US Education Department must reinstate nearly 1400 fired workers
'This decision is a first step to reverse this war on knowledge and the undermining of broad-based opportunity,' said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, one of the groups suing the department. 'For America to build a brighter future, we must all take more responsibility, not less, for the success of our children.'
The Education Department denounced Joun's ruling, saying it was not in the best interest of American students and families. The agency plans to challenge the order on an emergency basis.
'Once again, a far-left judge has dramatically overstepped his authority, based on a complaint from biased plaintiffs, and issued an injunction against the obviously lawful efforts to make the Department of Education more efficient and functional for the American people,' Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the department, said in an email. 'President Trump and the Senate-confirmed Secretary of Education clearly have the authority to make decisions about agency reorganisation efforts, not an unelected Judge with a political ax to grind.'
The ruling directs the Education Department to file status reports on their progress complying with the order within 72 hours and weekly after that until the department is restored to 'the status quo prior to January 20, 2025'.
Sheria Smith, president of AFGE Local 252, which represents Education Department employees, welcomed the order. Smith, an attorney in the Office for Civil Rights who was herself laid off, said she expects all impacted members to have their jobs restored.
'Today's order illustrates that the work our members performed was critical to states, school districts, students, and our fellow citizens – despite this administration's statements to the contrary,' she said in a statement.
The ruling arrives a day after the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators released a national survey of members who said the staff cuts at the department have led to breakdowns that could affect the processing of aid this year. About 59% of the 909 financial aid offices surveyed reported delays in processing timelines and responsiveness since the layoffs. Hundreds of staff in the Office of Federal Student Aid, which is responsible for administering student loans and Pell grants, have been let go.
In April, college and university financial aid officers reported they were experiencing disruptions that slowed their ability to calculate financial aid offers and get timely answers from the department about everything from adding academic programs to remaining eligible to receive federal aid, the Post found.
'This is a huge rebuke and powerful ruling for all of us, but in some ways a lot of the damage has been done,' said Rachel Gittleman, who worked in Federal Student Aid's ombudsman office before the cuts. 'Even if we go back, will we be able to do the work we were doing?'
Gittleman, who helped pull together employee declarations in the states' case, said many of her colleagues have been traumatised by the experience and worry about returning to a hostile work environment only to be let go again.
One attorney at the agency's Office for Civil Rights who was laid off said she looks forward to returning to her job and hopefully resuming work on cases that she was forced to abruptly abandon.
'I think many of us will go back in the hopes that we will be able to be reassigned to the cases that we already have and we hope to be able to continue working on and get some resolution for people,' said the attorney, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. 'We want to do the work that Congress directed us to do.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Trump targets mail-in ballots ahead of 2026 US elections, claims risks to integrity
But Trump repeatedly spread misinformation about the practice as he campaigned in 2020 and 2024. After his defeat in 2020, he falsely claimed that tens of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots had helped Democrat Joe Biden beat him. Trump said on Friday that his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin – whom US investigators found interfered on the Republican's behalf in the 2016 election – agreed with him that letting voters send in ballots by mail risked election integrity. According to Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin said that the US elections were 'rigged' due to mail-in voting. Photo / Getty Images 'You know, Vladimir Putin said something, one of the most interesting things,' Trump told Fox News. 'He said, 'Your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting.' He said, 'Mail-in voting, every election.' He said, 'No country has mail-in voting. It's impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections.'' Trump claimed falsely in his Truth Social post and again at an Oval Office press event on Monday that America is the only country in the world that uses postal voting. Dead on arrival In fact, data compiled by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance shows there are 34 countries worldwide allowing in-country postal voting – including Germany, Britain, Denmark, and US neighbour Canada. Trump issued an executive order in March directing Attorney-General Pam Bondi to 'take all necessary action' against states counting absentee or mail-in ballots received after the election, even if they were postmarked by election day. A judge ruled that Trump lacked the authority to impose state election rules and blocked the edict. The US Constitution is clear that the 'times, places,s and manner' of congressional elections is up to the legislatures in each state and not the business of the President. Despite his criticism, Trump cast mail ballots twice in Florida in the 2020 primary elections and used absentee ballots in New York in 2018 and 2017. But he voted in person in the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. His critics suspect his main concern in seeking to end mail-in voting is that it benefits Democrats, who outnumber Republicans using absentee or postal ballots. The President was asked about his new 'movement' during a press event in the White House on Monday and repeated his claims about mail-in voting being more susceptible to fraud – but also confirmed that he is motivated by the political realities. 