Solidarity group representing Jenu Kuruba Adivasis submit letter to senior forest officials demanding withdrawal of forces in Nagarahole
The representatives of over 70 social and environmental organisations, youth groups, experts and professionals submitted a letter to the PCCF stating that the forces are threatening 150 Jenu Kuruba adivasis with forced eviction which is in gross violation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) provisions.
'The collective submitted this letter to the PCCF in light of the recent tense situation that has been unfolding in Karadikallu Hattur Kollehaadi, Nagarahole Tiger Reserve from May 5 onwards, where over 120 paramilitary troops of the Forest Department, the State police, and the Special Tiger Protection Force (STPF) have been deployed to intimidate members of the Jenu Kuruba tribe, with threats to forcibly evict them,' the representatives said in a statement.
It further said that on May 5 and 6, 52 families of Karadikallu returned to reclaim their ancestral village from which they were forcibly evicted in 1982-83.
'Since then, they have been facing intimidation tactics, with paramilitary troops threatening the Jenu Kuruba members, dismantling structures, including sacred sites and temporary sites for menstruating women, blocking of access to the village by Forest Department officials, amounting to a gross infringement of constitutionally guaranteed rights under the FRA,' it further said.
In their letter, apart from demanding the withdrawal of STPF and other armed forces they called of initiating an immediate dialogue with members of the Nagarahole Adivasi Jammapale Hakku Sthapana Samiti (NAJHSS) and the Karadikallu FRC to address grievances and ensure democratic and participatory resolution.
'Allow free and fair media access to Nagarahole to report the situation and speak with affected community members, upholding transparency and accountability. Immediately recognise and approve the IFR, CFR, and CFRR claims of all the 52 families of Karadikallu Hattur Kollehaadi as per the FRA, based on the claims filed in 2021 and the completed joint verification,' were among the other demands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
19 hours ago
- The Print
Centre says forest dept not nodal agency for community forest resource management
The ministry said that the guidelines issued on September 12, 2023, along with Rules 4(1)(e) and 4(1)(f) of the Forest Rights Rules, clearly state that the CFRMC, constituted by the Gram Sabha, is responsible for preparing the CFRMP on its behalf. In a letter dated August 14 to the chief secretary of Chhattisgarh, the ministry responded to recent communications from the state's forest department and tribal development department seeking guidance on CFR management. New Delhi, Aug 17 (PTI) The Ministry of Tribal Affairs has clarified that Community Forest Resource Management Plans (CFRMPs) must be prepared by Gram Sabhas through their Community Forest Resource Management Committees (CFRMCs), in accordance with the Forest Rights Act and its rules, and not by the forest department or any other agency. The ministry's response comes amid controversy over a circular issued by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF), Chhattisgarh, dated May 15, which stated that the forest department would manage community forest lands until a model plan is received from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA). The circular also instructed that no department, NGO or private organisation should undertake any work within CFRR-allotted forest areas until such a plan is provided. However, MoTA has now clarified that while it is working on a long-term vision document for CFR management, it recognises the diversity of landscapes and local contexts across India. Therefore, a 'single standardized draft plan may not be practical'. Instead, the ministry has recommended that Gram Sabhas use the indicative framework provided in the operational guidelines of the Dharti Aba-Janajatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (DA-JGUA), a flagship scheme of the central government, to develop their own CFRMPs. These plans can be modified and adapted based on local conditions. The letter, signed by Joint Secretary Anant Prakash Pandey, also emphasised that the role of the forest department is that of a 'facilitator in this process'. It recommended that State Level Monitoring Committee meetings, chaired by the chief secretary, be held regularly to resolve field-level matters. In a separate letter dated July 8, the tribal development department of Chhattisgarh had written to MoTA seeking clarification on the PCCF's circular. The department pointed out that the forest department's designation as the nodal agency for CFR matters, as mentioned in the May 15 circular, had already been revised by a general administration department order dated June 1, 2020. That order clarified that the forest department's role is limited to coordination support, while the tribal and scheduled caste development department remains the nodal agency for implementing the Forest Rights Act in the state. The July 8 letter also noted that Chhattisgarh has been a frontrunner in implementing the FRA, with efforts underway to develop CFRMPs under the DA-JGUA initiative. It acknowledged that all management plans should be prepared scientifically in accordance with the National Working Plan Code, 2023, and implemented as approved by the Union Environment