Kazakhstan's oilfields, disputes and settlements with oil majors
MOSCOW, Jan 28 (Reuters) - Kazakhstan, one of the world's 10 biggest oil producers, increased pressure on international companies operating in the country on Tuesday, calling for improved contract terms.
The move is the latest in a string of claims, disputes and settlements in recent years which saw international firms cede control of oilfields to the state or reach cash settlements.
Following are details on Kazakhstan's main oilfields and pipelines and the main disputes and settlements since the late 2000s.
KASHAGAN
The giant offshore field in the North Caspian Sea was discovered in 2000 and remains one of the biggest discoveries in recent decades, as well as one of the costliest. Oil production started in 2013.
The field produced around 378,500 barrels per day (bpd) in 2024, lower than its initially forecast capacity of 400,000 bpd.
Its development plans aim to increase output capacity to 450,000 bpd.
Kashagan is operated by the North Caspian Operating Company (NCOC) that includes Eni (ENI.MI), opens new tab (16.81% stake), Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab (16.81%), TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), opens new tab (16.81%), ExxonMobil (XOM.N), opens new tab (16.81%), KazMunayGaz (KMGZ.KZ), opens new tab (16.88%), Inpex (1605.T), opens new tab (7.56%) and China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC.UL) (8.33%).
KARACHAGANAK
The Karachaganak gas-condensate field was discovered in 1979 in northwest Kazakhstan, covering an area of more than 280 square km (108 square miles). Production started in 1984.
The field is operated by the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating (KPO) consortium which includes Eni (29.25%), Shell (29.25%), Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab (18%), Lukoil (LKOH.MM), opens new tab (13.5%) and KazMunayGaz (10%)
Oil production reached around 263,000 bpd in 2024.
TENGIZCHEVROIL
The Chevron-led Tengizchevroil (TCO) consortium operates the Tengiz and Korolev fields. Tengiz, Kazakhstan's largest oilfield and one of the world's deepest, was discovered in 1979.
Chevron holds a 50% stake in TCO, while KazMunayGaz has 20%, Exxon 25% and Lukoil 5%.
It produced around 606,000 bpd in 2024.
CPC
More than 80% of Kazakhstan's crude is exported via the 935-mile (1,500-km) Caspian pipeline linking TCO, Karachaganak and other fields to the Russian port of Yuzhnaya Ozereyevka, close to Novorossiisk, which supplies around 1.2% of global oil demand.
The main shareholders in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) are Russian pipeline operator Transneft (TRNF_p.MM), opens new tab with a 24% stake, Kazakhstan's KazMunayGaz with 19%, and the Chevron Caspian Pipeline Consortium Company with 15%.
DISPUTES AND SETTLEMENTS
In 2023, Kazakhstan launched claims against companies developing Kashagan and Karachaganak oilfields for $13 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively, over disputed costs.
In 2020, Kazakhstan reached a $1.9 billion settlement, opens new tab with the Karachaganak partners that brought to an end a years-long dispute over profit-sharing from the giant field.
In 2012, partners in the Kashagan consortium agreed to cover $1 billion of Kazakh state energy company KazMunayGaz's extra costs to settle a dispute over the project.
A year earlier, the Karachaganak field consortium led by Eni agreed to give the Kazakh government a 10% stake in the field, valued at $1 billion, as part of a dispute resolution.
It is harder to put a value on other concessions won in Kazakhstan's legal wranglings, such as the addition of some long-term payments, obligations to sell gas to a state entity or non-reimbursement of some historic costs.
In 2008, Kazakhstan doubled its stake in Kashagan to 16.8% as part of a settlement with international oil majors over delays in development of the field.
