
Afghan Canadian fears mother may be sent back into Taliban's hands after they nearly killed her
Noorullah Hakemi, who lives in Ottawa and came to Canada in 2019, said his mother, Bibi Khatoon Yaqoubi, 57, remains in danger because the authoritarian government in Tajikistan has ordered the deportation of Afghan refugees.
"She is living in a good condition for now from the health perspective, but it's not a good condition from the safety perspective," Hakemi told CBC News.
He served as an adviser in the Afghan government before the Taliban took power.
"There is huge human rights violation [in Tajikistan]. They're arresting people, they're beating people, they're torturing people," said Hakemi.
English-language media reports from the region in June said that authorities in Tajikistan had launched sweeping immigration raids targeting Afghan refugees.
Rafi Ferdous, a founding member of the Afghanistan-Canada Council, said an estimated 3,000 Afghan refugees in Tajikistan were awaiting the processing of their sponsored refugee cases to come to Canada. He said Ottawa needs to prioritize these cases.
"We want the government [of Canada] to process the cases waiting in Tajikistan," said Ferdous.
Ottawa trying to 'protect' refugees destined for Canada
Canada allows community groups, organizations, corporations and groups of citizens to bring in refugees through a sponsorship program. Under the program, sponsors are responsible for providing refugees with living and financial support, and help them find work and arrange for schooling.
Throughout the late 1990s and into the early 2000s, Tajikistan was one of the main corridors Afghan refugees used to travel to Canada. The country has traditionally been hostile toward the Taliban, said Ferdous.
"They [the Tajikistan government] changed their behaviour …and this is new and this is kind of strange," he said.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada said in an emailed statement to CBC News that it was "deeply concerned about reports" of Afghan refugee deportations by Tajikistan authorities.
The statement said the government was working with the International Organization for Migration and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to liaise with authorities in Tajikistan to "protect and support Afghans destined for resettlement in Canada."
WATCH | Canada denies permit for Afghan refugee facing deportation from U.S.:
Canada denies permit for Afghan refugee facing deportation from U.S.
29 days ago
Global Affairs Canada said in an emailed statement that Canada does not recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan and that the group remains listed as a terrorist entity.
The statement said Canada was monitoring the treatment of Afghan refugees in Tajikistan, as well as in Pakistan and Iran.
Helen Thibault, an associate professor of political science at Nazarbayev University in Astana, Kazakhstan, said there may be several factors behind the Tajikistan's government decision to send Afghan refugees back into the arms of a Taliban government they have historically opposed.
Thibault said Tajikistan may be following the lead of Russia, which has recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate rulers.
"Whenever Russia does something, Tajikistan is one of the first countries of Central Asia to follow," she said.
'Copycat effect'
The Tajikistan government may also be feeling a strain on resources from hosting about 10,000 Afghan refugees in a small country, she said. The majority of refugees are in the poorer, more rural southern region that borders Afghanistan, said Thibeault.
"It could be that Tajikistan is seeing what is happening in the U.S. and says, 'Oh, well, you know, this is an acceptable practice now. We can deport anybody that is allegedly violating our migration laws.' It's like a copycat effect," she said.
For Hakemi, the motives don't change the fear he faces every day knowing his mother could be grabbed and deported back to a country under a regime that nearly took her life.
"Of course I'm afraid, she is not where she is supposed to be," he said. 'Where she is living is not stable. If she goes back to Afghanistan, I don't know what will happen with the Taliban there."
Hakemi said his mother's sponsorship was arranged through an Afghan women's immigration group in Toronto.
He said his mother fled to Tajikistan in December 2024 after recovering from a beating at the hands of Taliban officials that left her with two fractured legs and a fractured left hand, along with other injuries, according to a report submitted to Canadian immigration officials that included medical records and photographs.
She was dragged into the street, whipped and beaten in front of a crowd during Aug. 15, 2024, celebrations marking the Taliban's return to power, according to the report.
"There were two other women. I told them that the Taliban are murderers and all that," said Yaquobi in an audio statement she recorded for CBC News describing her ordeal.
"Those women told the Taliban what I said. The Taliban pulled me out of the car and beat me. I was unconscious and ended up in the hospital … When I regained consciousness, I realized my arms and legs were broken."
