logo
Is Building a Samsung Phone from AliExpress Parts Even POSSIBLE?

Is Building a Samsung Phone from AliExpress Parts Even POSSIBLE?

Geeky Gadgets17-07-2025
Building a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra using parts sourced from AliExpress is an intriguing concept for tech enthusiasts. It offers the allure of a hands-on project and the possibility of saving money compared to purchasing a new or refurbished device. However, this endeavor is far from simple. It requires navigating a series of challenges, including sourcing compatible components, ensuring quality, and managing the complexities of assembly. Below is a detailed exploration of the process in a great new video from Phone Repair Guru, the obstacles you may encounter, and whether this DIY approach is worth pursuing.
Watch this video on YouTube. Sourcing Components – A Balancing Act Between Cost and Quality
The first step in building a smartphone is acquiring all the necessary components. For the Galaxy S22 Ultra, this includes critical parts such as the motherboard, display, cameras, battery, and smaller items like screws and adhesives. AliExpress provides a wide range of these components, but the quality and compatibility of the parts can vary significantly. Motherboard: As the most expensive component, priced at $174 CAD, the motherboard was functional but lacked the rigorous quality control associated with official Samsung parts. This raises concerns about long-term reliability.
As the most expensive component, priced at $174 CAD, the motherboard was functional but lacked the rigorous quality control associated with official Samsung parts. This raises concerns about long-term reliability. Display: The screen, while functional, had thicker bezels and lower visual quality compared to the original. This compromises the premium experience expected from a flagship device.
The screen, while functional, had thicker bezels and lower visual quality compared to the original. This compromises the premium experience expected from a flagship device. S Pen: Although included, the S Pen lacked Bluetooth functionality, significantly reducing its capabilities compared to the original accessory.
These examples highlight the inherent risks of sourcing parts from third-party vendors. While some components may work adequately, others may fall short of the standards set by official Samsung products. This variability can lead to a final product that feels inconsistent and less refined. Assembly – Precision, Patience, and Problem-Solving
Once all the components are gathered, the next step is assembling the device. This process demands a high level of precision and patience. It involves installing the motherboard, attaching the cameras, securing the battery, and aligning the display with the frame. However, the assembly process is far from straightforward and presents several challenges. Missing Parts: Some screws and smaller components were not included, requiring additional purchases or creative improvisation to complete the assembly.
Some screws and smaller components were not included, requiring additional purchases or creative improvisation to complete the assembly. Adhesive Issues: Pre-installed adhesives complicated the process, particularly when aligning the screen with the frame. Misalignment can compromise the device's structural integrity.
Pre-installed adhesives complicated the process, particularly when aligning the screen with the frame. Misalignment can compromise the device's structural integrity. Lack of Instructions: Many components arrived without detailed guides, forcing reliance on online tutorials and trial-and-error methods. This can be especially daunting for those without prior experience in smartphone repair.
Even minor errors during assembly can lead to significant issues, such as a misaligned screen or improperly connected components. For individuals without technical expertise, this step can be both time-consuming and frustrating. Functionality Testing – Evaluating the Final Product
After assembly, the device must be thoroughly tested to ensure it functions as intended. In this case, the phone powered on and was capable of performing basic tasks such as calling, texting, and browsing. However, several shortcomings became apparent during functionality testing. Vibration Motor: The vibration motor was non-functional, detracting from the overall user experience.
The vibration motor was non-functional, detracting from the overall user experience. S Pen Limitations: The lack of Bluetooth functionality in the S Pen reduced its usability, particularly for advanced features.
The lack of Bluetooth functionality in the S Pen reduced its usability, particularly for advanced features. Display Quality: The screen exhibited muted colors and lower brightness compared to an original Samsung display, further diminishing the premium feel of the device.
While the phone was operational for basic tasks, these issues significantly impacted its overall performance and usability. The absence of premium features and the presence of functional gaps raise questions about the practicality of this DIY approach. Cost Analysis – Savings Versus Compromises
The total cost of the components for this DIY build was $427.72 CAD, making it approximately $100 cheaper than purchasing a refurbished Galaxy S22 Ultra. However, the cost savings come with notable trade-offs that must be carefully considered. Time Investment: The assembly process is labor-intensive and requires a significant time commitment, especially for those unfamiliar with smartphone repair.
The assembly process is labor-intensive and requires a significant time commitment, especially for those unfamiliar with smartphone repair. Quality Concerns: The variability in component quality introduces unpredictability, which can affect the durability and performance of the final product.
The variability in component quality introduces unpredictability, which can affect the durability and performance of the final product. Functionality Gaps: Missing or subpar features, such as the non-functional vibration motor and lower-quality display, detract from the overall user experience.
When compared to a refurbished device, which undergoes rigorous testing and quality assurance, the DIY approach falls short in delivering a comparable experience. The modest cost savings may not justify the time, effort, and compromises involved in this project. Is Building Your Own Galaxy S22 Ultra Worth It?
Assembling a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra using AliExpress parts is a technically feasible project, but it comes with significant challenges. While this endeavor may appeal to tech-savvy individuals or repair enthusiasts, it requires careful consideration of the potential drawbacks. Sourcing compatible components, navigating the complexities of assembly, and addressing functionality issues are all part of the process.
The final product, though functional, lacks the polish, reliability, and premium feel of an original or refurbished device. For most users, the modest cost savings are outweighed by the time, effort, and compromises involved. If you are considering this DIY approach, it is essential to evaluate whether the potential drawbacks align with your goals and expectations. For many, purchasing a refurbished device may offer a more reliable and hassle-free alternative.
Dive deeper into Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra assembly with other articles and guides we have written below.
Source & Image Credit: Phone Repair Guru Filed Under: Android News, Guides, Mobile Phone News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung reveals 115-INCH mega TV with jaw-dropping price tag and ‘world first' new screen
Samsung reveals 115-INCH mega TV with jaw-dropping price tag and ‘world first' new screen

