How is C.H. Robinson turning things around? CFO Lee has a few ideas
The stock performance of the few 3PLs that are publicly traded tells a stark story in the past 12 months.
RXO (NYSE: RXO), which in its most recent two quarters posted losses, is down about 31% in the past year. Landstar (NASDAQ: LSTR), which has yet to report its first-quarter earnings and is considered mostly a 3PL but with some unique characteristics, is down 25.5% during those 12 months.
C.H. Robinson (NASDAQ: CHRW), which a little more than a year ago was reported to be one of the most heavily shorted industrial stocks on Wall Street, is now five quarters into a turnaround that first showed signs of working with its first-quarter 2024 earnings. It's up about 9.3% in the past year.What's notable about a C.H. Robinson earnings call over an even longer period than just the more successful recent five quarters is an absolutely consistent message: The Lean principles expounded by CEO Dave Bozeman, now almost two years into his role, are working and have kept the company ahead of the rest of the brokerage pack. Executives like Bozeman and others on the earnings calls do not waver from citing these new practices as the reason for a turnaround that, if an elevator speech needed to be given about it, can be told in three figures.
In 2023's second quarter, the last one before Bozeman took over, the company had gross profit of $656.7 million. In the first quarter just completed, the figure was almost identical: $657.4 million.
But the adjusted operating margin in Q2 2023 was 19.9%. In 2025's first quarter, it was 26.3%. Diluted earnings per share two years ago in the second quarter was 81 cents. Most recently, it was $1.11 – $1.17 on an adjusted basis.
C.H. Robinson CFO Damon Lee, in an interview with FreightWaves several days after the release of C.H. Robinson's earnings and its call with analysts, stayed on that message. 'The easy part of answering that question about the reasons for our performance is in our strategy,' said Lee, who joined the company last year, just about a year after Bozeman took the top job. Neither had been in brokerage: Bozeman came out of Ford, Lee from GE.The goals are not complicated, Lee said: 'We're going to grow our operating profit, and we're going to do that by outgrowing the markets we participate in.' That 26.3% margin compared to two years ago is the most obvious factor. But the margin a year ago was 19.3%, and 700 bps points of operating margin improvement didn't come from a stronger freight market.
'That strategy, as simple as it is, has really guided us through not just a transformation from a Robinson perspective but through one of the most difficult freight markets on record.' Lee said.
C.H. Robinson and RXO management both compared different parts of their performance to the monthly indicators of the Cass Index, though they did not highlight the same comparisons.
But benchmarking against the overall market represented by Cass, Lee said, is necessary. 'If your strategy isn't pegged to what the overall market is doing, you can find yourselves getting into bad behaviors,' he said.
Lee cited an overarching example of a 'bad behavior': 'Where you overindex to volume at the sake of margins, and when that doesn't work the way you expected it to, you overindex to margins at the sake of volume.'
The Lean principles that Bozeman and Lee both tout as key to the turnaround at C.H. Robinson have been described as having five points: Define value, map the value stream, create flow, establish pull and pursue perfection.
No company would say it doesn't follow those principles. But when Lee was asked to give an example of how it might work at C.H. Robinson, he turned to the role of automation.
'I've gone through Lean transformations and it's not a one-year journey,' Lee said. 'It's not a two-year journey. Typically, around year three is where you end up with the personnel that's going to take you to the next level of evolution.'Some of it is culture, Lee said: 'I have to find a way to get better every single day, every single week, every single month.'
But then he got specific. Applying Lean principles to C.H. Robinson's activities would start with a question, he said: 'What is a customer willing to pay for?'
'If you think about all of these steps that we do for a customer, there's only a handful of them,' Lee said. 'They'd say, 'I'm willing to pay for that and I'm willing to pay for that.''
Bringing Lean into the process, he added, would identify those services that are necessary but for which a customer is not willing to fork out money. The Lean solution, according to Lee: 'We need to find a way to automate them.'
'Either eliminate the process altogether, because it's not value add in the eyes of the customer, or find a way to simplify the process, by eliminating steps or automating the process altogether' is how Lee summed up the philosophy of Lean and how it might work at a 3PL.
It goes to a bigger goal under Lean, which he defined as, 'We want our people spending their time on what the customer values versus what the customer doesn't.'
