Government promises to halve sewage pollution in next five years
What has the government announced?
The pledge to halve sewage spills by 2030 relates to 2024 levels, which was a record year for the duration of spills. Mr Reed said: "Families have watched their local rivers, coastlines and lakes suffer from record levels of pollution."My pledge to you: the Government will halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade."Sewage is the waste that comes from our toilets, baths, showers, and sinks.It goes through a network of pipes and ends up in a sewage treatment works. This is where the wastewater is cleaned, so it can safely go back into our rivers and seas.Sometimes, if it's raining a lot, sewage treatment works can become overwhelmed with wastewater and sewage.When this happens, water companies have permission to release some raw sewage - that's sewage that hasn't been treated yet - back into rivers and seas.Last year, sewage was released into England's rivers and seas for 3.6 million hours in total, and the number of recorded spills stood at around 450,000.The Environment Minister Steve Reed said the announcement marks the first time ministers have set a clear target on reducing sewage pollution.
The Government also announced plans for £104 billion to be invested into upgrading damaged pipes and building new treatment works. However, other political parties have criticised the plans and say that more needs to done to stop water bills from rising. Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: "Labour came to power with big promises to reform the water system, but so far, they have simply copied previous Conservative government policy and have done nothing to stop water bill rises."Labour must be transparent about where the £104 billion investment is coming from as some will come through customer bill rises," Ms Atkins added.
What has the report recommended?
An increasing number of sewage spillages and the rising cost of water bills led to the investigation by the independent Water Commission.The report has made 88 recommendations to change the water industry in England and Wales.As a result of the report, the government has announced plans to close water regulator Ofwat.Regulation is a way of keeping water companies in check to make sure they deliver for billpayers and the environment.But the government says Ofwat have not done enough to hold water companies to account.Environment Secretary Steve Reed, says this move will end the "complexity" that is hurting customers.The report suggests having a single water regulator in England and a single water regulator in Wales.The report also warns people that water bills might have to rise in the future and recommends the introduction of compulsory smart meters.These would work in a similar way to how energy meters currently work, where people would be charged for the water they use rather than paying a flat fee.
What has the reaction to the report been?
In response to the news, the Liberal Democrats have said they support the Government's decision to scrap the current water regulator.Environment spokesperson Tim Farron said: "This is a big win for the Liberal Democrats who have led the campaign against the sewage scandal for years. "Since 2022 we have called for Ofwat to be replaced with a tougher regulator, now finally the government appears to have listened."However, some campaigners have said the report and recommendations don't go far enough.River Action said the Independent Water Commission "blinked" when it had a "once-in-a-generation" chance to make major changes.According to its chief executive James Wallace, the report merely offers "the illusion of change, not real change."The Consumer Council for Water (CCW) added the industry has "drained" the public's trust because of service failures and poor environmental performance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
Forty per cent of Channel boat migrants who were asked lied about their age & often claim to be kids
FORTY per cent of Channel boat migrants who have claimed to be kids were actually found to be adults when challenged. The shock statistic shows the extent some will go to in a bid to cheat the asylum system. Among them were 1,305 from Afghanistan caught lying about their age to get special protection here. Many are thought to have destroyed their identity documents before arriving in Britain. Child refugees cannot be deported and must be given the same level of healthcare, education and sustenance as British children in care. Home Office figures obtained by The Sun on Sunday show that from mid-2022 to June 2024, 11,449 age disputes were raised by UK Border Force staff. Some 8,791 were resolved with 3,570 — 40 per cent — having lied about being under 18. Last year, 56 per cent of disputes involved migrants claiming to be kids being identified as adults. Over the two-year period, 1,305 caught lying were from Afghanistan, while Sudan was second with 571. And 355 Iranians, 325 Eritreans and 318 Vietnamese asylum seekers were caught out pretending to be kids. Last week, a report by the borders inspector David Bolt found immigration staff show a 'lack of curiosity' about the real age of Channel migrants. In one case, an Iranian with grey hairs and stubble was accepted as 17. Thick mud TRAPS channel migrants on UK-bound dinghy hours before Macron crunch talks AI age assessment tech is to be rolled out next year. Former Tory minister Sir Alec Shelbrooke blasted: 'These figures show the scale of soft touch Britain.' The Home Office was asked to comment. A male migrant suffered a fatal cardiac arrest on a boat which launched from Equihen-Plage in northern France yesterday morning. 1
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
The Online Safety Act is an assault on freedom
