I'm locked out of voting this election. I feel less Australian than ever
I haven't lived in Australia for 12 years, but I keep finding myself back here at election time. My last trip back was long awaited after enduring two years of solid border closures and happened to coincide with the 2022 federal election. This year, I'm here to launch a book while my fellow Australians decide whether to hand another term to Labor, return to the Coalition, or have another go at a minority government.
Sadly, Australian elections have become a spectator sport for me. I fell off the electoral roll some time during the long pandemic years, and the good folks at the electoral commission told me I couldn't re-enrol from outside the country. No democracy sausage for me.
That's not all I lost during Australia's long period of sealing itself off from the rest of the world.
For many, the pandemic was an opportunity to reflect on where we truly wanted to live. For some, that meant returning to Australia as soon as possible. For me, it created an ambivalence towards a place I used to call home. Five years after the borders first closed, I somehow feel less Australian than ever.
I migrated to Australia from the UK as a teenager, becoming a citizen in 2004. I quickly and enthusiastically adopted the identity – footy, Cup Day, Tim Tams, the lot. Life in Melbourne was as liveable as everyone said it would be, and I grew to love its unparalleled live music scene, its bars, the roar of the 'G. Melbourne was the city where I found my profession as a journalist, where I fell in love and where I became a passionate supporter of the Melbourne Demons (OK, some bad choices were made).
I left to work in Europe in 2013 and somehow never made it back. I didn't think that changed my Australianness – until COVID-19 hit.
My father was diagnosed with cancer soon after I left Australia, and I spent the following years ferrying back and forth between my new and old homes to be with him when I could, through surgeries and rounds of chemo. When I was back, we'd walk with the dog around our local oval, pop over to Cinema Nova for a film and then discuss it over ricotta panzerotti at Brunetti.
Then COVID-19 struck, the borders closed, and his condition took a turn for the worse. When it was clear the end was coming, I boarded a plane at an empty Charles de Gaulle Airport and went through 14 days of hotel quarantine, hoping he would last long enough for me to say goodbye in person.
He did. On July 7, 2020, the day after I got out of quarantine, my father died of cancer at home in East Brunswick. On July 8, Melbourne went into a lockdown that would become the world's longest. We held no funeral (restrictions meant we couldn't), and so I returned to Paris and tried to support my family remotely while they were confined to different neighbourhoods for months on end. It would be two years of waiting for Australia to reopen to the world before I saw them again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Rocky times: no-confidence motion set to dump premier
A Liberal state minority government is in political turmoil with a premier set to be dumped by parliament and a snap election looming. The motion, put forward by the Labor opposition, appears all but certain to pass with support of the Greens and three crossbench MPs. Mr Rockliff has conceded the numbers are against him but has vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. This stance could end up triggering an election, some 15 months after the Liberals were returned to power, governing in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Labor and some of the crossbench have lashed Mr Rockliff for budget "mismanagement" and delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Some crossbenchers and the Greens are opposed to a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position they reiterated on Wednesday. The Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Senior Liberal MP Roger Jaensch told parliament Labor leader Dean Winter was trying to steal power by moving the motion. "(He) has shown contempt for the Tasmanian people in favour of his own interest. Tasmanians voted for a Liberal government and Jeremy Rockliff," Mr Jaensch told parliament. If the motion passes, the Liberals could try to govern with another premier, with current deputy Guy Barnett or former senator Eric Abetz the most logical options. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff has kept the door ajar for a minority government scenario with Labor, who only hold 10 lower-house seats. Dr Woodruff said her party was prepared to work with Labor, saying Mr Winter could prevent Tasmania from going to an election in the event no feasible governing arrangement was found. Independent Kristie Johnston, one of the three crossbenchers to support the motion, hasn't ruled out working with Labor. A Liberal state minority government is in political turmoil with a premier set to be dumped by parliament and a snap election looming. The motion, put forward by the Labor opposition, appears all but certain to pass with support of the Greens and three crossbench MPs. Mr Rockliff has conceded the numbers are against him but has vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. This stance could end up triggering an election, some 15 months after the Liberals were returned to power, governing in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Labor and some of the crossbench have lashed Mr Rockliff for budget "mismanagement" and delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Some crossbenchers and the Greens are opposed to a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position they reiterated on Wednesday. The Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Senior Liberal MP Roger Jaensch told parliament Labor leader Dean Winter was trying to steal power by moving the motion. "(He) has shown contempt for the Tasmanian people in favour of his own interest. Tasmanians voted for a Liberal government and Jeremy Rockliff," Mr Jaensch told parliament. If the motion passes, the Liberals could try to govern with another premier, with current deputy Guy Barnett or former senator Eric Abetz the most logical options. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff has kept the door ajar for a minority government scenario with Labor, who only hold 10 lower-house seats. Dr Woodruff said her party was prepared to work with Labor, saying Mr Winter could prevent Tasmania from going to an election in the event no feasible governing arrangement was found. Independent Kristie Johnston, one of the three crossbenchers to support the motion, hasn't ruled out working with Labor. A Liberal state minority government is in political turmoil with a premier set to be dumped by parliament and a snap election looming. The motion, put forward by the Labor opposition, appears all but certain to pass with support of the Greens and three crossbench MPs. Mr Rockliff has conceded the numbers are against him but has vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. This stance could end up triggering an election, some 15 months after the Liberals were returned to power, governing in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Labor and some of the crossbench have lashed Mr Rockliff for budget "mismanagement" and delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Some crossbenchers and the Greens are opposed to a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position they reiterated on Wednesday. The Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Senior Liberal MP Roger Jaensch told parliament Labor leader Dean Winter was trying to steal power by moving the motion. "(He) has shown contempt for the Tasmanian people in favour of his own interest. Tasmanians voted for a Liberal government and Jeremy Rockliff," Mr Jaensch told parliament. If the motion passes, the Liberals could try to govern with another premier, with current deputy Guy Barnett or former senator Eric Abetz the most logical options. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff has kept the door ajar for a minority government scenario with Labor, who only hold 10 lower-house seats. Dr Woodruff said her party was prepared to work with Labor, saying Mr Winter could prevent Tasmania from going to an election in the event no feasible governing arrangement was found. Independent Kristie Johnston, one of the three crossbenchers to support the motion, hasn't ruled out working with Labor. A Liberal state minority government is in political turmoil with a premier set to be dumped by parliament and a snap election looming. The motion, put forward by the Labor opposition, appears all but certain to pass with support of the Greens and three crossbench MPs. Mr Rockliff has conceded the numbers are against him but has vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. This stance could end up triggering an election, some 15 months after the Liberals were returned to power, governing in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Labor and some of the crossbench have lashed Mr Rockliff for budget "mismanagement" and delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Some crossbenchers and the Greens are opposed to a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position they reiterated on Wednesday. The Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Senior Liberal MP Roger Jaensch told parliament Labor leader Dean Winter was trying to steal power by moving the motion. "(He) has shown contempt for the Tasmanian people in favour of his own interest. Tasmanians voted for a Liberal government and Jeremy Rockliff," Mr Jaensch told parliament. If the motion passes, the Liberals could try to govern with another premier, with current deputy Guy Barnett or former senator Eric Abetz the most logical options. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff has kept the door ajar for a minority government scenario with Labor, who only hold 10 lower-house seats. Dr Woodruff said her party was prepared to work with Labor, saying Mr Winter could prevent Tasmania from going to an election in the event no feasible governing arrangement was found. Independent Kristie Johnston, one of the three crossbenchers to support the motion, hasn't ruled out working with Labor.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
YouTube, Meta, TikTok reveal misinformation tidal wave
Thousands of misleading videos, scam ads and fake profiles made in Australia have been wiped from online platforms over the past year to address a growing wave of misinformation. More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google. Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation. Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat. The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads. US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal. TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic. Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them. Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide. Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies. Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners. In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia. Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations. "I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said. "I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit." In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles. Thousands of misleading videos, scam ads and fake profiles made in Australia have been wiped from online platforms over the past year to address a growing wave of misinformation. More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google. Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation. Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat. The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads. US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal. TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic. Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them. Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide. Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies. Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners. In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia. Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations. "I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said. "I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit." In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles. Thousands of misleading videos, scam ads and fake profiles made in Australia have been wiped from online platforms over the past year to address a growing wave of misinformation. More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google. Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation. Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat. The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads. US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal. TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic. Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them. Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide. Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies. Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners. In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia. Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations. "I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said. "I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit." In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles. Thousands of misleading videos, scam ads and fake profiles made in Australia have been wiped from online platforms over the past year to address a growing wave of misinformation. More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google. Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation. Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat. The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads. US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal. TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic. Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them. Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide. Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies. Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners. In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia. Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations. "I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said. "I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit." In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
YouTube, Meta, TikTok reveal misinformation tidal wave
Thousands of misleading videos, scam ads and fake profiles made in Australia have been wiped from online platforms over the past year to address a growing wave of misinformation. More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google. Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation. Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat. The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads. US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal. TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic. Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them. Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide. Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies. Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners. In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia. Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations. "I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said. "I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit." In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles.
