logo
Man accused of stabbing 11-year-old while wearing 'Scream' mask

Man accused of stabbing 11-year-old while wearing 'Scream' mask

USA Today17 hours ago

Man accused of stabbing 11-year-old while wearing 'Scream' mask
An Indiana man was taken into custody after police say he stabbed an 11-year-old child this week.
Fort Wayne police responded to a reported stabbing at about 1:30 p.m. on June 12, according to a press release.
At the scene, officers discovered the victim, who had been stabbed in the abdomen, police said. The child suffered from non-life-threatening injuries and was taken to the hospital for treatment.
Police stated that during the crime, the suspect was wearing a "Scream" mask, which became widely recognized as Ghostface's from the classic slasher horror film originally released in 1996.
An investigation is underway.
News: 2-year-old NYC boy missing; police await ID of body pulled from Bronx river
Police: 27-year-old man faces felony charge
According to police, 27-year-old Trayveon Sewel was later arrested without incident in connection with the stabbing. He is facing criminal recklessness with a deadly weapon, a level 6 felony charge.
Jail records show that his bond was set at $50,000. Sewell's link to the child is not immediately clear.
Police are urging people with information related to the case to contact the department at (260) 427-1201.
Fort Wayne is about 125 miles northeast of Indianapolis.
Taylor Ardrey is a news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at tardrey@gannett.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sean 'Diddy' Combs accuser reveals her identity in lawsuit alleging 4-year 'pattern of abuse'
Sean 'Diddy' Combs accuser reveals her identity in lawsuit alleging 4-year 'pattern of abuse'

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Sean 'Diddy' Combs accuser reveals her identity in lawsuit alleging 4-year 'pattern of abuse'

