
Mountainhead Review: A relevant, promising satire undone by heavy talk and blunted ideas
Story: Four ultra-wealthy tech billionaires gather at a mountain mansion in Utah for a retreat as the world reels from a global crisis sparked by AI-fuelled misinformation.
Review: 'Mountainhead' is a strange, slightly maddening film that wants to show us just how deluded tech billionaires can be. It's a drama, with flashes of black comedy, trying to get into the minds of the ultra-rich who genuinely believe they're here to shape the world — maybe even save it. The film revolves around four central characters and sets up an intriguing premise, but it never quite takes off. It often feels stuck in its own head, and the characters speak in such lofty, philosophical riddles that you begin to wonder who, exactly, this is for. Coming from Jesse Armstrong, the creator of the brilliant 'Succession,' it's hard not to feel let down by a film that could've had so much bite.
The plot revolves around a group of four super wealthy tech friends who call themselves the 'Brewsters' and have gathered at a luxury mountain retreat in Utah called Mountainhead — a not-so-subtle nod to Ayn Rand's 'Fountainhead.' There's Venis (Cory Michael Smith), who runs a social media platform called Traam that's accidentally spreading AI-generated deepfakes across the globe. Then there's Jeff (Ramy Youssef), whose AI tech is spiraling into misuse, and Randall (Steve Carell), a powerful investor now grappling with terminal cancer. Their reunion, hosted by Souper (Jason Schwartzman), starts off with some banter and passive-aggression but soon shifts into something darker. They turn their moral compass toward Jeff, eventually coming to the conclusion that his invention is a threat to humanity. All of this unfolds while the world burns outside, and they continue sipping rare whisky, as if the apocalypse were just another business issue to debate.
Armstrong treads familiar ground — the obscenely rich, cocooned from consequence — but where 'Succession' was sharp, messy, and emotionally alive, 'Mountainhead' is colder and more abstract. It also draws directly from real life: Venis' denial of responsibility for Traam's impact echoes Zuckerberg's detachment during the 2016 US presidential election, while Randall's fixation on cheating death recalls Peter Thiel. A close watch will reveal glimpses of Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Sam Bankman-Fried in the characters too. There are clever moments, especially when the film leans into satire — like when Souper writes everyone's net worth in lipstick on their bare chests or when Jeff's wealth overtakes Randall's by some obscure metric. But those flashes of absurdity don't carry through the whole film. Much of the dialogue is dense and philosophical, peppered with Kant and Plato, and after a while it stops feeling smart and starts feeling like noise.
The performances, though, are solid across the board. Jason Schwartzman, Steve Carell, Cory Michael Smith, and Ramy Youssef do what they can with characters who are often more like ideas than real people. The film does find a bit of momentum toward the end, when the outside world's chaos finally seeps into Mountainhead and shakes the group out of their bubble. It's the only point where the story feels like it has real stakes. Until then, it mostly meanders, unsure whether it wants to be a satire, a character study, or a tech-world fable.
In the end, 'Mountainhead' is more of a warning sign than a fully formed film. It has some compelling ideas — and certainly no shortage of ambition — but it's weighed down by its own cleverness. It wants to say something urgent about power, tech, and the people shaping our future, but it often gets lost in its own intellectual fog. There are moments that stick, but not enough to make the whole thing land. In the end, it comes across as a sermon disguised as a satire.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Salman Rushdie says he has never used AI, warns it could replace writers but first it needs to learn comedy
When OpenAI launched ChatGPT in 2023, the reaction was mixed. On one hand, everyone was excited to see cutting-edge technology and what artificial intelligence could do for humans. On the other, fears began to linger about AI replacing humans in various jobs. One of the roles people were most concerned about was that of writers, as AI platforms like ChatGPT and Gemini could write everything from essays to novels. And since then these tools have become much famous writer Salman Rushdie believes that writers shouldn't fear AI — at least not for now — as it lacks one very important skill: a sense of humour. Speaking at the Hay Festival in Wales, Rushdie quipped that writers are safe from being overtaken by machines, at least until a bot can write a book that genuinely makes people laugh.'I've never tried AI,' he said. 'I pretend it doesn't exist. It has no sense of humour, you don't want to hear a joke told by ChatGPT. If there's ever a moment when a funny book is written by ChatGPT, I think we're screwed.' Rushdie's comments on AI came during his first major in-person appearance in the UK since he was seriously injured after he was stabbed while on stage in the United States. The attack left him blind in his right eye, but he has continued to make public appearances and comment on developments in literature and writers have been among the first white-collar professionals to raise the alarm about the rise of AI and its potential to replace humans in writing work. In recent years, several prominent authors have voiced concerns that AI companies are training language models using their copyrighted works, without permission or 2023, a group of more than 8,500 authors came together and signed an open letter to tech companies asking them to stop using their books for training AI tools.'These technologies mimic and regurgitate our language, stories, style, and ideas. Millions of copyrighted books, articles, essays, and poetry provide the 'food' for AI systems, endless meals for which there has been no bill,' they wrote in the growing tension between technology and creativity is even prompting many in the literary community to call for regulation and transparency. Writers argue that while AI can mimic sentence structure and tone, it lacks the emotional nuance, lived experience, and cultural insight that define truly impactful literature.


