North Dakota removes lawmaker addresses from website in response to shooting
North Dakota lawmakers participate in a Senate floor session on April 25, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)
North Dakota legislative support staff on Saturday wiped legislators' home addresses from the Legislature's website in response to the shootings of two lawmakers in Minnesota.
John Bjornson, director of Legislative Council, said he made the decision Saturday morning hearing about the shootings that left one Minnesota legislator dead and another seriously wounded.
'I think everybody was shocked and shaken,' Bjornson said.
He said he received several messages from legislators thanking him for taking the initiative.
Website administrators and information technology staff were able to remove the address field from legislators' bios and from a contact page quickly.
Bjornson said a more long-term policy will be discussed next week when legislative leaders meet during the Legislative Management Committee meeting.
'Security is something we too often take for granted until something like this happens,' said Senate Majority Leader David Hogue, R-Minot.
Bjornson said legislators have had the option not to include their home address or phone number with their bio.
Candidates for public office in North Dakota are obligated to provide information to the Secretary of State's Office, which becomes a public record.
'Ultimately, we have to follow state law,' Sandy McMerty, deputy secretary of state said Monday.
While an address must be submitted to show eligibility to represent a legislative district or other geographic area, some candidates and officials use a post office box for a mailing address or for fundraising.
Sen. Ryan Braunberger, D-Fargo, said he has advised candidates considering a run for office about using a post office box and to consider their families when making that decision.
'I think it's important that we balance our security over availability,' Braunberger said.
Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, said she and her family have taken safety precautions since she began serving in the Legislature, but Saturday's shootings have likely shaken lawmakers around the country.
'It's just shocking, but I guess that's another reality we have to look at,' Myrdal said.
Braunberger said hearing the news of the shootings of the Democrats in Minnesota on Saturday morning did not make him hesitate to attend a No Kings protest that afternoon at City Hall in Fargo.
'It made me more vigilant about knowing my surroundings,' Braunberger said. He said he had no negative interactions at the protest. The event was interrupted briefly by a truck blaring its horn in the parking lot.
The suspect in Minnesota, Vance Boelter, was arrested Sunday. The Minnesota Reformer reported that Boelter had a list of potential targets — including Rep. Melissa Hortman who was killed along with her husband, and Sen. Steve Hoffman, who is recovering from gunshot wounds. Abortion providers and other Democratic elected officials from Minnesota and Wisconsin also were on the list.
Rep. Karla Rose Hanson, D-Fargo, who has sponsored bills supporting reproductive rights, said gun legislation she backed created the most negative reaction — including direct threats.
She also attended Saturday's protest and reflected on the shooting in a social media post.
'The way to express political disagreement is through peaceful protests like today's event and through the electoral process — never through violence,' Hanson said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Urges SALT Deal as Lawler Stands Firm on $40,000 Cap
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump expressed optimism that lawmakers could reach a compromise on the state and local tax deduction — a sticking point in his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — even as a key SALT advocate insisted a deal had already been reached. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown Trump said Wednesday that resolving the contentious debate over the SALT cap is imperative to passing his multitrillion dollar tax bill. 'It's very difficult, and I understand both sides, but we'll just have to see, hopefully a compromise or something's going to be made,' Trump told reporters at the White House. New York Representative Mike Lawler — one of the House's most vocal supporters of the SALT deduction — said earlier Wednesday he is open to negotiating with the Senate to advance the tax bill, but insisted he would not agree to lower the $40,000 SALT cap deal reached in the House. 'We negotiated,' Lawler said Wednesday in an interview with Fox Business of the House version of the bill. 'That's the deal.' The SALT deduction has been a primary sticking point holding up Trump's legislative agenda. Lawler, one of a handful of Republicans representing districts in high tax states, previously called the Senate version of the tax bill 'dead on arrival' because of its $10,000 cap on SALT. Senate leaders have characterized that figure as a placeholder while negotiations have continued, but have also said there is no desire among Republicans in their chamber to keep the cap at $40,000. GOP Senators are considering a $30,000 cap on SALT as a compromise between the $10,000 currently allowed and the more generous limit in the House tax bill. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is scheduled to meet with Senate Republicans on Wednesday to discuss the tax bill, according to a person familiar with the planning. Vice President JD Vance met with senators on Tuesday to urge them to support the legislation. The House and Senate have to agree on a plan before it can go to Trump's desk to become law, giving Lawler and his SALT-focused colleagues leverage to demand their concerns be addressed. Trump warned that making SALT a 'red line' would mean a tax increase. The bill renews many of his first-term tax cuts on households and small businesses, which are set to expire at the end of the year. Instead of agreeing that the SALT cap could be lowered, Lawler listed off costly items in the bill, including the child tax credit and cutting taxes on tips and overtime, that could be negotiated. 'We're not giving you the full boat,' Lawler said. 'I have negotiated in good faith from day one, and I am still willing to work with my colleagues to get this done, but we are not going to be fleeced in New York.' There are other variables that could be negotiated besides the cap amount, including length of time it is in place and the phase out for higher income taxpayers. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer criticized Republican colleagues in the chamber for seeking to minimize the SALT deduction, calling that move a 'a dagger aimed at the heart of blue states.' —With assistance from Erik Wasson and Cam Kettles. (Adds Wiles plan to meet with senators on Wednesday) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