Sean 'Diddy' Combs accuser reveals her identity in lawsuit alleging 4-year 'pattern of abuse' Show Caption Hide Caption Witness details rocky relationship with Sean 'Diddy' Combs A witness using the name Jane said Sean Combs dismissed her when she refused sex with other men, and threatened to stop paying her rent. More than eight months after accusing Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexually abusing and manipulating her over a four-year period in a 2024 lawsuit, a woman has come forward to identify herself. Chelsea Lovelace, described as a Florida business owner, entrepreneur, and model, on June 13 filed an amended complaint in the New York Supreme Court using her own name as plaintiff, replacing the anonymous name Jane Doe she'd used in her Sept. 27 filing. She alleges that between 2021 and 2024, Combs pressured her to regularly travel to meet him, ingest "illicit substances," have sex with other men and women and otherwise do his bidding by leveraging the allowance he was paying her. The claims and timeline mirror testimony Combs' former partner gave on the stand in his criminal trial. Lovelace's filing comes after Combs' legal team sought the court to issue a ruling that would compel her to use her legal name, Lovelace's attorney, Joseph L. Ciaccio, said in a statement to USA TODAY. "Before the Court made any decision on that, my client decided herself to come forward publicly on her own terms," Ciaccio said. In response to Lovelace's amended complaint, Combs' team told USA TODAY in a statement reiterating, "Mr. Combs has full confidence in the facts and the integrity of the judicial process. In court, the truth will prevail: That Mr. Combs never sexually assaulted or trafficked anyone - man or woman, adult or minor." Combs is on trial for charges of sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution and racketeering and has pleaded not guilty to all charges. The Grammy-winning rapper and producer has faced a barrage of civil lawsuits – many of them from unnamed accusers – since November 2023, alleging sexual assault, abuse and trafficking dating back to the 1990s. Combs denies all misconduct claims. Diddy on trial newsletter: Step inside the courtroom with our daily updates. Chelsea Lovelace says alleged relationship with Diddy 'turned into manipulation, control and abuse' He also shared a statement from Lovelace, who said of her alleged relationship with Combs, "There was a time I truly believed we shared something real. In my heart, for a time, I believed he genuinely cared about me. That we both cared for one another in a way that meant something. "But over time, that illusion shattered. And with it, so did parts of me," Lovelace continued. "What I once thought was love and loyalty, quickly turned into manipulation, control and abuse. I was not seen as a person with a soul, but as a pawn in a much larger game. I didn't want to believe it. I wrestled with God, with my heart, with my own silence." 'Coercive control' and Diddy: You won't hear about this during the trial — here's why it's still important. She clarified the lawsuit was "not an act of revenge," but rather "an act of release. Of standing in my truth. Of choosing healing over hiding." Lovelace added that eventually, "silence became too heavy to bear." Lovelace concluded by saying she believes "that light exposes what needs to be healed. And I believe that the truth, even when it hurts, is the beginning of freedom." She also noted, "Today, I choose to walk forward with my head held high and my voice intact." Chelsea Lovelace's lawsuit mirrors testimony from Diddy's ex, 'Jane' Lovelace sued Combs for sexual assault, sexual battery and infliction of emotional distress. She alleges she'd first met him on Nov. 5, 2020, on a three-day trip to Turks and Caicos for which he'd paid. (Lovelace's initial complaint did not specify this "overseas location.") She says he flew her back to his Miami estate via a private plane on Nov. 7, 2020, and sent her home Nov. 9. They started "seeing each other regularly" in early 2021, Lovelace alleges. However, she claims her monthly trips with Combs, or to meet him, were "not of her own volition." Combs and his accomplices "would use coercive and harassing language to compel her to comply," Lovelace's lawsuit states. She went on to detail several alleged incidents, including forced and coerced sex with Combs as well as other people, blacking out from "alcohol and substances" various times and the realization that he was tracking her phone. Lovelace also described Combs allegedly discouraging her from working and paying her an allowance that he would use as leverage "to control her." Diddy trial recap: Diddy's ex, Jane, says she felt obligated to have sex with male escorts for him The amended complaint includes details that have emerged throughout Combs' trial, which wrapped its sixth week in Manhattan federal court on June 13. Though Lovelace's September complaint included allegations about "City Girls" rapper Yung Miami, whose legal name is Caresha Brownlee, the new filing does not make mention of the musician, who is Combs' ex-girlfriend. Lovelace's claims are reminiscent of testimony given by one of Combs' other ex-partners, who used the pseudonym Jane in federal court and alleged Combs took her on multiple trips to the islands and pressured her to do so-called "hotel nights" with sex workers. Jane also told jurors Combs allegedly paid her $10,000 per month rent but regularly threatened to revoke it if she didn't do his bidding. They dated between 2021 and 2024, Jane said, at one point noting on the stand that while she was monogamous, Combs was not. If you or someone you know has experienced sexual violence, RAINN's National Sexual Assault Hotline offers free, confidential, 24/7 support in English and Spanish via chat and at 800-656-4673.

Judge moves toward nixing juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial over 'lack of candor'
Judge moves toward nixing juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial over 'lack of candor'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge moves toward nixing juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial over 'lack of candor'

The judge in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex-crimes trial moved closer to dismissing a juror, two days after prosecutors raised issues about the man's alleged "lack of candor with the court." U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian indicated he would be ordering for Juror No. 6's removal from the 12-person jury on Friday, June 13. Six alternates have been on the sidelines in the trial, which is wrapping its sixth week in Manhattan federal court. In court, Subramanian said, "Removal of the juror is required" and added, "The juror will be dismissed." The reason was "several inconsistencies" in the man's answers regarding where he lives. Subramanian continued, "The juror is unable to answer simple questions. … There are serious questions about the juror's candor and ability to follow instructions." Though it "seems like a trivial matter," it "goes to a juror's basic criteria to serve," he said. Because of the "changing answers and inconsistency," Subramanian said it brings up questions about whether the juror was truthful in responding to other questions more directly related to the case. Defense attorney Xavier Donaldson objected to the juror's dismissal. Subramanian responded that he would continue to take the issue under consideration over the weekend. Diddy on trial newsletter: Step inside the courtroom with our daily updates. According to the judge, Juror No. 6 offhandedly told a member of the jury department that he had recently moved in with his girlfriend in New Jersey, where he had been staying most of the time. June 13 in court: Ye makes appearance, assistant says he 'slipped and fell' from baby oil cleanup When asked where he lived during jury selection in early May, he'd said he was living in the Bronx with his fiancée and baby daughter, Subramanian said. In yet another interview, Juror No. 6 allegedly said he stayed four to five nights each week in an apartment in New York, where he worked and completed jury responsibilities. He'd also mentioned living with his aunt in New York. Before the jury entered the courtroom June 11, prosecutors reportedly asked the judge to oust one of them, known as Juror No. 6, according to outlets including NBC News and CNN. Per NBC News and The Washington Post, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey told Subramanian she saw "what appeared to be a lack of candor with the court" from Juror No. 6 "that raises serious issues." Alexandra Shapiro from Combs' team reportedly pushed back against the request, calling it "a thinly veiled effort to dismiss a Black juror, The Post and ABC News reported. Combs, 55, was arrested in September and charged with sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty. Contributing: Patrick Ryan, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Diddy trial's Juror No. 6 could be dismissed 6 weeks into trial

