
US orders social media vetting for student visa applicants
The US State Department has ordered a review of student visa applicants' social media presence and told them to make their profiles public, stepping up measures to restrict foreign nationals' entry to American campuses over national security concerns.
The department instructed consular officers screening online accounts to watch for any indications of hostility toward the US.
Foreign nationals applying for student and exchange visitors visas will be asked to set their profiles to public, and the department said failure to do so would raise red flags.
The new policy will help ensure that visitors to the US have been properly evaluated, a senior State Department official said, and that Americans expect such efforts to protect the country.
The announcement comes weeks after Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered embassies worldwide to stop scheduling student visa interviews as the administration weighed stricter guidelines regarding social media.
The policy further tightens scrutiny of foreigners seeking to the study in the US on top of an already rigorous process that includes proving strong academic credentials, financial means and intent to return home after graduation.
International students accounted for 5.9% of the total US higher education population of almost 19 million. Typically paying full tuition, they help offset costs that allow colleges and universities to provide more financial aid to US citizens.
The Trump administration's broader crackdown on immigration has spread to campuses, with moves including an order preventing foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard University, which a judge has temporarily blocked.
At the same time, however, President Donald Trump agreed to roll back a promised crackdown on visas for Chinese students as part of last week's trade deal with China.
Rubio had foreshadowed further visa restrictions in March after the arrest of a Tufts University doctoral student. The student, Rümeysa Öztürk, who helped write an op-ed supporting Palestinians, was later freed on bail as she fights possible deportation.
'If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student, and you tell us that the reason you are coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds, but because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalizing universities, harassing students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus — we're not going to give you a visa,' Rubio said at the time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
Did Modi's fact-check force Trump to make U-turn on India-Pakistan ceasefire credit?
Since May 10 — when India and Pakistan announced a ceasefire in hostilities — Donald Trump has on 14 different occasions claimed that he helped broker peace between the two nuclear-armed nations. However, in a press interaction on Wednesday, the US president changed his tune, crediting the countries' leaders for showing restraint. The reversal comes a day after PM Narendra Modi fact-checked the American president, saying India 'has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never accept it' read more Trump for the first time in weeks, didn't take the credit for stopping the military conflict between India and Pakistan. File image/Reuters It's not often one witnesses Donald Trump making a U-turn on his statements. But on Wednesday (June 18), the US president shifted his tone and admitted that it was India and Pakistan that decided to end hostilities in May. On Wednesday, Trump speaking to reporters in the Oval Office after hosting a lunch for Pakistan's Army chief General Asim Munir said he was 'so happy that two smart people… decided not to keep going with that war. That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided that'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is quite a reversal from the past where the US president has taken credit for the de-escalation between India and Pakistan — Trump has boasted at least 14 times that he had brokered the peace. In some instances, he claimed that he had used trade with the US as a tool to get the two countries to hold fire. But how did we get there? Was it PM Modi's fact-check that led to Trump's change in stance or was it Munir's lunch? Trump's change of heart After weeks of loudly boasting of brokering peace between nuclear rivals India and Pakistan , Trump did a 180, crediting the two countries' leaders directly for ending the hostilities. In remarks to the media following his lunch with Pakistan's Army Chief General Asim Munir, Trump praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and General Munir as 'very smart people', adding that they chose not to turn the conflict into a 'nuclear war'. 