They told us it was about protecting children. That's how they always do it. Wrap tyranny in the warm fuzz of 'safety', and hope nobody reads the fine print. But let me be clear: the Online Safety Act is not about protecting children. It is a Trojan horse for the biggest assault on free speech in modern British history. And unless we act, it will drag our country into a digital surveillance state worthy of Communist China. This is not hyperbole. This is a blunt reality. Section 179 of the act makes it a criminal offence to say something false that causes 'non-trivial psychological harm'. That's not protecting kids from predators. That's criminalising humour, satire, political dissent and angry tweets. Under this definition, a cutting meme, a sarcastic TikTok or a joke about a government minister could land you in court. This is not a safety law. It's a censorship law. Even George Orwell couldn't scarcely have imagined something so sweeping, so vague and so open to abuse. But it gets worse. Section 44 gives a single government minister the power to rewrite the censorship rules without Parliament. Let that sink in. A single person can direct Ofcom to impose new censorship obligations on the internet, and platforms will be legally forced to comply. No vote. No debate. Just diktat. This is the death knell of democracy. It's already happening. Content critical of government immigration policy – including videos of public protests outside migrant hotels – is quietly being censored from social media. Who can blame them? The act threatens them with fines of up to 10 per cent of global turnover and even criminal liability for their staff if they don't suppress content the Government deems 'harmful'. Faced with that, who wouldn't over-block? That's precisely the perverse incentive the act aims to create. This is not just an attack on public discourse, it's an attack on private conversations too. The act includes your private messages. WhatsApp and Signal have warned that the UK Government is demanding access to encrypted chats. That's right: the Government wants to read your DMs. And if tech companies don't build a back door, they face the full weight of the law. The Government claims it will hold off on this part, 'for now'. Don't be fooled. The Tories put this power on the books for a reason – they intend to use it. Today, they say it's for child safety. Tomorrow, it'll be about 'disinformation' or 'extremism' – code for anyone who challenges the failed policies of the political elite. Even more chilling is the mandatory ID scanning this law introduces. Not just for porn, but for regular social media too. If you're under 18, you'll be blocked from seeing 'harmful' content – which, in practice, means anything critical of the Government. This is especially sinister when you realise that 16- and 17-year-olds are being given the vote. They are being sent to the polls, but not allowed to see a political message the Government dislikes. And here's the final irony: this act won't even protect children. Anyone remotely tech-savvy – and let's be honest, most teenagers are – will use VPNs to get around the filters. Some will end up in the depths of the dark web, where the greatest dangers lie. So we get a censored internet, less privacy and no improvement in safety. This dystopian mess didn't come from Labour – though don't expect Starmer to repeal it. No, it was cooked up by the Tories. The same Tories who pretend to champion free speech and civil liberties when it suits them. Robert Jenrick and Suella Braverman – both now trying to reinvent themselves as defenders of British values – voted for this authoritarian legislation without question. No objections. No concern. In many ways this is the most insidious form of politician. One that says what we want to hear, and then sells us all out when it counts. The truth is this: the Online Safety Act is a disgrace to our democracy. It turns Britain into a state where truth is whatever the Government says it is. Where protest is suppressed, dissent is squashed, and your private thoughts are no longer private. Reform UK is the only political force willing to speak out against this. We believe in free speech, even when it's uncomfortable. We believe the role of government is to protect citizens – not to police their opinions. And we believe in repealing this dangerous act in full. Britain must remain a country where people can speak their minds without fear. Where satire thrives. Where criticism of the powerful is not just allowed, but encouraged. Clamping down on the free speech of British people will not succeed. Reform and Nigel Farage will see to that.
BBC News
a few seconds ago
- BBC News
Pubs and venues to be protected from noise complaints
Pubs and music venues will be given protection from noise complaints under planned changes to licensing the reforms, developers seeking to build near venues would be told to soundproof buildings, while permissions would be fast-tracked for new businesses or expanded outdoor areas in designated government hopes the changes will also make it easier to open new bars in disused shops, as well as promote outdoor drinking, al fresco dining and live the government said the changes would bring "vibrancy" to struggling town centres, the Conservatives said Labour's tax policy was responsible for "crippling the hospitality industry" in the first place. It comes after several well-loved pubs and music venue were left facing possible closure over noise complaints, leading to campaigns in some December, Moth Club, an independent music and comedy venue in east London, launched a petition challenging plans to build a new block of flats next door, over fears it could be shut down."Without being able to make noise, we can't make money," its manager told the BBC at the Manchester, venue Night and Day Cafe was subject to a three-year legal battle with the council over noise complaints lodged by a neighbour in was eventually permitted to continue operating as a nightclub with noise-limiting restrictions in government also hopes a planned reform of nationwide licensing regulations will help to reverse the decline in the pub industry by making it easier to open new British Beer and Pub Association says the number of pubs in the UK has steadily decreased every year since 2000, and estimated that 378 pubs would close in 2025 across England, Wales and Scotland, amounting to more than 5,600 direct job Tuesday, pub chain Brewdog was the latest to announce cuts, with 10 bars across the UK closing due to "rising costs, increased regulation, and economic pressures".Chancellor Rachel Reeves said "pubs and bars are at the heart of British life" as the government launched a consultation on the added: "For too long, they've been stifled by clunky, outdated rules. We're binning them, to protect pavement pints, al fresco dining and street parties - not just for the summer, but all year round."Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: "Though any cutting of red tape for hospitality businesses is welcome, this is pure hypocrisy and inconsistency from Labour."He accused Labour of "crippling the hospitality industry by doubling business rates, imposing a Jobs Tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape".