The specifics of automating some of the processes – or even ones that customers actually want and need, like price quotes – were spelled out in the company's earnings call by Arun Rajan, C.H. Robinson's chief strategy officer. He said on the call that AI agents have performed more than 3 million 'shipping tasks,' which includes more than 1 million price quotes and processing of a similar amount. It has also been 'quickly scaled' in the C.H. Robinson LTL business, he said.
The people who have been implementing the job on the ground have fallen into three categories, Lee said. 'You had some that were very excited that this was kind of a new day for C.H. Robinson,' Lee said.
Another group was cautious: 'Were they in the right boat?' is how Lee described their attitude. But that group, Lee said, 'just needed to learn more about how to be successful in this new Robinson.' The result so far, he added, is, 'I think they've grasped what we're trying to do with the company.'
And then there was a third contingent. As Lee described it, 'They said, 'This is not for me and is not really something I want to participate in.'' Many in that category have left the company, Lee said, 'but there are some that are still around and working through how they can get to the middle and can they move to the left?'
Any gains a company makes by internal procedures can often run up against the reality that they can only go so far. If the market served is weak, that will ultimately impact the company's performance no matter the level of company efficiency.
That's one way of looking at it. But that's not how Lee sees things.
'It's something we debate all the time internally,' he said. 'There is really no limit on how long we can continue this.'
The C.H. Robinson strategy under Bozeman is 'set up and established, and the foundational elements are to perform regardless of the market trend we're in,' Lee said. 'That same set of principles and foundational elements translates to midmarket and peak market as well.'
More articles by John Kingston
For the first time in years, C.H. Robinson's debt rating is downgraded by S&P Global
California deal with 16 states would end key parts of Advanced Clean Fleets rule
2 markets in 1 quarter: Auto-hauling demand volatile for Proficient
The post How is C.H. Robinson turning things around? CFO Lee has a few ideas appeared first on FreightWaves.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Revenue Surge Amid Strategic ...
Total Revenue: $37.4 million, up from $22.4 million in the prior year quarter. Loss from Operations: $35.8 million, compared to $41.4 million in the prior year quarter. Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders: $38.8 million, compared to $32.9 million in the prior year quarter. Net Loss Per Share: $1.79, compared to $2.18 in the prior year quarter. Adjusted EBITDA: Negative $19.3 million, compared to negative $26.5 million in the prior year quarter. Cash, Restricted Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments: $240 million as of April 30, 2025. Product Revenues: $13 million, compared to no product revenues in the prior year period. Service Agreement Revenues: $8.1 million, up from $1.4 million in the prior year period. Generation Revenue: $12.1 million, down from $14.1 million in the prior year period. Advanced Technology Contract Revenues: $4.1 million, down from $6.9 million in the prior year period. Gross Loss: $9.4 million, compared to $7.1 million in the prior year quarter. Operating Expenses: Decreased to $26.4 million from $34.3 million in the prior year quarter. Backlog: Increased by approximately 18.7% to $1.26 billion from $1.06 billion as of April 30, 2024. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with FCEL. Release Date: June 06, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. FuelCell Energy Inc (NASDAQ:FCEL) announced a restructuring plan to prioritize sales of its molten carbonate platform, aiming to accelerate the timeline to expected future profitability. The company is focusing on its core carbonate platform, which is aligned with the growing demand for distributed power generation in the US, Asia, and Europe. FuelCell Energy Inc (NASDAQ:FCEL) has formed a strategic partnership called Dedicated Power Partners (DPP) to accelerate the deployment of its carbonate FuelCell technology in data centers and other large-scale applications. The company reported a significant increase in total revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2025, reaching $37.4 million compared to $22.4 million in the prior year quarter. FuelCell Energy Inc (NASDAQ:FCEL) is committed to disciplined cost management, with a plan to reduce operating expenses by 30% on an annualized basis compared to fiscal-year 2024. FuelCell Energy Inc (NASDAQ:FCEL) is pausing broader solid oxide R&D, which may limit future innovation in this area. The company's Torrington manufacturing facility is currently operating at an annualized production rate of approximately 31 megawatts, well below the target of 100 megawatts needed for positive adjusted EBITDA. Despite narrowing losses, FuelCell Energy Inc (NASDAQ:FCEL) reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $38.