Head of State Bar of California to step down after exam fiasco
Leah T. Wilson, the agency's executive director, informed the Board of Trustees she will not seek another term in the position she has held on and off since 2017. She also apologized for her role in the February bar exam chaos.
'Accountability is a bedrock principle for any leader,' Wilson said in a statement.
'At the end of the day, I am responsible for everything that occurs within the organization. Despite our best intentions, the experiences of applicants for the February Bar Exam simply were unacceptable, and I fully recognize the frustration and stress this experience caused. While there are no words to assuage those emotions, I do sincerely apologize.'
Wilson's last day will be July 7.
Many February test takers urged Wilson to resign after the exam, which critics say was rolled out hastily in a bid to save money and ultimately plagued by technical glitches and irregularities. Last week, further controversy erupted when it became clear that the State Bar had not been transparent about the use of artificial intelligence to develop multiple-choice questions.
The news of Wilson's departure came on the day that thousands of February test takers were scheduled to get their exam results.
But the results appear to have been delayed after the State Bar was late filing a petition with the California Supreme Court on scoring adjustments for the exam that also responded to the court's questions about how and why it utilized AI to develop multiple-choice questions.
The State Bar filed a petition to the Supreme Court on Tuesday — and test takers remain in limbo, unsure when they will learn if they passed or failed.
Since the debacle, Sen. Tom Umberg (D-Orange), chair of the state Senate Judiciary Committee, and many legal experts have called on the State Bar to ditch the new questions and revert to the traditional test format in July — at least until new questions and methods are adequately tested.
On April 25, deans at more than a dozen California's American Bar Association-accredited law schools wrote to Patricia Guerrero, chief justice of the California Supreme Court, expressing 'serious concerns about the exam's fairness and validity.' The deans urged the court to release all 200 multiple-choice questions that were on the February exam and return to using the NCBE's Multistate Bar Examination for the multiple-choice portion of the next exam.
Wilson, however, signaled Friday that California should ultimately push ahead with its own bar exam.
'As the fourth largest economy in the world, it is only right that California develops its own bar exam, and that ultimately that exam reflect the innovation, excellence, equity, and accessibility principles that are central to who we are as Californians,' she said in a statement. 'We will not get there by turning backward.'
Wilson first took on the role of executive director in 2017, but exited briefly to work for a consulting firm before returning in 2021. She faced additional scrutiny for her income — she earned an annual 2023 salary of $362,067, plus $59,968 in bonuses —at a time when the State Bar is struggling financially.
'Stagnating revenue and increasing personnel costs,' California's state auditor said in a recent report, 'have led its general fund to a deficit in four of the last five years.'
Still, Wilson said she was proud of her time at the helm of the State Bar, citing her efforts to make the organization an 'exceptional workplace' that resulted in 'strong staff engagement, positive union relationships and historically low turnover.'
'Over the course of nearly 10 years, I have had the privilege of leading the State Bar through a period of transformative change,' Wilson said in a statement.
'I am particularly proud of our efforts to elevate and offer real solutions to the access-to-justice crisis in our state, make real our commitments to increasing equity and inclusion in the profession, and stabilizing the State Bar financially,' Wilson added.
Brandon Stallings, chair of the State Bar's Board of Trustees, praised Wilson's leadership, noting she had played a key role in advancing many of the organization's critical initiatives.
'The Board recognizes the significant contributions that Leah Wilson made during her tenure, particularly in the concerted effort to recognize and address racial disparities in the discipline system,' Stallings said. 'We understand and respect her decision, and we are grateful for her service.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
18 hours ago
- Epoch Times
California Is About to Change Its Redistricting Law—What Will Be Different?
California's governor has called for a special election in November 2025 to redraw the state's congressional districts. If approved, it would temporarily set aside the voter-created redistricting commission, and the new maps would be used when Californians vote for Congress members in 2026. Former state Assemblyman Don Wagner jo...
