Ex-MSNBC star warns Dems have fallen into Trump's DC crime 'trap'
Matthews - after leaving MSNBC in 2020 - told Brzezinski: 'I think that the Democrats need to go beyond saying, "No, look at the data, crime is going down,"' 'I feel that is exactly the wrong response politically,' he continued. 'Even if it's true.' With the 2026 midterm elections just over a year away, Matthews, 79, went on to explain more in-depth why he believes progressive relying on statistics showing that crime is decreasing are playing into the president's hands.
'The Democrats are, I agree with you, Mika, they're falling into the trap of defending what's indefensible,' he said, predicting the strategy could soon blow up in Dems' faces, especially when Midterms roll around next year 'I love DC I think it's a beautiful city,' he added separately. '[But you see] signs of homelessness, which is not being treated... You see graffiti, which drives me crazy, because it's right on the most beautiful places, the bridges and all covered in graffiti, and they have to paint it over to cover it up,'
'They don't really get rid of it, it's still there.' He said he believes the issue stems from a divide seen between those who live in 'the suburbs and the rural areas' of big cities like DC still struggling from a pandemic-related spike in crime. 'I think Trump knows that people are afraid to go into big cities, to go to a Phillies game,' Matthews said. 'They talk about it. They don't want to go downtown.' Brzezinski's cohost husband, Joe Scarborough, would have agreed if he were present.
He read a text from a 'very liberal' friend who lives in DC on-air Tuesday, to illustrate a similar point. 'He says, "This may sound controversial, but I'm not totally opposed to Trump's National Guard move in D.C. I know he's doing it for politics, but crime remains rampant,"' Scarborough read. '"I've had too many friends carjacked, shot at. None of us will walk more than three blocks after 8 p.m. 13 year-olds are committing many of these crimes. Quite a change from a decade ago, when things were much calmer."'
Cooper, on Tuesday, told New York Times correspondent Maggie Haberman that Dems' decision was set to backfire because so many locals of all political persuasions have personally experienced DC's lawlessness. 'It's so interesting,' Cooper he said on the set of Anderson Cooper 360. 'The conflict, you know, Democrats face when talking about the policing in the District of Columbia.'
'Do you point out statistics of out of a 30-year low as they as the statistics show, and thereby sound like you're saying, oh, there's not a crime problem in Washington, DC? Where there's crime problem everywhere.' Haberman, in turn, conceded: 'There is a crime problem everywhere.' The president justified the order by insisting the state of DC constituted a 'crime emergency'. Troops arrived there on Tuesday. The situation remains ongoing.
Total violent crime in the District of Columbia decreased 35 percent from 2023 last year, the DOJ said in January. But it continues to be plagued by shocking incidents. Brzezinski, in turn, told Matthews: 'Yes, it's a trap. If it's not a winner politically to say, "Oh, you're wrong, look at the data," because you know if one violent crime happens in a very heavily populated part of the city, people hear about it and it's visceral.
'They don't want it,' she added. 'And they'll gravitate to the person who appears to be doing something about it.' Brzezinski and Scarborough have lived in DC for the past three decades. retired from MSNBC after more than 30 years with the network in March 2020. He lives in a Maryland suburb with his family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Teachers applying for jobs in conservative state must sit test to root out 'woke indoctrinators'
Oklahoma is demanding new teachers from liberal states to take a first-of-its-kind assessment aimed at filtering out what officials call ' woke indoctrinators'. The new certification test, developed by conservative media company PragerU, is being administered for the first time ever on Friday and targets aspiring teachers who have relocated from California and New York. State Superintendent Ryan Walters told CNN that any applicant who fails the assessment will be denied a teaching certificate and barred from working in Oklahoma public schools this academic year. 'This keeps away woke indoctrinators,' Walters said. 'We will not allow these leftists' plans and schemes to take place here in Oklahoma. They are trying to warp the minds of our kids to turn them into social justice warriors.' The 50-question, multiple-choice test covers topics ranging from basic U.S. civics to more politically charged issues. One question asks which chromosomes determine biological sex, while another probes the importance of religious freedom in American identity, CNN reported. Walters, 40, said the test reflects Oklahoma's 'standards and values' and is designed to ensure new teachers 'teach history appropriately' and acknowledge the influence of Christianity in the nation's founding. PragerU, which is not an accredited university despite its name, has gained traction among Republican-led states in recent years. Its content has now been approved for use in public schools in ten states - including Alaska, Idaho, South Carolina, Louisiana, Arizona, New Hampshire, Montana, Texas and Florida - and its videos, which are often criticized for promoting misinformation, are widely used in conservative circles. Jonathan Zimmerman, a historian at the University of Pennsylvania, described the move as a 'watershed moment' for PragerU. 