UAE Confirms No Nuclear or Safety Impact From US-Iran Strike
Join our FREE WhatsApp channel to dive into a world of real-time engagement!
The reassurance follows US President Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday night that the US military had bombed three major nuclear enrichment sites in Iran, calling the attacks a 'spectacular military success.'
UAE Closely Monitoring the Situation
FANR said it is working in coordination with key national authorities and international partners, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The authority added that it receives regular updates through official and verified channels to ensure transparency and safety.
'FANR confirmed that it is well-informed and continuously following up on the situation,' the statement read. 'It urges the public to rely on official sources for information and avoid spreading rumours or unverified news.'
No Radiation Detected
The IAEA also issued a statement on Sunday confirming that there had been no increase in radiation levels detected outside the targeted nuclear facilities in Iran. Director General Rafael Grossi said the agency would hold an emergency board meeting to assess the situation further.
'As of this time, we don't expect any health consequences for people or the environment outside the targeted sites,' Grossi said. 'We will continue to monitor and assess the situation and provide updates as needed.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
10 minutes ago
- The National
Why Lebanon needs closure on the Beirut port blast
On this day five years ago, Lebanon experienced a traumatic event that arguably became the defining moment for an entire generation. Although the country is no stranger to tragedy, the detonation of nearly 3,000 tonnes of improperly stored ammonium nitrate at Beirut port continues to cast a shadow over Lebanon and its people. The blast, which killed more than 220, injured thousands more and flattened large parts of the capital, continues to stir up painful feelings and visceral reactions among many Lebanese and those who love Lebanon. Although the country has gone through the anguish of foreign occupation, Israeli bombardment and civil war, the explosion of August 4, 2020, remains unique in its significance. This is because it sums up so much of the Lebanese experience in recent times: chronic mismanagement; a lack of transparency; poor governance; a cavalier attitude to citizens' well-being as well as attempts to achieve accountability being hampered by obfuscation and delay. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast. The failure to prosecute those responsible for such a catastrophe has repercussions that reach far beyond the frustration of the victims' families. A pervasive sense that the country is on the wrong path led many young Lebanese to reluctantly pack their bags and leave for opportunities abroad. One of them, architect Grace Dergham, recently told The National how, when she left in July 2001, she did so to support her parents because she was 'starting to lose hope in the country'. This is not to overlook the efforts currently under way to put the country on the right path. On Friday, The National reported that tighter regulations concerning the shipping, handling and storage of goods have been introduced in Lebanon to prevent such a tragedy from happening again. That the country now has a functioning presidency and parliament is also an important step forward. And despite many setbacks – including political interference, legal challenges and the removal of lead investigators – a judicial investigation into the blast is continuing. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast Nevertheless, much remains to be done. Beirut port, which suffered extensive damage, has not resumed full operations. Housing, transport and cultural assets, including many religious and archaeological sites and national monuments, remain badly affected. And other issues have emerged to compound these challenges, such as the overspill from the Gaza war and a persistent financial crisis. But there are also faint signs that things may be slowly improving; a World Bank report released on June 19 found that Lebanon's real gross domestic product was projected to grow by 4.7 per cent this year 'supported by anticipated reform progress, a recovery in tourism and consumption and limited capital inflows'. What shines through is the spirit of the Lebanese people, who have demonstrated resilience and determination despite the physical and emotional hurt stemming from the blast and its aftermath. But they should not have to be so resilient. What they want – a better future and a fair, functioning country – is right and just. Therefore, it is the job of the government, the judiciary as well as Lebanon's political and business classes to draw a line under the devastating 2020 explosion by achieving accountability and rebuilding trust in the country's institutions. A failure to do so will dog Lebanon's leaders for years to come and take away the opportunity to meet its people's aspirations.
