Britain, France, and Germany ready to reimpose sanctions on Iran
The letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the UN Security Council says the three European powers are "committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon" unless Tehran meets the deadline.
The foreign ministers from the so-called E3 group threaten to use a "snapback mechanism" that was part of a 2015 international deal with Iran that eased UN Security Council sanctions.
Under the deal, which terminates in October, any party to the accord can restore the sanctions.
All three have stepped up warnings to Iran about its suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), after Israel launched a 12-day war with Iran in June, partly seeking to destroy its nuclear capability. The United States staged its own bombing raid during the war.
"We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snap back mechanism," foreign ministers Jean-Noel Barrot of France, David Lammy of Britain and Johann Wadephul of Germany said in the letter.
All three countries were signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with the United States, China, and Russia that offered the carrot and stick deal for Iran to slow its enrichment of uranium needed for a nuclear weapon.
President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the accord in 2018 during his first term and ordered new sanctions.
The European countries said they would stick to the accord. But their letter sets out engagements that the ministers say Iran has breached, including building up a uranium stock more than 40 times the permitted level under the 2015 deal.
"The E3 remain fully committed to a diplomatic resolution to the crisis caused by Iran's nuclear programme and will continue to engage with a view to reaching a negotiated solution."
"We are equally ready, and have unambiguous legal grounds, to notify the significant non-performance of JCPOA commitments by Iran ... thereby triggering the snap back mechanism, should no satisfactory solution be reached by the end of August 2025," the ministers wrote in the letter first reported by the Financial Times. End of cooperation The United States had already started contacts with Iran, which denies seeking a weapon, over its nuclear activities.
But these were halted by the Israeli strikes in June on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Even before the strikes, the international powers had raised concerns about the lack of access given to IAEA inspectors.
Iran halted all cooperation with the IAEA after the strikes, but it announced that the agency's deputy chief was expected in Teheran for talks on a new cooperation deal.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the UN last month saying that the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions.
The European ministers called this allegation "unfounded".
They insisted that as JCPOA signatories, they would be "clearly and unambiguously legally justified in using relevant provisions" of UN resolutions "to trigger UN snap back to reinstate UNSC resolutions against Iran which would prohibit enrichment and re-impose UN sanctions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
11 hours ago
- Euractiv
OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook
The company says it wants federal AI rules to avoid 'a patchwork of state rules' Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maximilian Henning Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 15:00 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. OpenAI is urging California, a trendsetter in US regulation, to align its AI rules with existing national or international frameworks, including the EU's, to avoid conflicting regulations across the country. The EU passed its AI Act last year and introduced a voluntary Code of Practice for providers of large AI models, a non-binding framework signed by almost all major US and European companies, including OpenAI. In a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom, OpenAI said the state should treat AI companies as compliant with its own rules if they have signed up to the EU's code, or if they work with the US's federal AI Centre. In the letter, OpenAI's chief lobbyist Christopher Lehane recommended policies 'that avoid duplication and inconsistencies' with those of similar democratic regimes. In a blog post accompanying the letter, the company warned the US must choose between setting clear national standards for AI and 'a patchwork of state rules', adding: 'Imagine how hard it would have been to win the Space Race if California's aerospace and tech industries had been tangled in state-by-state regulations'. At a US Senate hearing in May, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said having 50 different regulatory regimes would be 'quite bad' and warned that adopting the EU's approach to AI regulation would be 'disastrous', instead calling for a 'light touch' federal approach. California, the most populous and wealthiest US state, often seeks to set an example for others through its regulation. But tensions over AI rules between Washington and state capitals have been brewing for some time. At the start of July, the US Senate scrapped a decade-long ban on state-level AI laws from President Donald Trump's broad budget bill. Weeks later, the Trump administration published an AI Action Plan seeking to block federal funding for AI in states with 'burdensome AI regulations'. (de)
Euractiv
12 hours ago
- Euractiv
Ukraine willing to discuss territorial issues with Russia, German chancellor says
