Britain to consider rival plans for Heathrow Airport expansion
Finance minister Rachel Reeves said in January she wanted Heathrow to build a new runway, decisively backing expansion after decades of indecision when governments weighed environmental concerns against the desire for growth.
Heathrow Airport will submit its plans for expansion, which based on a 2020 plan are likely to include a full-length runway and the moving of a section of London's M25 motorway. The government will consider that against the Arora Group's plan.
Located west of London, Heathrow is Europe's busiest hub and operates at full capacity. Its two runways compete with four each in Paris' Charles de Gaulle and Frankfurt Airport, and six at Amsterdam's Schiphol.
Arora Group, which owns hotels and land close to Heathrow, said its plan, named Heathrow West, is for a new terminal and a new 2,800 metre (3,062 yards) runway, which would be too short for some of the biggest aircraft to use.
The plan offers a "cost-efficient solution," the Arora Group said, adding that it does not involve moving the M25. The development is expected to cost 25 billion pounds ($33.22 billion).
Airlines, such as British Airways-owner IAG (ICAG.L), opens new tab, have long complained that Heathrow is one of the most expensive airports in the world in terms of the charges it pays, and they have been worried expansion will mean higher fees.
"A shorter runway, suitable for today's aircraft is part of the solution. Avoiding the need to cross the M25 would remove complexity, reduce costs and help deliver better value for passengers," an IAG spokesperson said.
($1 = 0.7527 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Investors ‘in limbo' over proposed share tax hikes, claim Tories
The Conservatives are urging Chancellor Rachel Reeves to urgently rule out increasing share taxes in the upcoming autumn budget. This pressure follows a leaked memo from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, reportedly proposing several tax hikes. Proposed measures in the memo include removing the £500 dividend allowance, axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares, and increasing dividend tax rates. The Tories argue investors are 'in limbo' over the changes, which would pull millions more into paying investment levies. Labour responded by criticising the Conservatives' economic record and highlighting their own efforts to support businesses.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Guinness is helping Wetherspoons thrive — so why is its own parent company struggling?
Changing consumer tastes are nothing new – especially when it comes to food and drink – but if you've been out in pubs or bars around the UK over the past couple of years, it's likely you'll have noticed a pint of the black stuff being a favourite again for many. In short, Guinness sales are soaring. In fact, Wetherspoons cited the Irish stout as a 'standout performer' allowing the pub chain to continue to open new branches and bringing in surging revenue that draught beer sales have notably contributed to. With a world-famous brand performing so well you'd be forgiven for thinking the company which owns it would be smiling. But the complete opposite is true. Diageo is the third-worst performer, in share price terms, in 2025 to date – down a whopping 29 per cent. Its chief executive left suddenly a few weeks ago. And there are further uncertainties ahead for an incoming CEO to deal with. So what gives, and what's stopping Guinness propel its parent company to growth in the way its doing so for some of the pubs which pour it? The star among power brands and rapidly changing tastes First, it's useful to know the wider background of Diageo – a £40bn drinks giant that, even after a plummeting share price, still ranks inside the top 20 biggest UK firms on the London Stock Exchange. In terms of size, it's around the same as NatWest, or twice the size of BT or Vodafone. While it's UK based in headquarters terms, it's very much a global firm. It owns hundreds of alcoholic brands like Johnnie Walker scotch, Smirnoff vodka, Captain Morgan rum and Baileys liqueur. Those are the ones you might be familiar with from these shores, while in Asia, Latin America and other parts of the world, other brand names are just as big, just as important to the parent company's bottom line. Several years ago the company went big on 'premium' brands, in line with customer tastes and trends, exacerbated during lockdown when people spent a bit more on a nice drink at home. The first problem was that post-Covid, tastes and behaviours changed. We've known for some time that younger people in the UK have stopped drinking anywhere near as much alcohol as previous generations didhat's. T mimicked in many parts of the world where either alcohol isn't the go-to for drinks or else new types of beverages are in fashion. Add in the fact that there have been recession fears and lower consumer spending in many nations and those premium drinks have been swapped by many for cheaper alternatives. Tariffs and tablets Those are ongoing problems for the alcoholic drinks industry, but 2025 seems to have brought another level or two of issues to deal with. Firstly, Donald Trump's tariffs in April caused chaos for everybody. But given many types of drinks can specifically be produced only in certain parts of the world, the vague notion of 'produce your goods in America instead' simply isn't feasible for, say, champagne makers. After those first announcements, Diageo estimated tariffs would cost them $150m (£112m) but the company saw it as a 'manageable challenge, anticipating that half of the impact can be absorbed without price increases,' said Chris Beckett, head of equity research at Quilter said at the time. Months later, there still remains uncertainty about which nations are paying exactly what tariffs on individual prices – the EU, for example, still hope to get an exemption for spirits exports to the US included beyond their 15 per cent basic deal. Even more caution is noted by some due to an issue Diageo can have zero control over: weight-loss pills and injections. One of the UK's leading fund managers, Terry Smith, said earlier this year he sold his entire stake in the company over fears the 'entire drinks sector is in the early stages of being impacted negatively by weightloss drugs', as well as concerns over management. On the other hand, another star name in the industry, Nick Train, told ii he felt it 'implausible' that it would be the case worldwide to such an extent that a company the size of Diageo ultimately lost out. First of all, a new chief executive is required. Debra Crew was one of just 13 female CEOs of FTSE 100 firms but she faced an uphill battle all the way after taking over from the late Sir Ivan Menezes in 2023. Verushka Shetty, equity analyst at Morningstar cited 'mismanaged inventory in Latin America, missed targets and tariff headwinds' as three key issues which need overcoming, while Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell, says a new chief executive 'will have to bring new energy to the company'. Until that happens, interim boss Nik Jhangiani faces the task of cutting costs and potentially offloading a few parts of the business to reduce the debt load, until a path back to growth can be mapped out. One thing though is for sure: while pints of Guinness might be being bought more than ever before, the brand itself absolutely will not be for sale as Diageo bid to halt a three-year slump in fortunes.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Smith+Nephew first-half profit jumps 11.2%, launches $500 million buyback
Aug 5 (Reuters) - British medical products maker Smith+Nephew (SN.L), opens new tab posted an 11.2% jump in first-half profit on Tuesday, helped by cost cuts and a recovery in its U.S. markets which offset weaker demand in China. The London-based company also announced a new $500 million share buyback for the second half of the year. It posted a trading profit of $523 million for the six months ended June 28, beating analyst estimates of $496 million, according to a company-compiled consensus.
