Australia to reduce US beef import restrictions denounced by Trump as a ban
Australia will reduce restrictions on U.S. beef imports after U.S. President Donald Trump criticized what he described as an Australian ban on the meat, Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said.
Collins said Thursday that relaxing the restrictions designed to keep Australia free of mad cow disease, also known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy or BSE, among its cattle herds would not compromise biosecurity.
'Australia stands for open and free trade — our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this,' Collins said in a statement.
Australia has allowed imports of beef grown in the United States since 2019. But Australia has not allowed imports from the U.S. of beef sourced from Canada or Mexico because of the disease risk.
But the U.S. has recently introduced additional movement controls that identify and trace all cattle from Mexico and Canada to their farms of origin.
US cattle import controls satisfy Australian authorities
Australian authorities were 'satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the U.S. effectively manage biosecurity risks,' Collins said.
The timing of the new, reduced restrictions has not been finalized.
Trump attacked Australian import restrictions on U.S. beef when he announced in April that tariffs of at least 10% would be placed on Australian imports, with steel and aluminum facing a 50% tariff.
'Australia bans — and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything — but they ban American beef,' Trump told reporters then.
'Yet we imported $3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. They won't take any of our beef. They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and, you know, I don't blame them, but we're doing the same thing right now,' Trump added.
Lawmaker fears appeasing Trump endangers Australian cattle industry
Opposition lawmaker David Littleproud suspected the government was endangering Australia's cattle industry to appease Trump.
'I want to see the science and it should be predicated on science. I'm suspicious of the speed at which this has been done,' Littleproud told reporters.
'We need to give confidence to the industry, but also to you (the public): this is not just about animal welfare, this is about human welfare, this is about BSE potentially coming into this country and having a human impact, so I think it's important the government's very transparent about the science and I don't think it's even beyond the question to have an independent panel review that science to give confidence to everybody,' he added.
Around 70% of Australian beef is exported. Producers fear that export market would vanish overnight if diseases including mad cow or foot-and-mouth disease infected Australian cattle.
Will Evans, chief executive of Cattle Australia who represents more than 52,000 grass-fed beef producers across the nation, said he was confident the agriculture department had taken a cautious approach toward U.S. imports.
'The department's undertaken a technical scientific assessment and we have to put faith in them. They've made this assessment themselves. They've said: 'We've looked at this, we've looked at the best science, this is a decision that we feel comfortable with,'' Evans told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.
'When you have a 75 billion (Australian dollar, $50 billion) industry relying on them not making this mistake, I'm sure they've been very cautious in their decision-making,' he added.
US beef prices rise because of drought and a domestic cattle shortage
Beef prices have been rising in the U.S. due to factors that include drought and shrinking domestic herd numbers.
The average price of a pound of ground beef in the U.S. rose to $6.12 in June, up nearly 12% from a year ago, according to U.S. government data. The average price of all uncooked beef steaks rose 8% to $11.49 per pound.
Australia's opposition to any U.S. tariffs will be high on the agenda when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese secures his first face-to-face meeting with Trump.
Albanese and Trump were to hold a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of a Group of Seven summit in Canada last month, but the U.S. president left early.
Albanese expects the pair will meet this year, although no date has been announced.
The two countries have had a bilateral free trade deal for 20 years and the U.S. has maintained a trade surplus with Australia for decades.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Target vs. Costco
Key Points Costco has 80 million paid household members. Target recently raised its dividend for the 54th consecutive year. Target favors share repurchases, while Costco prioritizes maintaining a strong balance sheet. 10 stocks we like better than Costco Wholesale › Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) and Target (NYSE: TGT) are two of the most recognizable names in American retail. While both have been longtime winners for shareholders, their stocks have lost steam in recent months. However, when established leaders hit a rough patch, it can create a timely opportunity to invest at a more reasonable price. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Let's take a closer look at the valuation, shareholder returns, and recent financial performance to see which of these retail giants looks like the better buy today. Does Costco or Target have a better valuation? Valuation is critical in determining whether a stock is priced attractively relative to its earnings potential. It helps investors gauge whether they're paying a fair price, a premium, or a potential bargain. Target and Costco are blue chip retailers, but the market values them differently. Costco, up just 2% in 2025, carries a market capitalization of more than $413 billion -- nearly 3 times the $47 billion of Target, which has seen its stock fall 23% year to date. That gap reflects investor confidence in Costco's steady growth and recurring membership revenue, while Target continues to work through declining sales. Costco trades at a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 52.8 -- well above its three-year median of 46.5 -- suggesting the stock may be richly valued. In contrast, Target trades at just 14.6 times trailing earnings, below its three-year median