Yaquobi's case has been filed with the office of Richard Bennett, the UN's special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
6 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Should Canadians who fought in Afghanistan be considered for the Victoria Cross? One MP thinks so
OTTAWA — A petition sponsored by a Liberal MP is reviving calls for a fresh look at whether veterans of the Afghanistan conflict should be reconsidered for Canada's top military honour. Liberal MP Pauline Rochefort is sponsoring a new petition in Parliament. It calls for the creation of an 'Independent Military Honours Review Board to review Afghanistan veterans' cases' to determine whether any of them meet the bar for the Victoria Cross. The federal government says the Victoria Cross is reserved for soldiers who demonstrate 'the most conspicuous bravery, a daring or pre-eminent act of valour or self-sacrifice, or extreme devotion to duty, in the presence of the enemy.' Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The medal was created in 1993 by the Mulroney government to replace the British Victoria Cross. Twenty have been minted and are held at Rideau Hall. None have been awarded. Rochefort is MP for Nipissing-Timiskaming, which was home to the late Jess Larochelle, an army private whose actions under fire in Pashmul, Afghanistan, in 2006 have inspired a movement to award him a posthumous Victoria Cross. Larochelle was among 10 veterans the National Post profiled in a series last year called Heroes Among Us that proposed first-ever recipients of the medal. Rochefort said it seems like the right time to make this renewed push, as the federal government moves to reinvest in the military and boost recruitment. 'HR gurus will tell us the first thing you must do is appreciate your personnel because if you don't, they're not going to stay. So, if we want to attract young people to our military and qualified personnel, the first thing we must do is to show appreciation,' she told The Canadian Press. 'When you have a significant component of the people that have been there, who have fought there, 40,000 of them, and they're saying, 'We're not sufficiently recognized,' I think that that's something to be paid attention to.' Retired corporal Bruce Moncur, who started the petition, is part of a group called Valor in the Presence of the Enemy. He said his group has identified roughly three dozen soldiers it believes could stand for the medal. He said Larochelle's story stands out as a shining example due to the courage it took to hold off a Taliban attack on an observation post while badly wounded. 'I like to think that there's four parts to it — you changed the course of the battle, you saved lives, you're killed or wounded, and you did an incredible act of bravery. In my books, Jess clicks all those boxes,' Moncur said. 'What Jess did that day was nothing short of superhero.' Retired lieutenant-general Omer Lavoie, who led the counterattack that day and wrote a citation for Larochelle, remembers well what happened when the platoon came under fire. 'Two soldiers were killed almost immediately based on explosions from the rocket-propelled grenades,' he said. Larochelle was struck with shrapnel in the back and neck as he defended the strategic position. He remained in his position with a broken back, firing handheld rocket launchers and a machine-gun at the attacking insurgents. 'There's no doubt in my mind, having seen it first hand, that his immediate actions, fighting while being wounded, certainly cracked the momentum of that Taliban attack and bought us time to counterattack,' Lavoie said. 'Incredibly, he did this while being pretty seriously wounded.' Larochelle was awarded the Canadian military's second-highest honour, the Star of Military Valour, in 2007. He died in 2023 at age 40. Moncur pushed in 2021 for a review of Larochelle's actions. He said he wants to press the case for a wider review under Prime Minister Mark Carney's government. He said Ottawa should consider new evidence indicating that Larochelle had volunteered for the assignment. 'They knew an attack was coming and he put his hand forward and volunteered to man that observation post instead of being ordered to man it,' he said. 'So, that is just a perfect recipe for a Victoria Cross and I don't think anybody could convince me otherwise.' A motion by former Conservative leader Erin O'Toole in 2022 sought to press the government to launch a military honours review panel. It failed in the House of Commons when Liberals opposed it. 'The continued inaction on this issue by the Liberal government speaks for itself and veterans are fed up,' Conservative veterans affairs critic Blake Richards said in an emailed statement. 'Conservatives will continue to advance the case for Jess Larochelle to be awarded the Victoria Cross and will always stand with Canada's veterans to ensure that our heroes and their sacrifice for our country are not forgotten.' The Department of National Defence did not respond to a request for comment by deadline. Ottawa has said that the system for awarding national honours is designed to be insulated from political influence and public pressure campaigns. 'To ensure fairness and that honours were awarded according to the appropriate criteria, National Defence conducted an in-depth review in 2012 of all of the 20 Stars of Military Valour that were awarded in relation to the Afghanistan campaign,' said a government response to a previous petition effort on Aug. 17, 2022. 'The review committee found that the process was fair and consistent, that none should have received a different decoration, and that all awards respected the intent and criteria for the Star of Military Valour.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

6 hours ago
Ukrainians brace for betrayal as Trump prepares to meet Putin — with war still raging
