US Education Department must reinstate nearly 1400 fired workers
Joun also agreed that the coalition of states, school districts and unions – who filed separate lawsuits that have been consolidated – are likely to suffer irreparable harm as the cuts result in financial uncertainty, impeded access to vital knowledge and the loss of essential services provided by the Office of Federal Student Aid and the Office for Civil Rights. Department employees, university leaders, state education agencies, union members and educators provided testimony in support of the coalition.
'This decision is a first step to reverse this war on knowledge and the undermining of broad-based opportunity,' said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, one of the groups suing the department. 'For America to build a brighter future, we must all take more responsibility, not less, for the success of our children.'
The Education Department denounced Joun's ruling, saying it was not in the best interest of American students and families. The agency plans to challenge the order on an emergency basis.
'Once again, a far-left judge has dramatically overstepped his authority, based on a complaint from biased plaintiffs, and issued an injunction against the obviously lawful efforts to make the Department of Education more efficient and functional for the American people,' Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the department, said in an email. 'President Trump and the Senate-confirmed Secretary of Education clearly have the authority to make decisions about agency reorganisation efforts, not an unelected Judge with a political ax to grind.'
The ruling directs the Education Department to file status reports on their progress complying with the order within 72 hours and weekly after that until the department is restored to 'the status quo prior to January 20, 2025'.
Sheria Smith, president of AFGE Local 252, which represents Education Department employees, welcomed the order. Smith, an attorney in the Office for Civil Rights who was herself laid off, said she expects all impacted members to have their jobs restored.
'Today's order illustrates that the work our members performed was critical to states, school districts, students, and our fellow citizens – despite this administration's statements to the contrary,' she said in a statement.
The ruling arrives a day after the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators released a national survey of members who said the staff cuts at the department have led to breakdowns that could affect the processing of aid this year. About 59% of the 909 financial aid offices surveyed reported delays in processing timelines and responsiveness since the layoffs. Hundreds of staff in the Office of Federal Student Aid, which is responsible for administering student loans and Pell grants, have been let go.
In April, college and university financial aid officers reported they were experiencing disruptions that slowed their ability to calculate financial aid offers and get timely answers from the department about everything from adding academic programs to remaining eligible to receive federal aid, the Post found.
'This is a huge rebuke and powerful ruling for all of us, but in some ways a lot of the damage has been done,' said Rachel Gittleman, who worked in Federal Student Aid's ombudsman office before the cuts. 'Even if we go back, will we be able to do the work we were doing?'
Gittleman, who helped pull together employee declarations in the states' case, said many of her colleagues have been traumatised by the experience and worry about returning to a hostile work environment only to be let go again.
One attorney at the agency's Office for Civil Rights who was laid off said she looks forward to returning to her job and hopefully resuming work on cases that she was forced to abruptly abandon.
'I think many of us will go back in the hopes that we will be able to be reassigned to the cases that we already have and we hope to be able to continue working on and get some resolution for people,' said the attorney, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. 'We want to do the work that Congress directed us to do.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Statement from the Embassy of Israel: False Claims Regarding IDF Fire in Gaza
The Embassy of Israel in New Zealand would like to address and clarify recent reports regarding allegations of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) fire toward Gazan civilians near a humanitarian aid distribution site. These claims are false An initial IDF inquiry confirms that no fire was directed at civilians in or around the humanitarian aid distribution area. The incident in question occurred approximately one kilometre away from the distribution site and outside of its operating hours. During that separate event, IDF troops responded with warning shots toward individuals approaching their position under suspicious circumstances. There is no connection between this defensive action and the false claims circulating in the media. Hamas continues to exploit humanitarian aid efforts The IDF is working in coordination with the American humanitarian organisation GHF and international agencies to facilitate the delivery of aid intended for Gazan civilians — not Hamas. We wish to remind the public and the media that Hamas is a brutal terrorist organisation that deliberately endangers the lives of Gazan civilians in order to preserve its control over the Gaza Strip. Hamas systematically undermines humanitarian aid operations by seizing supplies, attacking aid convoys, and violently obstructing access to food. It uses disinformation as a strategic weapon — manipulating the media and public opinion to conceal its crimes and shift blame. Drone footage released by the IDF today shows armed individuals in southern Khan Yunis firing at Gazans trying to collect looted aid. These gunmen, identified as Hamas operatives, are seen obstructing access to food and basic necessities. You may view the footage here: We urge all members of the media to treat unverified claims from Hamas-affiliated sources with extreme caution. In past incidents, such disinformation has led to serious misreporting, ultimately harming the prospects for stability and humanitarian relief on the ground. We remain committed to supporting the safe and effective delivery of aid to Gaza's civilian population and to countering those who would weaponise suffering for political gain.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Announcement Of A Visa Restriction Policy Targeting Foreign Nationals Who Censor Americans
Marco Rubio, Secretary of State Free speech is among the most cherished rights we enjoy as Americans. This right, legally enshrined in our constitution, has set us apart as a beacon of freedom around the world. Even as we take action to reject censorship at home, we see troubling instances of foreign governments and foreign officials picking up the slack. In some instances, foreign officials have taken flagrant censorship actions against U.S. tech companies and U.S. citizens and residents when they have no authority to do so. Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States. We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech. This visa restriction policy is pursuant to Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the Secretary of State to render inadmissible any alien whose entry into the Unites States 'would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.' Certain family members may also be covered by these restrictions.