of 17, pointing to a potential discount. While valuation alone doesn't tell the whole story, it's a meaningful starting point, and in this case, Target has the edge over Costco for investors looking for a discount. COST PE Ratio data by YCharts Returning capital to shareholders Costco recently increased its quarterly dividend from $1.16 to $1.30 per share, its 21st consecutive annual raise -- bringing its yield to a modest 0.56%. While the yield may seem low, Costco has a track record of rewarding shareholders with sizable special dividends during periods of strong cash flow. In fact, it has issued five special dividends over the past 13 years, including a $15-per-share payout in January 2024. With a conservative payout ratio of just 20%, Costco has plenty of room to continue growing its dividend in the years ahead. Target, meanwhile, is a Dividend King -- having raised its dividend for 54 straight years. Its most recent increase bumped the quarterly distribution from $1.12 to $1.14 per share, translating to a 4.4% yield, one of the most generous among major retailers. Notably, its 49% payout ratio leaves room for management to continue its tradition of dividend hikes. When it comes to share repurchases, Target has been the more aggressive player. It bought back $251 million worth of stock last quarter and has reduced its outstanding share count by 9.3% over the past five years. However, with the stock trading near multiyear lows, some may question the effectiveness of those buybacks. Costco, by contrast, takes a more conservative approach, spending $215 million on repurchases last quarter, mainly to offset dilution. Over the past five years, its share count has remained essentially unchanged. For income-focused investors, Target's generous yield and long-standing dividend track record are hard to beat. But its buyback strategy hasn't always delivered the intended value. Costco's disciplined approach, lower payout ratio, and history of special dividends offer a different kind of appeal. Ultimately, both companies prioritize rewarding shareholders, making this category a tie. Recent financial performance and outlook For the final, and arguably most important, category for future stock appreciation, let's examine each company's recent financial performance and near-term outlook. Costco continues to deliver strong, consistent results. In its most recent quarter, the company reported $62 billion in revenue, an 8% increase year over year, driven by its 80 million paid household members. Net income rose 13% to $1.9 billion, and comparable sales (excluding the effects of gas prices and currency fluctuations) climbed 8%. E-commerce was particularly strong, growing 15.7%. While Costco doesn't provide formal financial guidance, CEO Ron Vachris expressed confidence heading into the final quarter of fiscal 2025, saying, "While the impacts of tariffs and the outlook for the economy in general remain unknown, we are confident in the ability of our operators and merchants to rise to the challenges and continue to offer great service and find consistent values for our members." Vachris' confidence is supported by the company's membership renewal rates of 92.7% in the U.S. and Canada and 90.2% globally. Target's latest quarter, by contrast, was more uneven. Revenue declined 2.8% to $23.8 billion, with comparable store sales down 5.7%. However, digital was a bright spot, with online sales up 4.7% thanks to a 36% increase in same-day delivery. Excluding a one-time legal settlement, adjusted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $1.30, down sharply from $2.03 the year prior. CEO Brian Cornell acknowledged the challenges: "I want to be clear that we're not satisfied with this performance, and we're moving with urgency to navigate through this period of volatility." Looking ahead, Target management expects adjusted EPS of $7 to $9 for 2025, compared to $8.86 in 2024 -- signaling continued uncertainty in the months ahead. All told, Costco's consistent top- and bottom-line growth, strong digital momentum, and unmatched member loyalty give it a clear advantage in this category. Which stock is the better buy? Both Target and Costco have their strengths. If its turnaround efforts succeed, Target offers a higher dividend yield, cheaper valuation, and upside potential. On the other hand, Costco continues to deliver impressive growth, fueled by its membership model and global footprint. In a more uncertain economic environment, Costco's consistency and proven membership model make it the better buy for most long-term investors, especially considering that Costco has a stronger balance sheet with $9.1 billion in net cash versus Target's net debt of $12.6 billion. COST Net Financial Debt (Quarterly) data by YCharts Should you invest $1,000 in Costco Wholesale right now? Before you buy stock in Costco Wholesale, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Costco Wholesale wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Economic Watch: Trump's sweeping new tariffs spark extensive criticism
U.S. President Donald Trump imposed sweeping new tariffs on 69 trading partners, sparking global criticism over economic disruption and sovereignty concerns. WASHINGTON, Aug. 2 (Xinhua) -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that further modified tariff rates with 69 trading partners, drawing criticism across the world. The order, set to be implemented on Aug. 7, imposes "additional ad valorem duties on goods of certain trading partners," with rates ranging from 10 percent to 40 percent. SWEEPING TARIFFS Under the new executive order, the "universal" tariff for goods entering the United States will remain at 10 percent, the same rate implemented on April 2. However, the 10-percent rate will only apply to countries with which the United States has a trade surplus, CNN reported, citing a senior official. For countries with which the United States has a trade deficit, a 15-percent rate will serve as the new tariff floor. Still, for more than a dozen other countries, the tariff rates are higher than 15 percent, either because they agreed to a trade framework with the United States or because Trump sent their leaders a letter requiring a higher tariff, it added. On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order increasing the tariff on Canada from 25 percent to 35 percent, with the higher tariff taking effect on Aug. 1. Goods qualifying for preferential tariff treatment under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement will continue to remain exempt from the new tariffs. Goods transshipped to evade the 35-percent tariff will be subject, instead, to a transshipment tariff of 40 percent. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order implementing an additional 40-percent tariff on Brazilian goods, bringing the total tariff amount to 50 percent. On the same day, Trump announced that Washington had reached a "full and complete" trade deal with South Korea, setting 15-percent tariffs on its exports. South Korea has also agreed to invest 350 billion U.S. dollars in projects "owned and controlled by the United States," and selected by himself, Trump said. Trump said on Wednesday that the United States would impose a 25-percent tariff on imports from India, starting on Aug. 1. On July 27, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that they had reached a trade deal under which the United States would impose a baseline tariff of 15 percent on EU goods. The deal allows the United States to impose a broad 15-percent tariff on EU goods while securing zero-tariff access for a range of strategic American exports. In contrast, the EU has pledged to purchase 750 billion U.S. dollars' worth of American energy and commit an additional 600 billion U.S. dollars in investments in the United States. WIDE CRITICISM The higher tariffs continue Trump's reversal of the decades of globalization that made America's massive services economy the envy of the world but contributed to its long decline in manufacturing, CNN commented. "Our businesses ... need some degree of certainty, and all they're getting is chaos and inflation. So the Trump tariff trade war is a trade war on the American people. We've seen this week the chaos and uncertainty," said Chuck Schumer, Senate Democratic leader. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement on Friday that his government is disappointed by Trump's decision to increase the tariff on Canadian goods to 35 percent. According to the statement, the sectors of lumber, steel, aluminum and automobiles are heavily impacted by U.S. duties and tariffs. The Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian and diversify export markets, said Carney. Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad said his government will soon announce a response plan focused on providing financing assistance, deferring tax payments, accelerating export tax refunds, and reactivating labor protection policies. Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade, slammed the U.S.-EU deal as "significantly imbalanced." In a statement following the announcement of the agreement, he said that "concessions have been made that are difficult to bear." The trade agreement is "a political, economic and moral fiasco," Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Rally party in the French parliament, said in an X post. "Hundreds of billions of euros of gas, as well as weapons, will have to be imported each year from the United States. This is a complete capitulation for French industry, and for our energy and military sovereignty," she said. "I don't think Trump wants a trade deal. He wants these countries to surrender their economic sovereignty," said Sizo Nkala, senior research fellow at the Center for Africa-China Studies, University of Johannesburg. "More than anything, the tariff rates represent an assault on and a violation of a rules-based multilateral trading system administered by the World Trade Organization," Nkala said.
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump cites new tariffs on India for buying Russian oil
WASHINGTON, D.C.: U.S. President Donald Trump declared on July 30 that his administration will impose a 25 percent tariff on imports from India, along with an additional levy targeting the country's continued purchases of Russian oil. Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump acknowledged India as "a friend," but criticized what he called "excessively high" Indian tariffs on American exports. In justifying the penalties, Trump pointed to India's ongoing defense and energy ties with Russia. He argued that India's purchases of Russian military hardware and crude oil were indirectly sustaining Moscow's war in Ukraine. "If we are serious about ending the war, we must stop enabling it," Trump said, announcing the start of what he called a "Russia-related penalty" tariff, set to take effect on August 1. The move is part of a broader overhaul of Trump's trade policy, which includes renegotiated frameworks with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Trump said those deals would open new markets for American products while giving the U.S. the authority to raise import taxes to support domestic industries and reduce the federal deficit, which has grown following his administration's income tax cuts. Trump has long used tariffs as leverage to reshape global trade dynamics. While supporters argue the strategy has helped U.S. manufacturing, critics, including many economists, warn that rising import costs often hit American consumers and businesses, fueling inflation and dampening economic growth. India, now the world's most populous nation, is seen as a key partner in Washington's long-term strategy to counterbalance China's global influence. However, India has maintained a neutral stance on the Ukraine war and has not joined Western sanctions against Russia. Its energy deals with Moscow, including purchases of discounted Russian crude, have drawn repeated concern from U.S. officials. During a February meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Trump expressed optimism about a budding energy partnership, claiming that India had agreed to buy American oil and liquefied natural gas. Yet on the flight back from a recent visit to Scotland, Trump told reporters that a comprehensive U.S.-India trade agreement remained unfinished. When asked whether a 25 percent tariff was imminent, he replied cryptically, "We're going to see." With the new tariff measures set to launch in August, India now joins a growing list of U.S. trading partners facing heightened duties under Trump's revised trade regime — a campaign he says is aimed at protecting American jobs and correcting global imbalances.
