Frustration, Gaza alarm drove Macron to go it alone
But it did not come out of the blue.
When Macron visited the Egyptian town of Al-Arish on the border with Gaza in April, he was struck by the mounting humanitarian crisis and made clear on his return home that Paris would soon opt for recognition.
Working with Saudi Arabia, Macron came up with a plan to have France plus G7 allies Britain and Canada recognise Palestinian statehood, while pushing Arab states to adopt a softer stance towards Israel through a United Nations conference. But despite weeks of talks, he failed to get others on board.
Three diplomats said London did not want to face the wrath of the US, and Ottawa took a similar stance, leaving Macron to go it alone.
"It became increasingly apparent that we could not wait to get partners on board," said a French diplomat, adding France will work to get more states on board ahead of a conference on a two-state solution in September.
Domestically, Macron was under rising pressure to do something amid widespread anger at the harrowing images coming out of Gaza. But with both Europe's biggest Muslim and Jewish communities and a polarised political landscape, there was no obvious course of action that would satisfy all sides.
Israel and its staunch supporter the US have blasted France's move, branding it a reward for the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which ran Gaza and whose attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, triggered the current war.
Macron had discussed the matter extensively with both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in advance.
Trump said on Friday that France's decision didn't "carry any weight" but added Macron was "a good guy".
French officials previously considered an announcement at a conference scheduled for June at the United Nations, co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, to sketch out a road map to a viable Palestinian state while also ensuring Israel's security.
But the conference was postponed amid intense US diplomatic pressure and after Israeli air strikes on Iran.
Macron's announcement on Thursday is linked to a rescheduled and rejigged version of the UN conference, now planned to take place on Monday and Tuesday.
That meeting will be at ministerial level, but Paris decided it would hold a second event with heads of state and government on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in September, where Macron will announce formal recognition.
Some analysts say Macron has used the carrot of recognition to extract concessions from Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, which is a moderate rival to Hamas, and other regional players.
"Macron here is acting as a catalyst to get the Palestinians to deliver on the needed reforms, to get the Arabs to deliver on a stabilisation force and the disarming of Hamas," said Rym Momtaz, editor-in-chief of the Strategic Europe blog run by the Carnegie Europe think tank.
Others say while recognition has symbolic value, there will still be no functioning Palestinian state whenever the war in Gaza comes to an end.
"Recognition by a European heavyweight like France is indicative of the rising frustration with Israel's intransigent policies," said Amjad Iraqi, senior analyst at International Crisis Group.
"What's the point of recognising a state if they're doing little to stop it from turning into ruins?"
French officials point to months of intense Israeli lobbying to try to prevent Macron's move - and Netanyahu's fierce criticism of it - as evidence that it matters a lot to Israeli leaders.
Sources familiar with the matter say Israel's warnings to France had ranged from scaling back intelligence-sharing to complicating Paris' regional initiatives - even hinting at possible annexation of parts of the West Bank.
But French officials concluded that Netanyahu would do whatever he thought was in his interests in the West Bank, regardless of what France did regarding recognition.
Israel's parliament voted on Wednesday in favour of a non-binding declaration urging the government to apply Israeli law to the West Bank, widely seen as a de facto annexation of the territory. That added to the urgency in Paris.
"If there is a moment in history to recognise a Palestinian state, even if it's just symbolic, then I would say that moment has probably come," said a senior French official.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
22 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Setback for Australia-EU trade talks after Trump's tariff twist
Canberra's hopes for a swift conclusion to free trade negotiations with the European Union have vanished, just as Donald Trump has indicated that the minimum 10 per cent import tariff he imposed on all Australian goods could be lifted to 15 or 20 per cent. After negotiations between Australia and the EU collapsed in October 2023, the parties rekindled talks in June this year as both sought insurance against the impact of Trump's global trade war.