'They were both here, but I was with Modi a few weeks ago. He was here actually, but now we speak to him. And I'm so happy that two smart people, plus you know, people on their staff too, but two smart people, two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war. That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided that,' Trump was quoted as saying. This is the first time in weeks when Trump did not take credit for stopping the military conflict between India and Pakistan. In fact, since May 10 — the day India and Pakistan stopped firing at each other — the US president has claimed at least 14 times that he had brokered the peace. On multiple occasions, Trump has said that he 'helped settle' the tension between the two neighbouring countries and claimed America would do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Earlier, speaking at the White House's Oval Office during a meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, Trump had said, 'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India. We settled that whole, and I think I settled it through trade.' Settled India, Pakistan issue with 'trade', says US President Donald Trump, pointing out that 'we are doing a big deal with India, Pakistan'; points,' Pakistan has great leader, & Modi is my friend' — Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) May 21, 2025 Prior to this, while on his way back from his Saudi Arabia visit, Trump had said on board Air Force One, 'I didn't like what was happening. And you know, they're two very strongly nuclear countries, with very, very powerful amounts of nuclear, too, serious stuff… STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'And I did a good job. (Secretary of State) Marco (Rubio) did a good job, and (Vice President) JD (Vance) did a good job. We sort of were a team. And we, I think, convinced them to let's have peace and let's go and make trade deals. If we can make trade deals, we like that much better than nuclear weapons. And that was a great thing.' He also told a crowd of US military personnel in Qatar, 'I don't wanna say I did but I sure as hell helped settle the problem between Pakistan and India last week, which was getting more and more hostile and all of a sudden you'll start seeing missiles of a different type and we got it settled. I hope I don't walk out of here and two days later find out that it is not settled, but I think it is settled.' While addressing a crowd of U.S. military personnel in Qatar, US President Donald Trump reiterated his mediation efforts between India and Pakistan. He said: "I don't wanna say I did but I sure as hell helped settle the problem between Pakistan and India last week, which was… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) May 15, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Modi disputes Trump's version of events Interestingly, Trump's reversal comes hours after he asserted that he 'stopped the war' between India and Pakistan. This claim came despite the fact that Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a telephonic conversation with the US president and told him that India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never do so in the future. India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri revealing details about the phone call, which was held on Tuesday night, said that Modi clarified India's position to Trump. 'PM Modi clearly told President Trump that during this entire incident, at no time, at any level, were there any talks on issues like India-US trade deal or mediation between India and Pakistan through America,' said Misri. 'PM Modi stressed that India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never accept it.' POTUS @realDonaldTrump called PM @narendramodi. 🎥 Listen to Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's statement on the telephone conversation. — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) June 18, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Furthermore, Misri in his remarks said that PM Modi also reiterated the statement, 'Goli ka jawab gole se' to the US president. The official added that US president also invited Modi to stop over in the US. However, due to prior engagements, PM Modi had to decline the offer. Lunch with Pakistan's Munir Some observers also note that Trump's change in stance coincides with his lunch with Munir and believe that meeting with the Pakistani general may also have had something to do with Trump's change in stance. When asked the purpose of meeting with Munir, Trump said, 'Reason I had him here was I wanted to thank him for not going into the war and ending it.' The US president further added that he was honoured to meet Munir and the two had discussed Iran, which he said Pakistan knew better than most. 'They (Pakistani leadership) know Iran very well, better than most. They're not happy about anything. It's not that they're bad with Israel. They know them both actually, but they probably, maybe, they know Iran better, but they see what's going on and he agreed with me,' he told reporters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The White House also confirmed that the meeting was held in recognition of Munir's remarks lauding Trump's role in halting a potential escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. Reasons for Trump doubling down on India-Pak claims But why is it that Trump until Wednesday continued to boast of his role in brokering peace between India and Pakistan? Most Trump analysts believe that it's part of a larger pattern with John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, telling ANI, 'It's nothing personal to India. This is Donald Trump, who takes credit for everything. 'It's typical of Trump because he would jump in before everyone else could take credit. It may be irritating, probably is irritating to many people, but it's nothing against India, it's just Trump being Trump.' It's also an attempt by the US president to reassert his image of a peacemaker. While campaigning for the US presidential elections in 2024, Trump had vowed to immediately stop the Ukraine and Russia war once he won. However, that promise remains unfulfilled. Furthermore, the Israel-Hamas war still rages on and he hasn't been able to stop it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Some also note that Trump's claims were his way of expressing his displeasure with India. As the Economic Times wrote that Trump may have view India's rebuttals as a personal affront rather than a routine diplomatic clarification. This may have bruised his ego, propelling him to restate the claim ever more publicly and forcefully. With inputs from agencies