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
US must restore academic freedom
Recent events at United States universities evoke vivid memories from my student past. While studying at the University of Cape Town (UCT) in 1958, the Extension of University Education Act was passed by the South African apartheid regime. It became "a criminal offence for a non-white student to register to a hitherto open university without the written consent of the Minister of Internal Affairs". At that time about 5% of SA university students were non-white, 552 at UCT. The Bill evoked vigorous public opposition, including street marches through major cities; support was received from 296 leading international universities. The UCT vice-chancellor, TB Davie, described four criteria of university academic freedom: who might be taught, what could be taught, how it should be taught, who was to be admitted to study. In 1959, a Flame of Academic Freedom was ceremonially extinguished in a prominent position on the university campus. A plaque describing the event was unveiled, but accompanied by another adjacent plaque leaving a blank date for when the flame would be reignited; this occurred in 1994. Many have repeated "if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear". But when "nothing wrong" excludes treating all fellow human beings with dignity and respect, is it a crime to follow your conscience? Democracies, and universities, encourage questions seeking the truth. Autocracies and totalitarian regimes discourage questions; exposing the truth may clash with uncompromising policies. US university students are facing similar challenges while advocating for matters of international justice. During my 20 years as an under- and post-graduate student and then on UCT staff, we protested apartheid policies. Most protest actions included demonstrations and having personal friendships and socialising with non-white students. Many of us were involved with charitable activities (mainly health and education) in underprivileged Coloured areas. Throughout the country, students and staff of all races were targeted. Some of our associates on campus were bullied, expelled, had activities and phone calls traced, banned, assaulted, whipped, deported, imprisoned without trial (some for 90 and some for 180 days, often in solitary confinement) and a few murdered. The "crimes" they had committed usually related to peacefully protesting apartheid policies in word or deed. As now in the US, anyone questioning official policy was construed as being an enemy of the state. Many American students are being persecuted and prosecuted for speaking out about international abuses in human rights. As in SA, authorities judge students according to their own interpretation, rightly or wrongly, of what they think is being protested. Current US policies make this particularly difficult for non-Americans who face potential deportation without trial. University administrations are being penalised heavily for defending their students and academic freedom. In 1965, a fellow SA researcher was denied permission by government authorities to present a paper accepted for presentation at a European nutrition meeting. The reason was the research exposed the dreadful nutritional status of Cape Coloured children. The situation was notified to congress organisers, requesting they leave the abstract on the programme but tell the audience why he was banned from presenting in person. That was the end of my friend's academic career. Should we not all continue to protest politically induced child starvation? As a Swiss citizen, I would be vulnerable if targeted during any protest. Advice was sought from the Swiss Consulate; he agreed I needed to follow my conscience, but advised against taking any leading role. The next day a protest letter appeared in the Cape Times , signed by all the medical registrars at Groote Schuur Hospital; my heart sank when the signatories appeared in alphabetic order, with mine at the top. We all had our mugshots taken when we went to farewell our mentor at the airport. Later that year, I presented a research paper at a scientific meeting in recently "liberated" Czechoslovakia. The irony was that the Russian communist system had been overtly suppressing the Czech public in similar ways to the apartheid regime in SA under the guise of being "anti-communist". Following these events, my wife (a health visitor in a poor Coloured area) and I became aware of dramatically increased official attention: our movements tracked, phone tapped, house searched and we were aware of police surveillance. Together with a large cohort of young academics, we left the country (in our case to New Zealand) in 1978. Young US academics are having their consciences silenced by those who believe they have a monopoly on the truth. Just as we had to abide by the dictates of cruel apartheid laws, US staff and students are free to express their views provided they agree with Make America Great Again policies. This is disastrous for universities and for the intellectual development and future prosperity of any nation. The career-enhancing post-doc experience I enjoyed in the US would not be possible under their current policies. True academic freedom must be restored before current policies induce a brain-drain and ruin outstanding American international institutions. ■Gil Barbezat is an emeritus professor of medicine, University of Otago.