BERLIN – Kyiv is willing to discuss territorial issues with Russia, amid new 'hope for movement" towards peace in Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Wednesday. The comments came after a digital summit of European leaders with Donald Trump, during which they discussed the US president's controversial meeting with Vladimir Putin on Russia's war in Ukraine, set to take place in Alaska on Friday. Merz said that Europeans used the call with Trump on Wednesday to underline that "fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests must be maintained in Alaska.' 'There is hope for movement. There is hope for peace in Ukraine,' Merz said during a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin. Merz outlined the joint European position on the talks, consisting of five points, including – notably – that Kyiv 'is prepared to negotiate on territorial issues." A legal recognition of Russian occupations was "not up for discussion,' he added, however. 'The principle that border must not be changed by force must be upheld," he stressed. The American president had raised eyebrows in Europe when he suggested that Moscow and Kyiv could discuss swapping Ukrainian-held territory against Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine, sparking fears that America and Russia could try and engineer a ceasefire deal in Ukraine's absence. Trump later said, however, that it was not up to him to make a deal and that he would try to get territory back for Ukraine. Zelenskyy previously said that he was not prepared to concede territory to Russia. In Berlin, he stressed that his overall position 'hasn't changed' and that any deal would need to be compliant with Ukraine's constitution. Aligned 'to very large extent' Other joint priorities listed by Merz included that Ukraine would need a seat at the table in future peace negotiations, that a ceasefire would need to precede peace talks, and that 'solid' security guarantees would need to be negotiated. Merz also called for a joint transatlantic approach, that would entail jointly "increasing the pressure... if there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska." Trump shared this position "to a very large extent,' Merz said. Other European leaders shared the optimistic outlook after the call, that included the heads of state and government of Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland, as well as the presidents of the European Commission and European Council, and NATO chief Mark Rutte. French President Emmanuel Macron noted that Trump had agreed during the call that Ukraine must be involved in territorial talks in any ceasefire deal with Russia. Meanwhile, Rutte wrote on X that European and America were 'united in pushing to end to this terrible war." 'The ball is now in Putin's court,' he added. *Magnus Lund Nielsen contributed reporting. (mm)
Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
Merz's partial arms export ban won't dent Germany, Israel defence links
Deep and long-standing ties between German weapons makers and Israel's military are set to continue despite Chancellor Friedrich Merz's decision to partly block arms sales for use by Israeli forces in Gaza. Many high-value exports, including submarines and naval corvettes, are said to be exempt from the ban, which applies only to weapons likely to be used in Gaza. German imports from Israel – including a major deal to buy Arrow-3 missile defence systems – will also remain unaffected. 'It seems unlikely that this will affect defence industrial relations between Israel and Germany in the long term,' said Zain Hussain, an arms export expert at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), which tracks the global arms trade. Germany is Israel's second-largest supplier of 'major arms' after the United States, and Hussain said 'Israel will continue to rely on these states for many of its major arms capabilities'. Germany suspends some weapon exports to Israel in response to Gaza decision The decision marks a drastic shift in Germany's stance on Israel Scope of the ban One unanswered question is whether shipments of German-made engines, gearboxes and replacement parts for Israeli armoured vehicles – which have been extensively deployed to Gaza and the occupied West Bank – will continue. A German government spokesperson on Monday declined to answer questions about tank parts, saying only that each case will be assessed individually. Engine manufacturer MTU, reportedly among the suppliers, said it would comply with export control rules in countries where it operates but would not comment on possible exports to Israel. Muriel Asseburg, an Israel expert at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), said Merz's restrictions were deliberately framed as limited in scope and duration, making long-term impacts on defence ties unlikely. However, 'it still sends a signal when Israel's second-largest arms supplier imposes a partial embargo,' she said. She also warned that Israel's far-right coalition government could "provoke further repercussions". German defence industry players also remain in the dark. The chair of German defence industry lobby group BDSV, Hans Christoph Atzpodien, told Euractiv on Monday that they 'do not have any information beyond what is publicly available'. Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems, which produces naval ships for Israel, likewise said it had 'no official information from the federal government'. According to SIPRI, Israeli Sa'ar 6 naval corvettes – partially built by Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems – have been used to strike targets in Gaza. In an internal paper to critics in his centre-right Christian Democrats, Merz said the ban would not apply to any "air and maritime defence equipment, which is central to Israel's self-defence". German supplies Details about German weapons exports are largely confidential, with export licences approved in secret by Germany's cabinet-level national security council. Beyond biannual figures on the total export value of defence products, little is formally disclosed. Germany issued arms export licences worth around €326 million for Israel in 2023 or almost ten times the previous year, after a prioritised approval process following the 7 October attacks. Another €161 million was approved in 2024. In the first half of 2025, Germany exported about €90 million in weapons to Israel, according to economy ministry figures. Shipments included firearms, ammunition, weapon parts, special army and navy equipment, electronics and special armoured vehicles, according to information obtained by the left-wing Die Linke party through a parliamentary inquiry. Asseburg said it is unclear from publicly available information exactly which German-made weapons are used directly in Gaza, but even equipment deployed elsewhere frees up other weaponry for Israel's military campaign. German deliveries of 'corvettes, anti-tank weapons, mechanical parts for armoured vehicles, armoured vehicle ammunition, small arms and ammunition for small arms' are all 'significant for Israel's war in the Gaza Strip,' she said. She added that Israel's "extreme dependence on US arms deliveries and financing" makes decisions by US President Donald Trump "decisive" in influencing Israeli conduct. Slovenia bans arms exports to Israel "Slovenia is the first European country to ban the import, export and transit of weapons to and from Israel," the government said (bts, de)
