logo
Johnstown council approves keypad systems for city properties

Johnstown council approves keypad systems for city properties

Yahoo21 hours ago

JOHNSTOWN, Pa. – The city of Johnstown plans to soon have new keypad security systems installed at its properties.
City Council approved hiring Iron Data Works for the project during its regular monthly meeting Wednesday.
City Manager Art Martynuska said the keypads will be installed on the Johnstown Public Safety Building, City Hall, city garage, two fire stations and possibly Sargent's Stadium at the Point.
'It's another security level,' Martynuska said. 'We always look at homeland security-type situations, so this gives us better access control. It's one of the things that's highly recommended.'
Each employee will receive a personalized entry code.
'Currently it's a hodgepodge across the city of keys, fobs,' Martynuska said.
'This is all going to be a keypad system that will be centrally controlled. We'll know who accesses, when they access.'
Work is expected to begin in August or September.
The project is being funded with American Rescue Plan Act money.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City's independent watchdog to be replaced as several reports remain under wraps
City's independent watchdog to be replaced as several reports remain under wraps

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

City's independent watchdog to be replaced as several reports remain under wraps

Jun. 13—The city of Albuquerque's inspector general is out of a job after months of conflict with an oversight committee that has yet to make public six completed investigations into alleged misconduct or malfeasance at City Hall. The city's Accountability in Government Oversight Committee put Inspector General Melissa Santistevan on administrative leave with pay on May 13 after deciding not to recommend she be retained for another four years. Her contract expires June 21, and three new OIG candidates are up for City Council consideration. At the same time, the committee sent the six OIG reports to an outside contractor for a "quality assurance review," according to a city spokeswoman. The city will pay the firm REDW up to $30,205 for the work as an "independent consultant." The reports may be made public after the committee's next meeting on July 29 but could conceivably be revised by the next inspector general. The City Council is set to consider the OIG appointment at its meeting Monday. "Rather than thanking the IG for pointing out problems regarding waste, fraud and abuse so the city could address them, they have chosen to get rid of her for doing her job," said her attorney Edward Hollington on Thursday. Her departure comes as city spending is at an all-time high, with $1.5 billion budgeted for the next fiscal year, and elections for mayor and five council seats set for November. Santistevan was appointed in 2021 after owning an accounting firm and working for the State Auditor's office. She supervised three city investigators. "Although I was not given the opportunity to serve a second term as Inspector General, I remain proud of the work accomplished to promote accountability, transparency, and integrity in local government," Santistevan said in a statement released to the Journal. The OIG in recent years has looked into violations of nepotism, misbilling, abuse of authority and leave policies, and abuse of power. Last November, for instance, the OIG reported uncovering nearly $300,000 in bonuses from a federal child care stabilization grant that went to 27 ineligible city employees, some high-ranking. The program was supposed to help child care providers defray unexpected business costs associated with the COVID pandemic. However, top city officials took issue with the findings and the oversight committee voted 5-0 against approval. The five-member oversight committee, whose volunteer members are appointed by the mayor and City Council, oversees the Office of Inspector General and its employees and conducts searches and screens candidates for the top job. It also oversees the city's internal auditor. Under city ordinance, once the committee receives an investigative report from the OIG, it can approve, defer until the next meeting or vote not to approve the report. Unless deferred, the reports become public. City officials say the committee isn't considered a public body, so its meetings aren't open to the public or advertised. Committee Chair Victor Griego, internal audit director at the University of New Mexico, couldn't be reached on Thursday. Other committee members are Robert Aragon, an Albuquerque attorney; Johnny L. Mangu, a certified public accountant; Esteban A. Aguilar Jr., who serves as vice chair; and Lia Armstrong, an at-large member. Ex-officio members include two top city administrators and two city councilors. The decision to hire someone new for the nonpartisan job comes after Santistevan went public with a notice March 31 noting that the committee had failed to consider and release a total of nine completed OIG investigations. Santistevan stated at the time that the pending reports dealt "with fraud, waste, or abuse that impact our City. Some of these reports have been completed for months without citizen awareness." One investigative report, still unreleased, dated back to October 2024. She urged release of the reports, but Griego, the committee chair, responded in an April notice that the committee had "multiple concerns regarding the quality of the reports and the underlying investigations." The committee released three of the reports in April, deferring action on the rest until May. But no release occurred at that time. Instead, Santistevan was placed on administrative leave, which Griego wrote in a May 13 notice "is in no way a reflection of her work product or job performance. She was an effective manager of the OIG's day-to-day operations, represented our community well as a certified member of the Association of Inspectors General, and is a strong advocate for transparency in government. Rather, the AGOC made this difficult decision to preserve the confidentiality of the work of the OIG and to ensure that work continues unabated during this transition period." An interim member of the office is in charge until a new inspector general takes over. City officials said neither REDW nor the oversight committee has the authority to edit the six pending OIG reports. Asked whether the incoming inspector general will be able to change the reports once appointed, a city spokeswoman said in an email, "The Office of Inspector General has the authority to make any changes to its reports that the Office deems necessary and appropriate, until such time as a report is published." During Santistevan's tenure, her office concluded the city had made an inappropriate purchase of artificial turf for the benefit of a privately owned entity; and determined that a contractor improperly billed the city for services to the homeless and near-homeless. "The work of independent oversight is vital," she stated, "and I remain hopeful that the office will continue to build on the strong foundation we've laid."