Kate Beckinsale says 'Canary Black' producers made her perform 'dangerous' action stunts
Kate Beckinsale says 'Canary Black' producers made her perform 'dangerous' action stunts

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kate Beckinsale says 'Canary Black' producers made her perform 'dangerous' action stunts

Kate Beckinsale is suing the producers of her 2024 film "Canary Black," claiming she was exposed to "unsafe" working conditions and forced to perform stunts resulting in "debilitating" injuries. In a lawsuit first filed anonymously in December, amended May 21 and obtained by USA TODAY June 12, Beckinsale alleged that the "extremely challenging and physically demanding" action role, in which she plays a former CIA agent, caused "significant trauma to her left knee." Media site Puck was first to report the lawsuit. Beckinsale is suing producer John Zois, Anton Entertainment Media Services and Canary Black LTD for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and battery. Beckinsale, 51, is requesting a jury trial, as well as economic, non-economic and punitive damages. USA TODAY has reached out to Beckinsale and Zois' reps for comment. Kate Beckinsale details assault on set at 18, more abuse after Blake Lively complaint Beckinsale, who filmed the movie from late 2022 to early 2023, said despite prior agreements and the actress and her team raising the alarm on what they call "unsafe" conditions – including 15-hour shooting days, surprise stunts and lack of adequate equipment and medical personnel on set – the production "recklessly and intentionally" forged ahead, according to the lawsuit. Before filming began in Croatia in September 2022, Beckinsale and the movie's producers had agreed to have physical health resources – including gym equipment, a physical trainer or a qualified massage therapist – but none were provided, the lawsuit stated. She was also contracted to be on set for no more than 12 hours, which filming routinely pushed past. She said the producers would often deviate from the filming schedule and inform her of stunts "spur of the moment," therefore "recklessly increasing the risk of injury." And she recalled being told on the same day that scenes previously set to be filmed via green screen were suddenly "practical." At one point, Beckinsale's stuntwoman broke an ankle after a "dangerous" scene. As a replacement, the producers provided an "unqualified" stunt performer who was "simply the girlfriend of the stunt coordinator." According to Beckinsale, Zois at another point told her "that the production company had failed" to do "any significant training period" for things like harness work. In November 2022, Beckinsale and her team brought concerns to Zois, per the filing, which he purportedly acknowledged. "I don't know what else to say other than you're right," he said, according to the suit. And "bottom line, we need to shorten these days…The days are too packed for the pace we are moving and it's CLEARLY not sustainable." However, conditions did not change, the lawsuit states. And in a December 2022 incident, Beckinsale was directed to perform a "dangerous" stunt with a male actor that involved throwing and slamming her into a wall, per the filing. The actor was fully padded, while Beckinsale only received mini pads, providing no protection. Despite her complaints, many takes were shot, resulting in her suffering a complex meniscus tear in her left knee, the suit said. The lawsuit stated that Beckinsale was immediately pressured to return to finish the film, with the actress asserting her return was contingent upon her doctor approving the shot list and the team sticking to strict physical limitations. Despite the medical orders, when the actress returned in February 2023, the film's producers failed to adhere to orders, continuing to inform her of unsafe action shots last minute, which caused further injury. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Kate Beckinsale lawsuit: 'Canary Black' stunts were 'unsafe'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store