'It's time that the Republicans get tough and stop it, because the Democrats want it,' he said. 'It's the only way they can get elected.' Chuck Schumer, who leads the Democratic minority in the US Senate, accused Trump of seeking a return to the 'Jim Crow' era of the late 1870s to mid-1960s, when many states enforced racial segregation and disenfranchised African Americans. 'Senate Democrats will make sure that any and every measure that would make it even more difficult for Americans to vote will be dead on arrival in the Senate and will continue to fight to protect our democracy,' he said. - Agence France-Press,
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
US needs to walk the talk
When new neighbours move in just down the street there is always a frisson of interest in what they are going to be like. Will they fit in well with the neighbourhood? How many people will be coming and going? Will they play loud music at all hours? Wellington, and New Zealand, have this week seen the arrival of someone different enough to get the net curtains twitching and set the tongues clacking. No less than the FBI, the United States' venerable law enforcement and criminal investigation agency, is in town. The first question which might spring to mind is, why would the US's domestic intelligence and security service want to have an office in New Zealand? That might quickly be followed by: what specifically are they going to be doing here? Do we need to be worried? The opening of the permanent legal attache FBI office at the US Embassy and the visit of FBI director Kash Patel were surrounded in secrecy, just as one might expect. Until now, New Zealand's links with the FBI through the Five Eyes intelligence partnership went through its office in Canberra. The new office in the capital has been established to investigate all threats to these countries and this geopolitical region, including cybercrime, terrorism, the narcotics trade and gun-running, child exploitation and money laundering. Mr Patel's visit was exposed when a sharp-eyed Newstalk ZB journalist recognised him in the basement of Parliament. There were other clues too for amateur sleuths — a US Department of Justice aircraft at Wellington Airport and a large group of American officials and New Zealand police gathering outside a downtown hotel. The US Embassy resorted to the old refusal to confirm or deny trick when asked. By the time Mr Patel put out a statement on Thursday afternoon explaining he was here to open the new office, he had already met with Police Minister Mark Mitchell, GCSB and NZSIS Minister Judith Collins, Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers. As University of Otago professor of international relations Robert Patman has pointed out, the move to open an FBI branch in New Zealand has its ironies. It may be good news that the US wants to take a larger role in fighting crime around the Pacific, but he says the Trump administration has shown little willingness itself to adhere to the international rules-based order since coming to power and has actually undermined the rule of law with claims to take over Canada and Greenland. More broadly, Mr Patel's visit and announcement also puts New Zealand and its leaders in a potentially difficult position when it comes to relations with China. While they have been extremely cautious making any comment about China, the FBI director was less tight-lipped, saying it would help to counter China's influence across the Pacific and, in the words of an FBI spokesman, confront threats from "hostile nation-state actors like the Chinese Communist Party". Our government has pushed back at those suggestions. Ms Collins said the office was about countering transnational crime and New Zealand was not going to single out any one country, and it was up to Mr Patel to decide what he wanted to say. Mr Peters said China was not even raised during his meeting with the director. Unsurprisingly, China has bristled, despite Ms Collins saying she did not think it would comment. A Chinese Embassy spokesperson said it opposed "groundless assertions or vilifications" out of a "Cold War mentality" and that it had noted the US assertions and our ministers' remarks to the media. Certainly there are some weird things going on in a world which seems to get stranger by the minute. Granted, an FBI office in New Zealand is not going to be everyone's cup of tea, particularly for those who want the country to pull out of the Five Eyes alliance. But it is certainly a good move if such international crime-busting endeavours are going to make a difference to stopping the awful spread of drugs such as methamphetamine among the most vulnerable people in Pacific nations. We have seen recently how drug smuggling is making many thousands of people's lives there a misery. Far better for us to be on the side of good in the fight against such evils.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Zelensky brings Europe's top leaders with him to meet Trump
