Olympic fencer cleared of doping after contamination from kissing partner led to failed test
Thibus, silver medallist in team foil at the Tokyo Olympics, had tested positive for ostarine, a prohibited muscle-building substance, during a competition in Paris in January 2024.
However, Cas concluded there was no intentional wrongdoing, finding it scientifically plausible that repeated kissing over several days with Olympic medallist Imboden, who was taking ostarine at the time, led to accidental contamination.
The court dismissed an appeal from the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), which had sought a four-year suspension.
The sport's top court instead upheld a previous ruling from the International Fencing Federation's doping disciplinary tribunal (DDT) that had already cleared Thibus of any fault.
"The CAS Panel ruled that the antidoping rule violation for the presence of ostarine was not intentional, and that it is not questionable that Ms Thibus bears no fault or negligence," the court said in a statement.
"The DDT decision is upheld and the appeal is dismissed."
The case has drawn comparisons to an incident in 2009 involving French tennis player Richard Gasquet, who was exonerated after arguing that he had tested positive for cocaine after kissing someone at a nightclub.
Thibus was able to compete at Paris 2024 following the initial DDT ruling, finishing fifth in the team foil event on home soil.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
France criticised for ‘inadequate' probe into death of British wine boss
A French investigation into the death of a wine expert killed in a collision with a car was 'inadequate', a coroner said. Philip Tuck, 59, who was a qualified master of wine, was cycling in the Burgundy area when the accident happened on July 20 2023. Tuck, from Old Basing, near Basingstoke, Hampshire, who helped found Hatch Mansfield premium wine merchants, was on the last day of a week-long trip with his son Felix and his son's friend. The hearing at Winchester Coroner's Court on Monday was told that the two younger cyclists were riding ahead down the descent into the village of Bouilland when they avoided being hit by a BMW which went on to collide with Tuck, who was riding at a distance behind them. The coroner, who ruled the death accidental, said the investigation by French police left 'many unanswered questions'. Tuck's widow, Kate, said she was also concerned that the driver had provided 'inconsistent' statements about who was at fault for the incident. In a statement read to the hearing, Felix described a 'relaxed ride' on a 'quiet country road, wide enough for two cars' that isn't 'particularly technical or steep'. He added: 'Tom and I had dropped Dad on the descent as he slowed down and was more cautious with his no-risk mindset.' Felix said when they realised Tuck had got behind, they turned around and rode back up the hill to find people attempting to help his father. His 'smashed up' Pinarello bike lay at the side of the road. Coroner Simon Burge said attempts were made to save Tuck's life by the driver and other members of the public before police and ambulance arrived, but the cyclist was pronounced dead at the scene. The coroner said the driver of the BMW, a French man with his daughter in the rear seat, had stopped at the scene and told police that the first two riders had cut across to the wrong side of the road on the bend. The driver claimed that the collision happened when he was unable to avoid hitting Tuck who had taken the same approach to the bend. Mr Burge added that the police determined that the crash was an accident and that the driver would not be prosecuted. Mrs Tuck told the hearing that she was concerned that the driver had provided 'inconsistent' statements about the incident, particularly by giving varying estimates of his speed from 50kph (31mph) to 70kph (43mph) in the 80kph (50mph) zone. She added that photographs of the scene suggested the accident happened before the bend, contradicting the driver's account. Criticising the French police investigation, the coroner, who recorded a conclusion of accidental death, said: 'Sadly the investigation carried out locally by the gendarmerie was inadequate in my view and leaves many unanswered questions.' He added: 'I do not reach any conclusion that Philip, Felix or Tom were riding recklessly. 'I find that all three of you having enjoyed a cycling holiday in France, you were out for a good time, riding at a leisurely pace.' Mrs Tuck said: 'It was a ghastly accident however we look at it and nothing will bring him back, but it's hugely disappointing if I feel the record states that my husband was riding on the wrong side of the road and there is no independent evidence to corroborate.' In a tribute to Tuck released after his death, Ascot-based Hatch Mansfield said: 'Philip was an immensely kind, loyal and considerate man.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Musk's X accuses Macron ally of politically motivated inquiry
A key ally of French president Emmanuel Macron has been accused of orchestrating a war on Elon Musk's social media platform over claims it promotes far-Right content. Criminal prosecutors this month accused X, formerly known as Twitter, of being an 'organised gang' and engaging in political interference by manipulating its algorithm and carrying out data harvesting. But on Monday, X accused Eric Bothorel, a senior figure in Mr Macron's Renaissance party, of instigating a 'politically motivated' campaign and pushing French prosecutors to file a criminal case against the site. 'French authorities have launched a politically motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction',' it said. 'X categorically denies these allegations. This investigation, instigated by French politician Eric Bothorel, egregiously undermines X's fundamental right to due process and threatens our users' rights to privacy and free speech.' Mr Musk's business claimed the 'gang' designation – which is said normally applied to 'drug cartels or mafia groups' – would allow police to wiretap X employees. The data harvesting claims can carry up to 10 years in prison under French cyber security laws. Mr Bothorel wrote to French prosecutors earlier this year warning over Mr Musk's 'personal involvement' in X and interference in European elections 'represents a real danger and threat to our democracies'. French authorities also suspect X of promoting posts from far-Right political figures in this year's European elections, local press has reported. Mr Musk has backed several Right-wing European leaders in recent months, throwing his support behind Alice Weidel, the leader of Germany's far-Right Alternative for Germany (AfD), as well as Marine Le Pen, the leader of France's National Rally. The investigation into X comes after French police arrested Pavel Durov, the founder of private messaging app Telegram, in a crackdown on online safety last year. Mr Durov was charged in August with failing to stop the spread of illegal content online, including child abuse and drug trafficking. He has denied the charges and the case remains ongoing. 'X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech,' the company said in a statement. X said it had received demands for information on its recommendation algorithm and posts by users, which it had refused to comply with. It claimed the experts in France who had been appointed to examine the data had a record of 'open hostility' against X. 'X is committed to defending its fundamental rights, protecting user data and resisting political censorship,' it said. Responding to X's claims, Mr Bothorel said the French police were not 'taking orders' from him. Writing on X, he questioned whether the site's algorithm had become 'doped with ketamine'.
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
X says French accusations of data tampering and fraud are politically motivated
Elon Musk's social media platform X has denied accusations from French prosecutors of alleged data tampering and fraud, calling them politically motivated. X was responding to an announcement earlier this month from the Paris prosecutor's office, which said it was opening an investigation into the two alleged offences. Advertisement Both offences involved an 'automated data processing system', according to prosecutors, who provided few details of the alleged wrongdoing. They are potentially punishable in France with a jail term of up to 10 years. The platform said French authorities were carrying out a 'politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction''. 'X categorically denies these allegations,' it said in a post from its Global Government Affairs account. Advertisement The prosecutor's office has said it acted on information that two people provided in January to its cyber crimes unit. One of them is a member of parliament, and the other is a senior official in a French government institution. It did not identify them or the institution. Prosecutors said the two people alleged suspected use of X's algorithm for the 'purposes of foreign interference', without providing details. The platform said it 'remains in the dark' about the the specific allegations. Advertisement 'However, based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech.' The Paris prosecutor's office said that it has asked X to grant police investigators access to its algorithm, as part of the probe. The request was made in a letter last week, it said. It said that 'investigators are bound by confidentiality and that only those in charge of the investigation will have access'. The office said it has not had a formal response from X. Advertisement