Los Angeles Times
20 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
To counter Texas, California lawmakers take up plan to redraw congressional districts
SACRAMENTO — California Democrats on Monday kicked off the process to redraw the state's congressional districts, an extraordinary action they said was necessary to neutralize efforts by President Trump and Texas Republicans to increase the number of GOP lawmakers in Congress. If approved by state lawmakers this week, Californians will vote on the ballot measure, labeled Proposition 50, in a special election in November. At a news conference unveiling the legislation, Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) said they agreed with Gov. Gavin Newsom that California must respond to Trump's efforts to 'rig' the 2026 midterms by working to reduced by half the number of Republicans in the state's 52-member congressional delegation. They said doing so is essential to stymieing the president's far-right agenda. 'I want to make one thing very clear, I'm not happy to be here. We didn't choose this fight. We don't want this fight,' said Assemblymember Marc Berman (D-Menlo Park). 'But with our democracy on the line, we cannot run away from this fight, and when the dust settles on election day, we will win.' Republicans accused Democrats of trying to subvert the will of the voters, who passed independent redistricting 15 years ago, for their own partisan goals. 'The citizens seized back control of the power from the politicians in 2010,' said Assemblymember Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego), flanked by GOP legislators and signs in the Capitol rotunda that said, 'Rigged map' and 'Defend fair elections.' 'Let me be very clear,' DeMaio said. 'Gavin Newsom and other politicians have been lying in wait, with emphasis on lying ... to seize back control.' After Trump urged Texas to redraw its congressional districts to add five new GOP members to Congress, Newsom and California Democrats began calling to temporarily reconfigure the current congressional district boundaries, which were drawn by the voter-approved independent redistricting commission in 2021. Other states are also now considering redrawing their congressional districts, escalating the political battle over control of the U.S. House of Representatives. Congressional districts are typically reconfigured once every decade after the U.S. census. Newsom, other Democratic lawmakers and labor leaders launched a campaign supporting the redrawing of California's congressional districts on Thursday, and proposed maps were sent to state legislative leaders on Friday. The measures that lawmakers will take up this week would: Whereas Texas and several other GOP-led states are considering an unusual mid-decade redistricting to keep the Republican Party's hold on Congress, Ohio is an anomaly. If its congressional districts are not approved on a bipartisan basis, they are valid for only two general elections and can then be redrawn. McGuire said California would go forward if Ohio does. 'The state of Ohio has made it clear that they are wanting to be able to proceed. They're one of the few states in the United States of America that actually allow for ... mid-decade redistricting,' he said. 'We firmly believe that they should cool it, pull back, because if they do, so will California.' Republicans responded by calling for a federal investigation into the California Democratic redistricting plan, and vowed to file multiple lawsuits in state and federal court, including two this week. 'We're going to litigate this every step of the way, but we believe that this will also be rejected at the ballot box, in the court of public opinion,' DeMaio said. He also called for a 10-year ban on holding elected office for state legislators who vote in support of calling the special election, although he did not say how he would try to do that. McGuire dismissed the criticism and threats of legal action, saying the Republicans were more concerned about political self-preservation than the will of California voters or the rule of law. 'California Republicans are now clutching their pearls because of self-interest. Not one California Republican spoke up in the Legislature, in the House, when Texas made the decision to be able to eliminate five historically Black and brown congressional districts. Not one,' he said. 'What I would say: Spend more time on the problem. The problem is Donald Trump.'
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom's redistricting plan is a power grab. But the GOP objections are rubbish
SACRAMENTO — One accusation hurled at Gov. Gavin Newsom for his retaliatory redistricting move against President Trump and Texas Republicans is that he's overriding the will of California voters. Rubbish. The flawed argument goes like this: Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens' commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters' edict. 'It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,' California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. 'This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it's for your own good.' Again, baloney. Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters' will? Hardly. Newsom is asking voters to express a new will–seeking permission to fight back against Trump's underhanded attempt to redraw congressional districts in Texas and other red states so Republicans can retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after next year's midterm elections. First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens' commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now. Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn't mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change. Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today's electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn't necessarily be tied to the past. Consider: PPIC researchers recently reported that 'partisanship now shapes the state's migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.' So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters' will. They're asking today's voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen's commission would return after the 2030 decennial census. The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom's plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week. It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump's demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats. Newsom's plan, released Friday, counters Texas' scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9. Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it's evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens' commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that's not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states' election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.' But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don't particularly trust. 'It'll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,' says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper. Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: 'There is no way to 'educate' voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote 'no' on ballot measures they do not understand. … It's sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.' But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn't see a problem. 'The messaging here is clear: 'Screw Trump',' South says. 'If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won't be a problem.' Gerrymandering may not be the voters' will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump. The must-read: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences The TK: Trial in National Guard lawsuit tests whether Trump will let courts limit authority The L.A. Times Special: Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma. Did they find paradise? Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