here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
8 things you should worry about in spending review - from schools to pay packets
While there were big wins for the NHS and the Ministry of Defence, experts warn that things are not as rosy for other departments with a row brewing over policing Rachel Reeves today unveiled her long-awaited Spending Review, saying public finances are finally on an even keel. She told MPs that unpopular measures in Labour's first year had cleared up a lot of the mess left by the Tories. It came after Keir Starmer told his top team the review "marks the end of the first phase of this government". But experts have said that although there were big wins for the NHS and the Ministry of Defence, there were "less generous" settlements for other departments. And numbercrunchers warned that despite cash being ploughed into schools, headteachers still face headaches. There are also questions over public sector pay increases, and a row is brewing over funding for police services. Here we look at some of the key points. 1. Alarm over police funding One of the first out the traps to react to the statement was London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, who voiced his alarm about the impact on police. He said he is concerned the spending review could result in "insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers". Ms Reeves announced police spending will rise by 2.3% per year in real times up until 2029. The Lib Dems went further, accusing the Government of "sleight of hand". Numbercrunchers said the review's figures presume council tax will rise by £395 for the average Band D home by 2029. This would see a £14 rise for policing each year. The party's home affairs spokeswoman, Lisa Smart, said: 'The Government is relying on a hidden council tax bombshell to fund their half-hearted rise in police funding as they pass the buck to local families. 'After frontline policing was neglected for years under the Conservatives, local communities deserve better than this sleight of hand." Figures within the spending review reveal that core police spending power will go up by just 1.7% between 2025/26 and 2028/29. 2. Defence spending questions Ms Reeves said that defence spending will go up to up to 2.6% of GDP from 2027 - which we already knew. But she did not go any further on the Government's pledge to get to 3% - which she described as an "ambition". It comes after NATO chief Mark Rutte said member states should be aiming for 5%. And earlier this week he ominously warned that if cash is not committed, people might need to start learning Russian. 3. School budgets 'squeezed by free school meals' School budgets will remain under pressure in spite of today's cash injection - with much of it swallowed up by expanding free school meals, announced last week. Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the NAHT union - which represents school leaders - said "this is not a time for celebration". He added: "In light of ever-increasing costs, we are already seeing signs of schools having to make cutbacks, including to staff numbers. "We also know that some of the increase in funding will be absorbed by the increased free school meal costs schools will be facing after last week's announcement. There is no escaping the fact that despite the funding announced in this statement, schools will be operating in a challenging financial climate for some years to come." Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) director Paul Johnson added: "The schools settlement in England is tight. Strip out the cost of expanding free schools meals, and you get a real-terms freeze in the budget. "With falling pupil numbers, this would in principle allow a rise in spending per pupil. Instead, the Government may have to freeze spending per pupil in order to meet rising demand for special education needs provision." 4. What will the civil service have to stop doing? Cuts to unprotected departments risk having a "genuine impact on the government's ability to deliver on its missions", a union chief warned. Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'The government will need to articulate much better what it wants the civil service to stop doing, given many essential government agencies are already facing recruitment and retention crises, particularly for specialist digital, scientific and technical staff. 'Only by investing in the skills it needs will it be able to achieve its objectives and undo the damage of the last 15 years.' 5. No leeway for public sector pay rises Another thorny issue that Government departments will have to face in future years is how to fund pay rises. The spending review document makes it clear that no more cash will be forthcoming from the Treasury - meaning bosses will have to find savings if their staff get a raise. The document says: "There will be no reserve access for public sector pay, if the PRBs (pay review bodies) recommend pay increases above the level departments have budgeted for, departments will need to carefully consider the justification for these awards.." It went to say bosses would need to "determine whether these additional costs can be borne either through off setting savings or through further productivity gains". 6. Looming questions over tax rises Ms Reeves closed off her speech by claiming the Government has turned a corner after a tricky Budget last autumn. She went as far as to say: "We will never have to complete a Budget like that again." But economists have warned that tax rises will inevitably follow. Stephen Millard, interim director of the NIESR economic research institute, said: "The Chancellor has yet again said that her fiscal rules are non-negotiable. "But, given the small amount of headroom at the time of the spring statement and the increases in spending announced since then, it is now almost inevitable that if she is to keep to her fiscal rules, she will have to raise taxes in the autumn budget." Raj Badiani, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said: "The goal of balancing books is likely to require a series of painful fiscal announcements… This year's autumn budget could be another tough fiscal event, should the UK economy falter amid heightened domestic and external tensions." 7. Fears raised over affordable homes pledge Housing campaigners welcomed the huge £39billion boost to affordable housing over the next decade - but warned that building social homes must be a priority. Currently, various types of housing are classed as 'affordable homes', including shared ownership, affordable rent, social rent, first homes Research by homelessness charity Shelter found that the current Affordable Homes Programme had delivered over 74,000 grant-funded affordable homes by March 2024. Only around 11,000 - just 15% - of these were genuinely affordable social rent homes. Speaking about the £39billion investment in a new Affordable Housing Programme, housing campaigner Kwajo Tweneboa said: "This announcement has potential - but without clear social housing targets, it risks becoming another promise that won't deliver change for the children and families who need it most." Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns & policy at Shelter, said the £39bn investment' is a watershed moment in tackling the housing emergency'. But she added: 'To truly tackle rising homelessness, it must come alongside a clear target for delivering social rent homes. For too long, past governments allowed thousands of social homes to be lost each year, while funnelling public money into so called 'affordable homes' which are priced far out of reach for many.' 8. Asylum hotel spending to continue One of the headline grabbing announcements in Ms Reeves' statement was that the use of asylum hotels will end by 2029. This will save £1billion a year, she told the Commons. But ministers have been urged to move faster, with Enver Solomon, chief at the Refugee Council, stating: "The deadline of 2029 feels far away, and we urge government to make it happen before then." And Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy and advocacy at Bond - a UK network for international development organisations - hit out at the use of aid money to pay for accommodation in the meantime. He said: "While it is welcome that the Chancellor has committed to ending the use of hotels for asylum accommodation by the end of this Parliament, planning very slow reductions and diverting £5.76 billion of UK aid over the next three years to cover these costs is a political choice that comes at the direct expense of the world 's most marginalised people."