'It's going to be very, very good for Springfield': Kearney Street Redevelopment Plan announced by City of Springfield
'It's going to be very, very good for Springfield': Kearney Street Redevelopment Plan announced by City of Springfield

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'It's going to be very, very good for Springfield': Kearney Street Redevelopment Plan announced by City of Springfield

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. — The City of Springfield announced it plans to reestablish the Kearney Street Corridor Redevelopment Plan. According to the City of Springfield, the redevelopment area is a 3.5-mile section of Kearney Street, from North Albertha Avenue just west of Kansas Expressway Avenue to a point approximately 900 feet east of North Glenstone Avenue, generally extending 300 feet north and south of the street. Registered neighborhoods adjacent to the corridor are Tom Watkins, Woodland Heights, Robberson and Doling. The plan was initially established in 2018 but expired in 2023 due to sunset provisions requiring City Council approval every five years. 'It is our intention to re-adopt the redevelopment plan so that we can once again have that incentive in place along the Kearney Street Corridor,' says Senior Planner, Matt Schaefer. 'We would like to use this as an opportunity also to make necessary adjustments or modifications to the redevelopment plan so that it more closely aligns with the recently adopted forward STF Comprehensive Plan and the New Development Code.' Schaefer continues, stating that the plan will promote engagement and revitalization. 'The idea is that it would improve the quality of life within the neighborhoods that are adjacent to the corridor as well as provide additional shopping and restaurant opportunities on the north side of Springfield,' said Schaefer. I spoke to London Evans, whose family owns Another Comic Shop on Kearney. She tells me that this project could bring more people towards their store. 'I think it's going to bring a lot more people,' says Evans, 'both from the older people who used to drive down and some of the newer who've been here for a few years. And every change, no matter how small, has brought in a number of new people.' Steven Deskins, another local business owner in the community, is hopeful that the plan will help to get people to invest in the area again. 'I think it's going to be very, very good for Springfield. There's a lot of cool things in this area on the north side.' Deskins continues, 'And, you know, Kearney Street used to be the busiest street in Springfield. So, to be able to bring that back, there's a lot of history here. I think it's really cool.' The City of Springfield is hosting a public input meeting on June 24 from 6 to 7 p.m., where residents and businesses can help shape and improve the plan. 'I think feedback from the community is very important,' adds Deskins. 'So, you know, we can communicate to the people that are making the decisions on what actually needs to be done in our community. So, I think that's very, very important. And, you know, maybe something I attend.' For more information, please visit the City of Springfield website. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Suisun City votes to move forward with California Forever annexation project research
Suisun City votes to move forward with California Forever annexation project research

CBS News

time18 hours ago

  • CBS News

Suisun City votes to move forward with California Forever annexation project research

SUISUN CITY -- The Suisun City city council voted 3-1 on Tuesday night to enter into a reimbursement agreement with California Forever, which means the city's plan to consider annexing up to 22,000 acres of land owned by the development group now takes a big step forward in what is projected to be a years-long process. California Forever, a billionaire-backed initiative that drew national attention for its plans to build a new city in Solano County, withdrew its "East Solano Plan" from the November ballot in July 2024. The group was asking Solano County voters to support their proposed city adjacent to Travis Air Force Base of around 400,000 people. Instead, the group went back to the drawing board amid public pushback to put together a full environmental impact report on the proposed city's impact, planning to put a measure back before voters in 2026. Suisun City, as has the city of Rio Vista, engaged in talks with California Forever beginning in early 2025 to consider annexing some of the group's land into each city. Tuesday's vote by the Suisun City city council now means California Forever will front the cost of all of research needed for the annexation proposal, including environmental impact reports and paying consultants chosen by the city. California Forever will pay the city an initial $400,000. If the proposed annexation is eventually adopted by the city council and then approved by the county's LAFCO authority, California Forever will pay Suisun City $10 million. Currently, the city is facing a projected more than $1 million budget deficit for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. City manager Bret Prebula spoke in support of the annexation project vote, calling it the city's path forward that now allows them to engage in talks with California Forever that could secure a 'prosperous' future for the city. "What it does is open the door for Suisun City to shape the conversation and ensure we are not left behind," said Prebula at Tuesday's meeting. More than one hundred community members signed up to give public comment Tuesday night, which meant conversation on this topic went on for more than four hours. There was standing room only as Solano County residents both for and against the vote packed the chambers. Several people in support of the annexation project said it stands to provide decades of work for skilled laborers in the county. "What's the problem? I don't get it. It should be an easy 'yes' vote to take the time and do the research. As far as I'm concerned, the project should go forward as well," said Alicia Mijares, representing local sheet metal workers and their union. Those in opposition made it clear they do not trust California Forever and they do not want the city's future tied to their initiative. "When it was happening last summer to go on the ballot, nobody wanted it. They took it off the ballot. Now with this, we don't even have that right anymore. For it to have our vote, our count. It's disgraceful," resident Jan Bartz told CBS News Sacramento before the meeting. Several called what they heard in Tuesday night's public hearing and presentation 'empty promises.' "You may think you are being transparent, but many people I speak to in Suisun City do not agree. Brief public comments are no substitute for genuinely transparent and publicly participatory processes," said one community member from the podium in public comment opposing the vote. Councilmember Princess Washington was the sole "no" vote on the reimbursement agreement with California Forever. Washington expressed hesitancy in her comments by saying that she doesn't feel five people, the council, should 'dictate the fate of the entire county.' She added that proposals of this nature should be up to voters. Mayor Alma Hernandez and the other members of the council commented that this is step one in a long process that will provide the city answers, not result in an outright decision, on annexation. CBS13 asked California Forever for a response to Tuesday night's meeting. "We look forward to working with Suisun City and Rio Vista to bring new industries, amazing neighborhoods, and new sources of tax revenue to the region," a spokesperson responded in a statement. Suisun City is also considering a recent offer by California Forever's CEO Jan Sramek to purchase $1.5 million in downtown city property to help the city offset its budget shortfall. The item is expected to return to the council for a vote in late fall 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store