7NEWS
22 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
US President Donald Trump ‘never had the privilege' of visiting convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's island
US President Donald Trump says he 'never had the privilege' of visiting Jeffrey Epstein's island, saying he turned down an invitation from the convicted sex offender in what the president called a moment of good judgment. Trump's remarks were his latest effort to distance himself from the political furore over his administration's handling of files related to Epstein's case and renewed questions over his past relationship with the disgraced financier, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down,' Trump told reporters during a trip to Scotland. 'In one of my very good moments, I turned it down.' Epstein owned a private island in the US Virgin Islands where he entertained prominent people from politics, business and entertainment. Prosecutors have alleged he used the compound to conceal the sex trafficking and abuse of under-age victims. Trump, who socialised with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, also offered new insight into why their relationship ended. The US president said he cut ties after Epstein attempted to recruit staff who worked for Trump. 'He hired help. And I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He stole people that work for me,' Trump said. 'He did it again. And I threw him out of the place persona non grata.' Last week, White House communications director Steven Cheung said Trump had cut ties with Epstein because he regarded him as a 'creep'. The White House has been under growing pressure from Trump's supporters and political opponents to release more information about the Justice Department's investigation into Epstein. After Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this year promised to release additional materials related to possible Epstein clients and the circumstances surrounding his death, the Justice Department reversed course this month and issued a memo concluding there was no basis to continue investigating and no evidence of a client list. Those findings sparked an angry outcry from some of Trump's supporters who have long believed the government was covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful. Trump's efforts to deflect attention from the case have so far faltered. On Monday, the president again called the story 'a hoax'. 'It's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion,' Trump said, saying Democrats controlled the Epstein files for several years and would have used them against him during the last presidential election if there was anything in them. Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island. Trump has denied ever being on the plane and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
Sky News AU
35 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Former SBS newsreader Mary Kostakidis draws big crowd of pro-Palestinian supporters for anti-Semitism case
A court has heard former SBS newsreader Mary Kostakidis spread 'anti-Semitic' conspiracy theories and promoted proscribed terrorist groups on her public X account. The journalist fronted the Federal Court for the first time in a bid to get the racial discrimination case brought by Zionist Federation Australia CEO Alon Cassuto struck out. Ms Kostakidis is accused of breaching section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act in two posts she shared to her account in January last year. The posts featured video of a speech given by the since-killed leader of Lebanese terror group Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, in which he calls for the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel. 'Here you don't have a future,' Mr Nasrallah says in an English translation of the speech. 'And from the river to the sea, the land of Palestine is for the Palestinian people and for the Palestinian people only.' Ms Kostakidis added the comment 'The Israeli government getting a taste of its own medicine' to one of her posts. Her barrister Stephen Keim SC told the court the comment was clearly directed at the Israeli government and not a criticism of Jewish people. He compared his client's 'reporting' of the speech to media reporting US President Donald Trump's notorious 'grab them by the p****' comments that were caught on camera before the 2016 US election. 'We argue that the reporting of statements by a well-known spokesperson for a party in a major regional conflict is an essential part of news reporting, which may involve reporting offensive statements,' Mr Keim said. 'For example, the widely reported Access Hollywood tape of the current president of the United States." Under Nasrallah's leadership, Hezbollah has fired thousands of rockets at Israel since Hamas' terror attacks on the Jewish state, including in heavily populated civilian areas, killing at least 24 people and causing the displacement of 70,000 others, Mr Cassuto's lawyers submitted in documents filed in court. Israel confirmed it had killed Nasrallah in an airstrike on Beirut in September 2024. Mr Cassuto's barrister Michael Borsky KC told the court while Ms Kostakidis used to be a newsreader, the post was 'not a straightforward news report.' 'Her sharing these posts, particularly with the commentary we allege is a form of endorsement – saying Israel, [the] Israeli government getting some of its own medicine with the genocide it started – is relevant to the question your Honour will at trial need to determine…,' Mr Borsky said. Mr Borsky said Jewish Australians and those of Israeli national extraction – his client is both – could arguably be offended or intimidated by calls for the only Jewish state to be 'erased off the map.' Mr Cassuto has argued Ms Kostakidis' offence was 'magnified' due to a series of other offensive posts shared to her X account, which has more than 44,000 followers and on which she posts prolifically and daily about Israel. Other posts cited in the case include those resharing justifications for the October 7 attacks as 'understandable' and akin to a 'jail break', ones in which Ms Kostakidis appears to express 'support' for Hamas and Hezbollah and conspiracy theories including that convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was an 'agent of Israel' and Israel was responsible for the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy. Mr Keim drew on a judgment earlier this month in the racial discrimination case against Sydney-based Islamic hate preacher Wissam Haddad, in which another Federal Court judge, Justice Angus Stewart, said 'it is not anti-Semitic to criticise Israel, just as much to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is anti-Semitic.' Mr Borsky countered that it was a matter of 'some subtlety and delicacy and reasonable minds can differ' on whether political criticism of Israel cannot be anti-Semitic. 'Mr Cassuto would, if it became relevant at the trial … would challenge the proposition,' Mr Borsky said. 'It is not part of our case that to criticise Israel is necessarily anti-Semitic ... But the fact that some acts done otherwise than in private might be characterised as criticisms of Israel, or even the Israeli government or the Israeli Defence Force, does not inoculate them from any even arguable contravention of 18C.' He gave examples of tweets in which Zionism had been equated with Nazism, which he said was a 'particularly offensive' comparison for Jews. '[It's] deliberately selected by many anti-Semites for that reason for the very reason that it accuses the victims of the Holocaust with committing the crime,' Mr Borsky said. Justice Stephen McDonald observed that 'spreading anti-Israel conspiracy theories, while they're related to Israel as their topic, might be potentially anti-Semitic' and that the relationship between Jews and Israel was 'different from the relationship between many other states and ethnicities.' Ms Kostakidis was cheered on at her arrival to court by about 50 supporters, many of whom were waving Palestinian flags, wearing keffiyeh and holding signs accusing Israel of 'genocide'. Outside court, Ms Kostakidis thanked supporters. 'I'm a strong believer in freedom of the press and freedom of political expression,' Ms Kostakidis said. 'I will defend my right to report the news and the right of every journalist to do so and the right of every Australian to engage in public debate.' In his own statement outside court, Mr Cassuto said the case was not about free speech, but 'hate speech'. 'Ms Kostakidis shared the calls of a proscribed terror organisation to ethnically cleanse Jews and Israelis and it's important that we hold her to account,' Mr Cassuto said. 'It's deeply offensive when someone with the platform and following of Mary Kostakidis shares hate speech and shares the calls of a proscribed terror organisation. We've all seen how hatred that starts with words ends in violence. For the sake of every Australian, we've got to stand up against racial hatred no matter who is being targeted and who is spreading it.' Justice McDonald will hand down his decision on whether the matter will proceed to trial or be struck out at a later date.