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
EU countries consider softening methane emissions law on gas imports
BRUSSELS, June 11 (Reuters) - European Union countries may demand that Brussels simplify the EU's methane emissions law, which has stoked concerns from companies that it could hamper imports of U.S. liquefied natural gas, according to a document seen by Reuters. From this year, the EU requires importers of oil and gas to monitor and report the methane emissions associated with these imports. Methane, which escapes from leaky gas infrastructure, is the second-biggest cause of climate change after carbon dioxide emissions. Draft conclusions from a meeting of EU countries' energy ministers on Monday showed governments are preparing to ask the European Commission to add the methane law to its "simplification" drive to cut bureaucracy for companies. The draft asked the Commission to quickly assess which EU energy laws can be simplified, "in order to decrease the administrative burden on Member States, industry and citizens, for example the methane regulation as it might impact the cooperation with economic operators from outside of the EU". The conclusions are still being drafted by Poland, which holds the EU's rotating presidency, and could change before ministers adopt them on Monday. The EU agreed its methane law last May, but the policy has come under increased scrutiny as the EU attempts to quit Russian gas - and to buy more U.S. liquefied natural gas to replace it. Washington and Brussels have each indicated that EU purchases of U.S. LNG could form part of a broader U.S.-EU trade deal. U.S. President Donald Trump has set a July 9 deadline for the EU to reach a deal and avert steep tariffs. Romania and Slovakia are among countries warning that the methane law could disrupt gas imports. Some U.S. LNG firms have warned they will struggle to comply with the EU law, since the fragmented nature of the country's industry means they cannot track emissions along their entire value chains, down to specific gas wells. Environmental groups have rejected this idea, arguing that systems exist which can digitally trace gas through the value chain, in line with the EU law's demands. In a letter to U.S. and EU officials this month, seen by Reuters, U.S. industry group LNG Allies asked for a trade deal to ensure U.S. gas exporters are deemed to be following "equivalent" methane rules to those of the EU, and therefore automatically comply with the methane law.
STV News
13 hours ago
- STV News
Elon Musk says he 'regrets' some of the posts he made about Donald Trump
Elon Musk has said he regrets some of the comments he made about US President Donald Trump. Posting to his social media platform X, Musk wrote: 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far.' While neither Musk nor Trump have spoken about a formal reconciliation following their public falling out over the last two weeks, Musk's post signals a cooling of tensions between the pair. The spectacular fallout between the president of the United States and the world's richest man played out largely on their respective social media platforms. After what had initially seemed like an amicable exit from the White House, Musk began criticising Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' leading the president to suggest cancelling Musk's lucrative government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 'This just gets better and better,' Musk quickly replied on X. 'Go ahead, make my day.' Donald Trump and Elon Musk's relationship has dramatically deteriorated over the last week. / Credit: AP Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Donald Trump lamented their frayed relationship and said he was 'very disappointed in Musk.' The mood quickly descended into personal attacks, as Trump said Musk had 'lost his mind' after the billionaire speculated about the US president's links to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk later offered up an especially stinging insult to a president sensitive about his standing among voters: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk retorted. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk said in a follow-up post. High-profile Republicans had been urging the two to put aside their differences, fearful of the damage that could be done in a drawn-out conflict. Last week, Vice President JD Vance told podcaster Theo Von he hoped Musk would come 'back into the fold,' though he admitted that may not be possible now. 'Look, it happens to everybody,' he added. 'I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours.' Vance made the comments on Theo Von's podcast – a favourite of MAGA supporters. / Credit: AP Musk's own father, Errol Musk, also poured water on the row, telling a Russian newspaper it 'was just a small thing' and would 'be over tomorrow.' He added: 'Trump will prevail – he's the president, he was elected as the president. So, you know, Elon made a mistake, I think. But he is tired, he is stressed.' Trump is yet to comment on this change of tone from Musk, telling reporters when last asked he assumed the relationship was over and warning Musk he would 'pay the consequences' should he start funding Trump's political rivals. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
