
Los Angeles Preliminarily Approves Minimum Wage Increase for Hotel and Airport Workers
In a 12–3 vote on May 14, council members authorized updates to the city's Living Wage and Hotel Workers Minimum Wage ordinances, which regulate the minimum wage for such workers. Hotel and airport employees would receive $22.50 an hour starting in July under the amendments, followed by an annual $2.50 increase over three years.
The matter will return to the City Council on May 23 for a second vote.
But the preliminary approval moved the city a step closer to finalizing a proposal initiated by Councilman Curren Price in 2023, which was originally supported by five other council members.
'For years, our hotel and airport workers have done the heavy lifting—welcoming millions, keeping L.A. moving and powering the city's growth,' Price said in a statement. 'This policy is about respect, recognition, and fair pay for the workers who've always been essential to L.A.'s success.'
Workers are expected to earn $25 an hour beginning July 2026, $27.50 an hour in July 2027, and $30 an hour in July 2028, as well as receive a new $8.35 per hour healthcare payment, which will begin in July 2026.
Related Stories
5/12/2025
5/8/2025
Council members introduced several amendments at the May 14 meeting to address some concerns with the overall plan.
For example, Councilwoman Nithya Raman called for city staff to monitor impacts of the minimum wage increase on the tourism industry six months prior to and after its implementation, as well as a one-year study. Councilwoman Imelda Padilla called for a measure to ensure hotel workers are not required to attend multiple sessions of a proposed public housekeeping training.
Two other amendments required more attention from council members.
Councilman Adrin Nazarian sought to ensure hotel and airport workers could recoup in cash their healthcare payment, if they already receive healthcare through a partner, spouse, or veteran plan. With assistance from a city attorney deputy, his amendment advanced.
Council members Monica Rodriguez and Traci Park, who opposed the minimum wage increase, sought an amendment to the proposal that would allow hoteliers to differentiate hotel employees from so-called variable-hour workers, or employees under contract for services such as marble polishing. The amendment was sent back to committee for further discussion after concerns were raised that it could impact restaurant workers located within a hotel.
Councilman John Lee, who also opposed the policy, sought to raise the 60-room requirement to 150 rooms, in a move to support limited-service hotels. It did not garner enough support to move forward.
The policy changes impact hotels with more than 60 rooms, and private companies at Los Angeles International Airport, like airlines and concessions. The city will also establish a public housekeeping training requirement, similar to policies in Santa Monica and West Hollywood.
The program will mandate no less than six hours of training for hotel workers. It would inform them of their rights and employer responsibilities, how to identify and respond to human trafficking, domestic violence, or violent conduct, among other things.
Under existing regulations, hotel workers earn $20.32 per hour and airport employees earn $19.28 with a $5.95 per hour health care payment, totaling $25.23.
Hoteliers and airport concessionaires criticized the wage increase, saying it will raise labor costs and could force some businesses to shut down at a time when the tourism industry faces challenges.
'It is deeply troubling that an idea as unprincipled as this has gone on this far in our legislative process,' Carlos Singer, chief policy officer for the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, said.
Mark Davis, the president and chief executive of Sun Hill Properties Inc., which manages the Hilton Los Angeles Universal City Hotel, has previously warned that investors will choose to do business elsewhere if the elected officials sign off on the wage increase.
On May 13, Davis told the Los Angeles Times that a future $250 million expansion of the hotel site, which would add a second 18-story tower, could be lost unless the proposal is reworked. The tower would open in time for the Olympics, adding more than 300 hotel rooms that would be available as part of a room block agreement with LA28.
'Our board was very adamant that if [council members] go forward with this nonsense, that it's dead,' Davis told The Times. 'They're going to move the project somewhere else.'
Meanwhile, Kurt Petersen, co-president of Unite Here Local 11—the union backing the minimum wage hike—said the measure would boost the local economy and support working families.
'Tourism workers have once again made history by winning the highest minimum wage in the nation! The Olympic and Paralympic Wage is the first step to ensure these mega events benefit hard working families and not just bosses and billionaires,' Peterson said in a statement.