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Samsung reveals 115-INCH mega TV with jaw-dropping price tag and ‘world first' new screen

It also has a special anti glare technology to stop reflections TELLY ME THE PRICE AGAIN?! TELLY ME THE PRICE AGAIN?! Samsung reveals 115-INCH mega TV with jaw-dropping price tag and 'world first' new screen Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SAMSUNG has unveiled a whooper new TV - but the size isn't the only shocker. The staggering 115-inch display has an eye-watering price tag. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 New TV is almost as tall as people Credit: Samsung 3 It's expected to go on sale in countries outside of South Korea soon Credit: Samsung 3 It has an anti glare technology to prevent reflections ruining the view Credit: Samsung In Samsung's home turf, South Korea, the new Micro RGB TV will set you back £24,000 (KRW 44.9 million). It's the world's first Micro RGB, a new premium TV technology that Samsung says brings "exceptional" colour accuracy. This is made possible thanks to a micro-scale RGB LED backlight with an ultra-fine pattern behind the panel. It also uses AI processing to boost both picture and sound. There's Glare Free technology too, designed to reduce reflections from bright light conditions that can sometimes make it hard to make out the picture. "Micro RGB achieves unprecedented precision in the control of micrometer-sized RGB LEDs, raising the bar for color accuracy and contrast in consumer displays," said Taeyong Son, Executive Vice President and Head of the R&D Team of the Visual Display (VD) Business at Samsung Electronics. "With this launch, we're setting the standard in the large-sized, ultra-premium TV market and reinforcing our commitment to next-generation display innovation." The TV isn't on sale beyond South Korea yet. But there are plans to release it in the US next. And there will be a global roll out with "a variety of sizes to meet customer needs", Samsung said.

US court says Trump's Doge team can access social security numbers and other sensitive data
US court says Trump's Doge team can access social security numbers and other sensitive data

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

US court says Trump's Doge team can access social security numbers and other sensitive data

A US appeals court on Tuesday rejected a bid by a group of unions to block the Trump administration government downsizing team known as the 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) from accessing sensitive data on Americans. The Virginia-based fourth US circuit court of appeals in a 2-1 decision said the unions were unlikely to prevail on claims that Doge would violate federal privacy laws by accessing data at the US Department of Education, treasury department, and Office of Personnel Management. The court refused to block Doge's access to the agencies' computer systems and data such as social security numbers and individuals' citizenship status pending the outcome of the case. The decision reverses a temporary injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland, which had been paused by the appeals court in April. The agencies involved in the case and the unions that sued, which include the American Federation of Teachers and the National Federation of Federal Employees, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Donald Trump after taking office in January launched Doge, then headed by billionaire Elon Musk, to dramatically shrink government bureaucracy and federal spending. Doge, which is not a formal government agency, has overseen job and spending cuts at nearly every federal agency and has been the focus of numerous lawsuits. Musk stepped down from Doge in May after publicly falling out with Trump. The fourth circuit on Tuesday said the unions that sued along with a group of military veterans had not shown how they would be injured by Doge accessing agencies' computer systems. They also probably lacked legal standing to sue because that access is not a 'final agency action' that can form the basis of a lawsuit, the court said. A dissenting judge said it was prudent to temporarily block access to the data while the case plays out, and that the standard his colleagues had imposed on the plaintiffs was too high.

US court says Trump's DOGE team can access sensitive data
US court says Trump's DOGE team can access sensitive data

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

US court says Trump's DOGE team can access sensitive data

Aug 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday rejected a bid by a group of unions to block the Trump administration government downsizing team known as the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing sensitive data on Americans. The Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision, opens new tab said the unions were unlikely to prevail on claims that DOGE would violate federal privacy laws by accessing data at the U.S. Department of Education, Treasury Department, and Office of Personnel Management. The court refused to block DOGE's access to the agencies' computer systems and data such as Social Security numbers and individuals' citizenship status pending the outcome of the case. The decision reverses a temporary injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland, which had been paused by the appeals court in April. The agencies involved in the case and the unions that sued, which include the American Federation of Teachers and the National Federation of Federal Employees, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. President Donald Trump after taking office in January launched DOGE, then headed by billionaire Elon Musk, to dramatically shrink government bureaucracy and federal spending. DOGE, which is not a formal government agency, has overseen job and spending cuts at nearly every federal agency and has been the focus of numerous lawsuits. Musk stepped down from DOGE in May after publicly falling out with Trump. The 4th Circuit on Tuesday said the unions that sued along with a group of military veterans had not shown how they would be injured by DOGE accessing agencies' computer systems. They also probably lacked legal standing to sue because that access is not a "final agency action" that can form the basis of a lawsuit, the court said. A dissenting judge said it was prudent to temporarily block access to the data while the case plays out, and that the standard his colleagues had imposed on the plaintiffs was too high.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store