23 minutes ago
Civil rights agency's acting chief to face questions on anti-DEI, transgender stances
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The acting chief of the country's top agency for enforcing worker rights will face questions at a Senate committee hearing Wednesday over her efforts to prioritize anti-diversity investigations while sidelining certain racial and gender discrimination cases and quashing protections for transgender workers. Andrea Lucas, who was first appointed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2020 and elevated to acting chief in January, is one of four Labor Department nominees to appear before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Her nomination to serve another five-year term as an EEOC commissioner requires Senate confirmation, though whether she stays on as chief will be up to President Donald Trump. Lucas, an outspoken critic of diversity, equity and inclusion practices and promoter of the idea that there are only two immutable sexes, has moved swiftly to enact Trump's civil rights agenda after he abruptly fired two of the EEOC's Democratic commissioners before the end of their five-year terms, an unprecedented move in the agency's 60-year history that has been challenged in a lawsuit. Lucas is prioritizing worker rights that conservatives argue have been ignored by the EEOC. That includes investigating company DEI practices, defending the rights of women to same-sex spaces and fighting anti-Christian bias in the workplace. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, chairman of the Senate committee holding the hearing, has championed many of those causes. He accused the EEOC under the Biden administration of 'injecting its far-left" agenda into the workplace, including by updating sexual harassment guidelines to warn against misgendering transgender workers and including abortion as a pregnancy-related condition under regulations for the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. Democrats on the committee are likely to grill Lucas over criticism that she overstepped her authority by profoundly shifting the EEOC's direction to the whims of the president in the absence of a quorum, which commission has lacked since Trump fired the two commissioners. Sen. Patty Murray, a member of the committee, said she will oppose any EEOC nominations unless Trump reinstates the two fired Democratic commissioners, which she and more than 200 other Democratic senators and Congress members condemned in a letter to the president as an abuse of power. 'President Trump is weaponizing the independent EEOC to serve his personal political agenda, firing commissioners without cause and warping the mission of the EEOC beyond recognition,' Murray said in a statement ahead of the hearing. 'Commissioner Lucas is a right-wing extremist who has been in lockstep behind Trump's pro-discrimination agenda.' Lucas has made clear her views of the limitations of the EEOC's autonomy. In a recent memo to employers, Lucas declared that the 'EEOC is an executive branch agency, not an independent agency" that will "fully and robustly comply" with all executive orders. That includes two orders that Trump signed in January: one directing federal agencies to eliminate their own DEI activities and end any 'equity-related' grants or contracts, and the other imposing a certification provision on all companies and institutions with government contracts or grant dollars to demonstrate that they don't operate DEI programs. The EEOC's new approach alarmed more than 30 civil rights groups, which sent a letter to the Senate committee demanding that Lucas face a hearing. The groups argued that the EEOC was created by Congress under 1964 Civil Rights Act to be a bipartisan agency that would function independently from the executive branch. The EEOC, the only federal agency empowered to investigate employment discrimination in the private sector, received more than 88,000 charges of workplace discrimination in fiscal year 2024. Its commissioners are appointed by the president to staggered terms, and no more than three can be from the same party. Much of the EEOC's authority is granted by Congress, including the obligation to investigate all complaints and enact regulations for implementing some laws. Under Lucas, the EEOC dropped seven of its own lawsuits on behalf of transgender or nonbinary workers. It also moved to drop a racial discrimination case on behalf of Black, Native American and multiracial job applicants after Trump ordered federal agencies to stop pursuing discrimination that falls under 'disparate impact liability,' which aims to identify practices that systematically exclude certain demographic groups. Instead, Lucas has turned the EEOC's attention to investigating company DEI practices. In her most high profile move, she sent letters to 20 law firms demanding information about diversity fellowships and other programs she claimed could be evidence of discriminatory practices. Lucas has also repeatedly encouraged workers nationwide to come forward with DEI complaints. She launched a hotline for whistleblowers and said workers should be encouraged to report bad DEI practices after a Supreme Court decision made it easier for white and other non-minority workers to bring reverse-discrimination lawsuits.
