigation was necessary. BRT-Rea Vaya veers off track When cities commit to ending spatial inequality (which means that poor black people live on the outskirts while the middle and wealthy classes live in the city near opportunities and amenities), there are two ways to do so: provide transport for workers to get to economic opportunities or increase social housing near jobs. In Johannesburg, the rapid bus transport system was an innovative idea to mediate apartheid planning by making it cheap, easy and fast for workers living on the city's outskirts to go into town, to where they worked, or to get around. The city, which began as a gold mining town, was built along the ultimate apartheid master plan. Black people were housed in dormitory towns and suburbs far out of the white city in enclaves easily controlled by security forces if they resisted – the violent response to the 1976 student rebellion was the obvious example of how it worked. The BRT/Rea Vaya incorporates the taxi industry and co-owns two companies that run the system, PioTrans and Litsamaiso. The city pays BRT/Rea Vaya for trips made. The system has not been without conflict, especially with PioTrans. Its expansion to the north (the so-called Phase 1C) of the project has fallen prey to serial infrastructure and leadership weaknesses that beset local government, which Maluleke highlighted. The city has expanded north, and job opportunities are increasingly available in the new nodes. Phase 1C would almost double the number of buses and take people to where the opportunities are. But new stations lie dormant as delays have repeatedly impacted on roll-out. The weaknesses include corruption (as the R972-million contracts suggest), institutional capacity, effective project governance, ineffective planning, procurement and contract management weaknesses and a lack of accountability for poor performance. Maluleke's report lays bare all these factors. Phase 1C is eight years behind schedule, and the Johannesburg Development Agency (JDA) missed a pledge to get it running by the end of 2024. Daily Maverick regularly tracks the route to check, and progress is still far from complete. This detracts from the effort to end spatial inequality and get young people into jobs — Gauteng and Johannesburg have among the highest youth unemployment rates. Because it is subsidised, trips on the Rea Vaya are cheaper than other forms of public transport. Intervention delivers little Johannesburg is under soft intervention by the Presidency because of its rapidly collapsing infrastructure and services, but after 100 days, most residents say the impacts on the ground are imperceptible. In the past week, there have been multiday water cuts in the east of the city and power outages in the near west and across the inner city as underground fires roar through cabling. Last week, Mayor Dada Morero launched a 'bomb squad' to help him improve city management. MMC for Transport Kenny Kunene said, 'I have not heard anything about it (the R972-million dodgy tenders).' He said he would investigate and revealed that when he started his job in 2021, R23-million had been stolen from the BRT and officials had been suspended, but reinstated after the ANC intervened. He had ensured they exited as part of an anti-corruption plan, he told Daily Maverick. Failing management Johannesburg's audit outcome was unqualified with findings. (For context: the board of a private sector CEO of a company with a budget of R88-billion – Joburg's budget – would sack a CEO for this outcome.) The city lost R2.9-billion in water and R4.93 billion in electricity. Auditors ensured city finance officials reduced fruitless and wasteful expenditure to R1.48-million in 2023/24. Over the past three years, this figure stood at R354-million. The AG said the quality of its submitted statements was poor, but good on publication after remediation. The quality of its performance reports was poor. The overall status of its financial controls was poor. The BRT/Rea Vaya delays symbolise this failing management. The AG also found that 'The City of Johannesburg did not coordinate effectively with its entities. This was due to misalignment between the metro and its entities on expectations and plans, obligations, budgets and timelines for the successful delivery of key projects.' The DA has lodged a formal complaint with the Special Investigating Unit over the R1-billion in awards to companies that are linked to current and former councillors, said its head of caucus, Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku. 'This shocking report paints a grim picture of a city where public money is seemingly treated as a personal piggy bank by those elected to serve it. At a time when Joburg's streets are crumbling, power outages are the norm and basic service delivery is in freefall, it is unacceptable that councillors may be benefiting from a broken procurement system.' Risk is that nothing will be done – Corruption Watch 'The worrying thing is that it is a sizeable amount – it may be six officials (or six awards to one official) or their relatives who cost Joburg residents just under R1-billion. 'The official response is quite disturbing. The biggest risk is that nothing will be done, and another big transport infrastructure is threatened. Metro governments are regressing in terms of their reports to the Auditor-General,' said Moepeng Talane of Corruption Watch, who assesses all AG reports for the organisation. 'It's worrying and urgently needs the intervention of the provincial governments,' she said. DM
