Israel steps up Gaza bombing after Bibi vow to expand offensive; airstrike kills 6 journos
CAIRO: Palestinians reported the heaviest bombardments in weeks on Monday in areas east of Gaza City, just hours after Israeli PM
Benjamin Netanyahu
said he expected to complete a new expanded offensive against Hamas "fairly quickly".
An airstrike also killed six journalists including prominent Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al Sharif in a tent at Gaza City's Al Shifa Hospital compound, the deadliest strike against journalists during an Israeli campaign that has lasted more than 22 months.
Israel's military said it targeted and killed Al Sharif, alleging he had headed a Hamas militant cell and was involved in rocket attacks on Israel. Al Jazeera, which is funded by the Qatari govt, rejected the assertion, and before his death Al Sharif had also denied such claims by Israel.
Al Sharif, 28, was among a group of four journalists and an assistant who died in an airstrike on a tent near the hospital in eastern Gaza City, Gaza officials and Al Jazeera said. A hospital official said two other people died. A sixth journalist, local freelance reporter Mohammad Al-Khaldi, was also killed in the strike, medics at the hospital said on Monday.
The Israeli military said in a statement that Al Sharif led a Hamas cell and "was responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians" and Israeli troops, citing intelligence and documents it said were discovered in Gaza as evidence but which it did not disclose.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute
Navy Quest
Undo
Hamas, the militant group which has run Gaza since 2007, linked his killing to the new planned offensive. The Hamas-run Gaza govt media office said 238 journalists have been killed in almost two years of war. The Committee to Protect Journalists said at least 186 journalists have been killed.
Witnesses, meanwhile, said Israeli tanks and planes pounded Sabra, Zeitoun, and Shejaia, three eastern suburbs of Gaza City in the north of the territory, Monday, pushing many families westwards from their homes.
Some Gaza City residents said it was one of the worst nights in weeks, raising fears of military preparations for a deeper offensive into their city, which Hamas says is now sheltering about 1 million people after the displacement of residents from the enclave's northern edges.
The Israeli military said its forces fired artillery at Hamas militants in the area. There was no sign on the ground of forces moving deeper into Gaza City as part of the newly approved Israeli offensive, which was not expected to begin in the coming weeks.
"It sounded like the war was restarting," said Amr Salah, 25. "Tanks fired shells at houses, and several houses were hit, and the planes carried out what we call fire rings, whereby several missiles landed on some roads in eastern Gaza," he told Reuters via a chat app.
The Israeli military said its forces on Sunday dismantled a launch site east of Gaza City, which Hamas used to fire rockets towards Israeli communities across the border.
Netanyahu on Sunday said he had instructed the Israeli military to speed up its plans for the new offensive. He also indicated that the coastal area of central Gaza may be next, saying Hamas militants have been pushed there too.
(This is a Reuters report)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia Sends Second Warning To Trump; Cautions Against Zelensky, European Leaders' Agenda
Israel Shamed By Own Troops; Thousands Go Missing, Abandon Fight Against Hamas | IDF Begs For Help The IDF is battling a severe manpower shortage, with ultra-Orthodox enlistment absent and thousands of soldiers missing. Israel now seeks young Jewish recruits abroad, mainly from the U.S. and France. As the Gaza war intensifies, Netanyahu insists on occupying Gaza City to enforce Hamas disarmament, despite global opposition. Hamas vows resistance while pushing for a ceasefire-hostage deal, with Qatar mediating talks in Egypt. 905.7K views | 1 day ago
New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Qatar urges for ceasefire in Gaza after 'positive response' from Hamas
JERUSALEM: Qatar, a key mediator, on Tuesday stressed the urgency of brokering a ceasefire in Gaza after Hamas showed a 'positive response' to a proposal, but Israel has yet to weigh in as its military prepares an offensive on some of the territory's most populated areas. The prospect of an expanded assault on areas sheltering hundreds of thousands of civilians has sparked condemnation inside Israel and abroad. Most war-weary Palestinians see no place in Gaza as safe, not even declared humanitarian zones, after 22 months of war. Many Israelis, who rallied in the hundreds of thousands on Sunday, fear the offensive will further endanger the remaining hostages in Gaza. Just 20 of the 50 remaining are thought to be alive. 'If this (ceasefire) proposal fails, the crisis will exacerbate,' Majed al-Ansari, a spokesperson for Qatar's foreign ministry, told journalists, adding they have yet to hear from Israel on it. Al-Ansari said Hamas had agreed to terms under discussion. He declined to provide details but said the proposal was 'almost identical' to one previously advanced by US envoy Steve Witkoff. That US proposal was for a 60-day ceasefire, during which some of the remaining hostages would be released and the sides would negotiate a lasting ceasefire and the return of the rest. 'If we get to a deal, it shouldn't be expected that it would be instantaneously implemented,' al-Ansari said. 'We're not there yet.' That cautious assessment came a day after the foreign minister of Egypt, the other Arab country mediating the talks, said they were were pushing for a phased deal and noted that Qatar's prime minister had joined negotiations between Hamas leaders and Arab mediators. Witkoff has been invited to rejoin the talks, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty told The Associated Press. Witkoff pulled out of negotiations less than a month ago, accusing Hamas of not acting in good faith. It was not clear how Witkoff has responded to the invitation. A senior Israeli official said Tuesday that the country's position on a ceasefire 'is consistent and has not changed.' 'Israel demands the release of all 50 hostages in accordance with the guidelines set by the Cabinet to end the war,' said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak with the media. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said a final push is needed to 'complete the defeat of Hamas." He has vowed to continue the war until all the hostages are returned and Hamas has been disarmed.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
US revokes thousands of student visas in 2025 over alleged crimes: The new legal grey zone for ‘outsiders' in America
In 2025, the Trump administration revoked over 6,000 student visas—a number that has sparked concern not only in immigration policy circles but also across global academic communities. Approximately 4,000 of these were attributed to alleged 'criminal activity,' while an additional 200 to 300 were reportedly linked to accusations of 'support for terrorism.' But behind the headlines lies a less visible, more troubling shift: A transformation in how legality, suspicion, and dissent are being redefined for international students in the United States. From conviction to classification Visa revocation was once a legal consequence, the result of a specific breach—overstay, unauthorised work, or a confirmed criminal conviction. Today, it is increasingly a preemptive administrative action, where the burden of proof has quietly given way to the weight of perception. With agencies now authorised to scan vast law enforcement databases like the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC), students can be flagged for infractions ranging from dismissed charges to decades-old traffic violations. The legal threshold is no longer conviction—it is presence in a dataset. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 3 minutes, if you own a mouse Undo This signals a deeper shift: From an immigration system that adjudicates to one that categorises. And students—especially from countries like India, China, and Iran—find themselves at the receiving end of a policy architecture that conflates irregularity with risk. Redefining 'law' at the Consular Desk At the EducationUSA fair in Hyderabad, US Consul General Laura Williams reiterated Washington's 'zero tolerance' stance on law-breaking. But in the current environment, the definition of law-breaking itself has grown elastic. Social media posts, prior affiliations, and online expressions that challenge US foreign policy are increasingly being treated as indicators of ideological unreliability. Students are learning that the pathway to a US degree is not just academic but behavioural—and policed long before they ever set foot on campus. Visa applicants are now expected to keep their social media profiles public. AI systems under the 'Catch and Revoke' initiative scan these for signs of activism or dissent. Students who once engaged freely in political discourse must now self-censor—not out of guilt, but out of precaution. For many, silence is not compliance but survival. Academic merit, conditional belonging Indian students, among the most populous international cohorts in the US, have historically been prized for their academic excellence and economic contribution. Yet, 2025 has made it increasingly clear that merit alone is insufficient. A spotless academic record may be outweighed by a misconstrued tweet. A research grant may be eclipsed by a protest photo from years ago. The lesson is uncomfortable but unmistakable: For international students, presence in the U.S. is not a right secured by achievement—it is a conditional belonging, contingent on alignment with a shifting set of political expectations. Institutional ambivalence Universities, while publicly affirming their commitment to diversity and academic freedom, operate within a compliance-heavy environment. Many have quietly adapted to the new climate. Course content is adjusted. Invitations to controversial speakers are rescinded. Campus groups are advised to tone down their activism. In such settings, critical inquiry competes not with ignorance, but with risk management. This recalibration may be practical—but it is also revealing. A university, once a sanctuary for dissent and pluralism, is slowly being reshaped into a space where dissent must be rehearsed cautiously, if at all. Beyond policy: A shift in first principles The real story is not just that 6,000 visas were revoked. It is that revocation itself has shifted from being a tool of last resort to a symbol of the government's expanding discretionary power. The rule of law has not disappeared, but it is being supplemented—sometimes replaced—by a more informal regime of reputational risk and political readability. For international students, especially those from democracies with vibrant political cultures, the dissonance is sharp. The US remains a global hub of innovation and higher learning. But the cost of accessing it is no longer measured only in dollars or grades. It is increasingly measured in restraint, in silence, and in the willingness to accept ambiguity as part of the contract. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