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
As AI redefines engineers' roles, Cisco CPO Jeetu Patel reveals 'grossly underestimated' skills needed for the future
Hiring More, Not Less: Cisco's Contrarian Approach AI as a Co-Pilot, Not a Competitor Forget Syntax — Think Strategy You Might Also Like: AI poses a greater threat to women in the workforce, but why? ILO study reveals alarming gender gap predictions The Imagination Age is Here You Might Also Like: Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here is why In a world increasingly reshaped by artificial intelligence, the engineering profession is undergoing a rapid evolution. While many tech companies are rethinking the size and scope of their engineering teams, Cisco is taking a different path — one rooted in expansion and reimagination. Jeetu Patel, President and Chief Product Officer at Cisco, recently spoke to Business Insider, offering a compelling vision of how the engineer of tomorrow will look very different from the one we know the industry buzzes with discussions of automation replacing human roles, Cisco is "unapologetically hiring" engineers, Patel revealed. With 27,000 engineers already on board, the company isn't slowing down. "We feel more constrained now than ever before on not having enough engineers to get prosecuted all the ideas that we've got going internally," he said. For Cisco, the limitation isn't in the talent they have — it's in the untapped ideas they want to bring to said, Patel is not blind to the reality of AI redefining roles. Cisco has already partnered with OpenAI to integrate its Codex AI coding assistant into the company's workflow. The tool performs tasks like code writing, bug fixing, and test running — effectively becoming a digital co-pilot to human engineers. This shift will make engineers significantly more productive, freeing them from routine coding and allowing them to focus on high-impact innovation.'AI will make engineers 10 to 50 times more productive,' Patel noted. 'The speed at which an idea becomes a product will go from months to minutes.'So, what does the engineer of the future need to focus on? Patel emphasized that traditional skills like syntax understanding — while still important — will become less central. Instead, two 'grossly underestimated' skills will come to define engineering success in the AI AI tools become more sophisticated, engineers will need to master the art of managing not just human teams but also agent ecosystems. These AI agents will communicate, collaborate, and solve problems in tandem — and someone needs to oversee that orchestration. Patel believes that knowing how to delegate intelligently between humans and machines will be 'super important.'Beyond coordination lies creativity. According to Patel, the true value of a future engineer will rest not in how well they code, but in how well they imagine. As AI reduces the grunt work, engineers will have more space to ideate and innovate. Tools like Codex, he says, 'unlock human imagination,' removing bottlenecks created by a scarcity of paradigm shift isn't just about productivity — it's about job satisfaction. Patel believes that engineers, liberated from repetitive tasks, will find more meaning in their roles. "This evolution will improve output capacity, but also the satisfaction that someone gets from a job," he said. In his words, the only remaining constraint in the engineering world will be one's Cisco redefines what it means to be an engineer in the AI age, the message is clear: the future belongs not to those who code the fastest, but to those who think the furthest.


Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
I'm interested in writing about power: 'Succession' creator Jesse Armstrong on new film 'Mountainhead'
New Delhi, "Succession" creator Jesse Armstrong says his film "Mountainhead", much like his critically-acclaimed HBO show about media mogul Logan Roy, is an exploration of power and how a group of people control the quality and quantity of information that goes out in the world. In his directorial debut, currently streaming on JioHotstar, the multiple Emmy and Golden Globe-winner Armstrong once again trains his lens on the ultra rich. In the movie, four tech billionaires come together for a weekend retreat as a global crisis unfolds thanks to the deep-fake videos of a social media app owned by one of them. The real world filters through videos and images on their screens, but they are more concerned about their net worth and how the crisis can help multiply it. Asked why he is so focused on exploring the lives of the rich in his stories, Armstrong said it may be because he thinks a lot about "income distribution and how very unbalanced it is". "A writer doesn't always know why they choose the subjects they do or why they're drawn to certain areas. Maybe I'm more angry than I know , but I think I'm writing about power," Armstrong responded to a question posed by PTI during an international media roundtable. "In 'Succession', he said, it was the power of Logan Roy's family and their control over the media. "In this story , it's not that they're rich guys although it's important that they are rich guys and are constantly ranking themselves and thinking about their wealth but it's their power that's the centre of the story. It's their ability to change how most of the people in the world receive information and the quality and quantity of information that they're receiving." In "Mountainhead", the eldest of the group is Randall , he is also the group's leader. Jeff is the founder of an AI tech company that's on the upswing thanks to crisis created by Venis' social media app and Hugo is the owner of the mountain top villa whose name is a play on Ayn Rand's novel "Fountainhead". For much of the movie's duration, they remain in the mansion. And when they go out, they write their net worths on their chests during a hike in what seems to be among the many absurd rituals the four have for their poker weekend. Armstrong, 54, said he did not want his first movie to be "too expensive", which is why he thought of the story "much like a chamber piece" where everyone is locked in a house. "I like that feeling of pressure cooker... But I also knew that we are on TV and most TV now is big screens in people's homes. So, I needed some sense of scope and to let some air in. I normally don't do this, but it was kind of back engineered like why do these guys go out? Maybe they have a ritual during their poker weekends where they do this ranking." Armstrong, also known for "Downhill", "Peep Show", and "In the Loop", said he did not have any particular actors in mind while writing the movie, but he knew that "Office" star Carell would be brilliant as Randall. On a question about what went through his mind when he saw tech CEOs at president Donald Trump's inauguration and Elon Musk's involvement with DOGE, Armstrong said "it didn't feel good as a human being watching that stuff". "...but it did feel like, 'Yeah, this was the bubble of time that I was trying to write about and how I thought it feels in the world'... You get these weird coincidences of real stuff in the real world. And it feels spooky when it's very close. "...The tech billionaires in my film are actually outside government, so it wasn't like DOGE was part of the film, but certainly that interconnectedness between political power and tech power at the moment did feel like 'Okay, the film is still writing about this world, which is happening in front of our face'." Armstrong said during his research, he started listening to podcasts of "some of these tech world figures talking to each other" and was struck by their tone. "Sometimes you could feel the level of confidence tipping into a certain haughty arrogance. And that is a very rich vein for a comedy writer to hit. So I think it was that tone of voice, which I was attracted to."