Ukraine's future could hinge on a hastily assembled meeting at the White House as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky brings with him an extraordinary cadre of European leaders to show US President Donald Trump a united front against Russia. The European political heavy-hitters were left out of Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin last Friday, and they look to safeguard Ukraine and the continent from any widening aggression from Moscow. By arriving as a group, they hope to avoid any debacles like Zelensky's February meeting in the Oval Office, where Trump chastised him for not showing enough gratitude for American military aid. The meeting on Monday (early Tuesday morning, NZ time) also is a test of America's relationship with its closest allies after the European Union and United Kingdom accepted Trump's tariff hikes partly because they wanted his support on Ukraine. Monday's showing is a sign both of the progress and the possible distress coming out of the Alaska meeting as many of Europe's leaders are descending on Washington with the explicit goal of protecting Ukraine's interests, a rare and sweeping show of diplomatic force. ADVERTISEMENT "It's important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine, and therefore for all of Europe," Zelensky said on X. The night before the meeting, however, Trump seemed to put the onus on Zelensky to agree to concessions and suggested that Ukraine could not regain Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014, setting off an armed conflict that led to its broader 2022 invasion. President Donald Trump welcomes Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House in Washington, Friday, Feb. 28, 2025. (Source: Associated Press) "President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," he wrote Sunday night on social media. "Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" Zelensky appeared to respond with his own post late Sunday, saying, "We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably." He went on to say that "peace must be lasting," not as it was after Russia seized Crimea and part of the Donbas in eastern Ukraine eight years ago, and "Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack." The sitdown in Alaska yielded the possible contours for stopping the war in Ukraine, though it was unclear whether the terms discussed would ultimately be acceptable to Zelensky or Putin. The European heavyweights going to Washington ADVERTISEMENT Planning to join Zelensky in America's capital are European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. On the table for discussion are possible NATO-like security guarantees that Ukraine would need for any peace with Russia to be durable. Putin opposes Ukraine joining NATO outright, yet Trump's team claims the Russian leader is open to allies agreeing to defend Ukraine if it comes under attack. Trump briefed Zelensky and European allies shortly after the Putin meeting, and details from the discussions emerged in a scattershot way that seemed to rankle the US president, who had chosen not to outline any terms when appearing afterward with Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, is welcomed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz upon arrival in the garden of the chancellery in Berlin, Germany, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025 (Source: Associated Press) "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA," Trump posted Sunday on social media. The president also bemoaned media coverage of his summit with Putin and said on Truth Social: "I had a great meeting in Alaska." Following the Alaska summit, Trump declared that a ceasefire was not necessary for peace talks to proceed, a sudden shift to a position favored by Putin. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that a ceasefire was still possible but that "the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal." ADVERTISEMENT The issues on the table for the European allies European officials confirmed that Trump told them Putin is still seeking control of the entire Donbas region, even though Ukraine controls a meaningful share of it. And Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the US and its allies could offer Ukraine a NATO-like commitment to defend the country if it came under attack as the possible security guarantee. "How that's constructed, what we call it, how it's built, what guarantees are built into it that are enforceable, that's what we'll be talking about over the next few days with our partners who are coming in from overseas," Rubio told NBC's "Meet the Press." Rubio said on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures" that such a commitment "would be a very big move" by Trump. He expects the delegations will "spend six, seven hours talking about these things, maybe more, and try to get to a point where we have something more concrete." Monday's meeting will likely be very tough for Zelensky, an official close to the ongoing talks said. That official spoke on condition of anonymity to speak openly about thinking within Ukraine and between allies. Zelensky needs to prevent a scenario in which he gets blamed for blocking peace talks by rejecting Putin's maximalist demand on the Donbas, the official said. It is a demand Zelensky has said many times he will never accept because it is unconstitutional and could create a launching pad for future Russian attacks. ADVERTISEMENT If confronted with pressure to accept Putin's demands, Zelensky would likely have to revert to a skill he has demonstrated time and again: diplomatic tact. Ukrainian leadership is seeking a trilateral meeting with Zelensky, Trump and Putin to discuss sensitive matters, including territorial issues. Zelensky is looking to avoid another Oval Office blowup After enduring a public tirade by Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February, Zelensky worked to repair relations with the US. Constant diplomatic communication and a 15-minute meeting at the Vatican in April on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral helped turn the tide. Trump appeared at the time to be swayed by Zelensky's conditions for peace. But Trump says he cares primarily about ending the war, an ambition that led him after his meeting with Putin to discard the need for a ceasefire. European allies also have worked with Trump, reaching a deal in July for NATO allies to buy weapons from the US for Ukraine. Ahead of Monday's meeting, France's Macron stressed the importance of building up Ukraine's military and the need to show Putin that Europe interprets his moves as a threat to other nations. ADVERTISEMENT "If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and — make no mistake — they can impact us, too," Macron said.
