Sunday hunting is up for debate again in the state House
The latest effort to expand hunting on Sundays in Pennsylvania passed a key House committee with bipartisan support Tuesday.
State Rep. Mandy Steele (D-Allegheny), sponsor of House Bill 1431, described the effort to repeal Pennsylvania's Sunday prohibition on hunting as a 'groundbreaking collaboration' of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau, Pennsylvania Game Commission, and multiple advocacy groups.
The bill passed by a 18-8 vote in the House Game & Fisheries Committee, with every Democrat voting in favor and four Republicans supporting. It will next be considered by the full House.
'In my busy family with four active kids, Sundays are often our only free day of the week,' Steele said. 'Sunday could be an opportunity to educate our children about the great American tradition of protecting wild places and the deep connection to the land that comes through responsible and respectful hunting, a core value among hunters.'
Steele said when delving into the issue, she learned that farmers and wildlife biologists think expanding hunting on Sundays would reduce crop damage and help the state's woods by better managing the deer herd.
'We must heed this call from so many so intimately connected with the land,' Steele said, while asking for support to end what she described as the state's 'archaic and harmful prohibition on Sunday hunting.'
Gov. Tom Wolf signed a law in 2019 to allow deer hunting on three Sundays: One during archery season, one during rifle season, and one selected by the Game Commission.
That law was sponsored by Sen. Dan Laughlin (R-Erie), who authored Senate Bill 67, a companion bill to Steele's proposal.
Both Steele and Laughlin's bills would require at least one member of the Pennsylvania Game Commission's Board of Commissioners to have an agriculture background.
For years, Pennsylvania's 'blue law' prohibition of hunting on Sundays has been a hot-button issue. Supporters argue that expanding hunting on Sundays could help grow the sport, while organizations representing hikers and horseback riders have made the case that Sundays are best left without it, so they can enjoy the outdoors without concerns for their own safety from those hunting.
The House passed Steele's proposal to repeal Pennsylvania's Sunday hunting ban last June by a 129-73 vote, although it did not pass the Senate.
Laughlin and Steele told the Capital-Star earlier this year they're optimistic this is the session the bill could get across the finish line.
State Rep. David Maloney (R-Berks), minority chair of the House Game and Fisheries Committee, voted against the proposal on Tuesday and spoke at-length about his concerns. He discussed his issues with the language about trespassing penalties, the requirement for a member of the agriculture community to be on the Game Commission Board, questioned the effectiveness of the law combatting crop damage and protecting forests, and free time.
'I don't really buy into this idea that another weekend day is going to clear up all the woes of the sportsmen and the Game Commission,' Maloney said.
He added that he has never taken a position about whether or not he'd hunt on Sunday, but asked for a no-vote, believing the legislation 'complicates the issue.'
In response to Maloney's concerns, Steele emphasized that the bill is being backed by a wide variety of organizations that include the Pennsylvania Game Commission, the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau, Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen and Conservationists, and Hunter Nation.
The committee also unanimously approved House Bill 1507, authored by Steele, to allow out-of-state college students living in Pennsylvania to purchase a hunting license for the same price as residents.
Steele argued it could boost hunting participation in Pennsylvania. The Game Commission, Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, and the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen and Conservationists support the bill.
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission also offers fishing licenses to out-of-state college students for the same price as residents, but Game Commission license fees must be approved by the General Assembly, according to a co-sponsorship memo.
'For a student surviving on ramen noodles … this could be a deciding factor between participating in the great American outdoor tradition or being priced out entirely,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: Newsom makes 'major announcement' in response to Texas redistricting plan
California Gov. Gavin Newsom announces his response to Republicans' proposed new district maps in Texas.
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
ICE Arrests of Migrants Without Criminal Records Surge Nearly 200 Percent
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A far larger share of non‑criminal migrants have been arrested as part of the Trump administration's expanded immigration enforcement campaign, according to new federal and independent data. The director of the Deportation Data Project told Newsweek that he found it "impossible" for the president to keep his promise of mass deportations of "criminals." Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, however, told Newsweek, in part, "It is not an accurate description to say they are 'non-criminals.' This deceptive categorization is devoid of reality and misleads the American public. Let us remind you that being here illegally is in fact a crime (8 USC 1325)." Why It Matters President Donald Trump emphasized a prioritization of the removal of violent offenders and the "worst of the worst" during his presidential campaign; however, data shows growing arrests of people without U.S. criminal charges or convictions, raising legal and policy questions about resources, detention capacity and humanitarian oversight. Recent cases involving nonviolent immigrants lacking criminal records have exacerbated concerns and led to broader discussions of whether immigrants, in certain instances, who lack citizenship but have abided by all other U.S. laws, should be removed. NYPD officers arrest protestors for blocking traffic on Broadway as they protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) outside of the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 08, 2025, in New York City. NYPD officers arrest protestors for blocking traffic on Broadway as they protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) outside of the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 08, 2025, in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images What To Know Federal and independent datasets show that ICE arrested substantially more people overall during the Trump administration's first six months in office than during the final six months of the Biden administration. Researchers at the the University of California at Berkeley's Deportation Data Project, which compiles federal data, found that roughly 37 percent of ICE arrests in July 2025 were of people with no U.S. criminal convictions or pending charges—doubling to about 92,000 during the first six months of the Trump administration compared with the final half‑year of the Joe Biden administration. That 37 percent figure is up from 13 percent during Biden's last full month in office in December. "As the [Trump] administration increases immigration arrests, it will inevitably sweep in many people with no criminal record," Davis Hausman, a law professor and faculty director of the Deportation Data Project, told Newsweek via email on Thursday. "There just aren't many noncitizens with criminal records, so the promise of mass deportations of criminals is an impossible one to keep." The Trump administration has dramatically increased arrests of people who have never been convicted of a crime in the US, accounting for a little more than 60 percent of ICE arrests during his first six months in office, roughly equating to 188 days, compared to the 44 percent of arrests during Biden's last six months as president. Of the Trump administration's approximate 132,485 arrests, 39 percent had criminal convictions; 31 percent had criminal charges pending; and 30 percent had no criminal charges. In comparison, the Biden administration's approximate 52,334 arrests included 56 percent with criminal convictions, 28 percent with pending criminal charges, and 16 percent with no criminal charges. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, told Newsweek via email that the Deportation Data Project "is being cherry peddle a false narrative." Multiple independent analyses and reporting showed the detention population rose to record levels in June and July, with estimates of roughly 55,000 to 59,000 people held in ICE facilities during late June and July, according to The Guardian—noting that ICE arrests have more than doubled in 38 states and are most prevalent in states with large immigrant populations including California, Florida and Texas. Southern and western states that have embraced Trump's agenda have also experienced higher arrests. During a White House meeting in May, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller urged ICE agents to aim for as many as 3,000 arrests per day. A recent case involving a Chinese immigrant and small-business restaurant owner, Kelly Yu, in Arizona has led to bipartisan calls for her release from ICE detainment. DHS has refuted statements in her defense. "Lai Kuen Yu, an illegal alien from Hong Kong, has had a final deportation order from a judge since 2005," Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, told Newsweek via email. "She was arrested illegally crossing the border by U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona on February 4, 2004, and two days later was released into the country." DHS said that in November 2013, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed her appeal and upheld her final order of removal. On August 23, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied her appeal. On June 12 of this year, the Board of Immigration Appeals granted her a temporary stay of removal while it considers her motion to reopen. She will remain in ICE custody pending her removal proceedings. "ICE does not deport U.S. citizens," McLaughlin said. "It's her choice. Parents are asked if they want to be removed with their children or ICE will place the children with someone the parent designates." What People Are Saying Davis Hausman, a law professor and faculty director of the Deportation Data Project, told Newsweek via email on Thursday: "As the [Trump] administration increases immigration arrests, it will inevitably sweep in many people with no criminal record. There just aren't many noncitizens with criminal records, so the promise of mass deportations of criminals is an impossible one to keep." Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, told Newsweek via email on Thursday: "This data is being cherry picked by the Deportation Data Project to peddle a false narrative. Many of the individuals that are counted as 'non-criminals' are actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters and more; they just don't have a rap sheet in the U.S. Further, every single one of these individuals committed a crime when they came into this country illegally. "It is not an accurate description to say they are 'non-criminals.' This deceptive categorization is devoid of reality and misleads the American public. Let us remind you that being here illegally is in fact a crime (8 USC 1325). We are putting the American people first by removing illegal aliens who pose a threat to our communities." What Happens Next Lawmakers have sent oversight letters raising priority questions for enforcement, and legal groups filed suits challenging arrests at courthouses and expanded detention practices, indicating litigation and hearings were likely to follow. The administration has sought expanded detention capacity and funding to sustain higher arrest rates, with federal budget allocations and proposals under discussion as the enforcement campaign continues.
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Analysis: Do Democrats have a Zohran Mamdani problem?