For many in Ukraine's front-line cities, enduring nightly attacks from Russian drones and missiles may be less terrifying than giving in to anything Vladimir Putin proposes during his upcoming summit in Alaska with Donald Trump. Almost every day, we hear Shaheds, said Arthur Korniyenko, referring to the Iranian-made drones laden with explosives launched by Russia — some nights in the hundreds. Korniyenko is a software developer based in the battle-scarred city of Zaporizhzhia, just 30 kilometres from the Russian front. A Russian strike on the region injured at least 12 people on Sunday. He says his company, Genova Web Art, has lost colleagues to Russian attacks. One of his 20 employees who was killed in fighting two years ago. Enlarge image (new window) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks during a press briefing following phone calls with U.S. President Donald Trump, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, on May 19. Photo: Reuters / Thomas Peter He told CBC News he's extremely skeptical that Russia's president wants to end the war or intends to offer any substantial concessions in his upcoming summit with U.S. President Trump on Friday. I hope Donald Trump will understand that Putin lied to him ... and you can't negotiate with people like [Putin], he said. Ukrainians and their supporters, especially in Europe, are apprehensive about how the negotiations in Alaska, in whatever from they take, will play out. They fear the summit represents a moment of peril rather than an opportunity to forge a lasting peace driven by shared democratic values and the sanctity of international borders. Perilous moment Trump's comments Monday did little to mitigate those fears, as he appeared to suggest Ukraine's territorial integrity could be bartered away like a real estate deal. There will be some swapping and changes of land, he said in Washington, D.C., as he went to explain how Putin's forces have seized prime oceanfront property along the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. It's always the best property, he added. Other observers frame the Alaska gathering as the latest act in a well-rehearsed performance, where Russia feigns interest in peace while preparing its next offensive. In the aftermath of his infamous Oval Office blowout (new window) with Trump in February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy offered Russia an unconditional 30-day ceasefire, only to have Putin ignore it. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the White House, in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 11. Photo: Reuters / Jonathan Ernst More recently, (new window) Trump, who has often appeared to treat Putin with unusual deference, has said he was disappointed in Russia's leader and even vowed to impose stiff economic sanctions within two weeks if Putin didn't make moves to end the war. But now, Trump has agreed to hold this summit — without making Putin give up anything in return. Uncompromising demands Russia's demands to end the war have remained largely unchanged since the early days of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. They comprise assuming full control over four eastern Ukrainian regions and Crimea, including territory that Ukrainian forces still hold; limits on the size of Ukraine's army; a ban on ever joining NATO or the European Union; and what Russia calls the de-Nazification of Ukraine, a vague term that's believed to mean (new window) the installation of a Russian-friendly president and government. All the framing is coming from Russia, says Roman Waschuk, a former Canadian ambassador to Ukraine, who still lives and works in the capital, Kyiv. There is no U.S. proposal, no multilateral plan. Everything is about accommodating, interpreting or responding to what Russia wants. Enlarge image (new window) Russian President Vladimir Putin welcomes Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Moscow on Aug. 6. Photo: Sputnik/Gavriil Grigorov/Pool via Reuters Russia currently occupies around 20 per cent of Ukraine, while Ukraine holds only a tiny portion of Russian territory in Kursk. It brings back memories with regard to Munich [in] 1938, when the fate of the country was decided over the heads of this country, said Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the committee on foreign policy and inter parliamentary relations in Ukraine's parliament. The year before the start of the Second World War, Nazi Germany signed a deal with Britain, France and Italy that ultimately led to the disintegration of Czechoslovakia, without the Czech government present. Many historians see it as the culmination of the British and French policy of appeasing Hitler that strengthened the Nazi regime and contributed to the start of the war in the fall of 1939. When you start negotiations with the idea of territorial swaps, you're just repeating Putin's narratives — you already agree to something which doesn't belong to you, said Merezhko. Enlarge image (new window) An engine of a Russian drone lies near an apartment building hit by Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the town of Bilozerske in Donetsk region, Ukraine, on Aug. 10. Photo: Reuters / Oleksandr Ratushniak Negative outcomes While the summit's agenda is shrouded in secrecy, several possible outcomes are circulating among diplomats, analysts and Ukrainians alike. None are straightforwardly positive for Ukraine. Trump may push for a ceasefire that freezes the current lines of control. Ukraine would retain sovereignty over most of its territory, but not the Russian-held areas of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. The war stops, but the occupation remains. Waschuk, the retired Canadian diplomat, sees this as the most likely compromise scenario. It's unsatisfactory, but maybe vaguely tolerable. It allows Ukraine to survive militarily and continue toward the EU. But it doesn't stop Russia. It just delays the next phase. For Korniyenko, the software developer, such a deal amounts to a betrayal: We tried freezing things before, he said. And what happened? More invasion. More death. Enlarge image (new window) Ukrainian and European Union