Ministry. However, it stressed that further decisions should follow the model plan being developed by MoTA and that the forest department had already written to MoTA on March 6 requesting the plan. MoTA's August 14 letter further clarified that once a CFRMP is approved by the Gram Sabha, it becomes the responsibility of the District Level Committee or District Level Monitoring Committee to facilitate its integration with the forest department's working plans, micro plans or management plans. Community-prepared plans and initiatives, it said, can serve as major inputs for broader conservation and management regimes. The Forest Rights Act, 2006, empowers forest-dwelling communities to claim individual and community rights over forest land they have traditionally protected and used. The Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR) provision allows Gram Sabhas to manage and conserve forest resources and prevent activities that harm biodiversity and wildlife. Activists have raised concerns that the Chhattisgarh forest department's recent circular undermines the FRA's core objective of democratizing forest governance. Alok Shukla, a Chhattisgarh-based forest and tribal rights activist, had earlier told PTI that the forest department's attempt to assert control over CFR lands 'goes against the basic structure of the Act' and reflects an unwillingness to hand over management rights to communities. PTI GVS NB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Forest dept not nodal agency for community forest resource management: Govt
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs has clarified that Community Forest Resource Management Plans (CFRMPs) must be prepared by Gram Sabhas through their Community Forest Resource Management Committees (CFRMCs), in accordance with the Forest Rights Act and its rules, and not by the forest department or any other agency. In a letter dated August 14 to the chief secretary of Chhattisgarh, the ministry responded to recent communications from the state's forest department and tribal development department seeking guidance on CFR management. The ministry said that the guidelines issued on September 12, 2023, along with Rules 4(1)(e) and 4(1)(f) of the Forest Rights Rules, clearly state that the CFRMC, constituted by the Gram Sabha, is responsible for preparing the CFRMP on its behalf. The ministry's response comes amid controversy over a circular issued by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF), Chhattisgarh, dated May 15, which stated that the forest department would manage community forest lands until a model plan is received from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA). The circular also instructed that no department, NGO or private organisation should undertake any work within CFRR-allotted forest areas until such a plan is provided. However, MoTA has now clarified that while it is working on a long-term vision document for CFR management, it recognises the diversity of landscapes and local contexts across India. Therefore, a "single standardised draft plan may not be practical". Instead, the ministry has recommended that Gram Sabhas use the indicative framework provided in the operational guidelines of the Dharti Aba-Janajatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (DA-JGUA), a flagship scheme of the central government, to develop their own CFRMPs. These plans can be modified and adapted based on local conditions. The letter, signed by Joint Secretary Anant Prakash Pandey, also emphasised that the role of the forest department is that of a "facilitator in this process". It recommended that State Level Monitoring Committee meetings, chaired by the chief secretary, be held regularly to resolve field-level matters. In a separate letter dated July 8, the tribal development department of Chhattisgarh had written to MoTA seeking clarification on the PCCF's circular. The department pointed out that the forest department's designation as the nodal agency for CFR matters, as mentioned in the May 15 circular, had already been revised by a general administration department order dated June 1, 2020. That order clarified that the forest department's role is limited to coordination support, while the tribal and scheduled caste development department remains the nodal agency for implementing the Forest Rights Act in the state. The July 8 letter also noted that Chhattisgarh has been a frontrunner in implementing the FRA, with efforts underway to develop CFRMPs under the DA-JGUA initiative. It acknowledged that all management plans should be prepared scientifically in accordance with the National Working Plan Code, 2023, and implemented as approved by the Union Environment Ministry. However, it stressed that further decisions should follow the model plan being developed by MoTA and that the forest department had already written to MoTA on March 6 requesting the plan. MoTA's August 14 letter further clarified that once a CFRMP is approved by the Gram Sabha, it becomes the responsibility of the District Level Committee or District Level Monitoring Committee to facilitate its integration with the forest department's working plans, micro plans or management plans. Community-prepared plans and initiatives, it said, can serve as major inputs for broader conservation and management regimes. The Forest Rights Act, 2006, empowers forest-dwelling communities to claim individual and community rights over forest land they have traditionally protected and used. The Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR) provision allows Gram Sabhas to manage and conserve forest resources and prevent activities that harm biodiversity and wildlife. Activists have raised concerns that the Chhattisgarh forest department's recent circular undermines the FRA's core objective of democratising forest governance. Alok Shukla, a Chhattisgarh-based forest and tribal rights activist, had earlier told PTI that the forest department's attempt to assert control over CFR lands "goes against the basic structure of the Act" and reflects an unwillingness to hand over management rights to communities. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Centre says forest dept not nodal agency for community forest resource management