FacebookTweetLink Ever since Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor two months ago, Republicans have been licking their chops, and prominent Democrats have been squirming. The GOP sees this as an opportunity to tie the broader Democratic Party to a self-described socialist with many far-left policies who is well poised to become mayor of the nation's largest city. And the reaction from some Democrats – many high-profile ones have declined to endorse him – suggests they see potential peril here. The issue is coming to a head. Polls reinforce Mamdani is a strong favorite to become mayor. Congressional Republicans are running ads invoking him as they try to hold onto the US House next year. And The New York Times reports he's heard from former President Barack Obama, perhaps signaling a thaw with the Democratic establishment. Now Mamdani is getting the Time magazine cover treatment. So, it's a good time to ask: How much of a liability could he be for Democrats? It's still too early to say. Mamdani remains very new on the national and even the local stage, and much will depend on how he runs his campaign and ultimately, if he wins in November, how he governs. There have been some signs of attempted moderation. But we do have some early clues about how he could affect his party. For starters, Mamdani is clearly not popular outside of New York City. A Siena College poll this week showed statewide New York voters disliked him 37%-28% – and that's in a left-leaning state. A recent Yahoo News-YouGov poll, meanwhile, showed a relatively similar verdict among Americans nationwide: 31%-22% negative. While those aren't good numbers, they don't exactly suggest he's a pariah who could be used effectively as a bogeyman on the national stage – at least yet. In the national survey, 46% didn't even have an opinion of the Democratic mayoral nominee, underscoring the room that exists for him to define himself — or be defined by others. (Even in New York, 34% of voters didn't have an opinion about him.) It's relatively normal for politicians to be somewhat underwater these days. Mamdani's numbers in New York state were better than those of his top two opponents, New York Mayor Eric Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, for example. And his national numbers are about as negative as President Donald Trump's, if you adjust for name recognition. But the polls also reinforce how Mamdani could alienate some key voters. Both surveys show he's popular with young voters, but he gets much less popular as voters get older. The New York poll showed voters 55 and older dislike him 47%-18%. The national poll shows voters 45 and older dislike him about 2-to-1. From there, it's a question of whether his ideas could alienate lots of voters – as people become familiar with them and particularly if he actually pursues some of the more far-left ones. Trump and others have painted Mamdani as not just a socialist, but also as a communist. The Yahoo poll suggested that some of Mamdani's more socialistic proposals are actually quite popular. For instance, Americans liked the idea of freezing rent for low-income tenants, 60%-22%. They liked making public buses free, 46%-36%. They even liked Mamdani's (much-maligned on the right) idea of government-owned grocery stores, 51%-31%. Whether those policies would work in practice is a huge variable, but voters actually seem to like them in theory. And to the extent Mamdani focuses on kitchen-table issues, it's less likely some of these stances would be a problem for Democrats. But then we get into the other stuff. Mamdani has a problematic paper trail on some hot-button issues that Republicans have been gleeful to highlight. Late in the primary, he refused to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' leading some Democrats who view it as a call to arms against Jewish people to strongly rebuke him. He's since signaled he would discourage the phrase. Mamdani has also in the past supported the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. But polls suggest relatively few Americans are familiar with these subjects. A 2022 Pew Research Center poll, for instance, showed 84% of Americans said they'd heard 'not much' or 'nothing at all' about the BDS movement. The polls also suggest Americans writ large are adopting an increasingly skeptical posture toward Israel and its prosecution of the war against Hamas in Gaza. That doesn't mean people will be okay with 'globalize the intifada' or Mamdani's comments about the phrase, but it suggests his criticisms of Israel might be less of an issue than they once could have been. Mamdani was also once an outspoken supporter of the Defund the Police movement, which was prominent among some corners of the left amid racial justice protests years ago. He called the NYPD 'racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety' and once mocked an image of a crying police officer. Those comments could be a problem for his party, given it's been relatively rare to see a high-profile Democrat who espoused defunding the police. Polling from 2021 showed as much as 70% of Americans opposed that movement. But Mamdani's now sought to distance himself from those past comments and said he doesn't support defunding the police anymore. And finally is the s-word: socialist. Americans' views on socialism have improved somewhat in recent years, owing in large part to the rise of self-described 'democratic socialist' Bernie Sanders, the Independent Vermont senator. But socialism as a whole has remained an unpopular ideology. Gallup polling in 2021 showed Americans viewed it unfavorably, 59%-38%. A Pew poll showed they opposed socialism by a similar margin, 60%-36%. And a Fox News poll in 2022 showed voters said that the country moving toward socialism would be a bad thing, 60%-32%. But just because they don't like socialism doesn't mean they're not open to candidates who use that label. Sanders, for one, remains popular even as he's embraced the 'democratic socialist' label. A Gallup poll last month showed he actually had the best numbers of 10 US political figures tested. And in second place? Another self-described democratic socialist, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. She, like Sanders, beat out a series of Trump administration figures tested by Gallup. All of which could suggest Mamdani might not be the pariah Republicans envision him as — depending on how he adjusts to his newfound prominence. Republicans certainly have material to work with here, but time will tell.