flags fly, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in central Kyiv on Aug. 11. Photo: Reuters / Gleb Garanich Russian troops seized Crimea and the eastern Donbas region in 2014, and a series of accords known as the Minsk agreements were later negotiated, with Western help, to reduce — but not permanently end — the fighting. Eight years later, Russia launched its full-scale invasion. Waschuk believes the risk of Ukraine being pressured to accept an imposed deal is high, possibly with threats of reduced military aid from the United States. It's already happening, he says. We're just seeing the trappings of diplomacy over something that's already in motion. Such a move could fracture the Western alliance, embolden Russia and humiliate Ukraine, he says. Worse, it could permanently damage trust between Kyiv and Washington, leaving Ukraine increasingly dependent on assistance from Europe and Canada to continue fending off the Russian invasion. In a social media post Monday (new window) night, Prime Minister Mark Carney underscored that Ukraine must be a party to any ceasefire negotiations and that decisions on the future of Ukraine must be made by Ukrainians. A Putin victory In the most cynical interpretation, the summit itself is already a victory for Putin. By standing as an equal with a U.S. president, Putin breaks out of international isolation and signals to his domestic audience that he's still a global player. Putin doesn't need a result, said Korniyenko. He just needs the meeting. That's already a win for his ego. Even if no formal agreement is reached, the mere shift in tone from Washington regarding the future of the war could have lasting consequences. Merezhko, the Ukrainian MP, says most of his countrymen have already resigned themselves to fighting on, regardless of the outcome of the Alaska gathering. Our only option — if we don't want to be subjugated and destroyed by Russia as a nation, as a state — is to continue to fight no matter what, because the alternative ... is total annihilation, he told CBC News. Waschuk echoes his concern. The danger isn't only in a signed deal. It's in the subtle downgrading of commitment — the quiet turning-away. Chris Brown (new window) · CBC News · Foreign correspondent Chris Brown is a foreign correspondent based in the CBC's London bureau. Previously in Moscow, Chris has a passion for great stories and has travelled all over Canada and the world to find them.


Edmonton Journal
6 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Should Canadians who fought in Afghanistan be considered for the Victoria Cross? One MP thinks so
Article content 'I like to think that there's four parts to it — you changed the course of the battle, you saved lives, you're killed or wounded, and you did an incredible act of bravery. In my books, Jess clicks all those boxes,' Moncur said. 'What Jess did that day was nothing short of superhero.' Article content Retired lieutenant-general Omer Lavoie, who led the counterattack that day and wrote a citation for Larochelle, remembers well what happened when the platoon came under fire. Article content 'Two soldiers were killed almost immediately based on explosions from the rocket-propelled grenades,' he said. Article content Larochelle was struck with shrapnel in the back and neck as he defended the strategic position. He remained in his position with a broken back, firing handheld rocket launchers and a machine-gun at the attacking insurgents. Article content 'There's no doubt in my mind, having seen it first hand, that his immediate actions, fighting while being wounded, certainly cracked the momentum of that Taliban attack and bought us time to counterattack,' Lavoie said. Article content Article content 'Incredibly, he did this while being pretty seriously wounded.' Article content Larochelle was awarded the Canadian military's second-highest honour, the Star of Military Valour, in 2007. He died in 2023 at age 40. Article content Moncur pushed in 2021 for a review of Larochelle's actions. He said he wants to press the case for a wider review under Prime Minister Mark Carney's government. Article content He said Ottawa should consider new evidence indicating that Larochelle had volunteered for the assignment. Article content 'They knew an attack was coming and he put his hand forward and volunteered to man that observation post instead of being ordered to man it,' he said. 'So, that is just a perfect recipe for a Victoria Cross and I don't think anybody could convince me otherwise.' Article content A motion by former Conservative leader Erin O'Toole in 2022 sought to press the government to launch a military honours review panel. It failed in the House of Commons when Liberals opposed it. Article content Article content 'The continued inaction on this issue by the Liberal government speaks for itself and veterans are fed up,' Conservative veterans affairs critic Blake Richards said in an emailed statement. Article content 'Conservatives will continue to advance the case for Jess Larochelle to be awarded the Victoria Cross and will always stand with Canada's veterans to ensure that our heroes and their sacrifice for our country are not forgotten.' Article content The Department of National Defence did not respond to a request for comment by deadline. Article content Ottawa has said that the system for awarding national honours is designed to be insulated from political influence and public pressure campaigns. Article content 'To ensure fairness and that honours were awarded according to the appropriate criteria, National Defence conducted an in-depth review in 2012 of all of the 20 Stars of Military Valour that were awarded in relation to the Afghanistan campaign,' said a government response to a previous petition effort on Aug. 17, 2022. Article content 'The review committee found that the process was fair and consistent, that none should have received a different decoration, and that all awards respected the intent and criteria for the Star of Military Valour.'