'It's actually giving Prager an explicit role. It's official and it's institutionalized,' Zimmerman said. So far, the test applies only to incoming teachers from California and New York, but Walters said it could soon extend to applicants from as many as eight additional states. An aide to the superintendent told CNN that the test will affect a 'fairly large' number of applicants, though specific figures were not provided. The initiative comes amid a teacher shortage in Oklahoma and increased scrutiny of the state's education system, which ranks near the bottom nationally. Critics have argued that the assessment amounts to a 'political loyalty test,' not an evaluation of teaching ability. 'You don't sign up to teach schools because you hate America,' John Waldron, chairman of the Oklahoma Democratic Party and a former teacher, said. 'That's not who's teaching in our classrooms,' he said while calling the test an 'insult to our profession.' At a recent State Board of Education meeting, members raised legal concerns and requested to review the assessment before its rollout. However, Walters declined, insisting he had full authority. 'Every teacher that teaches in the state of Oklahoma will have to have a certificate that goes through my office,' he said. 'It has my signature on it. So those will not move forward until this is done.' According to CNN, who obtained a partial look at the assessment, the test includes questions about the Constitution, U.S. Senate composition, and civics basics, alongside more ideological content. In July, the state education department shared Oklahoma's certification standards with PragerU, which then compared them with California and New York requirements to build the test. 'You're gonna teach that there's biological differences between males and females, period,' Walters said. 'We want our students to be patriots. Here in Oklahoma, our academics are going to be grounded in fact.' PragerU CEO Marissa Streit said the goal is to 'undo the damage of gender ideology' and align with the values of Oklahoma's parent community. Walters, a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump, has also previously mandated the teaching of the Bible in schools as a historical document.
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Global News Podcast Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine: A Global News Podcast special
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have finished their meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, held to discuss a potential end to the war in Ukraine. It lasted less than three hours. And while the leaders said it was productive, they failed to reach a deal. In this special edition of the Global News Podcast, we bring you reaction and analysis from Anchorage and gauge the feeling in Ukraine and Russia. We also look at the true cost of the war in lives and money, and find out what's next for Washington, Moscow and Kyiv on the road to peace. The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jenrick calls for removal of judges who ‘bring personal politics' into job
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has said judges who 'bring their own personal politics' to the job need to be removed. Mr Jenrick said tighter checks are needed before judges are appointed to see if they have partisan views, as well as a system which would allow for them to be removed from their position if political meddling is confirmed. He told The Daily Telegraph: 'If judges want to enter the political sphere themselves, then they should stop being judges and go into politics. 'We have to have a situation where judges who act politically and bring their own personal politics into their job as a judge are held to account and frankly, can be removed.' Mr Jenrick said he has exposed judges who have tweeted 'highly political, partisan messages' while others have acted as trustees of charities which he described as 'highly partisan'. 'I think that is bringing the historic independence of our judiciary into serious disrepute, and we've got to change that,' he said. Among suggestions from a review is removing the appointment of judges from an independent body – introduced in 2005 under then prime minister Tony Blair – and returning them to the Lord Chancellor. Removing senior judges requires a vote in both the Commons and the Lords, while an investigation ending in a recommendation of removal is needed in lower courts. Mr Jenrick said that while UK judges in some areas remain 'among the most respected in the world', he said the independence of the judiciary has been 'brought into disrepute' in some areas, including immigration tribunals. 'There's no point extricating ourselves from activist judges in Strasbourg only to be beholden to activist judges here,' he said. The former immigration minister also told the Telegraph he wanted 'every single illegal migrant in this country' to be deported. He said that included not only those arriving on small boats, but also those who have arrived in lorries or claimed asylum after landing at airports. Earlier this week, the BBC apologised to Mr Jenrick after a refugee charity boss suggested the shadow justice secretary is xenophobic. Mr Jenrick accused the broadcaster of smearing 'millions of worried citizens as 'xenophobic' for their completely understandable fears'. While appearing on Radio 4's Today programme on Wednesday, Krish Kandiah, a director of Sanctuary Foundation, claimed Mr Jenrick had increased 'fear of the stranger' among people.