The National
10 minutes ago
- The National
EU-US deal won't really happen - the reason is in the details
Energy was one of the most freely traded goods in the post-Second World War era, even behind the Iron Curtain. A flood of sanctions has eroded that in recent years. But are the latest EU-US trade deal and Donald Trump's tariff threats an even greater danger? Under Thursday's trade pact, the EU has agreed to buy an extra $250 billion of US energy each year until 2027, and invest $600 billion in the US by 2028. Separately, Mr Trump has proposed 'secondary tariffs' on countries buying Russian oil, notably India. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told China that it would face 100 per cent tariffs if it continued to purchase Russian oil, for which it is the biggest customer. The reality of the European deal can be dismissed in detail. Impossible numbers The bloc imported $76 billion of American coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil last year. The US exported $318 billion of energy to all its customers, and EU customers imported nearly $407 billion of energy from all suppliers. So, the US would have to divert all its energy exports to Europe, and Europe would in turn have to buy almost exclusively from America. Yes, US LNG exports are set to rise substantially. Here are some easy gains in energy trade for the EU. The last remnants of the old Russian gas empire will be swept away, as Brussels plans to end imports from its hostile neighbour by 2027. But prices are likely to fall as new supply comes online over the next five years, from Qatar, the UAE, Canada and elsewhere as well as the US. Japan and South Korea have also agreed to buy more American energy products. Meanwhile, the EU's bulk energy buys will probably keep falling, as renewables and electric vehicles meet more of its needs. 'Europe' does not buy energy – its companies and consumers do. There is no way for Brussels to redirect energy trade on the massive scale required to meet these commitments. Big chunks of the imports are from Norway, Algeria and Azerbaijan, tied into the EU by gas pipelines. These are not going to be diverted elsewhere, whatever the White House tries to dictate. Similarly, US companies decide whom to sell to on commercial, not political grounds. Here, admittedly, some combination of arm-twisting and subsidies might divert trade. But that is more likely to relate to large, visible, single inward investments such as Japan's reported interest in the $44 billion Alaska LNG project. One-trick trade pony European companies would invest in renewable, hydrogen and electric vehicle projects in the US – but these are undercut by the current administration's hostility. The withdrawal of tax incentives, increased barriers to receiving permits, and onerous rules on foreign content, make them unappealing. As Nippon Steel found out in its purchase of US Steel, sizeable foreign acquisitions of American companies are also likely to face unreasonable opposition and an opaque process of lobbying to win approval. The reliance on energy sales shows the US to be a one-trick trade pony – or at best, three tricks, including agricultural goods and weapons. Its other goods are not very competitive – gas-guzzling cars and planes that fall out of the sky – and will become even less so as tariffs drive up input costs for key materials such as aluminium, steel and copper. Ultimately, such trade commitments by Europe are not going to raise US oil and gas output. So, even if fulfilled, they just shuffle energy trade around. Sanctions could be a different matter. Mr Trump could execute his threat of 100 per cent tariffs against India and China if they persist in buying Russian oil. This is a bizarre approach to defeating Moscow's war against Ukraine, instead of imposing stronger sanctions on specific customers and shippers, which is the same approach used against Iran. Beijing will not back down; it cannot allow its economic model, its foreign policy, its alignment with Moscow, to be dictated by Washington. It buys about two million barrels per day of Russian oil. New Delhi might concede, though. It has not changed its policy yet, but Reuters reported that Indian oil refineries had paused purchases of Russian oil while matters are worked out. India's imports of Russian oil averaged 1.8 million barrels per day in the first half of this year. The third major customer, Turkey, takes about 250,000 barrels daily. If India and Turkey drop out, China would no doubt step up its purchases of Russian oil, but it would not take all the remainder. This is partly for logistical reasons, but also political. It would gain further leverage over its junior ally, and could extract generous discounts, as it does from Iran, where it is essentially the only customer. So, there would probably be an overall reduction in Russian oil exports. The gap would be filled by Opec+, depending on its policy decisions, and potentially by higher US output. But US oil production will only increase if prices rise substantially. Mr Trump has shown himself acutely sensitive to inflation and to the concerns of American drivers, preferring lower rather than higher prices, to the discomfort of his supporters in Texas. So how does this all tie together? Less Russian oil and gas means more room for Gulf suppliers. If they end up sending less to Europe to fill a gap in India, or if prices rise enough to boost American production, the US may then supply more to Europe, cosmetically satisfying part of the trade deal. The inconsistency and volatile, contradictory messages emanating from the White House make all this very hard to evaluate. There's a good chance that the impending 'secondary tariffs' never materialise. Yet what is clear that a free and liquid energy market is being replaced by a constrained and politicised one.
Zawya
10 minutes ago
- Zawya
SEWA implements Al Dhaid natural gas network connection project
SHARJAH: In implementation of the directives of His Highness Sheikh Dr. Sultan bin Mohamed Al Qasimi, Supreme Council Member and Ruler of Sharjah, the Sharjah Electricity, Water and Gas Authority (SEWA) has begun implementing the first phase of the natural gas network connection project for Al Dhaid City. The current completion rate has reached 46%, and this phase is expected to be completed during the first quarter of 2026, according to the approved timetable. Engineer Ibrahim Al Balgouni, Director of the Natural Gas Department at the authority, explained that the first phase includes extending the natural gas pipeline to the Jabal Omar and Tal Al Zafran neighbourhoods, extending 83 kilometres at a total cost of AED14 million. He noted that the project will serve approximately 989 residents in the area. Al Balgouni emphasised that the authority is continuing its efforts to develop a modern and sustainable infrastructure and expand the natural gas network across the Emirate of Sharjah, in support of the vision of the wise leadership to achieve comprehensive development and community well-being. The project to connect natural gas services to the city of Dhaid represents a qualitative leap in the quality of services, given the high standards of safety and security of the implemented networks. It also represents an economical alternative to the use of traditional gas cylinders, contributing to an improved quality of life and fostering the growth of the city's residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.