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs has clarified that Community Forest Resource Management Plans (CFRMPs) must be prepared by Gram Sabhas through their Community Forest Resource Management Committees (CFRMCs), in accordance with the Forest Rights Act and its rules, and not by the forest department or any other agency. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency In a letter dated August 14 to the chief secretary of Chhattisgarh, the ministry responded to recent communications from the state's forest department and tribal development department seeking guidance on CFR management. The ministry said that the guidelines issued on September 12, 2023, along with Rules 4(1)(e) and 4(1)(f) of the Forest Rights Rules, clearly state that the CFRMC, constituted by the Gram Sabha, is responsible for preparing the CFRMP on its behalf. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo The ministry's response comes amid controversy over a circular issued by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF), Chhattisgarh, dated May 15, which stated that the forest department would manage community forest lands until a model plan is received from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA). The circular also instructed that no department, NGO or private organisation should undertake any work within CFRR-allotted forest areas until such a plan is provided. Live Events However, MoTA has now clarified that while it is working on a long-term vision document for CFR management, it recognises the diversity of landscapes and local contexts across India. Therefore, a "single standardized draft plan may not be practical". Instead, the ministry has recommended that Gram Sabhas use the indicative framework provided in the operational guidelines of the Dharti Aba-Janajatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (DA-JGUA), a flagship scheme of the central government, to develop their own CFRMPs. These plans can be modified and adapted based on local conditions. The letter, signed by Joint Secretary Anant Prakash Pandey, also emphasised that the role of the forest department is that of a "facilitator in this process". It recommended that State Level Monitoring Committee meetings, chaired by the chief secretary, be held regularly to resolve field-level matters. In a separate letter dated July 8, the tribal development department of Chhattisgarh had written to MoTA seeking clarification on the PCCF's circular. The department pointed out that the forest department's designation as the nodal agency for CFR matters, as mentioned in the May 15 circular, had already been revised by a general administration department order dated June 1, 2020. That order clarified that the forest department's role is limited to coordination support, while the tribal and scheduled caste development department remains the nodal agency for implementing the Forest Rights Act in the state. The July 8 letter also noted that Chhattisgarh has been a frontrunner in implementing the FRA, with efforts underway to develop CFRMPs under the DA-JGUA initiative. It acknowledged that all management plans should be prepared scientifically in accordance with the National Working Plan Code, 2023, and implemented as approved by the Union Environment Ministry. However, it stressed that further decisions should follow the model plan being developed by MoTA and that the forest department had already written to MoTA on March 6 requesting the plan. MoTA's August 14 letter further clarified that once a CFRMP is approved by the Gram Sabha, it becomes the responsibility of the District Level Committee or District Level Monitoring Committee to facilitate its integration with the forest department's working plans, micro plans or management plans. Community-prepared plans and initiatives, it said, can serve as major inputs for broader conservation and management regimes. The Forest Rights Act, 2006, empowers forest-dwelling communities to claim individual and community rights over forest land they have traditionally protected and used. The Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR) provision allows Gram Sabhas to manage and conserve forest resources and prevent activities that harm biodiversity and wildlife. Activists have raised concerns that the Chhattisgarh forest department 's recent circular undermines the FRA's core objective of democratizing forest governance. Alok Shukla, a Chhattisgarh-based forest and tribal rights activist, had earlier told PTI that the forest department's attempt to assert control over CFR lands "goes against the basic structure of the Act" and reflects an unwillingness to hand over management rights to communities.