By Jose Herrera
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canton residents push back against project website
CANTON, Texas (KETK)– Canton residents are speaking out against the new website for the Grand Saline Creek reservoir, voicing their displeasure at the city council meeting on Tuesday. The Canton City Council met Tuesday night in a packed room filled with residents pushing back against the Grand Saline Creek reservoir project. 'If your land was being stolen, would you be upset? I mean, that's exactly what's happening,' Canton resident Donna Greer said. Amazon plans new delivery station in Nacogdoches At the meeting, the Canton City Council announced the launch of the Grand Saline Creek Reservoir website, where people can read about the project, see frequently asked questions, and submit questions. 'It was a last-ditch effort for transparency, of which there has never been any transparency through this whole thing,' Geer said. Residents said they think the information on the site is wrong, claiming it doesn't show the harm it would bring to people. 'My thoughts are it's misrepresented, it's not truthful, and it was put out the day before the big meeting,' Geer said. 'It was a last-ditch effort for transparency, of which there has never been any transparency through this whole thing.' Med truck tire blowout leads to crash, injuring 2 firefighters in Jasper County Van Zandt County resident John Borgstedt said he's surprised the mayor is still pushing this project forward and wants people to know he and others in the community will continue to fight against it. 'Families just want to take their house, 143 families' houses. She wants to take over 5000 something acres, and she says there are no structures that are going to be affected by this,' Borgstedt said Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
L.A. city leaders declare Valley Plaza shopping center a public nuisance
Los Angeles city leaders on Tuesday declared Valley Plaza, a once-thriving shopping center in the San Fernando Valley, a public nuisance after years of disrepair. The decision was unanimously approved by the city's Board of Commissioners of Building and Safety after they heard remarks from City Councilman Adrin Nazarian, who represents the area. He spoke on Tuesday, stating that the site, located at Laurel Canyon Boulevard and Victory Boulevard, has been a magnet for crime and concern in recent years. "These ruined buildings have cast a pall on the entire community, depressing commerce for our small businesses, degrading the quality of life for an entire neighborhood, and creating a real danger for the community," said a statement from Nazarian's office. "Once this shopping center was a source of pride to our community; now it's become a blight on the neighborhood and a constant danger to the public. The people of North Hollywood have waited too long. Enough is enough." Now that the decision has been approved, the city can demolish all six buildings in the 17-acre plaza, which is still owned by the Charles Company after it changed hands about a decade ago. It has been vacant since, despite requests from city officials to develop the site or sell it. "Under the Charles Company, the properties have decayed to what you see standing behind me," Nazarian said during a news conference outside the property. "They've been vandalized, covered with graffiti, filled with trash, damaged beyond repair." The Valley Plaza opened in 1951 and has housed a series of prominent grocery and retail stores until it became unoccupied. CBS News Los Angeles has reached out to the Charles Company for comment, but has not yet heard back.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minneapolis leaders condemn council member's profane attack on Mayor Frey
The Brief Aisha Chughtai, the city council vice president, verbally attacked Mayor Jacob Frey during a campaign event in Minneapolis on Saturday. The video was posted on her Instagram account. Three of her colleagues condemned her remarks, calling them "outrageous" and "an extraordinary breach of decorum." MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - Minneapolis City Council Vice President Aisha Chughtai posted a video of herself on social media saying "F*** Jacob Frey," remarks her own colleagues characterized as "inflammatory" and "disrespectful." Council member's remarks about mayor draw backlash What we know During a campaign event at the Green Room in Minneapolis on Saturday night, Chughtai said, "F*** Jacob Frey. F*** fascism. F*** Donald Trump." Her remarks drew immediate cheers from the crowd. While expressing her support for State Sen. Omar Fateh, who is challenging Frey in November's mayoral election, she said, "We're going to transform this city." Chughtai is running for reelection to her council seat, which covers Whittier and South Uptown, among other neighborhoods. Chughtai's colleagues call remarks 'extraordinary breach of decorum' What they're saying In a joint statement on Tuesday, Council Members Linea Palmisano, Andrea Jenkins and Michael Rainville said: "The council vice president's outrageous remarks are an extraordinary breach of decorum. In our time on the city council, we have never seen a council member – much less council leadership – use such inflammatory and disrespectful rhetoric toward a sitting mayor. This is the kind of behavior from the council majority and council leadership that has made it even harder to work through our disagreements for the good of the city. "We understand that it is an election year and that the council vice president is supporting one of the mayor's opponents. That is no excuse for this behavior. She owes an immediate apology to the mayor, to the council colleagues she has been trusted to lead and to Minneapolis residents who deserve better from their leaders." Mayor's office says council majority doesn't share the same values The other side In an email on Tuesday, Ally Peters, a spokeswoman for Frey, said: "The mayor believes in collaboration and the importance of setting aside politics to find common ground. Unfortunately, it's clear that the city council majority doesn't share those same values. The mayor remains focused on working together to deliver for the people of Minneapolis." Chughtai did not immediately respond to a request for comment.