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Americans may pay $2,000 more for each new car, thanks to Trump
Trump's plan of 'Making America Great Again' is likely to backfire and punish its own people and industry. His $30 billion worth auto tariffs are set to have a direct impact on car buyers, or plainly put, the Americans themselves will be bearing the brunt of it. As July approaches and with the tariffs taking effect, car prices are expected to shoot up by almost $2,000 per vehicle, driving up already high US auto prices, Bloomberg reported citing consultant AlixPartners. The firm estimates that automakers will pass along about 80 per cent of the tariff costs directly to customers, who will be paying around $1,760 more per car on average. As a result, US auto sales could drop by 1 million vehicles over the next three years. However, the firm expects a rebound to 17 million annual sales by 2030, a million more than last year, as tariff effects begin to ease. 'These tariffs bring a big wall of cost,' said Mark Wakefield, global auto market lead at AlixPartners, during an online briefing. 'We see consumers taking the majority of the hit.' Major US carmakers have already flagged the impact. General Motors expects a $5 billion hit from the tariffs this year, while Ford estimates $2.5 billion. Both companies say they plan to manage the blow, partly by adjusting prices. Live Events AlixPartners' forecast is less severe than others because it assumes tariffs will reduce over time as trade talks progress. The current 25 per cent tariff on imported cars may fall to 7.5 per cent on fully assembled vehicles and 5 per cent on parts, with even lower rates for vehicles that qualify under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). 'This tariff wall is not likely to last forever,' Wakefield added. EV incentive Cuts may stall American auto innovation While tariffs may ease in the long term, a more lasting concern for the auto industry is the Trump administration's move to cut electric vehicle (EV) incentives. AlixPartners warned that scaling back support measures, such as the $7,500 consumer tax credit for EVs, will push buyers toward cheaper, gasoline-fueled vehicles. 'Car buyers will follow their pocketbook,' Wakefield said. As a result, the firm has sharply cut its forecast for US EV adoption. It now expects EVs to make up only 17 per cent of total vehicle sales in 2030, down significantly from an earlier projection of 31 per cent. Meanwhile, traditional internal combustion engine vehicles are expected to make up 50 per cent of the market, up from 33 per cent. Hybrid models are forecast to grow modestly to 27 per cent, while plug-in hybrids and extended-range EVs are expected to shrink to just 6 per cent, down from 10 per cent. For consumers, that could mean fewer affordable electric options and a deeper dependence on older, fuel-based technologies, just as the rest of the world moves ahead. The shift away from EVs could leave American automakers falling behind global competitors, especially as companies in China continue to lead in electric vehicle technology. 'It makes it much more likely that they end up licensing or joint venturing or otherwise using platforms and EV technologies from China,' Wakefield said. With fewer incentives and higher costs, the US risks becoming an outlier in clean transportation. 'They'll have the world's best V8 engines by 2028,' Wakefield added. 'They'll probably also have the world's only V8 engines by 2028.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Asim Munir powerful than Pak PM': Ex-Pentagon official's big revelation amid Trump dinner affair
Former Pentagon official and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Michael Rubin, said, "President Trump is enamoured with Generals. We've known that since his first term. Second, it's a reality that Asim Munir has more power than the Prime Minister of Pakistan... Donald Trump is simply reflecting the reality without the diplomatic polish... The issue becomes, did Donald Trump tell Asim Munir that his actions risk a covert response that the Pakistanis will not be able to abide by and not like? Is Donald Trump threatening Pakistan in private, to allow it to save face in public?... China's chief interest is that much of the oil, nearly 44%, which comes out of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, goes out to China and Asia. If a conflict continues to disrupt supplies, China is the big loser there, and not the US or Iran... Pakistan is a Chinese proxy, and it would not surprise if some messages were being passed not only from Trump to Asim Munir but if Asim Munir was delivering certain messages to Trump from China at the same time... Pakistan is hardly an independent country anymore..." Show more Show less