New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sen. Ron Johnson tears into White House's ‘misleading' claims about the true cost of Trump's ‘big beautiful' bill
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), a former accountant, unveiled a detailed analysis of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and concluded that the Republican-backed measure will blow up the deficit — despite opposite claims coming from the White House about its budgetary effects. Johnson's 31-page analysis ran through multiple projections of the tax-and-spending megabill's impact before accusing the White House of 'misleading' budgeting tricks to paint a rosier picture of the marquee agenda package. The deficit will increase by a whopping $24.1 trillion over the next 10 years and at least $3 trillion of that would come from the GOP's bill, according to the analysis which cites the Congressional Budget Office's scoring of the legislation. His analysis also ripped into a recent White House memo suggesting that there are plans to slash the deficit by $6.7 trillion to $6.9 over the next 10 years through tariff revenue and discretionary spending cuts. In reality, he found the best-case scenario would see a $2.5 trillion reduction over the next 10 years to the 'current law' baseline from those policies. 3 Sen. Ron Johnson has long urged Republicans to be more aggressive about reining spending in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Getty Images But he later cautioned that the best-case scenario isn't even likely because Democrats will almost certainly challenge the planned discretionary cuts and the courts may shut down President Trump's tariffs. 'It's my humble attempt not being a professional economist, to just lay out what we ought to be looking at,' Johnson told reporters Wednesday. 'The kind of information we ought to be analyzing as we move forward to pass a very consequential, massive piece of legislation.' The Badger State senator gave his analysis to the Trump's economic adviser Kevin Hassett last week to give the Trump administration a chance to spot any errors in his analysis. 'I hope this report sparks the debate,' Johnson told reporters. 'I hope this report causes other economists to bring forward their scenarios, because right now, but all we rely on is that the black hole of the CBO.' 3 Senate Majority Leader John Thune is working to wrangle the One Big Beautiful Act through the upper chamber. REUTERS The Wisconsin senator, who has opposed the House-passed version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in its current form due to its deficit impact, hinted that he is flexible on a lot of the details of the legislative but needs it to get 'spending under control.' His report noted that there is a 'legitimate criticism' of the CBO's scoring in that it is premised on 1.8% gross domestic product growth, when the average between 2000 to 2024 was 2.21%. But the analysis also tore into well-worn Republican claims that the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act paid for itself after adjusting for pandemic-induced inflation. 'The claim that the TCJA paid for itself in seven years is hard to support,' the report stated bluntly. A central component of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is that it renews and makes permanent key provisions within the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Johnson stressed that he doesn't 'want to increase taxes,' which is what will happen if the key provisions of the 2017 cuts are allowed to expire at the end of the year, but stressed that Republicans need to do more to curb spending. One potential remedy Johnson suggested is for Congress to conduct a forensic audit of government outlays, something that would have more teeth to cut spending than the current iteration of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 3 President Trump's signature agenda package is facing headwinds in the Senate. AP The senator also beliefs that the Fourth of July time frame to get the One Big Beautiful Bill Act across the finish line in the Senate isn't realistic and would like to see Republicans attempt other reconciliation bills to rein in spending further. He also predicted that the megabill will get voted down if it comes up in the Senate next week. Johnson is joined by at least three other fiscal hawks in the upper chamber who are concerned that the legislation doesn't do enough to curb spending. On Tuesday, the CBO released a new dynamic scoring estimate concluding that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would add $3.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years when accounting for its impact on economic growth. That's higher than the $3 trillion it initially forecasted on a static basis, which doesn't account for economic growth. Usually the CBO's dynamic scoring projections find less deficit increases than statis estimates. Johnson's analysis used the CBO's static project before it was conducted before the dynamic scoring was released.