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2025. The restructuring plan includes a global workforce reduction and significant reduction of discretionary overhead spending, which may impact employee morale and operational capacity. Advanced technology contract revenues decreased to $4.1 million from $6.9 million, indicating potential challenges in this segment. Q: Can you provide an update on the Dedicated Power Partners (DPP) initiative and any momentum with customers and orders? A: Jason Few, President and CEO, explained that DPP is focused on data center customers, combining fuel from Diversified Energy, Fuelcell power generation, and financing through TESIAC. They are actively pursuing conversations in Northern Virginia and Kentucky and feel positive about the momentum in turning these discussions into transactions. Q: What is the timeline for reaching EBITDA neutrality, and what are the production targets? A: Michael Bishop, CFO, stated that achieving adjusted EBITDA positive is expected when the Torrington facility reaches 100 megawatts of production. Currently, the facility operates at 31 megawatts, and the timeline depends on the flow of orders. The facility has a capacity of 100 megawatts without additional capital expenditure and can expand to 200 megawatts with further investment. Q: How does the current focus on manufacturing impact the path to profitability compared to the generation portfolio? A: Michael Bishop noted that while the generation portfolio contributes to financials, the focus is on product and service sales. The company is not relying on increasing the generation portfolio but sees opportunities in selling products into DPP and other markets, including Korea, which will also include service agreements. Q: With the rising costs of gas turbines, how does this affect your pricing strategy for data center applications? A: Jason Few mentioned that the increased cost and timeline for gas turbines present an opportunity for Fuelcell Energy. They do not foresee significant changes in pricing to customers due to demand driven by electricity growth and intend to capitalize on this opportunity. Q: Can you elaborate on the power generation opportunities for AI and data centers and which customers are showing the most urgency? A: Jason Few highlighted that the opportunity is not solely around data centers but includes grid resiliency and reliability projects. The data center market is fragmented, with developers, hyperscalers, and gas distribution companies all showing interest. Fuelcell Energy is engaging with all these segments, focusing on delivering power blocks to get data centers operational. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Wall Street Journal
4 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq All Positive on the Year Once Again
All three major U.S. stock indexes closed in positive year-to-date territory simultaneously for the first time since Feb. 21. The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average all rose by 1%, or more, during Friday's trading. Stocks have been volatile through weeks of tariff news, but have recovered losses from recent months. This year, the S&P 500 is up 2%, the Nasdaq is up 1.1% and the Dow is up 0.5%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG) by anygal on r/investing on Reddit. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on ACOG. Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG)'s share was trading at $9.33 as of 30th May. ACOG's forward P/E was 26.88 according to Yahoo Finance. A chemist in a laboratory analyzing data from the various therapeutic tests conducted. Alpha Cognition Inc. (NASDAQ: ACOG) represents a potentially overlooked opportunity in the Alzheimer's treatment space, having recently launched its oral drug, Zunveyl, at the end of March. With a current market cap of $150 million and $45 million in cash, the company is targeting the underserved segment of the Alzheimer's population—specifically, the 50% of patients in long-term care (LTC) not taking any current medications due to severe side effects. Unlike other galantamine-based drugs, Zunveyl significantly slows disease progression and improves short-term memory with a markedly better safety profile—only one serious side-effect case was reported in its Phase 3 trials, versus a 50% rate seen in traditional options. The drug's Medicare coverage further eases affordability, lowering monthly out-of-pocket costs to $30–$190. Initial demand appears promising, with nearly 500 patients starting treatment in the first two weeks of launch. Even a modest 1% market penetration into the LTC segment could yield $135 million in annual revenue, with $67.5 million in net income assuming 50% margins. A 5% penetration would put net income at $675 million, dwarfing the current valuation. Alpha Cognition has also secured a distribution deal with a major Chinese pharmaceutical firm, creating a royalty-based revenue stream in Asia. While the upside is substantial, key risks remain—most notably, the emergence of unforeseen serious side effects post-launch, which could lead to FDA scrutiny or suspension of sales. Still, the market's underreaction and the company's positioning as a safer, effective alternative in a high-need space make ACOG a high-upside, high-conviction bet for risk-tolerant investors. Previously, we have covered ACOG in March 2025 wherein we summarized a by BullishDoctor on Twitter. The user highlighted that Alpha Cognition Inc.'s drug ZUNVEYL addressed the major side effects of existing Alzheimer's treatments, making it highly tolerable and poised for adoption in long-term care facilities, a $2 billion market. The company was pre-revenue but launched in March 2025 with strong physician support, a nearly complete sales force, and promising catalysts like a Phase 4 study and sublingual formulation, projecting breakeven within three years. Since our last coverage, the stock is up 61% as of 30th May. Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 8 hedge fund portfolios held ACOG at the end of the first quarter which was 10 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of ACOG as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio