logo
Erin Patterson trial: Simon wanted a strong household. A mushroom meal saw it all fall apart

Erin Patterson trial: Simon wanted a strong household. A mushroom meal saw it all fall apart

The Age04-05-2025

'I guess one of the things that attracted me to her in the first place was definitely her intelligence,' he said.
'She's quite witty, and can be quite funny.'
Erin had a university degree in business, did part of a vet science course, and studied legal courses as well. She worked as an accountant and was a qualified air traffic controller at Tullamarine.
After marrying in 2007 and having two children, the couple eventually settled in Korumburra. Simon's parents, Don and Gail, lived nearby.
Erin stayed home to look after the kids, benefiting from a significant inheritance, first from her grandmother and then her mother, that gave her $2 million and then routine disbursements.
Erin Patterson. Credit: Jason South
When the Pattersons first met, Erin had been an atheist and Simon a Christian who attended church every week. A trip to the local baptist church changed that for Erin when she was visibly moved by a communion service.
Simon continued to go to church weekly; Erin joined with the kids every fortnight. He helped with technical work during the service; she assisted with the livestream, the court was told. The pair often went to Bible study classes.
'She was influenced by a few factors, including, I guess, my involvement in her life. I'm a Christian ... it's really God's leading that makes us Christians or not,' Simon said.
Don and Gail also attended the church. Heather Wilkinson, Gail's sister, was married to the pastor, Ian Wilkinson, who had been at the church since 1999.
The Pattersons' family life was uneventful. Don and Gail looked after their grandchildren, helped them with their homework. They shared a good relationship with Erin.
'They got on very well,' Simon told the court as he fought back tears. 'She especially got along well with Dad. They shared a love of knowledge and learning and an interest in the world and I think she loved his gentle nature.'
Simon told the court he and Erin finally separated for good in late 2015, but they remained on good terms.
Don Patterson (left), Gail Patterson, Heather Wilkinson and Ian Wilkinson were poisoned by a mushroom meal.
They talked, shared duties for the children and even took family holidays together. They are still technically married.
However, Simon told the court the couple's relationship took a turn for the worse in late 2022 when he listed himself as separated for the first time on his tax return.
'She was upset about it. That was probably the first thing that made me feel there was substantial change in our relationship,' he said. 'Our habit for years was to message each other a lot in a chatty way. The chatty nature of it pretty much stopped. It became functional, and sometimes nothing.'
According to Simon, Erin, in a move supported by him, applied for child support but the $38 a month he was told to pay increased tensions between the pair. There were still doctors' bills and school fees to pay for.
In text messages from December 2022, shown to the jury, Simon tells Erin he wants a mediator to help the pair sort out their child support disputes.
'I was keen to resolve it, and I could see that Erin and mine's communication about it ... wasn't working. And, yeah, I guess, from my point of view, Erin was being extremely aggressive, and so I thought a mediator would probably help us communicate about it,' he said.
Simon said Don and Gail continued to speak with Erin, but were keen not to become mediators in any of their disputes.
'They were both really strong on us working our marriage out together and everything out together,' he said.
But during that time there was also what Simon described as a misunderstanding about his mother's 70th birthday.
Simon asked his estranged wife if she was going to the party. Erin said she hadn't been invited.
'I might pass … as I'd rather not go somewhere I'm not welcome,' Erin said in a message.
After some back and forth, Erin said she felt 'very hurt' about not being invited.
Simon insisted it was a mistake, his father had thought Erin had already accepted his invitation to go. She eventually agreed to attend.
By July 2023, Erin said she had news to break to her family, according to the prosecution's opening statement. She asked her in-laws, her estranged husband and the Wilkinsons over to lunch.
Simon pulled out of the event the night before, saying he was 'too uncomfortable' to attend.
Loading
Erin sent her children to the cinema and sat down to a lunch of individual beef Wellingtons, mashed potato and green beans with Don, Gail, Ian and Heather, according to the prosecution's opening statement.
Erin served the meals on four grey dinner plates, hers sitting on a smaller, coloured plate. They said grace and tucked into the meal as she told those assembled of a cancer diagnosis and asked for advice on how to tell her children, the court heard.
The group prayed together, shared cake and fruit for dessert, then parted.
Within a day, all four elderly guests were critically ill. Don, Gail and Heather would succumb to the effects of death cap mushroom poisoning. Ian spent weeks in intensive care before pulling through.
Erin, who has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, says their deaths were a terrible tragedy, but an accident.
Prosecutors claim she deliberately lured the group to her home with 'murderous intent'.
A jury in Morwell will hear up to six weeks of evidence before deciding which it is.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Erin Patterson trial: Alleged mushroom poisoner to give evidence for seventh day
Erin Patterson trial: Alleged mushroom poisoner to give evidence for seventh day

West Australian

time2 days ago

  • West Australian

Erin Patterson trial: Alleged mushroom poisoner to give evidence for seventh day

Alleged death cap mushroom cook Erin Patterson has told her triple-murder trial a sixth beef Wellington she had prepared was 'just an extra one'. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing trial accused of murdering three of her husband's relatives with a deliberately poisoned lunch she hosted in the country Victorian town of Leongatha on July 29, 2023. She is also accused of the attempted murder of a fourth relative, who recovered after falling ill. She has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Prosecutors allege she spiked the meal with death cap mushrooms with 'murderous intent' while her defence say she did not intend to poison anyone and the case is a tragic accident. Don Patterson, his wife Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson died in the week following the lunch while Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson survived. Giving evidence at her trial on Tuesday, Ms Patterson was quizzed about a sixth beef Wellington she prepared ahead of the lunch. She denied a suggestion by Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC the dish was made for Simon Patterson, her estranged husband if he changed his mind and attended. 'I didn't make that sixth one for Simon,' she replied. 'I did not make that one for him … it was just an extra one. Simon wasn't coming.' Earlier in the trial, Simon Patterson told the jury he'd been invited two weeks before the lunch alongside his parents and aunt and uncle, initially agreeing to attend. But the evening before the lunch, he texted Ms Patterson to decline. 'Sorry, I feel too uncomfortable about coming to the lunch with you, mum, dad, Heather & Ian tomorrow,' the message read. Ms Patterson responded saying it was 'really disappointing' and urging Simon to change his mind. 'I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow … and spent a small fortune on beef eye fillet to make beef Wellingtons because I wanted it to be a special meal,' she wrote. 'It's important to me that you're all there tomorrow and that I can have the conversations that I need to have. 'I hope you'll change your mind. Your parents and Heather and Ian are coming at 12.30. I hope to see you there.' Ms Patterson told the jury she was 'hurt' Simon didn't want to come and may have exaggerated. 'I guess I wanted him to feel a little bit bad about cancelling at the last minute after he would have known I'd done a lot of preparation,' she said. Asked last week what happened to the sixth beef Wellington, Ms Patterson told the jury she placed it into her fridge to deal with later. She said she served the meal, with the pastry and mushroom scrapped off, to her two children for dinner the day following the lunch. Ms Patterson denied a suggestion by Dr Rogers that she did not feed the meat from this meal to her children, but she did agree the meat was removed. 'I did do that,' the accused woman said. 'And where was it put?' Dr Rogers asked. 'Into my children's stomachs,' Ms Patterson responded. The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.

Cook denies sixth meal was for husband: Court
Cook denies sixth meal was for husband: Court

Perth Now

time2 days ago

  • Perth Now

Cook denies sixth meal was for husband: Court

Alleged death cap mushroom cook Erin Patterson has told her triple-murder trial a sixth beef Wellington she had prepared was 'just an extra one'. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing trial accused of murdering three of her husband's relatives with a deliberately poisoned lunch she hosted in the country Victorian town of Leongatha on July 29, 2023. She is also accused of the attempted murder of a fourth relative, who recovered after falling ill. She has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Prosecutors allege she spiked the meal with death cap mushrooms with 'murderous intent' while her defence say she did not intend to poison anyone and the case is a tragic accident. Don Patterson, his wife Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson died in the week following the lunch while Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson survived. Erin Patterson has pleaded not guilty to counts of murder and attempted murder. Supplied. Credit: Supplied Giving evidence at her trial on Tuesday, Ms Patterson was quizzed about a sixth beef Wellington she prepared ahead of the lunch. She denied a suggestion by Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC the dish was made for Simon Patterson, her estranged husband if he changed his mind and attended. 'I didn't make that sixth one for Simon,' she replied. 'I did not make that one for him … it was just an extra one. Simon wasn't coming.' Earlier in the trial, Simon Patterson told the jury he'd been invited two weeks before the lunch alongside his parents and aunt and uncle, initially agreeing to attend. But the evening before the lunch, he texted Ms Patterson to decline. 'Sorry, I feel too uncomfortable about coming to the lunch with you, mum, dad, Heather & Ian tomorrow,' the message read. Simon Patterson was called as the prosecution's first witness. NewsWire / David Geraghty Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Patterson responded saying it was 'really disappointing' and urging Simon to change his mind. 'I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow … and spent a small fortune on beef eye fillet to make beef Wellingtons because I wanted it to be a special meal,' she wrote. 'It's important to me that you're all there tomorrow and that I can have the conversations that I need to have. 'I hope you'll change your mind. Your parents and Heather and Ian are coming at 12.30. I hope to see you there.' Ms Patterson told the jury she was 'hurt' Simon didn't want to come and may have exaggerated. 'I guess I wanted him to feel a little bit bad about cancelling at the last minute after he would have known I'd done a lot of preparation,' she said. Asked last week what happened to the sixth beef Wellington, Ms Patterson told the jury she placed it into her fridge to deal with later. She said she served the meal, with the pastry and mushroom scrapped off, to her two children for dinner the day following the lunch. Ms Patterson denied a suggestion by Dr Rogers that she did not feed the meat from this meal to her children, but she did agree the meat was removed. 'I did do that,' the accused woman said. 'And where was it put?' Dr Rogers asked. 'Into my children's stomachs,' Ms Patterson responded. The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.

The deadpan defendant denies mushroom witnesses' accounts
The deadpan defendant denies mushroom witnesses' accounts

The Age

time2 days ago

  • The Age

The deadpan defendant denies mushroom witnesses' accounts

Demeanour. It is the quality of the accused in a criminal trial that prosecutors seek to exploit and the defence hopes might help. Members of the jury strain their senses to match it with the flow of evidence. It is a source of the strange fascination that draws members of the public to line up outside courtrooms in the hope of a seat in the gallery and their opportunity to deliver inexpert judgment on the state of the trial, and it is the stuff of pub chatter afterwards. And so it was on the 29th day of the trial of Erin Patterson, accused of murdering three of her lunch guests – two of them her parents-in-law – by poisoning them with death cap mushrooms added to her home-cooked beef Wellington, and of attempting to murder a fourth. She has pleaded not guilty to all charges. And her demeanour, as always, was inscrutable. As the hours passed, she was accused again and again by the prosecution of lying. And her response? It was to calmly disagree with the prosecutor's suggestions. A doctor, a nurse, a pastor who survived the mushroom poisoning, her estranged husband Simon, who declined to attend the fatal lunch … even Erin Patterson's son. She disagreed with aspects of their evidence, which the prosecutor put to her during cross-examination.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store